ClaytonBlackmoorLeftPeg
Full Member
- Joined
- May 22, 2017
- Messages
- 13,122
Unlucky to be up against the new manager bounce.
wouldn’t take anything from this game
wouldn’t take anything from this game
Or, his own ‘new manager bounce’ is coming to an end.Unlucky to be up against the new manager bounce.
wouldn’t take anything from this game
Lampard actually started pretty craply. Can you get a "new manager bounce" when it;s not a new manager?Or, his own ‘new manager bounce’ is coming to an end.
They did get Kovacic, Pulisic as well as being back Mount and Abraham.Second half of season will show us if he’s up to it.
Top four would be a great achievement considering rookie season and not allowed to sign anyone in the summer after losing their best player.
No doubt Spurs will finish above Chelsea and I would not be surprised if we finish above them as well.Spurs will probably nab fourth if Chelsea don't.
I was one of them. For me, that thought was mainly colored by the fact that Hazard had left and you had the transfer ban (summer and winter). But just going through the squad again, aside from the defense, Chelsea had the best squad outside City and Liverpool.https://www.redcafe.net/threads/predict-the-top-6-in-order.449619/
Lampard doing a lot better than the vast majority of you all thought so far. A fair few had us outside the top 6!
Amazed by the number of people who had City 1st. I don’t think I replied to that thread but I was saying Liverpool would win it this year since the tail end of last season..https://www.redcafe.net/threads/predict-the-top-6-in-order.449619/
Lampard doing a lot better than the vast majority of you all thought so far. A fair few had us outside the top 6!
Totally agreed. We went toe to toe vs. Liverpool twice and gave Man City at the Etihad a serious go of it as well.I knew we had losing 3-1 to Everton in us, to be fair. It wasn't even as bad as the Valencia game (I still don't even know what that was). As for people saying that we're shit against good teams, I was actually very pleased with some of our performances against some very good teams despite losing - sounds almost Arsenalish, but oh well.
You say as if this is something certain - that Lampard is not superior to Ole - and that it's something everyone should 'understand'. Personally I'm much more impressed by Lampard based on the first glance of his managerial career (at Chelsea). But it is only a first glance. How he builds on that early start and can keep refining and perfecting a style of play, chooses player in the transfer window and is as a motivator, all remain to be seen.I would say that his problem is similar to Ole. Young squad and results will go up and down. What I hope is that people talking about system Lampard has "implemented" try for once to understand that Lampard is not superior to Solskjaer.
OGS has been managing for more than a decade, Lampard is not even halfway through his second year.I would say that his problem is similar to Ole. Young squad and results will go up and down. What I hope is that people talking about system Lampard has "implemented" try for once to understand that Lampard is not superior to Solskjaer.
fixed that for youhttps://www.redcafe.net/threads/predict-the-top-6-in-order.449619/
The kids are doing a lot better than the vast majority of you all thought so far. A fair few had us outside the top 6!
My post was just pointing out that Lampard is in similar situation as Ole and results are going up and down.OGS has been managing for more than a decade, Lampard is not even halfway through his second year.
I really don't see why they get compared so often.
It is certain. Lampard is not better (not saying that he is worse either). Every manager coaching young teams goes through some tough period. My point was that those putting Lampard high might look at last weeks and realise that Lampard maybe isn't who they thought he was. Just a good manager, like Ole. Working with young players and rebuliding team.You say as if this is something certain - that Lampard is not superior to Ole - and that it's something everyone should 'understand'. Personally I'm much more impressed by Lampard based on the first glance of his managerial career (at Chelsea). But it is only a first glance. How he builds on that early start and can keep refining and perfecting a style of play, chooses player in the transfer window and is as a motivator, all remain to be seen.
How random (and hence by nature, uncertain). Truth is, there is no certainty when judging managers who are inexperienced at this level. Based on their peformances this season, though, Lampard has been far more impressive. How that certainly shows that they are of the same level is strange. If anything Lampard has imposed his ideas (or has better ideas) on his team better.It is certain. Lampard is not better (not saying that he is worse either). Every manager coaching young teams goes through some tough period. My point was that those putting Lampard high might look at last weeks and realise that Lampard maybe isn't who they thought he was. Just a good manager, like Ole. Working with young players and rebuliding team.
