Robbie Boy
Full Member
Watching Welbeck every weekChrist, as if our resident Irish supporters weren't excited enough, this'll send them over the edge
Watching Welbeck every weekChrist, as if our resident Irish supporters weren't excited enough, this'll send them over the edge
It's not that long ago that I was seeing his dad play, which is a great and not at all alienating age for to get toSurreal to think I used to watch this kid come off the bench in Dalymount and the strides he has come on since then and he is still a teenager. Brighton is the perfect club for him right now.
You’d be crazy to spend the same money on him than Kane.Probably not the right move but I'd prefer him for 75m£ over Kane for 75m£.
2 of those were against Grimsby the other day.7 goals and 3 assists in 599 minutes...
Yeah you are probably right. I just wish we could somehow get him. He is probably not ready to be our main striker, but then who knows how much he is going to cost in 2 years or how things will be in 2 yrs where other teams may need a striker more?You’d be crazy to spend the same money on him than Kane.
Kane should have at least 5 years at current level - he’s only 29. I agree though it still makes sense to get both if that was somehow possible.I'd actually like to see us pick up both Kane and Ferguson this summer. Kane has 2-3 seasons max at this level, although he'll undoubtedly want a 4 year contract but in the end will have to settle for a 3 year contract.
Ferguson is only 18 years old. The timing of the transition from Kane to Ferguson could not be more perfect.
If they rate him so highly Brighton will already ask for a sky rocketed price. And we can’t rely on a kid next season.Go get him now before his price really skyrockets.
He will be 30 before season starts, also his ankle injuries means i won't be sure about next 5 years.Kane should have at least 5 years at current level - he’s only 29. I agree though it still makes sense to get both if that was somehow possible.
That's cherry picking mate. He has 7 goals and 3 assists in 599 minutes of first team football, that's just a fact. He only turned 18 last October, so of course there's a-lot of room for improvement.2 of those were against Grimsby the other day.
He has 3 goals in the league in 10 appearances. Brighton are an attacking team that likes to dominate possession and thus create a lot of chances, but they're known as a team that lacks finishers and with good reason.
As everyone has said he's only 18, lots of room to improve so Brighton is a good place for him to stay and develop.
So you’re saying we’ll win nothing with kids?If we get players like this then the fanbase has no right to put pressure on us winning next years title.
Good young player but we can’t win titles with players like him.
Yep. If the choice is between Kane and a right back or Kane and Ferguson I would pick the latter option.I'd actually like to see us pick up both Kane and Ferguson this summer. Kane has 2-3 seasons max at this level, although he'll undoubtedly want a 4 year contract but in the end will have to settle for a 3 year contract.
Ferguson is only 18 years old. The timing of the transition from Kane to Ferguson could not be more perfect.
As our main striker yes.So you’re saying we’ll win nothing with kids?
Not comparing him to Rooney.That's cherry picking mate. He has 7 goals and 3 assists in 599 minutes of first team football, that's just a fact. He only turned 18 last October, so of course there's a-lot of room for improvement.
Greenwood???As our main striker yes.
Our front line will be all under 25 next season in Rashford, Greenwood, Amad, Garanacho, Antony, Pellestri, Sancho.
Arguably the only one with some experience is Martial.
If an 18 year old player is going to make the difference to win a title next year - I personally don’t see it.
I think Ten Hag values experience anyway - I can see him going for a 24-25 year old Osihmen that’s about to reach his peak or Kane who is experienced but I can’t see him going for an 18 year old next season and then being pushed to win the league by himself.
You mean 860 minutes, but still good. He didn’t score those FA Cup goals from the sideline7 goals and 3 assists in 599 minutes...
Its not cherry picking, it's breaking down the stats to provide additional context and its relevant to do so.That's cherry picking mate. He has 7 goals and 3 assists in 599 minutes of first team football, that's just a fact. He only turned 18 last October, so of course there's a-lot of room for improvement.
