Erling Haaland / signs for Dortmund

Status
Not open for further replies.

Fosu-Mens

Full Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2016
Messages
4,101
Location
Fred | 2019/20 Performances
Hahahaahaha the hype on here and you've all barely seen him play. Ridiculous.
People thinking that we should buy him in January and that he would improve our attack should reevaluate their understanding of football. Playing as a poacher in a team unable to create chances or control the ball around the oppositions 18-yard box will not make for a good solution.
 

lysglimt

Full Member
Scout
Joined
Jun 1, 2008
Messages
15,267
Judging solely from his YouTube highlights, he has similarities to a young (but taller) Rooney. He is fast, he is aggressive and appears to be ruthless in front of the goal. Of course, his goalscoring record right now seems phenomenal, but we have to keep in mind that (1) he is playing in Austria and (2) it is way to soon to conclude that he can keep this up. We all remember players like Michu in that amazing Swansea stint or Cissé when he couldn't stop scoring for Newcastle for a couple of months.

We should forget about his amazing goalscoring record for a bit and really look at his skills. As I said: He does seem fast and he does seem physical. He seems to prefer his left foot quite a bit. His dribbling and his first touch seem (slightly) above average, but I assume that his highlights on YouTube just omit technical errors as opposed to there not being any.

What I'm saying is: It's ludicrous for anyone who hasn't really watched him - me included - to be happy to spend 60M on him. That's what has gotten us in this mess: grossly overspending on players.
Does he look like a generational talent in his videos: I say no. He looks like a good young player with an amazing physique on an amazing run of form. I might be wrong - again I also haven't really watched him. But if I'm not even overly impressed (meaning that he is worth 60M, not meaning he isn't a good young player) by his highlights, I highly doubt that.
Well - if anyone has seen him, it's OGS. So this isn't a gamble - he knows if Haaland is good enough or not.
 

red thru&thru

Full Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2004
Messages
7,657
Definitely seems the type of player we should be after. Guess the Saudis will sign this off.
 

MikeKing

Full Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2017
Messages
5,125
Supports
Bournemouth
People thinking that we should buy him in January and that he would improve our attack should reevaluate their understanding of football. Playing as a poacher in a team unable to create chances or control the ball around the oppositions 18-yard box will not make for a good solution.
While I do agree that buying him in January simply to improve our attack short term is a big risk due to his price, you have to really ignore context if that is your perception of the prospect of signing him. Even if you are correct and he is unable to replicate the stats due to lack of chances created and considering he would have to adjust to the league too it would be expected, so what? He'll have half a season under his belt while being integrated with the squad, and a full-preseason leading up to the next. If we can get it done in January, why not?

To add another layer of context or 'understanding of football'. We sold our only striker, which means we had no striker but for our alternatives. Rashford who it has become evident is not a striker, and Martial who (lets be honest) still has it all to prove in that position. Both have been criticised for their movement in our build up play. For good or worse, we have had nobody to compare them to but Lukaku there. From just watching United, it will be hard to know what a striker with a different set of skills can bring to our setup.

Have you seen Haalands movement and involvement in attacks? He is not similar to Martial and Rashford, or even Greenwood. A specialised striker should have a big understanding of where to run to create space as this leads to chances. Haaland isn't a Lukaku type poacher, his movement around the box in the build up is more similar to Aguero, only different from Martial and especially Rashford he knows where to be in the box. Our problem in scoring goals can be just as much about not having a striker like that, as it is us playing with Lingard and Mata.

I have seen a few good crosses from the right this season from James and Bissaka, nobody in the box. I'd also argue that we could play Martial in Lingards place if he had a partner up top that complimented him. Even Gomes would have it easier next to a big guy like that. Mainly my point is, the more dangerous individuals you have the more space is going to open up, and chances will be converted to goals. Teams can't double mark Martial or Rashford knowing full well James can decide to just run from everyone and there'll be a young boy in the box waiting every time.

As for Greenwood, I have no doubts he'll eventually make his way into the team somehow, and he'll still score shitload of goals no matter if it is as a striker, second striker, right winger or whatever.
 

Isotope

Ten Years a Cafite
Joined
Mar 6, 2012
Messages
23,621
If he adds "van" to his name, everybody wants some and would jump on him.
 
Last edited:

momo83

Massive Snowflake
Joined
Dec 5, 2013
Messages
1,463
How many people have actually seen him play 90 mins week in week out?
 

fps

Full Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2018
Messages
5,504
Well - if anyone has seen him, it's OGS. So this isn't a gamble - he knows if Haaland is good enough or not.
That is a good point, but more importantly considering recent transfer successes, has Goggs seen him play?
 

