England World Cup Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
If England don't have a good tournament, the press will bury Tuchel.
 
I feel kinda sick to be honest, not look forward to the World Cup now.


Trent Alexander-Arnold -------------Harry Maguire----------James Hill-------------Lewis Hall
-------------------------------Alex Scott--------------------Adam Wharton---------------------------------
----------------------------------------------Morgan Gibbs-White--------------------------------------------
Cole Palmer----------------------------Danny Welbeck------------------------------------Phil Foden


Trent, Foden, Palmer might not deserve to go.. But taking Madueke, Eze, Burn, Spence and Henderson over them is crazy.

Heck, I would even take Max Dowman over some of them too.
 
But I've long felt Tuchel is absolutely overrated, his CL win for Chelsea really overhyped his brand. He was shite for Bayern and is questionable at best with his squad building for this WC.
Same! Always felt like he just rode the Klopp hype more than anything else.
 
I do feel Maguire should've held fire on his Insta post. A Dan Burn twisted ankle this weekend would've meant he was on the plane if he'd keep his disappointment to himself and his friends/family.
 
-----------------------------------Pope-------------------------------
Trent ------- Maguire ------------- Colwill ------------Hall
----------------------Garner ------- Wharton-------------------
Palmer/Bowen ---------------- Gibbs-White---------------- Foden/Barnes
---------------------------------DCL------------------------------------

That's without including Lewis-Skelly, Shaw, Tomori etc.
Forgot about Bowen , mad he didn't make it.
 
I don't hate the squad, a few choices I'd have mad different. England's biggest issue will be conditions, like in Brazil.

We have the best striker in the world who appears to actually be fit and will have had a few weeks rest before the tournament starts for once. Our midfield is probably as good as anyone's, can only think of Portugal who can match it and they have to deal with Ronaldo.

We seem to have picked people who are prepared to run beyond kane for the wide positions rather than crabs like Palmer and foden which is what we need. Our defence isn't the best but it's at worst serviceable. James is excellent, Konsa and guehi aren't bad and O'Reilly has had a great end to the season too.
I'm the same - we are fecked if we get injuries to key players though I suppose that applies to most teams but I do think he could have picked a squad with a bit better squad depth.
 
I do feel Maguire should've held fire on his Insta post. A Dan Burn twisted ankle this weekend would've meant he was on the plane if he'd keep his disappointment to himself and his friends/family.

Colwill is probably ahead of Maguire in pecking order. Can see him getting call up if someone is injured in next few weeks. Probably would've been in the squad if he'd returned in April.
 
I do feel Maguire should've held fire on his Insta post. A Dan Burn twisted ankle this weekend would've meant he was on the plane if he'd keep his disappointment to himself and his friends/family.
If Dan Burn twists his ankle and the replacement called up is not Maguire, the victim of this won't be Maguire. It will be England.
 
How many years did successive England managers mess things up trying to fit Gerrard, Lampard and Scholes into the team?

We all accept that was very costly for us and that we should have built a team around how we were going to play not based on obligation of fitting in players based on reputation or qualities they demonstrate at their own club.

I agree with your general point, but the example you're using — Gerrard, Lampard, and Scholes being fit into the same midfield — lasted for less than a month in the summer of 2004. And one manager, Eriksson.

I understand you may have been led to believe differently, given the way it's often talked about.
 
When I look at what squad it just looks like the subs are basically inferior versions of the starting 11. Who is going to come on and change a game when the system doesn’t work?
That's what Ivan Toney is for ;)
 
If England don't have a good tournament, the press will bury Tuchel.
Regardless of the squad this would happen anyway. You don't appoint Tuchel without raised expectations and he knows it. Looking at the draw, I think he has to reach the SFs at minimum. If group winners go as expected and no major surprises in the knock outs then it will be Brazil in the QF. That's where we got knocked out last time, to France, and I think the expectation will be to get at least one step further.
 
I’m hoping it’s like the good old days on here where if we all moaned about the starting line up then we’d all look like mugs when we won and looked good doing it.

Maybe Tuchel is a genius. Only a genius or a moron picks Jordan fecking Henderson.

I’ll be invoking my 25% Scottish heritage if they out perform England.
 
Tenure defining decisions from Tuchel. I think anything less than a semi final and his position will be questioned by many.

Can see a poor world cup run, Tuchel departed and Howe being the manager this time next year.
 
To be fair to Tuchel, fans have long asked coaches to pick a team that work well together, not just names.
 
Not including two goal threats of Gibbs White and Maguire (could sub him on if we're chasing a game) is utter madness. Especially as the squad isn't exactly over flowing in goal scorers.

