tenpoless
No 6-pack, just 2Pac
What ist gebrochen
Agree with all of that, but one little extra caveat I’d add. Our captain and best player plays in the exact same position; he’s on course to break the assist record and is in the conversation for player of the season. He’s been consistently brilliant from the moment he arrived.Seems to be a polarising topic that there might be an active thread on a high profile player in the football forum section of a massive internet message board. A few things maybe to take into consideration - it's not only been about him at Liverpool, there were about 50-60 pages of messages about him when he was still at Leverkusen. Also, despite all the snarky messages about "Utd fans making fun of Wirtz lol", the main contributors to this thread aren't Utd fans. When you look at the top posters in here, the top 10 ones aren't Utd fans - they're German or Liverpool fans. So let's take the number of posts with a pinch of salt as well.
Also, number of "chances created" is a bit of a silly stat. I think if you really want to judge the creativity of a player, looking at "big chances created" is a much better indicator - and in that ranking, he falls to 71st in the league, in the illustrious company of Dalot, Guéhi-playmaker-extraordinaire or Neko Williams.
Pretending that this transfer and his season have been anything else than an unmitigated failure at this stage is plain nonsense. He has puffed up his stats against mediocre opposition to make them look ok, but as soon as he's up against decent opposition, it's pretty bad. Beyond not impacting big games, he actively goes missing in them. He's shy, weak and doesn't seem up to it.
Now that may change (I've consistenly said that I think he'll be better in his second season in England) and I guess a change of manager, a fresh start after the summer, whatever, might be exactly what he needs to confirm his potential, but currently he's shown nothing in England and it's a bit tiring that Utd fans have to justify on a Utd forum why they're playfully mocking (I don't believe there's anything particularly egregious in the way he's talked about on here) a guy who was plain terrible in the last game against Manchester United.
And yet, Bruno has consistently been criticised by the media for this, that and the other.Agree with all of that, but one little extra caveat I’d add. Our captain and best player plays in the exact same position; he’s on course to break the assist record and is in the conversation for player of the season. He’s been consistently brilliant from the moment he arrived.
We’ve got the best creative, attacking midfield player in the league, and they just spent £120m on an absolute ghost that’s not fit to lace his boots. Our point of reference and the contrast could not be more stark.
To be fair, I don't remember Sancho getting a lot of stick in his first season. Most of the blame was allocated to Ole, Rangnick and our arguably dysfunctional setup. It's only after ETH sent him over to that mental camp in his second season that things started to break loose.I think this largely stems from the fact that a large proportion of United’s big-money signings are quite literally slaughtered by the media after 5 or 6 games. Sesko was a recent example he’s the same age as Wirtz and was taking flak just weeks into his move. We also saw it with Pogba and others. The funny thing is that both Pogba and Sesko have been better than Wirtz in their first year, yet he hasn’t taken any stick from the mainstream media, whereas Pogba was being hammered weekly and Sesko, until recently, was taking a lot of stick too. Wirtz had been sold to the league as this world beater, ready to take the league by storm. When he has looked as good if not worse than Jesse Lingard at West Ham.
He has done nothing in a big PL game. Nothing in Europe when it mattered. He has been an almighty flop in his first season.
I've seen this argument before and I really fail to see how that's relevant. It's like saying PSG fans are in a better position to criticize underperforming wingers than Tottenham fans because their wingers are amongst the best in the world.Agree with all of that, but one little extra caveat I’d add. Our captain and best player plays in the exact same position; he’s on course to break the assist record and is in the conversation for player of the season. He’s been consistently brilliant from the moment he arrived.
We’ve got the best creative, attacking midfield player in the league, and they just spent £120m on an absolute ghost that’s not fit to lace his boots. Our point of reference and the contrast could not be more stark.
That’s about Sesko. The poster referenced Sancho.
