That’ll be me done
So what? Hasn't it been demonstrated that it costs the city money? So if the city residents know this and they vote against it, then I see no problem.They can and sometimes do but the trade-off is that you will lose the team if you succeed. In fact you even take the risk to lose the team if your proposal isn't as interesting as the one made by an other city, that's why every "small" market fanbase is currently afraid of Seattle, Las Vegas and Tampa Bay who are all looking for franchises to host.
There's no chance these billionaires wouldn't have amassed all the estimation in the details to make a decision of such a magnitude. I'm not entirely against the idea of a super League but it needs to address risk / reward more prominently.I think their confidence isn't based on legal grounds. They just believe, not unreasonably, that FIFA wouldn't shoot itself in the foot by banning some of the most 'attractive' players from its competitions, the ones that are the biggest draw for viewers.
the average fans can’t afford footballs as it is. Not saying this is right. But it’s been a long time since football was for the average fan.How can your average football fan afford this.
Nev is going OFF. Go on Gaz
Neville going in, skewering people left right and centre.
Go on Gary, he’s laying into everyone
Well said Gary Neville
often it's a blessing but I'm raging my river ran dry before the post match today.I don’t say this very often but Gary Neville is absolutely spot on.
Well said Gaz!
It works in all US sports though. It is not a matter of opinion, there is a lot of evidence that it might work.Also, from a spectacle perspective, what do you think happens when the system is closed? When there's no guarantee of losing your place? The CL works because exiting a competition is a reality. League systems work because relegation is a reality. The threat of relegation and exit means that lower table games are exciting because there's something to play for. What's to play for when you're in the lower half of the Super League? Nothing. What's the motivation to try when there's no consequence of being in the bottom 5-6? There isn't any.
That is true. Maybe I should rephrase, how can most people afford this.the average fans can’t afford footballs as it is. Not saying this is right. But it’s been a long time since football was for the average fan.
You want to come to mine and take Molly?That’ll be me done
I presume it works in American sports because it has been the model from the beginning? I like that there is no relegation/promotion in those sports because it makes sense in the American context, but it has no business in European sports.It’s the norm here in the states so it’s not usually challenged. In cases where it is, like the Raiders, the team will just relocate. Oakland, CA didn’t want to fund a new stadium and Las Vegas did so now they’re the Las Vegas, Raiders.
This is also a big reason why relegation will never be a thing in America. Owners will not pay the franchise fee and then risk having them team drop to a lower league. Cities funding stadiums and then the team is relegated, wouldn’t be acceptable. This is the mindset in American sports and it has been extremely successful in all American leagues besides the MLS so far.
The FA in this country have sat by as these suddenly oh so important clubs have folded (mostly due to relatively peanuts financial troubles) left, right and centre. Their pearl clutching today about how we need to keep the pyramid structure because money flows down from the big boys who have apparently signed up to this is the biggest load of shit I've ever heard.To those who says ”but UEFA is bad to”. Well, UEFA isn’t perfect but who are giving money to smaller federations? To even say that they are on same level as this proposed fake league is so far from the truth.
Oh, you know, he could actually just be against the idea like most fans of football.Gary Neville is minding his own investments, you sheep. His Salford City project depends on the big clubs staying and not messing up the payment structure.
true. All you will get is 96% home attendances as well. Bollocks.That is true. Maybe I should rephrase, how can most people afford this.
and Sky, BT, BBC, ITV etc will likely lose out too, so obviously there will be a lot of vested interest in discrediting the proposalGary Neville is minding his own investments, you sheep. His Salford City project depends on the big clubs staying and not messing up the payment structure.
Levy loves a cash grab.How are spurs part of this?