Peformances are similar. Up and down. And his form lately is far from impressive although I understand as I said that he has young squad. And being beaten twice this year by a comparing manager is impressive?How random (and hence by nature, uncertain). Truth is, there is no certainty when judging managers who are inexperienced at this level. Based on their peformances this season, though, Lampard has been far more impressive. How that certainly shows that they are of the same level is strange. If anything Lampard has imposed his ideas (or has better ideas) on his team better.
As I've said before since for both it's early, there is little to no certainty. There can only be views one way or another. And for this level we don't really know of either is a 'good manager'. Ole has performed like anything but a good manager.
Chelsea's peformances have been much better. That's why they're far ahead of us in the table. Needless to say I'd like for them to slump and us to go on a great run. But every team that has 'ups and downs' isn't the same. Chelsea have been better and that's why their manager isn't the one many fans want out. Time for that to change of course.Peformances are similar. Up and down. And his form lately is far from impressive although I understand as I said that he has young squad. And being beaten twice this year by a comparing manager is impressive?
Hmmmm I'm not so sure about this you know..Chelsea's peformances have been much better. That's why they're far ahead of us in the table. Needless to say I'd like for them to slump and us to go on a great run. But every team that has 'ups and downs' isn't the same. Chelsea have been better and that's why their manager isn't the one many fans want out. Time for that to change of course.
I mean, Everton have beaten Chelsea twice in a row in that fixture. It's an irrelevant point to make.
He should be doing better than us with the experience in the squad at his disposal.Hmmmm I'm not so sure about this you know..
Very similar to United imo
now its time to w*nk over Arteta here in caf ..Fat fraud.
https://www.redcafe.net/threads/mikel-arteta-arsenal-manager.452009/post-25195856now its time to w*nk over Arteta here in caf ..
Rashford has been carrying Ole's team at the age of 22 and Fred was never as terrible as he was made out to be, he cost 50m after all. Who else has progressed? we're still leaking goals galore at the back despite him spending over 100m on Maguire and AWB.He should be doing better than us with the experience in the squad at his disposal.
He's an average manager at best. The difference between him and Ole is that Ole, despite the cafs overral negatitvity, has clearly progressed our squad and players are doing better under him than Mourinho. Players are getting worse under Frank and the teams form is dropping off.
You can't really think this. I'm mean both teams are doing bad, but that's so biased it's like Ole's mum wrote it.He should be doing better than us with the experience in the squad at his disposal.
He's an average manager at best. The difference between him and Ole is that Ole, despite the cafs overral negatitvity, has clearly progressed our squad and players are doing better under him than Mourinho. Players are getting worse under Frank and the teams form is dropping off.
Hahathat's easy to say now.He should be doing better than us with the experience in the squad at his disposal.
Lamps has the better foundation and squad. He also has less pressure being at a smaller club.Lamps is in his second year managing. Ole has been managing for a decade
Winning titlesLamps is in his second year managing. Ole has been managing for a decade
I think both managers can point to improving performances by players under their management, for United it's hard to pick many players who haven't played better this season than last but then we've had a much bigger rotation in the squad than Chelsea so improvement in the likes of Fred for example could just be down to more game time now that the likes of Herrera are no longer around than anything Ole has done per-say. For Lampard he's got more out of Abraham than I expected he could and then the likes of Jorginho and Kovacic look better this season but is that just because they're now acclimatised with the PL now?You can't really think this. I'm mean both teams are doing bad, but that's so biased it's like Ole's mum wrote it.
Come on you must even see that this is not an impartial post. When a manager gets rid of a 75m top scorer, and puts trust in a young striker who shows by far and away his best ever form and a way more rounded game, you don't get to say he's 'carrying' the team. Somebody has to be top scorer and somebody has to be the best player. Solskjaer set up a team to get out of a player he trusted and both got rewarded.Rashford has been carrying Ole's team at the age of 22 and Fred was never as terrible as he was made out to be, he cost 50m after all. Who else has progressed? we're still leaking goals galore at the back despite him spending over 100m on Maguire and AWB.
Lampard also isn't good enough.
99% of the nation this summer said we would be mid table at best. The lineup at Old Trafford was so mercilessly mocked one United fan tweeted "4-0 atleast or we should send Ole back to Norway".Lamps has the better foundation and squad.