Fantasy Premier League 2026/27

Twitter FPL is a beauty to behold from time to time. Just seen a discussion about Super El Niño and how it will likely give Chelsea DGWs this fall, given that they're not in Europe and postponement of games due to storms and inclement weather is likely :lol:
 
Twitter FPL is a beauty to behold from time to time. Just seen a discussion about Super El Niño and how it will likely give Chelsea DGWs this fall, given that they're not in Europe and postponement of games due to storms and inclement weather is likely :lol:
Andy Martin is absolute gold.
 
The final Opta updates usually happen overnight, that's allowing for any changes to bonus and DEFCONs arising from them in the last game(s) of the week, it's not a tech thing.
So to get a few minor points more accurate they've delayed the gameweek being finalised. As it used to be ready by the morning of the day after, rather than the afternoon.

I'd have probably stayed as were.
 
I’m going to be less knee-jerky and stick with Shaw, Mbeumo and Brobbey till GW5 and see what happens. Different tactic this season
 
I must bench one between Wissa and Pedro. I am thinking Pedro. Am i wrong?
 
I must bench one between Wissa and Pedro. I am thinking Pedro. Am i wrong?
Pedro for me is one of those players you keep in your team despite fixtures. Especially way Chelsea are currently playing

Can always pop up with a goal
 
105 points in GW2, very happy. Team is set for GW3.

Raya
Shaw Calafiori Ajer
Elanga Schade Bruno Groß
DCL Haaland Pedro
 
Yeah no Haaland vs Coventry feels risky as everyone will captain or TC him...I think either FH or WC him in if you started Haaland Less might be the rational play.

Or you just go yolo, risk it without him and watch behind the Sofa haha.

It is so tempting to WC and put him in.

Big thing against it is that I still haven't used bench boost and ideally want that done and dusted first. So much easier to create a WC by chucking a 4.0 non-playing goalie in there then spending the money for fun. Perhaps even go dirt cheap on an 8th mid/attacker too to free up funds for starters.

Kneecapped myself into no early bench boost by picking up Konsa so early, knowing he wouldn't play GW1 and probably not GW2. If not for that I'd have used it by now.

Will have to have a look at possible WCs that also suit future BB usage if going with it.
 
How are there no other options? Who have you got starting?
At this moment it is
Raya
Konsa, Gvardiol, Muharemovic
Elanga, Cherki, Rogers, Szobo, Saka
Haaland, Pedro

Wissa is on the bench. One player in form will be left out. Now....i must decide which one. Shame that you can't play 2-5-3 :)
 
At this moment it is
Raya
Konsa, Gvardiol, Muharemovic
Elanga, Cherki, Rogers, Szobo, Saka
Haaland, Pedro

Wissa is on the bench. One player in form will be left out. Now....i must decide which one. Shame that you can't play 2-5-3 :)

I'm benching Pedro because I'm a nutter and am starting Gonzalo Garcia (unless I play WC), but with that setup I prefer him over Rogers and at least old Elanga, new and improved looking Elanga might be a different kettle of fish.

Wissa over Pedro. I'd probably bench one of those mids.
 
At this moment it is
Raya
Konsa, Gvardiol, Muharemovic
Elanga, Cherki, Rogers, Szobo, Saka
Haaland, Pedro

Wissa is on the bench. One player in form will be left out. Now....i must decide which one. Shame that you can't play 2-5-3 :)
Yeah as above I'd back Wissa over Rogers against Arsenal
 
I'm Gona maybe move Slobo to Rogers next week anyway.
At this moment it is
Raya
Konsa, Gvardiol, Muharemovic
Elanga, Cherki, Rogers, Szobo, Saka
Haaland, Pedro

Wissa is on the bench. One player in form will be left out. Now....i must decide which one. Shame that you can't play 2-5-3 :)
Lots of upside there but no Palmer just feels like it's too much.

Saka is a guy who can get an 8-10 pointer but I think Palmer can go even higher on his good days
 
2 decisions for me -
Kinsky or Raya in goal
Cherki or Bruno for captain

I am leaning Kinsky and Cherki as captain.
 
I'm Gona maybe move Slobo to Rogers next week anyway.

Lots of upside there but no Palmer just feels like it's too much.

Saka is a guy who can get an 8-10 pointer but I think Palmer can go even higher on his good days
Don't make that mistake. I mean, buy Rogers but don't remove Szobo.
 
Don't make that mistake. I mean, buy Rogers but don't remove Szobo.
I sort of pivoted.

I have foden, Palmer and cherki on WC.

Downgraded to Ajer and De Cuyper in defence but they're behind konsa caliafori and hall anyways.

I have £1m in the bank which allows me to get to Barcola in one move as my punt. And yeah no Slob haha
 
2 decisions for me -
Kinsky or Raya in goal
Cherki or Bruno for captain

I am leaning Kinsky and Cherki as captain.

Raya. It's Raya every week with perhaps 1 or 2 exceptions all season and even then maybe not. Would have to be something like City v Arsenal and Spurs v Coventry in the same week.

My Lammens v Kinsky decsion is closer, don't really fancy either.
 
