It really baffles me how people can't see this. Even if we sign a new CM/DM, it's not Fred that'll be getting dropped for him. Despite his erratic passing, he's still too crucial to our game. He's the only one that presses, harries, recovers the ball. He was on the pitch for 75 mins and had the most presses, tackles and blocks. We went from 70% possession (in last 10 minutes) to 40% after he got taken off.
He still had a bad game. He can and should be doing better. But the fact people are so dismissive of what he brings is just so bizarre.
Not particularly about Fred but each season if not successful, there is always a scapegoat that fans believe we would be better 'if'. We replace them, still no change and we move onto the next player/position. I would argue and it's a bold statement, more than any other player, if Fred plays well we win football matches. I think Ole and the coaching staff know this too. For a player that's seen so poorly, his best performances for Utd have been against the best teams in Europe and Prem.
It's all about confidence and when he starts poorly, he over compensates then tries too hard to fix it. He often needs half time to reset. I think sometimes the eye test isn't always right and like most players, you look for the things they do wrong whilst ignoring the things they do right.
My issue is we shouldn't need a Fred in the starting 11 but it's kind of a reflection of where the team is at. Like how we used Park, Fred has a skillset for specific games, ironically the bigger ones......