European Super League

Do you want the ESL to happen?


  • Total voters
    1,921
  • Poll closed .

FlawlessThaw

most 'know it all' poster
Joined
Oct 26, 2005
Messages
29,600
This stupid super league has already sucked the life out of me and it hasn't even started yet.
Weirdly it's been the opposite for me. I've found football in general a tad boring of late with mostly the oil-driven clubs leading the charge. At least this has caused some controversy that has ignited a bit of passion in the game.
 

Shane88

Actually Nostradamus
Joined
Jan 12, 2011
Messages
35,168
Location
Targaryen loyalist
It'll be a grim day if City and/or Liverpool show more balls than us and drop out and we desperately cling on to this boondoggle for the faint sniff of cash.

May need to re-evaluate some things then.
 

stevoc

Full Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2011
Messages
20,110
Chelsea have been looking to buy that out for years now to move to a new stadium haven't they?

Without Chelsea leasing the stadium could that group afford the upkeep?
 

Paxi

Dagestani MMA Boiled Egg Expert
Joined
Mar 4, 2017
Messages
27,678
It might play great in Spain, but Perez just ensured that tomorrow the fire and fury in England is going to redouble. He sounds like a crazy old bastard who is willing to change any aspect of the game as long as the clubs make more money.

As a PR response to the UK government and opposition speaking out already against his plans, it's probably the stupidest thing he could have done.
Incidentally, I don't think any of them lot expected the gov to get involved. Yeah serious blowback was to be expected but not from Tories and Labour in unison. We could potentially end up with a Germany style ownership out of this shit show. Glazer's, Kroenke may have inadvertently seen themselves off. Hopefully.
 

Ronaldo's Mum Eh?

Ronaldo is shite
Joined
Jan 25, 2009
Messages
5,292
Location
TORONTO
Weirdly it's been the opposite for me. I've found football in general a tad boring of late with mostly the oil-driven clubs leading the charge. At least this has caused some controversy that has ignited a bit of passion in the game.
I think you're confusing passion with frustration :lol:
 

Striker10

"Ronaldo and trophies > Manchester United football
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
18,857
they are snakes who have conspired behind the backs and against the will of the people. However folks have let it happen. Anyone willing to 'listen' is as bad because they listen to a cheap sale. But nationalism is racist so they got people all tied up. Its all greed and evil for them to do this. Dont listen to liars. People need to learn. Of course capitalism is used to push communism or socialism. Capitalism is fine in a free open market but thats not what we have. We have a system in place to enslave. Government gave up right to make money for you interest free. So why do folks think they listen? This super league is a pig with lipstick on it. Its still a pig.
 
Last edited:

stevoc

Full Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2011
Messages
20,110
Swap ‘Super’ for ‘Europa’ and it’s basically what you’ve spent the last three seasons doing anyway.
Well we've been in the CL 2 out of the last 3 years. Plus the Europa isn't that bad, you'll love it next year if Liverpool qualify.
 

Giggs86

Full Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2014
Messages
3,632
Location
USA
If Chelsea & City pull out now, this is dead in the water. Bayern have already said no, PSG haven't signed on (and if they tried the French government will likely feck them anyway) and there aren't any other teams big enough to tilt the balance.

They played their cards and now it's all about momentum. Any big dropouts and it's done.
Even if it is, the idea is out there. If it gets binned now, it'll come back in one way or another within a year. No way football stays in its current format after what happened in the last 24 hours.
 

FlawlessThaw

most 'know it all' poster
Joined
Oct 26, 2005
Messages
29,600
I think you're confusing passion with frustration :lol:
Maybe I'm just convinced that I can't see this happening.

I'm not frustrated by this by any means, this has been on the cards for a long while. It's all about whether or not it happens and what the ramifications could be. I find trying to what that out quite fascinating.
 

Kentonio

Full Member
Scout
Joined
Dec 16, 2013
Messages
13,188
Location
Stamford Bridge
Supports
Chelsea
Chelsea have been looking to buy that out for years now to move to a new stadium haven't they?

Without Chelsea leasing the stadium could that group afford the upkeep?
Probably not, but it's worth noting that it's not just the freehold on the stadium, it's the clubs name too. Roman cannot just move the team elsewhere and remain Chelsea Football Club.
 

Harry190

Bobby ten Hag
Joined
Apr 18, 2010
Messages
7,615
Location
Canada
Now the reporters are hearing stuff that they didn't know was gonna happen until the press release was ready to go? Get out of here. This came from the very top, from people who do not talk to the media. The whispers wouldn't come out.
 