In fairness it really is a bit strange how a Wirtz thread on a United forum got 164 pages![]()
Bruno has been consistently good for Utd, and the fact some online fans who get angry at everything and would be criticising Cantona in another era feel differently is not a gotcha. Online message boards are a terrible metric to judge a player.I've seen this argument before and I really fail to see how that's relevant. It's like saying PSG fans are in a better position to criticize underperforming wingers than Tottenham fans because their wingers are amongst the best in the world.
It's also pretty pointless to compare current Bruno to first-year-in-the-league Wirtz. Bruno was even older than Wirtz currently is when he arrived in England a good while ago now, and the revisionism is pretty damn strong if you think he's been "consistently brilliant from the moment he arrived". Even on here there's been plenty of posters who have wanted him gone at different points in his United career, if not for his performances, then for his childish on-field antics.
I feel like several posters did their best to explain why comparing a 120m attacking midfield signing to another attacking midfielder performing well in the same league was useful for discussion, but you just basically ignored all of the points raised.I've seen this argument before and I really fail to see how that's relevant. It's like saying PSG fans are in a better position to criticize underperforming wingers than Tottenham fans because their wingers are amongst the best in the world.
It's also pretty pointless to compare current Bruno to first-year-in-the-league Wirtz. Bruno was even older than Wirtz currently is when he arrived in England a good while ago now, and the revisionism is pretty damn strong if you think he's been "consistently brilliant from the moment he arrived". Even on here there's been plenty of posters who have wanted him gone at different points in his United career, if not for his performances, then for his childish on-field antics.
Why do you always have such a snide tone?I don’t think you even remotely understand football rivalry or banter.

He's just been the obvious best of a very bad bunch in several seasons imo, but I'll take your word for it.Bruno has been consistently good for Utd, and the fact some online fans who get angry at everything and would be criticising Cantona in another era feel differently is not a gotcha. Online message boards are a terrible metric to judge a player.
It's not what's been said, back then and now it sounds like "we are best placed to judge Wirtz' performances because Bruno plays at United". The only apt comparison (and criticism on Wirtz) would be that Bruno has had a way of still looking decent even when United were at their absolute worst, which is currently lacking for Wirtz, but they are not remotely close to being at the same point in their career right now so even that would be quite harsh to me.I feel like several posters did their best to explain why comparing a 120m attacking midfield signing to another attacking midfielder performing well in the same league was useful for discussion, but you just basically ignored all of the points raised.
Well he has always produced goals and assists, regardless of quality around him, which is the job of an attacking midfielder. That’s why he’s used as a comparison for an extremely expensive player that plays the same position, in the same league, and in this case, for a poorly performing side. I find it bizarre that the comparison needs any explanation at all, particularly when there has been discussion in this very thread about how Wirtz is being let down by his teammates. But again, I’m pretty sure this was all covered the last time this discussion came up.He's just been the obvious best of a very bad bunch in several seasons imo, but I'll take your word for it.
It's not what's been said, back then and now it sounds like "we are best placed to judge Wirtz' performances because Bruno plays at United". The only apt comparison (and criticism on Wirtz) would be that Bruno has had a way of still looking decent even when United were at their absolute worst, which is currently lacking for Wirtz, but they are not remotely close to being at the same point in their career right now so even that would be quite harsh to me.
And this is definitely not me trying to justify or defend Wirtz' performances by the way, I'll caveat that he simply hasn't shown enough in his debut season and was very likely worse than Bruno at United in his first season (which I can't remember anything of).
Fair enough. I don't really care about him or this thread very much, just think it's a bit strange how he is the only Liverpool player that gets shit on. You don't see a Gravenberch thread going on in here after looking like an elite midfielder last season. I guess people weren't a fan of how hyped he was and loving how he turned out to be a lot worse for Liverpool than expected.Seems to be a polarising topic that there might be an active thread on a high profile player in the football forum section of a massive internet message board. A few things maybe to take into consideration - it's not only been about him at Liverpool, there were about 50-60 pages of messages about him when he was still at Leverkusen. Also, despite all the snarky messages about "Utd fans making fun of Wirtz lol", the main contributors to this thread aren't Utd fans. When you look at the top posters in here, the top 10 ones aren't Utd fans - they're German or Liverpool fans. So let's take the number of posts with a pinch of salt as well.
