- Dec 15, 2016
Haaland is quite clearly the better player. Eventually, Sancho will be sold for less than £100m to Liverpool or City.
A club that plays consistently exciting football?I wouldn't mind sending Martial to them to sweeten the deal. He plays like he belongs to that sort of club.
What? Who? Where are they?Haaland. The very best strikers almost always start scoring in big numbers within 2 to 3 years of entering a big league. Haaland did it in year 1, and in the last 3 years he's at exactly 1 goal per game. He's going to be something special.
Sancho is brilliant too, but he plays in a position where we already have plenty of talent.
They would not be interested in him considering the players they have or will have eventually. Their transfers have been shocking as of late, I concede.Martial will not sign for Dortmund, but rather for PSG. After all, he grew up in Paris. I predict this will happen the day we sign Haaland.
Oh yes, I agree he was needed, and I was gutted we didn´t sign him. Still, next summer, we could be in a situation where he is less needed.I think it’s early for Greenwood let alone the other two, he’s obviously talented but is that Defoe talent or RVP talent. Sancho was needed
Yeah he plays there now because we have no recognized right wingers. I don't see him playing there his whole career, do you?Greenwood plays on the right cutting in.
100% agree regarding Raiola.Halaand, though I don't like the idea of dealing with Mino again, that might just spoil it all....
A club with loser dna.Martial was the best striker in the league after the restart but now a lot of our fans want to bin him. Crazy.
Haaland and Martial can both coexist in the same 11 and certainly in the same 18.
We need a creative wide player, but yes, Sancho hasn't convinced he is that, yet.
A club that plays consistently exciting football?