My centre back has just been loaned out to a championship club. Shows the level of research I did :lol:
 
Already whacked it on him straight after the deadline.
I'm pretty tempted too. Ipswich or Hull at home could be better but it's hard to know if other fixtures may impact his minutes by the time those matches come around. Seems like some of the content creators are doing wildcards this week too so might be nice to do it in a week where they can't
 
Leaning strongly towards playing free hit. In a bit of a weird place with my squad. Don't think the transfers I made this week already were great for the long term and FH cancels them, resetting me back to last week's squad next week.

I can bring Haaland in on the FH too which is obviously a huge plus. Mostly happy to gamble without him again after this week. Will still lose points on him to all the TC'ers but nothing I can do there. Hand-picking everyone else should hopefully make for it and triple City attack looking likely for a start.

Got a minutes-risk player (Tzolis) so FH allows me to just put him to the side for a week. Probably selling him next week anyway, but if he starts and has a great game I could change my mind. I get to assess him this week now.
 
I was planning on wild carding week 4 to get Bruno out - however I think after last week I’ve changed my mind.

I’ve got 2FTs so likely to just do
White to Konsa (presuming he starts this weekend)
Tzolis to Rogers
 
Sounds like Konsa is set to start ahead of Mosquera. I'm torn between benching Konsa for Joao Pedro or doubling up on Arsenal defenders and backing them to keep a clean sheet vs Chelsea.
 
Sounds like Konsa is set to start ahead of Mosquera. I'm torn between benching Konsa for Joao Pedro or doubling up on Arsenal defenders and backing them to keep a clean sheet vs Chelsea.
Doubling defenders is risky imo. I'm playing Pedro and benching konsa. Cala covering goons df
 
Sounds like Konsa is set to start ahead of Mosquera. I'm torn between benching Konsa for Joao Pedro or doubling up on Arsenal defenders and backing them to keep a clean sheet vs Chelsea.

Always tricky with things like that.

I have got Pedro slightly ahead as a points projection for the week in isolation, so do 2 sites I've just took a look at (FPL Review and Solio).

Game theory says Pedro if you agree with that, choosing the individuals who have the best chance of returning points.

But then you know you might not be maximising possible top-end returns depending on what actually does happen. Arsenal clean sheet, should they get one eliminates any chance of Pedro scoring so doubling up at the back probably gives you the higher ceiling from the fixture.

Starting Pedro gives you a higher floor from the match, a Pedro goal or assist wiping out 2 defender's clean sheets at once. Makes it the safer option.

Some people hate the idea of risking double ups or triple ups at the back in that sort of situation, knowing they're walking that tightrope of one goal wiping out more than one cleanie. Playing Pedro spreads that risk.

Others just hate the attacker vs defender thing in general, seeing it almost as a waste as you cannot get a cleanie for Arsenal and an attacking return from Pedro in the same match, you don't know what to hope for essentially if following what's happening. It's horribly confusing.

Suppose there's a chance Calafiori (he is your other Arsenal, right?) gets an attacking return and so does Pedro but that's got be the least likely scenario. More often it's scenarios where Arsenal keep a a cleanie, times where they don't and Pedro returns, and times where they don't and Pedro has no returns.

It's also complicated due to Konsa's historic lack of any sort of defcon or attacking output, or even xG/xA. It's why Calafiori or Gabriel is ahead of Pedro on projections due to perceived attacking threat, but Konsa is behind him. It's a bit like Van Dijk and Konate from Liverpool of last season - (175 points vs 129), there'd have been matches where you might want to start Van Dijk as he has other roads to points, but not Konate even if you had both. You might find a big defcon guy to use ahead of Konate from another fixture even if he had a slighlty lower chance of a clean sheet that week.
 
Last edited:
Always tricky with things like that.

I have got Pedro slightly ahead as a points projection for the week in isolation, so do 2 sites I've just took a look at (FPL Review and Solio).

Game theory says Pedro if you agree with that, choosing the individuals who have the best chance of returning points.

But then you know you might not be maximising possible top-end returns depending on what actually does happen. Arsenal clean sheet, should they get one eliminates any chance of Pedro scoring so doubling up at the back probably gives you the higher ceiling from the fixture.

Starting Pedro gives you a higher floor from the match, a Pedro goal or assist wiping out 2 defender's clean sheets at once. Makes it the safer option.

Some people hate the idea of risking double ups or triple ups at the back in that sort of situation, knowing they're walking that tightrope of one goal wiping out more than one cleanie. Playing Pedro spreads that risk.

Others just hate the attacker vs defender thing in general, seeing it almost as a waste as you cannot get a cleanie for Arsenal and an attacking return from Pedro in the same match, you don't know what to hope for essentially if following what's happening.

Suppose there's a chance Calafiori (he is your other Arsenal, right?) gets an attacking return and so does Pedro but that's got be the least likely scenario. More often it's scenarios where Arsenal keep a a cleanie, times where they don't and Pedro returns, and times where they don't and Pedro has no returns.

It's also complicated due to Konsa's historic lack of any sort of defcon or attacking output, or even xG/xA. It's why Calafiori or Gabriel is ahead of Pedro on projections due to perceived attacking threat, but Konsa is behind. It's a bit like Van Dijk and Konate from Liverpool of last season - (175 points vs 129), there'd have been matches where you might want to start Van Dijk as he has other roads to points, but not Konate even if you had both.
Thank you. I wasn't aware of Konsa's low defcon. In that case, he will most likely sit on my bench for one more week. And yeah, Calafiori is my other Arsenal defender.

I could even bench Shaw and start both Arsenal defenders + Joao Pedro.