Beachryan

More helpful with spreadsheets than Phurry
Joined
May 13, 2010
Messages
11,622
PL without the big six.
The three teams to be relegated stay up and six others promoted.
It does make for a "fairer" league that anyone could win.
Could actually be more interesting.
If there were a realistic outcome I'd actually be for it. So many matches these days are mind numbingly one sided attack v defense, at least if all teams were closer in resources it might become a competition again.
 

cyberman

Full Member
Joined
May 26, 2010
Messages
37,331
Weirdly it's been the opposite for me. I've found football in general a tad boring of late with mostly the oil-driven clubs leading the charge. At least this has caused some controversy that has ignited a bit of passion in the game.
I agree with this. Football has needed a cleaning out for a while now but if this just leads us to clapping hands for City as they win 9 titles in 10 years then the whole thing is fecked since what are we even trying to protect?
Get the Glazers out, City owners out, Roman out. Salary cap, wage cap, independent transfer evalaution, get the lot in.
 

sglowrider

Thinks the caf is 'wokeish'.
Joined
Dec 27, 2009
Messages
25,201
Location
Hell on Earth
Oh how I would love it if a couple of the english clubs get cold feet, and it fecks over Real and they stay on their road to bankruptcy , and kicked out of UEFA comps for a bit to boot.

I dont even care who the clubs are. I can guarentee it wont be us though. If any English clubs blink it'll be City, Chelsea or Liverpool. Sadly from our point of view. But we have the scummiest owners of the lot.
Leave Martin Edwards alone!
 

Redplane

( . Y . ) planned for Christmas
Joined
Sep 4, 2013
Messages
10,343
Location
The Royal Kingdom of Trumpistan
I know but Chelsea and Man City were reluctant to join in the first place apparently, so it's likely to be them.
More critically probably is all the talk from Perez making it sound like all the clubs will be required to open their books and disclose a lot more - do we really think especially City and Chelsea think that's a grand idea ? Seems unlikely.
 

Kentonio

Full Member
Scout
Joined
Dec 16, 2013
Messages
13,188
Location
Stamford Bridge
Supports
Chelsea
Even if it is, the idea is out there. If it gets binned now, it'll come back in one way or another within a year. No way football stays in its current format after what happened in the last 24 hours.
That's why the clubs need to be punished, not just some compromise reached. They've been waving this gun around for a long time and it was a scary threat. Now they've started firing. We can't just go back to a situation where they can threaten again whenever they please.

This is a shitty situation, but if the right people hold their nerve it's also a great opportunity to break the stranglehold these feckers have over the game.

We should have learned back in 08 that 'too big to fail' is toxic bullshit.
 

Giggs86

Full Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2014
Messages
3,632
Location
USA
At this stage, FIFA are opposing the Super League just like UEFA are. We'll see how long they maintain their position.
They'll maintain their position until the envelopes show up. It is FIFA we're talking about here.
 

Withnail

Full Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2019
Messages
29,759
Location
The Arena of the Unwell
Even if it is, the idea is out there. If it gets binned now, it'll come back in one way or another within a year. No way football stays in its current format after what happened in the last 24 hours.
That is always the danger but not if this spurs the governments on to finally sort this mess out and reform the way football is run.
 

stevoc

Full Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2011
Messages
20,110
Probably not, but it's worth noting that it's not just the freehold on the stadium, it's the clubs name too. Roman cannot just move the team elsewhere and remain Chelsea Football Club.
If Chelsea are resolute in joining this as they seem to be. Then do you see the pitch owners holding them up in reality?

If they got difficult and Chelsea just walk away play at Wembley, have to change their name and the free hold are forced to sell the bridge that would basically be the end of Chelsea as the entity we know them as. Like Wimbledon moving to Milton Keynes.
 

SecondFig

Full Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2008
Messages
6,520
Location
▲ You Are Here
It does make you think whether the Americans pushed this through.
(Kroenke, Glazers and FSG)
Them and Barca and Real - those two are in really bad financial positions (Barca more so than Real) after years of mismanagement, suspect they saw this as the perfect way to fix up their balance sheets
 

Giggs86

Full Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2014
Messages
3,632
Location
USA
Can't wait for the half time shows, matches in China, America,... Changing rules.
Every match is gonna be like the superbowl :annoyed: :lol: :rolleyes:
...Presented to you tonight by Budweiser, Mcdonalds and Chevrolet, from the Florentino Perez arena here in Miami, we welcome you to the beginning of the World Soccer Series between the Red Devils Bank of America of Manchester and the London Burger King Hotcocks, competing for the first ever Glazer super trophy...
 

bosnian_red

Worst scout to ever exist
Joined
Aug 13, 2011
Messages
57,913
Location
Canada
Even if it won't stop it completely straight away 2 clubs saying feck it off is a start at least
Oh for sure. A breakaway competition where only 10 clubs actually agree to it is something that will never take off. Bayern, Dortmund and PSG rejecting it is big too. This sort of thing can only work if all of the main guys buy into it. The main guys are United, Liverpool, Real Madrid, Barca, Bayern, Juve and probably Chelsea/Man City/PSG. Bayern resisted, PSG resisted, Man City and Chelsea dropping out would be a hammer blow to them, but who knows what sort of contracts were signed here. It'll collapse without them. Thing is, the teams involved should all be punished regardless even if it doesn't go through. Could even see them still try and make it work but it completely fail, at which point the remainder of football wouldn't want to let them back in unless they comply with their rules/requirements.
 