Adam-Utd

Part of first caf team to complete Destiny raid
Joined
Sep 10, 2010
Messages
39,954
People thinking that we should buy him in January and that he would improve our attack should reevaluate their understanding of football. Playing as a poacher in a team unable to create chances or control the ball around the oppositions 18-yard box will not make for a good solution.
:boring::boring::boring:

It's not going to be like that forever. So, we don't try and buy the best young talent available because currently our team isn't as good as it could be? right...
 

jamesjimmybyrondean

Full Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2019
Messages
7,083
With Ole's recent comments about Martial I'd say he has put his trust in Martial to be our main striker. So i don't think we would go after a young striker (when we have Greenwood Martial and Rashford) in January or someone who would want the starting starting spot. I think we would try and get an experiences striker to serve as back up

Hopefully it's not Mandzukic. Ben Yedder would have been perfect but that ship has sailed. Who else fits this category? Cavani maybe
 
Last edited by a moderator:

-Supreme-

Full Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2018
Messages
2,447
Him being left footed is a huge plus, our attack is in need for some balance
 

playtowin

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Aug 3, 2017
Messages
29
Not seen a great deal of him playing, but have watched out for him the Europe this season.

I think he looks like he will be a top top striker, and would be a great buy for Utd. Interesting to see it being reported in Austrian press that the deal is done, time will tell. But that would be impressive business if it's true, so credit will be due if it is.
 

Red_toad

Full Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2010
Messages
11,616
Location
DownUnder
How many people have actually seen him play 90 mins week in week out?
‘If’ we sign him, why would fans opinions matter? Ole knows him far far better than any random from the Caf. I’ve seen him play twice, he looks a prospect and offers something different to any of our current strikers. It’s very debatable if he’s in the form of his life and it’s a flash in the pan, or if he’s going to continue improving?
 

Fosu-Mens

Full Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2016
Messages
4,101
Location
Fred | 2019/20 Performances
While I do agree that buying him in January simply to improve our attack short term is a big risk due to his price, you have to really ignore context if that is your perception of the prospect of signing him. Even if you are correct and he is unable to replicate the stats due to lack of chances created and considering he would have to adjust to the league too it would be expected, so what? He'll have half a season under his belt while being integrated with the squad, and a full-preseason leading up to the next. If we can get it done in January, why not?

To add another layer of context or 'understanding of football'. We sold our only striker, which means we had no striker but for our alternatives. Rashford who it has become evident is not a striker, and Martial who (lets be honest) still has it all to prove in that position. Both have been criticised for their movement in our build up play. For good or worse, we have had nobody to compare them to but Lukaku there. From just watching United, it will be hard to know what a striker with a different set of skills can bring to our setup.

Have you seen Haalands movement and involvement in attacks? He is not similar to Martial and Rashford, or even Greenwood. A specialised striker should have a big understanding of where to run to create space as this leads to chances. Haaland isn't a Lukaku type poacher, his movement around the box in the build up is more similar to Aguero, only different from Martial and especially Rashford he knows where to be in the box. Our problem in scoring goals can be just as much about not having a striker like that, as it is us playing with Lingard and Mata.

I have seen a few good crosses from the right this season from James and Bissaka, nobody in the box. I'd also argue that we could play Martial in Lingards place if he had a partner up top that complimented him. Even Gomes would have it easier next to a big guy like that. Mainly my point is, the more dangerous individuals you have the more space is going to open up, and chances will be converted to goals. Teams can't double mark Martial or Rashford knowing full well James can decide to just run from everyone and there'll be a young boy in the box waiting every time.

As for Greenwood, I have no doubts he'll eventually make his way into the team somehow, and he'll still score shitload of goals no matter if it is as a striker, second striker, right winger or whatever.
Buying him based on the idea that he will be extremely good in the future, is something I can agree with. But, people on here seem to think that he will improve our attack if we bought him this January or even in the summer, which is highly debatable. His movement in the box is great, but one has to take into consideration that he plays in a highly functioning team with 2 extremely hardworking players around him. His involvements in the buildup are questionable, his touch on the ball is not that good or consistent, his passing is not good when not given time.
If he played in a less functional team, like Manchester United, his lackings as a player would be easier to spot. And I think that his performances for the Norwegian national team make for a better understanding of his abilities as a player in isolation, rather than his performances for Salzburg.

His positioning and movement in the box are really good.

If it is our lack of a poacher or our inability to create chances that is the reason as for why we are struggling to score would be like the chicken and the egg paradox, but we are struggling to get the ball into the final third unless we are counter-attacking so difficult to create chances consistently without controlling the ball in the final third. Haaland is no Firminho that would help us with this, and if we were able to break down teams like City or Liverpool does, then having a player like Haaland would be useful, but in our current state and the way we "play" he will be of little us.

