Finances - Europa vs Champions League

Bastian

Full Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2015
Messages
18,530
Supports
Mejbri
Of course there are numerous benefits in qualifying and cons in failing to do so. It's perhaps difficult to evaluate sponsorship impact, but apparently the annual £75m Adidas drops down to £50m without the CL. Then there's the TV money from the CL (compared to the Europa). I've seen very different figures bandied about, regarding both TV money and prize money, for the CL. I haven't got a clue about the Europa.

Listened to the Transfer Window podcast and they were talking about some huge figures. Does anyone have a ballpark figure for the difference to United's financials with regards to the Europa and Champions League?

And is the 25% wage cut across the board, inclusive of all the players, when we fail to qualify for the CL?

Just trying to get a better idea about how the next 3 matches will impact our finances.
 

Bastian

Full Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2015
Messages
18,530
Supports
Mejbri
Does no one know the financial difference - I can't find it, hence asking. And here I was thinking this was interesting with view to our transfer window..
 

lsd

The Oracle
Joined
Jun 5, 2016
Messages
10,838
Is there a difference in tv money for clubs who qualify for the champions league through the Europa Cup and those who qualify via their league ?

I'm sure i remember hearing something about it last time we won the Europa
 

Revan

Assumptionman
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
49,575
Location
London
Is there a difference in tv money for clubs who qualify for the champions league through the Europa Cup and those who qualify via their league ?

I'm sure i remember hearing something about it last time we won the Europa
I think so. We don't get the money from group stage (or probably, "some" money from the group stage) or something. Or maybe it was that some money goes to the league to be shared from the four clubs that got qualified, and a team getting qualified from Europa League does not get any money from it.

But yes, last time we were there from EL, we got less money than a team who would have reached the same results but qualified via the League.
 

TheNewEra

Knows Kroos' mentality
Joined
Jan 20, 2014
Messages
8,181
It's available on a Marca Article.

https://www.marca.com/en/football/international-football/2019/07/11/5d27616646163f138c8b45aa.html

Champions League
Breakdown of prize money for 2019/20 Champions League *
  1. Reaching the group stages: 15 million euros
  2. Reaching the round of 16: 9.5 million euros
  3. Reaching the quarter-finals: 10.5 million euros
  4. Reaching the semi-finals: 12 million euros
  5. Reaching the final: 15 million euros
  6. Winning the final: 4 million euros
* UEFA will also pay teams 2.7 million euros for every match they win and 900,000 euros for every match they draw.

So, if a team wins every single game on their way to lifting the Champions League trophy, they will earn 82.2 million euros.

Champions League: Maximum 82.2 million euros

Europa League


Breakdown of prize money for 2019/20 Europa League
  1. Reaching the group stages: 2.75 million euros
  2. Reaching the round of 32: 500,000 euros
  3. Reaching the round of 16: 1.1 million euros
  4. Reaching the quarter-finals: 1.5 million euros
  5. Reaching the semi-finals: 2.4 million euros
  6. Reaching the final: 4.5 million euros
  7. Winning the final: 4 million euros

Europa League: Maximum 16.75 million euros

StageChampions League (Million Euros)Europa League (Million Euros)Difference (Million Euros)
Group Stage152.7512.25
Round of 169.51.67.9
Quarter Finals10.51.59
Semi Finals122.49.6
Final154.510.5
Win Final440
Total6616.7549.25

If you go all the way in both tournaments it's approximately (based on mental mathematics here) ~50 million euros less (plus the 2.7 million euro per match won bonus)

Unsure of the "paid per match won" is also for the Europa League *

Coefficient Ranking Payments* payed to clubs based on their ranking

Coefficient ranking (€84m)
On the basis of the new ten-year ranking, a ranking table has been established and the total amount of €84m has been divided into 'coefficient shares', each worth €71,430. The lowest-ranked team will receive one share (€71,430). One share will be added to every rank and so the highest-ranked team will receive 48 shares (€3.42m).

https://www.uefa.com/memberassociations/uefarankings/revenue/index.html

Man Utd are 7th in the coefficient ranking for payments of shares.
 