RedDevil@84

Full Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2014
Messages
21,631
Location
USA

Ceferin, who has been Uefa president since 2016, has overseen an agreement on a new-look 36-team Champions League but made clear his disdain for the ESL project.

"We are all united against this nonsense of a project," he said.

"I cannot stress more strongly how everyone is united against these disgraceful, self-serving proposals, fuelled by greed above all else.

"[It is a] cynical plan, completely against what football should be. We cannot and will not allow that to change.

"Players who will play in the teams that might play in the closed league will be banned from the World Cup and Euros. We urge everyone to stand tall with us as we do everything in our power to ensure this never ends up in fruition.

"This idea is a spit in the face of all football lovers. We will not allow them to take it away from us."


Anyone else feels it is super ridiculous that UEFA is talking player bans and not club bans. All the threats maybe futile in the end, but if he wants to threaten someone with dire consequences, then it should be the clubs.
 

SecondFig

Full Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2008
Messages
6,520
Location
▲ You Are Here
"There are too many players on the pitch. Maybe turn it into a 5-aside. End to end stuff"
The problem with those 90 minute games, is that sometimes the game is already decided with half an hour to go. So maybe we need to make the final 10-minutes of all games next goal wins?
 

bosnian_red

Worst scout to ever exist
Joined
Aug 13, 2011
Messages
57,913
Location
Canada
Them and Barca and Real - those two are in really bad financial positions (Barca more so than Real) after years of mismanagement, suspect they saw this as the perfect way to fix up their balance sheets
Juve too. It's for different reasons. City, United, Chelsea, Liverpool and Arsenal aren't in a bad financial state at all. It's just greed from the owners. Or at least from United/Liverpool/Arsenal. Chelsea and City are probably just in by FOMO, as their owners never really looked to be in it to make money or worried about money, but just to win everything and get famous. Madrid, Barcelona and Juventus are in a financial crisis due to mismanagement, and are looking at this as their chance to save themselves without changing their models, rather than change their models to be actual decent, sustainable business models. No idea with Milan or Inter, they're probably just happy to be invited and because they needed some other Italian teams.

feck knows how and why Spurs were involved, also not quite sure on their financials but they did just build this fancy new stadium.
 

Kentonio

Full Member
Scout
Joined
Dec 16, 2013
Messages
13,188
Location
Stamford Bridge
Supports
Chelsea
If Chelsea are resolute in joining this as they seem to be. Then do you see the pitch owners holding them up in reality?

If they got difficult and Chelsea just walk away play at Wembley, have to change their name and the free hold are forced to sell the bridge that would basically be the end of Chelsea as the entity we know them as. Like Wimbledon moving to Milton Keynes.
A number of very rich people have expressed a lot of interest in buying the club previously. Roman wouldn't gain a lot by walking away with a team under a new name, if someone else could just come in and restart the actual Chelsea FC at the Bridge.

Last I checked Chelsea are worth over $2b. Roman isn't going to throw away a large part of that value for no good reason, in that scenario he'd be considerably better off just selling it and starting something totally fresh.
 

RedDevil@84

Full Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2014
Messages
21,631
Location
USA

Things might start getting a bit more interesting if there's any truth in this
Arsenal and Spurs :D

Arsenal are having second thought about being the whipping boys of ESL and Spurs are still confused why they are being pulled into this
 

Scholsey2004

Full Member
Joined
May 12, 2016
Messages
3,600
Can the Queen seize the 6 clubs with Parliament's help? Doesn't she technically own all the land in the UK?
No, but the government has the power to nationalise companies. Not something the Tories would be keen on but this is a clear threat in lots of ways to the future of English football.

Edit: of course we're listed on the New York stock exchange so that may change matters in terms of what government can do.
 

SecondFig

Full Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2008
Messages
6,520
Location
▲ You Are Here
Anyone else feels it is super ridiculous that UEFA is talking player bans and not club bans. All the threats maybe futile in the end, but if he wants to threaten someone with dire consequences, then it should be the clubs.
Pretty sure they're talking about both. There's already been suggestions that Real, City and Chelsea could be kicked out of the CL this season (presumably PSG then win it by default?) and I'd assume that if that came to pass they'd do the same for the Europa - so a Villareal vs Roma final...

Personally, I hope they do