horsechoker
Sailor vee, this is a right off.
Lamps managed to get a goal, give him a 5 year contractGarnacho should have made that 5…
Lamps managed to get a goal, give him a 5 year contractGarnacho should have made that 5…
Only because Gary Neville managed in Spain.Is he the worst manager the league has ever seen?
To be fair his first spell wasn’t that bad… But you gotta wonder what he’s been doing during his unemployment... He f***d up Everton’s season and he should never have taken this hopeless Chelsea gig…Only because Gary Neville managed in Spain.
Possibly out of managers who have had a decent number of games. He has been awful and he has perhaps thought going back to Chelsea was a free hit. He knew the season was done but maybe thought they would pick up a few wins as well as lose a few. Instead going back has completely obliterated his career. Unless he drops down the divisions or goes abroad, he is finished as a PL manager.Is he the worst manager the league has ever seen?
Negative vibesNo structure, no game plan, no instructions, no adjustments, no discipline. Just vibes.
How did you concede a goal to us? Shambles at Man United.How have we not scored 13 goals passed them?
Because you have one very very talented player, who unfortunately won’t be playing for Chelsea next season.How did you concede a goal to us? Shambles at Man United.
Not having a clue what stats you are talking about, I'm gonna say absolutely yes.Are those stats for real?
He had 35% win rate, that's some 3x better than Lampard.Only because Gary Neville managed in Spain.
To be fair the only person that scored isn’t even owned by Chelsea.How did you concede a goal to us? Shambles at Man United.
Neville was a meme for years after his stint at Valencia, but his record was 10 wins, 7 draws, 11 losses.Only because Gary Neville managed in Spain.
Never underestimate English football's love of rubbish English managers.I almost feel sorry for him. This has been a horrible season for him. I doubt he will ever get a job in the PL again.
Wiki says 3 in 16 which works out as around 18%. He was at Valencia though so had more to work with then EvertonHe had 35% win rate, that's some 3x better than Lampard.
His overall record says 35%. Lampard had much better resources than Valencia.Wiki says 3 in 16 which works out as around 18%. He was at Valencia though so had more to work with then Everton
How so? Valencia were in the Champs league at the time?His overall record says 35%. Lampard had much better resources than Valencia.
I thought he had been on one for the last 12 monthsHis interview is a car crash.
Think he needs a break from management.
Should never have been sacked. That decision alone is what makes me confident Chelsea will be no threat again next season with the current ownership making the decisions that they are.It’s easy to forget this season started with Tuchel as manager.
One of the things I’ve seen mentioned is that he tries to press but doesn’t know how to coach it properly. Nothing worse than committing but not doing it right, just leaves big gaps. United could have had 6 or 7 easily today. In his first Chelsea spell they at least scored goals but this time they can’t even do that. For that though I’d blame possibly the most bloated and unbalanced squad assembled by a big teams in PL history, which was there before he took over.What is it that makes Lampard such a bad manager?