- Joined
- Oct 29, 2023
- Messages
- 2,724
Well I for one am shocked that a Cup that never in my lifetime was any popular, is still not popular amongst football fans, specially considering the crazy ticket prices atm.
I'd much rather see the latter in the competition.
One of my main issues with it. Considering the weight of PSR and FFP in today's footballing world, having some teams play in this on the basis of some flimsy (at best) criteria who could have their fortunes massively improved thanks to the prize money (siphoned into it by massively dubious sources) seems really fecked up. That's the main difference with the nations' World Cup.I mean, as a fan of a club which isn't participating at this tournament, there is no reason to watch the CWC and much to hope that it flops. A tournament for a select few clubs in which you can earn more money over the span of four weeks than by winning the UCL is distorting the competition massively and what makes it even worse is that it comes at the cost of the quality of football overall because the top players get even less rest after long and exhausting seasons.
To be a proper World Club Cup it should have been 1 club from each country. Go by the domestic team who have won the most trophies over last 4 years for each country.Why would they do that ? The only motivation is financial. Getting Barcelona in would have helped FIFA financially sure... But the rest would be a net loss.
The 2 clubs limit makes it a bit more open for countries outside the big 6/7 to be represented. And that helps FIFA get consent for it from more UEFA associations... The clubs from the Netherlands, Turkey, Belgium, Denmark may all look at this edition and think we may be there next time. With your system, it is more of a closed shop.
I'd rather make it 1 team per country (unless a country gets more UCL winners). Which would kick out Atletico, Dortmund, Juventus and Benfica... Replacing them with Ajax, Shakhtar, Brugge and Copenhagen.
To be a proper World Club Cup it should have been 1 club from each country. Go by the domestic team who have won the most trophies over last 4 years for each country.
Let kids and families in for free or very very cheap. Pack the stadiums out.
9 x teams from Europe
9 x teams from America's
9 x teams from Africa / Middle East
9 x teams from far east / other regions
But FIFA are greedy and want their own CL, so it won't happen.
Add the fact that it is taking place in a country where people are currently being randomly collected from the streets and locked up.Well I for one am shocked that a Cup that never in my lifetime was any popular, is still not popular amongst football fans, specially considering the crazy ticket prices atm.
because pre existing confederations are skewed towards europe in terms of slots. there has to be more redistribution of wealth ourside of europe.Why would you a) have a 36 team tournament and b) break it down by those weird regions rather than the pre-existing confederations?
Well I for one am shocked that a Cup that never in my lifetime was any popular, is still not popular amongst football fans, specially considering the crazy ticket prices atm.
It's already bad enough that they don't have the most fun team to watch with the most promising young player. But it's even worse when you see the teams they have instead. Even in my native México I doubt people outside of the hardcore fans would rather see Pachuca.Barcelona and Liverpool being in it is far better for them financially and in terms of competition than Benfica and Salzburg, and at least better in terms of competition than Juventus.
The problem I have with the "winners of the CL qualify" alongside a limit of clubs per nation is precisely that we've ended up with three teams from USA and four teams from Brazil, but couldn't find room for some of Europe's best sides based on a daft restriction of "just two clubs".
Edit: I've just realised that Inter Miami have qualified as "hosts" because they topped the MLS league phase but didn't actually win the recognised league title, and were basically just given entry because Messi plays for them. The whole thing's a farce.
But it’s not make-a-wish. Your team didn’t qualify since it didn’t meet the criteria. I know you need the money for some additional levers, but still…It's already bad enough that they don't have the most fun team to watch with the most promising young player. But it's even worse when you see the teams they have instead. Even in my native México I doubt people outside of the hardcore fans would rather see Pachuca.
because pre existing confederations are skewed towards europe in terms of slots. there has to be more redistribution of wealth ourside of europe.
36 is my mistake, i forgot it was 32 so 8 per region
Best you could do. What's the point of a CWC when 99% of the time the winners will be a European club?How is yours not still skewed towards Europe?
All you've done is arbitrarily merged the American confederations and split the Asian one up to merge them with the African and Oceanic ones.
Also, Europe gets more spots because the European teams have more teams at a good level. Same as the proper World Cup.
Best you could do. What's the point of a CWC when 99% of the time the winners will be a European club?
Have more teams from other regions, however that's split. Make prize money equal for all teams to participate (which it currently isn't). Hopefully strengthen the teams from the other regions over time and make them stronger competition.
Basically currently it's a useless competition.