Please check your numbers. WhoScored has counted not his minutes in the FA cup. It’s 7/3 in 860 min, which is great too, just not that greatThat's cherry picking mate. He has 7 goals and 3 assists in 599 minutes of first team football, that's just a fact. He only turned 18 last October, so of course there's a-lot of room for improvement.
Calm down princess. I saw the stat saying 599 minutes, so if it's wrong, then fair enough. And yes, it's impressive either way. The overall point about Brighton struggling to score with him in the team was just pretty odd.You mean 860 minutes, but still good. He didn’t score those FA Cup goals from the sideline
You also don't want to miss the boat though. Nothing wrong with identifying potential and signing someone that isn't the finished article.2 of those were against Grimsby the other day.
He has 3 goals in the league in 10 appearances. Brighton are an attacking team that likes to dominate possession and thus create a lot of chances, but they're known as a team that lacks finishers and with good reason.
As everyone has said he's only 18, lots of room to improve so Brighton is a good place for him to stay and develop.
Think you need to read where this started. Where's the evidence to point to Brighton struggling for goals with him in the team?Its not cherry picking, it's breaking down the stats to provide additional context and its relevant to do so.
There's nothing wrong with providing additional context and still acknowledging he's got bags of potential.
Shhh I’m desperate for everyone to under rate him and think he’s sh1t!Think you need to read where this started. Where's the evidence to point to Brighton struggling for goals with him in the team?
Shhh I’m desperate for everyone to under rate him and think he’s sh1t!
What a load of absolute rubbishBeing Irish I can confirm there is a lot of hope & excitement surrounding Ferguson. Personally I would prefer him to Kane. He is young & raw but he is 12 years younger than Kane & has massive potential. In the last few days ex Birmingham & Wimbledon defender Kenny Cunningham discussed Kane & the possible transfer to United on Irish radio. His opinion was that Kane is not a good fit for us, as his work rate off the ball / pressing is poor. He argued that his current style of play is similar to Ronaldo, he is just a goal scorer, and we just got rid of Ronaldo because he didn't suit the pressing style. I would be interested to know if any Spurs fans share this view or is he talking rubbish.
Who knows? He turned 18 in October so obviously it could go either way. He's shown lots of early promise, and has been highly regarded since he was 14 or so. The main thing is; he seems to have a good head on his shoulders, which will be vital to his development.So is he actually good or is he "We should sign James McCarthy" good?
Safe to say his opinion on Kane is absolutely rubbish.Being Irish I can confirm there is a lot of hope & excitement surrounding Ferguson. Personally I would prefer him to Kane. He is young & raw but he is 12 years younger than Kane & has massive potential. In the last few days ex Birmingham & Wimbledon defender Kenny Cunningham discussed Kane & the possible transfer to United on Irish radio. His opinion was that Kane is not a good fit for us, as his work rate off the ball / pressing is poor. He argued that his current style of play is similar to Ronaldo, he is just a goal scorer, and we just got rid of Ronaldo because he didn't suit the pressing style. I would be interested to know if any Spurs fans share this view or is he talking rubbish.
Now why did you need to write that? How does it help your post, your argument, anything really?Calm down princess.
Kane would obviously be a better signing.Being Irish I can confirm there is a lot of hope & excitement surrounding Ferguson. Personally I would prefer him to Kane. He is young & raw but he is 12 years younger than Kane & has massive potential. In the last few days ex Birmingham & Wimbledon defender Kenny Cunningham discussed Kane & the possible transfer to United on Irish radio. His opinion was that Kane is not a good fit for us, as his work rate off the ball / pressing is poor. He argued that his current style of play is similar to Ronaldo, he is just a goal scorer, and we just got rid of Ronaldo because he didn't suit the pressing style. I would be interested to know if any Spurs fans share this view or is he talking rubbish.
Well, the sarky comment about him scoring from the sidelines brought that on, obviously...Now why did you need to write that? How does it help your post, your argument, anything really?
29 is twilight of a career. And he will be 30 by the time next season starts.Kane should have at least 5 years at current level - he’s only 29. I agree though it still makes sense to get both if that was somehow possible.