Last edited:

Bastian

Full Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2015
Messages
18,530
Supports
Mejbri
It's available on a Marca Article.

https://www.marca.com/en/football/international-football/2019/07/11/5d27616646163f138c8b45aa.html

Champions League




Europa League




Europa League you don't get paid 2.7 million per match won, and the prize money at each stage is significantly less.

If you go all the way in both tournaments it's approximately (based on mental mathematics here) ~50 million euros less (plus the 2.7 million euro per match won bonus)
Thanks for that - excellent. For an OK Champions League season, we'd probably be looking at 6 wins or more. So another 16m euros. So that's 66m euros - roughly 59m pounds + 25m extra from Adidas, 84m. Whereas, 14.5m (16m euros) from the Europa, max, according to your math. So 70m drop.

I'm not sure how the wages are calculated, whether it's all the staff though it's surely just the players (probably +95% of all wages) who take that 25% no CL cut. Come to think of it, it's a rather ingenious stipulation by the club. One could argue it should even be a higher cut.
 

TheNewEra

Knows Kroos' mentality
Joined
Jan 20, 2014
Messages
8,181
Thanks for that - excellent. For an OK Champions League season, we'd probably be looking at 6 wins or more. So another 16m euros. So that's 66m euros - roughly 59m pounds + 25m extra from Adidas, 84m. Whereas, 14.5m (16m euros) from the Europa, max, according to your math. So 70m drop.

I'm not sure how the wages are calculated, whether it's all the staff though it's surely just the players (probably +95% of all wages) who take that 25% no CL cut. Come to think of it, it's a rather ingenious stipulation by the club. One could argue it should even be a higher cut.
I've updated my post slightly with a little more information, it's certainly a huge loss to be out of the CL (Adidas and CL prize money yes).
 

Bastian

Full Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2015
Messages
18,530
Supports
Mejbri
I've updated my post slightly with a little more information, it's certainly a huge loss to be out of the CL (Adidas and CL prize money yes).
Yes, and it has huge factors outside of the finances and it most definitely affects sponsorship money, which is hard to gauge. Effectively the boys are playing for a 25% wage rise, apart from everything else.
 

Bastian

Full Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2015
Messages
18,530
Supports
Mejbri
Athletic says CL brings between £85 million to £100 million, while Europa £40 million. And of course, CL qualification ensures the full benefit of the Adidas deal (not cut down by £25m, or £22.5m as Athletic contend).

While the players get their wages back up having taken on that 25% cut.

Seems all roads lead to the same place: Get rid of underperforming players, perma-crocked players and those who don't fit. That's one long list. And we have to stop dishing out outlandish contracts unless it's for genuine and consistent world class performances.
 

ti vu

Full Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2015
Messages
12,799
Athletic says CL brings between £85 million to £100 million, while Europa £40 million. And of course, CL qualification ensures the full benefit of the Adidas deal (not cut down by £25m, or £22.5m as Athletic contend).

While the players get their wages back up having taken on that 25% cut.

Seems all roads lead to the same place: Get rid of underperforming players, perma-crocked players and those who don't fit. That's one long list. And we have to stop dishing out outlandish contracts unless it's for genuine and consistent world class performances.
Short term, it may not be that huge of an issue. However an EL regular would face negative chain effect on sponsorship and domestic TV deals long term. Playing in EL on Thursday would mean losing flexibility to broadcast the games, now that other leagues are improving their appeal. Sponsor wants exposure. Less flexibility = higher risk of losing that exposure. We know how other leagues are more flexible to move schedule to accodomate their egg laying hens of clubs. PL clubs have less room to maneuver hence it's more a big deal to qualify for CL football. Having opened gates for clubs that can live off money from sugar daddy like PL, who didn't care about revenue yet still able to compete, leaving it more competitive, desperate for the "more organic" clubs to fight for this CL club status.
 

