I am really looking forward to all this fizzling out and that lot trying to pretend that it never happened.
European Super League
- Thread starter esmufc07
- Start date
Chill mate. Arsenal is ok. What everyone really wants to know is how the feck did spurs get in.
What did it say?
Not us, the sport. And that is my point.
Isn't there a rule in German football that the fans own 51% of the club so their owners can't make any decisions like this on their own? I remember the owner of Wolfsburg I believe did some fishy stuff and all 17 fanbases where chanting that he needed to die and all type of bad stuff and the league made him step down. Could be that I remember it wrong but TLDR the Germans got their values straight when it comes to football.
Probably about whether or not they can scream at a referee until it goes away.
So many deleted tweets in this thread
They will have already considered the various governments actions.
Tweets disappearing all over the place 
its a shit idea. Its not even cut and run that any of the 6 english teams will always get in the champions league. All of them bar city have failed in recent times. You have to earn the right, and if leicester or west ham beat you to it thats the beauty of it. Its like a big two fingers up to the spirit of football and professional competition from entitled owners.
A quarter final with real madrid has to be earned with away ties in cold scandinavia or navigating(or not) a really difficult group draw with PSG andnRBL etc. Its part of a competition. Whats the point of playing them twice a year in this super league as a permanent fixture? Meaningless
Monumental night this. Biggest change in football EVER!?
The remaining clubs may well get extra/new fans too.
So if we get kicked to the lowest league, the TV deal for could be better then the Premierleague deal 
.
.Because you have no business being involved in an elite european competition. As your league form shows. Why should they get a guaranteed place rather than objectively better teams like Leicester, West Ham or Everton
Personally, I couldn't support another club. Either United or im out.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Oh my days, are the corporates really censoring?Tweets disappearing all over the place
I also think it depends what offer will the Premierleague teams make to the other 14 teams (or the league).
the overreaction by Twitter and football purists would've reacted the same when the Premier League was formed (with cheerleaders) but nobody now thinks that was a bad idea!? So maybe just maybe people should give it a chance.. the same people moaning about it and saying they will stop supporting the club will STILL watch it guaranteed! Hypocrites!
It is a key.
Devalue the brand by mocking it into the ground
Disagree. This is based on how big they are. If anything, City is the odd man out of all those clubs. City and Spurs.
I meant young fans who grow up and decide to support someone in the 'real' league.
It's obviously not about footballing ability. Arsenal are a bigger team than the ones you mention.
i agree. Its a farce. State owned football clubs. I couldnt believe that psg and city got to ignore ffp, then have their bans overturned and pay a tiny fine. Kills the game.
at the same time you have solvent clubs albeit with ‘debts’ propped up by owners cash in the football league placed under embargos, docked points and relegated for breaking ffp rules.
So the game has actually gone, bit of a downer for a sunday.
This is what made me doubt the existence of some paid shills on here. How do you support this club and its history and think this is OK?!??!?
Ahh, I see. My bad.
For sure. I'd be straight to Norwich myself. Suspect many of us who have been brought up to support United but actually have a decent local team would do similar. Albeit, it'd never be quite the same.
Stop this WUM.
That wasn't a friendly.
Tbf, Levy can now pay-off Jose.
Regarding Gary's passionate speech can we really block the clubs money?
The tv money from Sky essentially funds the league. You take that money away the premier league will receive a lot less due to to the amount of people using sky et al and I assume Sky also lose money from their sponsors etc.
The tv money from Sky essentially funds the league. You take that money away the premier league will receive a lot less due to to the amount of people using sky et al and I assume Sky also lose money from their sponsors etc.
I'd expect the people actual playing feel differently if I'm honest. Mason would still want to winning games, scoring goals and playing at a level that sees him revered by fans.
Why do you think anyone supports anyone that isn't a big 6 club? Do you not think players kfr other clubs out a shift in even though they know full well they won't win anything at all. Do Birmingham City fans love their club because there's a chance they will win a Premier league? And the players, have they never played well despite not having a league title as a possibility? Or qualifying for Europe even?
This actually seems pretty disrespectful to players. I've seen people just assume they don't give a shit outside of a league win. In reality that's fans projecting their own feelings onto other people.
I fully expect that people who go to the ground will continue to do so. Just like Arsenal fans would still be going now if stadiums we allowed to be full, despite their absolute shambolic season, yethey would still turn up and then moan on aftv about the situation. Their players are still trying to win games, so do most other players of other clubs who have no hope of even qualifying for the Europa.
Greenwood will be absolutely buzzing tonight and it won't be because of much more than he played a match of football, played well and scored. He won't only be happy because top 4 is getting more likely or we've now got a shout at catching City.
Taking the top four argument in isolation, it's only been a thing for about 15 years, before that it was top 3 and before that just the winner. The PL can rectify this by adding a financial incentive (on top of the existing one which will be tricky if the numbers are true)
Sky sports loved talking about the big four, then the top 6. It's been invented and reinvented by sky for years.
The harder part is where the top 3 just nope out of the CL, but then that's more of a problem for the CL than the PL.
Sky sports loved talking about the big four, then the top 6. It's been invented and reinvented by sky for years.
The harder part is where the top 3 just nope out of the CL, but then that's more of a problem for the CL than the PL.
Hm, I may be disliked for my opinions on here but I definitely support this club (in my own way). Who the hell are you?
They can't do that and in all honesty, them feeling they have the ability to punish players for their club may be part of the problem. I actually want to see how this looks like. I don't like the idea of permanent members, but I suspect this is them simply cutting out UEFA, eventually more clubs will join if its successful and it will replace the champions league.