I'm not saying that he should not be a potential target, but buying him based on the idea that he will improve our team short term is not something I agree with. He still got many areas for improvement (non-poacher related). This might be influenced by my opinion that poachers are a dying breed not only in general but in football as well, and the tendencies are there that hypothesising that we will see a similar development as in the NBA where players abilities and size converge towards a perceived optimum is not farfetched. I.e less specialized players, and more players that contribute in most situations on the pitch.
 

Handré1990

Full Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2013
Messages
4,819
Location
In hibernation
‘If’ we sign him, why would fans opinions matter? Ole knows him far far better than any random from the Caf. I’ve seen him play twice, he looks a prospect and offers something different to any of our current strikers. It’s very debatable if he’s in the form of his life and it’s a flash in the pan, or if he’s going to continue improving?
He was out for a period, with illness I think. He came back in and picked up where he left off. Isn’t that a sign? He was on fire before the summer brake as well? How long does the form of his life last?

Also, how weird it is to experience the caf as a mirror of reality, we have guys blitzing every Ole threads, unsubtly calling everyone who doesn’t agree with them stupid, without sense or blind, and in this mega long thread lots of posters coming in and asking the same questions and making the same wrong conclusions based on nothing. How about reading a little bit? Aimed at you who keep asking who’s watched him, and why Ole didn’t but him for 5m to United, while being employed as the manager of Molde...

It’s teeming with Norwegians on here, most would have seen him plenty. They’ve (Norwegian media) gone out of their way to make RBS games available to the public here.
 
Last edited:

CR1

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jun 18, 2019
Messages
125
There's easily enough room in the starting eleven for both Haaland and Martial, along with Rashford:

Rashford - Martial - HAALAND
MCGINN - PHILLIPS - McTerminator
Williams - Maguire - Tuanzebe - Awb
Ddg

Rotation: James, Greenwood, Fred, Garner, Dalot, Shaw, Lindelöf, CB, Romero

James and Greenwood would get plenty of minutes as part of a five-man strike force competing for three places with games coming thick and fast. However I think Greenwood could benefit from a loan move in which case I would bring in WERNER as well, along with the other signings in capital letters above.
 

Ekeke

Full Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2006
Messages
53,283
Location
Hope, We Lose
There's easily enough room in the starting eleven for both Haaland and Martial, along with Rashford:

Rashford - Martial - HAALAND
MCGINN - PHILLIPS - McTerminator
Williams - Maguire - Tuanzebe - Awb
Ddg

Rotation: James, Greenwood, Fred, Garner, Dalot, Shaw, Lindelöf, CB, Romero

James and Greenwood would get plenty of minutes as part of a five-man strike force competing for three places with games coming thick and fast. However I think Greenwood could benefit from a loan move in which case I would bring in WERNER as well, along with the other signings in capital letters above.
:houllier:

He's a goal poaching striker. Not a right winger
 

Cathy Ferguson

Full Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2010
Messages
3,954
Our weakest links are Periera and Fred, and if we buy Håland then it will be for the future to compete with Martial. I would like to try Pogba in the Pereira role and bring in a new midfielder in January, rather than buy Håland. But Håland would be a great Lukaku replacement and make us less reliable on an injury prone Martial.
 

CR1

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jun 18, 2019
Messages
125
:houllier:

He's a goal poaching striker. Not a right winger
He's left-footed from what I gather. So he could start off as a right forward (which is not the same as a right winger) and cut in. Lukaku played this role a few games last season. It's not necessarily the same as a left winger, especially not if the front three is fluid and interchanging positions.

That could be a way to accommodate both him, Martial and Rashford in the starting eleven. Then he could slowly but surely start to play more central. Another option would of course be to just move Martial back to the left:

Martial - Haaland - Rashford

My point is that signing Haaland wouldn't necessarily spell the end for Martial in the starting eleven.
 

Cassidy

No longer at risk of being mistaken for a Scouser
Joined
Oct 2, 2013
Messages
31,439
He's left-footed from what I gather. So he could start off as a left forward (which is not the same as a left winger) and cut in. Lukaku played this role a few games last season. It's not necessarily the same as a left winger, especially not if the front three is fluid and interchanging positions.

That could be a way to accommodate both him, Martial and Rashford in the starting eleven. Then he could slowly but surely start to play more central.
This would be silly
 

RyRy11

Full Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2014
Messages
1,596
People thinking that we should buy him in January and that he would improve our attack should reevaluate their understanding of football. Playing as a poacher in a team unable to create chances or control the ball around the oppositions 18-yard box will not make for a good solution.
According to xG this season we've been on top for chances created but we haven't been able to put them away (only beaten on xG by Arsenal and Liverpool).
 