Bastian

Full Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2015
Messages
18,530
Supports
Mejbri
Short term, it may not be that huge of an issue. However an EL regular would face negative chain effect on sponsorship and domestic TV deals long term. Playing in EL on Thursday would mean losing flexibility to broadcast the games, now that other leagues are improving their appeal. Sponsor wants exposure. Less flexibility = higher risk of losing that exposure. We know how other leagues are more flexible to move schedule to accodomate their egg laying hens of clubs. PL clubs have less room to maneuver hence it's more a big deal to qualify for CL football. Having opened gates for clubs that can live off money from sugar daddy like PL, who didn't care about revenue yet still able to compete, leaving it more competitive, desperate for the "more organic" clubs to fight for this CL club status.
Absolutely this. There are contextual effects that will impact the club, and have impacted the club. And even, if we hypothetically assume that all the board cares about is CL qualification year in, year out, the splash Chelsea are now making in the market means we simply have to compete financially. To do so, the most sensible decision we could make is appoint people who know what they're doing so we stop wasting hundreds of millions of pounds where we don't need to or shouldn't.
 

Isotope

Ten Years a Cafite
Joined
Mar 6, 2012
Messages
23,611
Need to consider that teams are more likely to go out much earlier at CL than Europe. Also, players most likely are getting bonuses and/or wage increase with CL. And winning trophy is actually matter more than just being in CL as a goal.

All in all, the money difference may not be that big.
 
Last edited:

lysglimt

Full Member
Scout
Joined
Jun 1, 2008
Messages
15,224
It should be added that all our players have C.L-clauses in their contracts as I understand it. So if we don't play in the C.L - the wages probably drop quite a bit. I assume we still have this - I think Alan Smith was the first player to get this into his contract - about 15 years ago
 

Infra-red

Full Member
Joined
May 4, 2010
Messages
13,411
Location
left wing
It should be added that all our players have C.L-clauses in their contracts as I understand it. So if we don't play in the C.L - the wages probably drop quite a bit. I assume we still have this - I think Alan Smith was the first player to get this into his contract - about 15 years ago
I believe that it's a 25% cut in years where we don't participate in the CL.
 

Bastian

Full Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2015
Messages
18,530
Supports
Mejbri
Guys, that's clearly stated in the OP and subsequent posts - no CL, 25% wage reduction. @Isotope CL money matters a hell of a lot - why else would you have managers sacked as soon as that objective is not met (I mean, both Moyes and LVG could have gone sooner). The difference in money - leaving the wages out of it, is somewhere between £50-80m. Now we save on wages if we don't qualify, but we also become less attractive to sponsors, to our current players and to potential recruits. It's painstakingly obvious really.

The real question is does the board rest satisfied with merely qualifying for the CL or push on - which is what our rivals are doing.
 

Viral United

Full Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2013
Messages
1,713
Location
India
Need to consider that teams are more likely to go out much earlier at CL than Europe. Also, players most likely are getting bonuses and/or wage increase with CL. And winning trophy is actually matter more than just being in CL as a goal.

All in all, the money difference may not be that big.
Even if you go out earlier in CL, the money difference will way bigger.
Not only better prize money, you get better TV money and also bigger gate receipt in CL.
So its much more profitable to be in CL then EL even though you go out much earlier in CL.
 

Josep Dowling

Full Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2014
Messages
7,641
Guys, that's clearly stated in the OP and subsequent posts - no CL, 25% wage reduction. @Isotope CL money matters a hell of a lot - why else would you have managers sacked as soon as that objective is not met (I mean, both Moyes and LVG could have gone sooner). The difference in money - leaving the wages out of it, is somewhere between £50-80m. Now we save on wages if we don't qualify, but we also become less attractive to sponsors, to our current players and to potential recruits. It's painstakingly obvious really.

The real question is does the board rest satisfied with merely qualifying for the CL or push on - which is what our rivals are doing.
This is my issue. Everyone thinks Champions League football means Sancho will be signed. But he is the perfect target for the board. We walk away from player who’s value is over £100m, and they can blame COVID for being financially cautious.

The last few times we have made Champions League the next push to sign players stopped and I can see it happening again this season.
 

Bastian

Full Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2015
Messages
18,530
Supports
Mejbri
This is my issue. Everyone thinks Champions League football means Sancho will be signed. But he is the perfect target for the board. We walk away from player who’s value is over £100m, and they can blame COVID for being financially cautious.

The last few times we have made Champions League the next push to sign players stopped and I can see it happening again this season.
I have the same concerns, to a different degree. I think we'll sign Sancho. But we need to be ruthless and cut our losses with loads of players and sign maybe 3-4 players this window.