I just hope they invested bit more into the game than they did in the teaser.I’m hoping since it’s a nice round number and milestone in the series they might have some big changes but I’m not hopeful. Gameplay needs a serious revamp, as does the AI and the career mode.
How so? It's a powerful and good engine. Problem is they don't want to invest resources in gameplay/graphics, they rather fully focus on online modes.Have they moved from frostbite yet? That's a large part of what's holding them back
We've literally been saying this since the beginning of time.I’m hoping since it’s a nice round number and milestone in the series they might have some big changes but I’m not hopeful. Gameplay needs a serious revamp, as does the AI and the career mode.
No it’s terrible for non Battlefield games. It’s why the animations of Mass Effect Andromeda were a mess and the same can be said for Fifa.How so? It's a powerful and good engine. Problem is they don't want to invest resources in gameplay/graphics, they rather fully focus on online modes.
It just seems very limited in what they can do with it, look at all the glitches etc in fifa 19, theres always been an OP go to move to ensure a goal whilst using frostbite too. The way the players move, it isn't 360 degrees and its fluid, where you can turn, move, dribble, pass, shoot etc is limited.How so? It's a powerful and good engine. Problem is they don't want to invest resources in gameplay/graphics, they rather fully focus on online modes.
"Frostbite is like an in-house engine with all the problems that entails—it's poorly documented, hacked together, and so on—with all the problems of an externally sourced engine. Nobody you actually work with designed it, so you don't know why this thing works the way it does, why this is named the way it is."How so? It's a powerful and good engine. Problem is they don't want to invest resources in gameplay/graphics, they rather fully focus on online modes.
No.Have they moved from frostbite yet? That's a large part of what's holding them back
Hired 2 people, very late in the cycle. I honestly don't expect them to meaningfully improve on these issues. To some extent I think the issues are core to the current monetization strategy (which is to induce some level of frustration that drives some people to spend heavily on packs).EA have actually hired people from the FIFA online community to help with development of this one, and by what they have said on the recent pitch notes they seem to understand the issues with 19 so I have higher hopes than usual.
Still would get it regardless, but always hopeful it will be the best one yet
Don't.Getting bit tired with Konami so might try this FIFA.
The thing is, FIFA is not built around frostbite, it's just being used for certain parts like cutscenes in journey mode. Base game is running on some old custom built engine which is outdated and most of "gameplay improvements" made in the last X years have basically been tweaking the sliders which can take you not very far. They clearly do not care how it plays on the pitch and why would they, you have 1000s of Youtubers uploading daily videos of them opening packs and doing SBCs as it's more interesting than playing a morally and technically outdated game. It really sucks that FIFA does not have any competition and they can easily sell copies even if they only reskin and update players database every year."Frostbite is like an in-house engine with all the problems that entails—it's poorly documented, hacked together, and so on—with all the problems of an externally sourced engine. Nobody you actually work with designed it, so you don't know why this thing works the way it does, why this is named the way it is."
"If it takes you a week to make a little bug fix, it discourages people from fixing bugs. If you can hack around it, you hack around it, as opposed to fixing it properly."
- This is what the Anthem dev team are blaming for their shit show. EA of course should know about it but lots of their devs have spoken out too if my memory is correct.
Really they should swallow their pride, pay Epic the 5% and jump to Unreal.
Pro clubs could be the greatest mode ever that EA have had on any game, yet they never make the necessary additions/changes because it doesn't make them money.Fifa 64 and I'll still be disappointed after waiting on some development or depth to pro clubs.
They'll add tattoos or something.
No, the game runs on Frostbite and has done so since FIFA 17.The thing is, FIFA is not built around frostbite, it's just being used for certain parts like cutscenes in journey mode. Base game is running on some old custom built engine which is outdated and most of "gameplay improvements" made in the last X years have basically been tweaking the sliders which can take you not very far. They clearly do not care how it plays on the pitch and why would they, you have 1000s of Youtubers uploading daily videos of them opening packs and doing SBCs as it's more interesting than playing a morally and technically outdated game. It really sucks that FIFA does not have any competition and they can easily sell copies even if they only reskin and update players database every year.
It really does not, it's used mainly for visuals like I said, cutscenes. Anyway, not gonna discuss it any furtherNo, the game runs on Frostbite and has done so since FIFA 17.
EA are lying if they said pros want those features in the game.Also timed shooting and moving the GK are still in the game because according to EA some pros wanted it in the game. Did you want it in the game @Eddy_JukeZ or @Macern? That goes for any of the regular FUT players. How many of you actually wanted those two features in the game?
You're wrong.It really does not, it's used mainly for visuals like I said, cutscenes. Anyway, not gonna discuss it any further
Whatever, believe what you want but I can bet you are wrongYou're wrong.
The FIFA engine has been on Frostbite since FIFA 17.
They don't have 2 engines. All EA games have been using Frostbite for a while now.
There's nothing to believe.Whatever, believe what you want but I can bet you are wrong
Definitely not! I haven’t used timed finishing in several months actually. I think FIFA should be about understanding of the game, ability to make the right decision on the ball and such, not about how well (or in a lot of cases lucky) you can move the goalkeeper and how good you are at hitting the shoot button twice in a row.Also timed shooting and moving the GK are still in the game because according to EA some pros wanted it in the game. Did you want it in the game @Eddy_JukeZ or @Macern? That goes for any of the regular FUT players. How many of you actually wanted those two features in the game?
Hence the I’m not hopeful.We've literally been saying this since the beginning of time.
Not officially, but I estimate about even. A billion USD revenue for each.Are the figures out there for money made through UT vs sales of the game?
We all willI imagine this will be a groundbreaking 0.1% improvement over 19.
I will buy it nonetheless.
Where is this from?Currently it's just the graphics that are on frostbite, with the actual game engine changing over to it this year
career mode hasn't had any significant upgrade since 2013, it's still fundamentally the same mode just with extra bells and whistles. They haven't even fixed the scheduling problem in that time.Feck the online community and the pandering to the gits who go on about it 24/7 in the FIFA Caf thread. I want some significant improvements to the offline mode and some significant gameplay improvement. To this day it still plays like a damn pinball game on ice.
I don't actually know if I've just made it up, but I'm sure I've read numerous times that the graphics are run from Frostbite and not the actual gameplay, however I could well be wrong as I now can't find anything on itWhere is this from?
sounds about right.You can predict what bullshit the game changing feature will be every year
Pick one from each list:
Precision
360
Timed
Total
Perfect
Skilled
Crossing
Shooting
Sprinting
Defending
Heading
Skill moves