Cassidy

No longer at risk of being mistaken for a Scouser
Joined
Oct 2, 2013
Messages
31,439
I meant in the games we played.
Given we have the best xG against in the league, it doesn't really indicate we create well, it just shows we defend well. If we give up less than 1xG a game then its not hard to outperform our opponents in a game we just have to beat 1xG

Anyway the eye test alone shows that we don't create a lot, don't really need stats to see that
 

Lee565

Full Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2019
Messages
5,055
Would prefer that money going towards a right winger who has a good goal scoring record and a top class midfielder before even considering buying haaland for 60 million.
 

Rob

Full Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2009
Messages
3,226
Supports
Liverpool
He has 22 senior goals this season. 42 senior goals in all.
You’re right, I missed his Molde goals.

I think if you doubled the sample size, his value would double too. It's the right time to buy for any club looking at him that can afford him. Otherwise you'll be looking at figures similar to the Mbappe fee.
Well, I’ve been thinking for a while that United should try and get the unearthed gems like you seem to have done with James, so perhaps you’re right. 60m is just an incredible amount of money for a guy with one good season in Norway and four brilliant months in Austria.

If the sample size becomes too big, he'll attract more suitors and we're then in a bidding war that we'll inevitably lose. And we'll be left asking exactly what it is our scouts do, & why we only bid for players when everyone else do.

It's a lose/lose situation.
I bet Messi never scored 9 vs Honduras U21!
Probably not:lol:

That's how you have to buy or you'll end up paying 100-110 in another year which we most definitely cannot with all our other holes. You have to take these kind of calculated gambles/risks. We can't just plan on paying 80-120 for top players.
As above, you could be right, but 60m is a big chunk of your transfer kit on what is a bit of a wild card.

We’ll see, I guess. I know I wouldn’t want Liverpool to spend 60m on a guy who’s got couple of good seasons in Norway and Austria.
 

Gordon S

Full Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2018
Messages
3,655
Would prefer that money going towards a right winger who has a good goal scoring record and a top class midfielder before even considering buying haaland for 60 million.
DJ is looking pretty good at rw imo. Agree that desperately need to strenghten our options in midfield but Haaland might be too good to pass on. Our options upfront are really poor as well.
 

momo83

Massive Snowflake
Joined
Dec 5, 2013
Messages
1,463
‘If’ we sign him, why would fans opinions matter? Ole knows him far far better than any random from the Caf. I’ve seen him play twice, he looks a prospect and offers something different to any of our current strikers. It’s very debatable if he’s in the form of his life and it’s a flash in the pan, or if he’s going to continue improving?
The way posters are posting, i just wondered what they knew that I didn’t. Other then he’s scored goals this season.
 

RamblingRebel

Hitler dead!
Joined
Jan 8, 2014
Messages
1,429
Location
Ireland
Supports
Burnley
:houllier:

He's a goal poaching striker. Not a right winger
From what I've seen of him, he is far more than a goal poaching striker. Yes, he's got that side of the game in his locker, but he does contribute much more and does some good stuff from the right moving inside. As part of this "fluid" front 3 that Ole seems to want I reckon he could do that, also be the "target man" if the game calls for that. Lad seems versatile enough to play a few different roles up top. Although if I'm honest I've not seen loads of him. If Ole wants him he will be sure of his capabilities and mentality considering he's had him before.

He actually reminds me of one of those FIFA players you create and max out his height, weight, speed, and stamina, then use your joystick skills to get the job done.:lol:
 

Ekeke

Full Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2006
Messages
53,283
Location
Hope, We Lose
From what I've seen of him, he is far more than a goal poaching striker. Yes, he's got that side of the game in his locker, but he does contribute much more and does some good stuff from the right moving inside. As part of this "fluid" front 3 that Ole seems to want I reckon he could do that, also be the "target man" if the game calls for that. Lad seems versatile enough to play a few different roles up top. Although if I'm honest I've not seen loads of him. If Ole wants him he will be sure of his capabilities and mentality considering he's had him before.

He actually reminds me of one of those FIFA players you create and max out his height, weight, speed, and stamina, then use your joystick skills to get the job done.:lol:
Reminds me of Dzeko. I'd want him in the box which is where he scores his goals and where he could use his physical size
 

NoLogo

Full Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2009
Messages
19,872
Location
I can't remember why I joined this war.
Would be great to get him but I still feel our midfield needs improvement as well. If we don't have a midfield that can build up an attack or play a final pass we could have Kane and still would look shite in attack.

At the minute the only one who can ragularly cause some sort of thread from midfield is the lad who last season still played in the Championship, which is a fecking damning statement about the rest of our midfield. Pereira, Lingard, Fred and Matic are all complete trash and need to be replaced asap.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.