If Kane fails to turn up again then who's going to score the goals? I get that he wants squad balance, but some really wild decisions and taking several players with questionable fitness records is a recipe for disaster.
 
Until now I thought Mike Bassett calling up a League Two player for England was unrealistic.

Thomas Tuchel has genuinely called up a player who has played in the Saudi League for the last two years in Ivan Toney.

Embarrassing.
 
What is our problem with full-backs? Why do we never take enough proper fullbacks? There are 2fkn6 spots in the squad, you don't need to take any utility players. So last time was an out of form Trippier and an injured Shaw for LB. This time we've got an attacking midfielder and a RB with a broken jaw to do LB.

I did laugh this morning at hearing TAA being described as the first name on the RM teamsheet. As with Maguire, he would add summat from the bench for when we need a goal, Special Teams for FKs and corners to stick 'em on Harry Header's forehead. James is in on merit although not fully up to speed yet after injury I imagine. Livramento a decent back-up, but I'd still have had TAA in as a great bench option, and also to rest James for the Panama game. He might not manage 6 or more full games without breaking down, if we can get that far. TAA in games that we're likely to face a low block makes all kinds of sense.
 
Tuchel has put himself right in the firing line with that squad, very strange.
 
To be fair to Tuchel, fans have long asked coaches to pick a team that work well together, not just names.
Gibbs-White, Maguire and to some extent Welbeck, Garner should have qualms over not getting picked but otherwise, it looks like he had a first 11 in mind and picked everyone else based on what kind of back ups he wants in specific circumstances.
 
Not a single Liverpool player in the squad. Scouse not English.
 
I’ve had a problem in the past with England managers trying to shoehorn their biggest “talents” in over creating a very solid squad that is actually suited to playing together. So I’ll give him props for ignoring all of that.

However I’m really unsure of what his deciding factors were with some of his picks. Obviously Maguire is a big talking point but I think it’s a huge oversight to leave him. I think he’s been the most consistent English CB this season. I can get leaving him out if he wants to play a high line or he prefers Konsa, but will he play a high line? You’ve also got Declan Rice who has been putting in pin point corners all season, surely there’s nobody better than Maguire to get on the end of them if we’re searching for a goal?
 
Am I the only one NOT complaining about Ivan Toney being in the squad? He should have had far more minutes in the last Euros, with the labouring Kane given more time off the pitch. He's quality, good all-round CF that we should have bought instead of letting him go to SA.

His penalties alone make him worth a spot.
 
One of the best mental england squads i've ever seen.

Any competent manager takes Trent/Maguire even if you don't expect to start them they can both get you a goal in the last 10 mins, and last time i checked goals were pretty important in football. Where to even begin with taking Henderson, let alone over Wharton and not taking Shaw at least for squad depth is so weird.

On the plus side, it's good for United, but i really feel for Harry, he's never playing another tourn for england now and his experience / goals (let alone he's superb for england and has been for us this season) will be missed.
 
Am I the only one NOT complaining about Ivan Toney being in the squad? He should have had far more minutes in the last Euros, with the labouring Kane given more time off the pitch. He's quality, good all-round CF that we should have bought instead of letting him go to SA.

His penalties alone make him worth a spot.
I can see why he was picked, it’s not an issue for me, just strange he wasn’t involved before under Tuchel and now suddenly picked.
 
Am I the only one NOT complaining about Ivan Toney being in the squad? He should have had far more minutes in the last Euros, with the labouring Kane given more time off the pitch. He's quality, good all-round CF that we should have bought instead of letting him go to SA.

His penalties alone make him worth a spot.
Been in the Saudi league for 2 years and in the international wilderness for a year. It's a bizarre pick.
 
Am I the only one NOT complaining about Ivan Toney being in the squad? He should have had far more minutes in the last Euros, with the labouring Kane given more time off the pitch. He's quality, good all-round CF that we should have bought instead of letting him go to SA.

His penalties alone make him worth a spot.

If the only reason he's being brought is for penalty taking then it puts a huge amount of pressure on him to do his one and only task. Being a good penalty taker should be an added bonus, not the sole reason.

I don't mind him as a player, he'll be used to warmer environments at the very least. What makes me question the decision is the lack of time he's featured for England. It just makes the friendly and competitive games utterly pointless if you throw all that knowledge away and pick a random. It's bizarre.
 
With this squad selection, I get the feeling he’s going to be hailed a fraud if they don’t get to the semi finals as a minimum.
 
The rest I can sort of understand, even Maguire's snub, but Henderson and Spence have no business being there.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.