Also, number of "chances created" is a bit of a silly stat. I think if you really want to judge the creativity of a player, looking at "big chances created" is a much better indicator - and in that ranking, he falls to 71st in the league, in the illustrious company of Dalot, Guéhi-playmaker-extraordinaire or Neko Williams.
Pretending that this transfer and his season have been anything else than an unmitigated failure at this stage is plain nonsense. He has puffed up his stats against mediocre opposition to make them look ok, but as soon as he's up against decent opposition, it's pretty bad. Beyond not impacting big games, he actively goes missing in them. He's shy, weak and doesn't seem up to it.
Now that may change (I've consistenly said that I think he'll be better in his second season in England) and I guess a change of manager, a fresh start after the summer, whatever, might be exactly what he needs to confirm his potential, but currently he's shown nothing in England and it's a bit tiring that Utd fans have to justify on a Utd forum why they're playfully mocking (I don't believe there's anything particularly egregious in the way he's talked about on here) a guy who was plain terrible in the last game against Manchester United.
That's not the case at all. There's threads for VVD, Mac Allister, Szoboszlai on here. Create one on Gravenberch if you care so much.Fair enough. I don't really care about him or this thread very much, just think it's a bit strange how he is the only Liverpool player that gets shit on. You don't see a Gravenberch thread going on in here after looking like an elite midfielder last season. I guess people weren't a fan of how hyped he was and loving how he turned out to be a lot worse for Liverpool than expected.
It's not when he doesn't take set pieces. He has like 20 corners for Liverpool, and Bruno Fernandes has around 90 for us. That's a lot of "chances" there. You could also look at xA instead of big chances created, where he is 13th, so really not as bad as it's made out to be. If they get a competent manager, he can turn it around because his talent is not in question. At Wirtz' age, Bruno was playing for Sampdoria, so it's not like he's finished or something.
Yeah, there's generally a theme with opposition players that get shat on. It's either they're hyped up as the best in their class or they cost a monumental amount of money. Sometimes both. Wirtz hits both.That's not the case at all. There's threads for VVD, Mac Allister, Szoboszlai on here. Create one on Gravenberch if you care so much.
And in some cases, they have extremely vehement defenders that antagonise more responses.Yeah, there's generally a theme with opposition players that get shat on. It's either they're hyped up as the best in their class or they cost a monumental amount of money. Sometimes both. Wirtz hits both.
I don't care, I just said that I find it strange, just a simple opinion. Mac Allister thread is 16 pages, Wirtz has 165. I get that he cost a lot, but he is not some asshole player who chose the price tag himself.That's not the case at all. There's threads for VVD, Mac Allister, Szoboszlai on here. Create one on Gravenberch if you care so much.
Nothing out of the extraordinary apart from his first full season and this current season imo, especially for a guy on penalties and all free kicks / corners most of the times. Put Wirtz on penalties and a few extra assists on corners and he hits close to the average of Bruno in his first season which is rightly considered pretty awful by most people.Well he has always produced goals and assists, regardless of quality around him, which is the job of an attacking midfielder.
Yeah and I disagreed with most of those points back then as well, so indeed better to just give it a rest. I'm not trying to shit on Bruno or downplay his performances or impact for United by the way if it comes across that way.That’s why he’s used as a comparison for an extremely expensive player that plays the same position, in the same league, and in this case, for a poorly performing side. I find it bizarre that the comparison needs any explanation at all, particularly when there has been discussion in this very thread about how Wirtz is being let down by his teammates. But again, I’m pretty sure this was all covered the last time this discussion came up.