Yeah didn't even want to get into the political side of this, considering I think pretty much everyone knows how USA are atm. But yeah, doesn't help at all.Add the fact that it is taking place in a country where people are currently being randomly collected from the streets and locked up.
I have already accepted the fact we are not in. Lamine, Lewandowski and Pedri were pretty tired anyway. I would rather have them rested for next season than risking and injury. FIFA and the tournament as a whole lose more than we do.But it’s not make-a-wish. Your team didn’t qualify since it didn’t meet the criteria. I know you need the money for some additional levers, but still…
#INeverWantedHerAnywaysI have already accepted the fact we are not in. Lamine, Lewandowski and Pedri were pretty tired anyway. I would rather have them rested for next season than risking and injury. FIFA and the tournament as a whole lose more than we do.
Even our friendly matches vs Real Madrid in the USA sell much more than that "World Cup".
The bonuses the players of the winning club will be on for winning this will ensure this is one seriously competitive event.#INeverWantedHerAnyways
It‘s 100m for the winner.
ICE will probably be waiting at the turnstiles sadly.Yeah didn't even want to get into the political side of this, considering I think pretty much everyone knows how USA are atm. But yeah, doesn't help at all.
Imagine watching Bayern-Boca Juniors in La Bombonera or Flamengo-Chelsea at Maracana. Now that would sell tickets and have a great atmosphere. But as you say, the revenue would probably not please FIFA.Be interesting to see how this goes. For me, they should've put this in South America to begin with as they would've sold the tickets easily - even if the revenue wasn't great. However, the greed of FIFA wouldn't allow that.
This and it is also a test run for next year's WC.Be interesting to see how this goes. For me, they should've put this in South America to begin with as they would've sold the tickets easily - even if the revenue wasn't great. However, the greed of FIFA wouldn't allow that.
Yeah, I know. It reminds me a bit of the ole Confederations Cup with served as a runup to the World Cup sometimes.This and it is also a test run for next year's WC.
Has been answered 574 times in this thread an Google is free.How did Inter Miami make it to this tournament?
Did they have to play some qualifiers against scrubs?
That's what I feel slightly dubious about. What stops , for example, Saudi setting up a pre-season tournament with Newcastle and 3 other random teams from Saudi with a winning prize as 100M? Will that count towards PSR or does it only count if the tournament is associated with FIFA/UEFA?One of my main issues with it. Considering the weight of PSR and FFP in today's footballing world, having some teams play in this on the basis of some flimsy (at best) criteria who could have their fortunes massively improved thanks to the prize money (siphoned into it by massively dubious sources) seems really fecked up. That's the main difference with the nations' World Cup.
"But it's some more football games in a month where there's none" is a really shit argument to support an inherently flawed competition.
They need to find a way to get Ronaldo in it. His fanboys have single handedly lifted the level of the Nations League to dizzying heights in only a few days.
Get Ronaldo out there on his knees in tears, ignoring his teammates and in 4 years, it should be on par with the CL
If they've bought tickets, why would they want to?I feel (a little) bad for the people who've bought tickets already. They can't give them away.
Damn, Ronaldo living in your head rent free hahaha
Genius staged a football tournament in the US and is surprised that people aren't interested. Similar thing will happen at rhe 2026 World cup, although to a lesser extent probably because of the World cup's popularity. The US and football simply do not mix well.
You mean US American teams? I don't think there's a salary cap in the Mexican league or in South America.There's an article in the biggest Belgian newspaper today that claims the Bayern board is putting a lot of pressure on Kompany to try and win this abomination. Not for any sportive reasons of course, but for the 100m+ on offer for the winners.
How does this even work for the American teams? Doesn't their league have a salary cap and a distribution system? What if one team suddenly banks an extra 100 million (or even 30 million or so)?
There's an article in the biggest Belgian newspaper today that claims the Bayern board is putting a lot of pressure on Kompany to try and win this abomination. Not for any sportive reasons of course, but for the 100m+ on offer for the winners.
How does this even work for the American teams? Doesn't their league have a salary cap and a distribution system? What if one team suddenly banks an extra 100 million (or even 30 million or so)?
No chance. 1994 broke attendance records, and that was before the MLS and before the European leagues were widely broadcast in the US.Genius staged a football tournament in the US and is surprised that people aren't interested. Similar thing will happen at rhe 2026 World cup, although to a lesser extent probably because of the World cup's popularity. The US and football simply do not mix well.