Why you'll rather we bring this players over and play them in the youth team which doesn't truly test them, or you'll rather we let them go to the likes of benfica, Dortmund or Leverkusen and then they're priced for 100m in two years.Not a fan of this 'Chelsea' business at all, but I suppose it's just how football works now. Hope the lad does well.
Is it fair to ask why you’re not a fan of signing promising youngsters ?Not a fan of this 'Chelsea' business at all, but I suppose it's just how football works now. Hope the lad does well.
Not a fan of this 'Chelsea' business at all, but I suppose it's just how football works now. Hope the lad does well.
Why you'll rather we bring this players over and play them in the youth team which doesn't truly test them, or you'll rather we let them go to the likes of benfica, Dortmund or Leverkusen and then they're priced for 100m in two years.
This is the way United could get them Haaland and Bellinghams groom them and they arrive as proper United players.
Is it fair to ask why you’re not a fan of signing promising youngsters ?
This club can’t win. It’s great to see in my opinion and see their development unfold .
I'm not criticising youth player signings at all, just the multi-club model. It's just objectively shit that Chelsea own Strasbourg, and especially that City own Palermo, Girona, Troyes, Lommel, Melbourne, New York... etc etc.Yeah I’d much rather spend £50m+ on proven players and feck our psr too
In the late 90s didn't United loan young players to Royal Antwerp to gain first team experience? I see no difference here except United didn't own the Belgian club.
He did, as did Higginbotham, Wallwork, Chadwick, Rachubka, Bardsley, Dong, Eckersley, Ritchie Jones, Lee Martin, Heaton, Ebanks-Blake, Simpson, Frazier Campbell, Jonny Evans, Darron Gibson, Shawcross, Cathcart and a few others.John O’Shea went there I think!
He did, as did Higginbotham, Wallwork, Chadwick, Rachubka, Bardsley, Dong, Eckersley, Ritchie Jones, Lee Martin, Heaton, Ebanks-Blake, Simpson, Frazier Campbell, Jonny Evans, Darron Gibson, Shawcross, Cathcart and a few others.
Because I remember at the time thinking what an exciting and innovative approach it was. I know there were others but all of those were players that I remember thinking would really go somewhere based on their Antwerp loan. Shows how wrong I was, although many did go on to have decent careers.Incredible memory. Mad to think two of our players from the squad last year went on loan there!
Incredible memory. Mad to think two of our players from the squad last year went on loan there!
Good for him.Assisted the only goal for Lausanne in their win over Fiorentina in the Conference League tonight.
Angry man shouting at clouds again?So, what's happening here? Another INEOS masterstroke?
Some people don't need a real reason. I mean there is a lot of valid reasons for criticism, but signing this kid doesn't feel like one of themSigned on a free, last season was disrupted with injuries whilst on loan and likely to go on loan again.
A youngster with some potential who was worth a cheap punt on. Not exactly a stick to beat Ineos with?
Some people don't need a real reason. I mean there is a lot of valid reasons for criticism, but signing this kid doesn't feel like one of them
NoSo it was a good decision, seemingly, to sign him? Or what else do you mean by "don't need a reason"? Explain yourself.
Has he been loaned out again to Lausanne? Or has he been training with the U21s?
So it was a good decision, seemingly, to sign him? Or what else do you mean by "don't need a reason"? Explain yourself.
Nobody knows. But remember, you can't criticize the signing!
You can critique the signing but you haven’t? You’ve eluded to the fact you’re unhappy with it but it’s not really clear why.Nobody knows. But remember, you can't criticize the signing!
Think I saw him in today’s 1st team training pictures.
3rd picture.