Thats irrelevant though. It seems quite obvious to me why an extremely hyped player that is one of the most expensive transfers of all time would be scrutinised / mocked more than a mid tier signing.I don't care, I just said that I find it strange, just a simple opinion. Mac Allister thread is 16 pages, Wirtz has 165. I get that he cost a lot, but he is not some asshole player who chose the price tag himself.
I would agree with that, but some just seem overly invested in this. @Posh Red made a good point about how Wirtz has so many vehement, aggressive defenders so sometimes it seems like it's more getting back at posters rather than the player himself. Any way, he is playing poorly in relation to his price tag, that's a good thing being a Liverpool player, let's hope all the trash talk doesn't come back to bite us in the ass. Would be typical Liverpool that Wirtz becomes their Bruno next season and for the next 10 years with how much luck they have with transfers.Thats irrelevant though. It seems quite obvious to me why an extremely hyped player that is one of the most expensive transfers of all time would be scrutinised / mocked more than a mid tier signing.
Yes, and I think also there is the point that he's joined the season after they romped to the title and this season they're way off the pace. Obviously other factors like Salah and VVD dropping off haven't helped but he was meant to come in and lift the level higher and he hasn't even helped maintain it.I would agree with that, but some just seem overly invested in this. @Posh Red made a good point about how Wirtz has so many vehement, aggressive defenders so sometimes it seems like it's more getting back at posters rather than the player himself. Any way, he is playing poorly in relation to his price tag, that's a good thing being a Liverpool player, let's hope all the trash talk doesn't come back to bite us in the ass. Would be typical Liverpool that Wirtz becomes their Bruno next season and for the next 10 years with how much luck they have with transfers.
He's just been the obvious best of a very bad bunch in several seasons imo, but I'll take your word for it.
It's not what's been said, back then and now it sounds like "we are best placed to judge Wirtz' performances because Bruno plays at United". The only apt comparison (and criticism on Wirtz) would be that Bruno has had a way of still looking decent even when United were at their absolute worst, which is currently lacking for Wirtz, but they are not remotely close to being at the same point in their career right now so even that would be quite harsh to me.
And this is definitely not me trying to justify or defend Wirtz' performances by the way, I'll caveat that he simply hasn't shown enough in his debut season and was very likely worse than Bruno at United in his first season (which I can't remember anything of).
Nothing out of the extraordinary apart from his first full season and this current season imo, especially for a guy on penalties and all free kicks / corners most of the times. Put Wirtz on penalties and a few extra assists on corners and he hits close to the average of Bruno in his first season which is rightly considered pretty awful by most people.
I read someone on this very forum say that we should offer Konate £400k a week. So take some opinions with a pinch, or a bucket, of salt.I've seen this argument before and I really fail to see how that's relevant. It's like saying PSG fans are in a better position to criticize underperforming wingers than Tottenham fans because their wingers are amongst the best in the world.
It's also pretty pointless to compare current Bruno to first-year-in-the-league Wirtz. Bruno was even older than Wirtz currently is when he arrived in England a good while ago now, and the revisionism is pretty damn strong if you think he's been "consistently brilliant from the moment he arrived". Even on here there's been plenty of posters who have wanted him gone at different points in his United career, if not for his performances, then for his childish on-field antics.
And Wirtz was 5th in the league this season in that very category if the poster on the previous page is to be believed. Stats without context mean nothing.You really need to fact check before typing nonsense.
Bruno has created the most chances in the league since he joined United. He has exceptional assist stats across every season, the only reason he doesn't have even more assists is because of the poor attackers he has had in front of him.
He's just been the obvious best of a very bad bunch in several seasons
I'll caveat that he simply hasn't shown enough in his debut season and was very likely worse than Bruno at United in his first season (which I can't remember anything of).
Nothing out of the extraordinary apart from his first full season and this current season imo, especially for a guy on penalties and all free kicks / corners most of the times. Put Wirtz on penalties and a few extra assists on corners and he hits close to the average of Bruno in his first season which is rightly considered pretty awful by most people.
*Was*What ist gebrochen