- Joined
- Oct 30, 2018
- Messages
- 19
- Supports
- Liverpool fc
Kind of wonder what spurs fans would do! Swap Jose for Ole?
Start a new thread then. 0 relevance to this one.
Start a new thread then. 0 relevance to this one.
Top priority seems to have been to clear out those who aren’t giving 100%. Whatever you think of Pereira, Young and Jones, they always go all-in.Why ask them? Better ask the one who keeps them here...
I think its amazing that Ole has bagged a job like Man Utd given his previous lack of managerial experience/success. It is further compounded by having coaches like Carrick who also have zero experience.Would you like him managing your club - not counting his affiliation to us. I'm just curious as I've heard many people say he's the worst manager in the entire league, even among our fanbase, I'm curious to see how he's viewed elsewhere.
Top priority should be to clear out the ones who are not good enough and convince the rest that if they give you 100% you'll take them places. Might as well replace Pogba with Longstaff and call it a win. That's my take on it.Top priority seems to have been to clear out those who aren’t giving 100%. Whatever you think of Pereira, Young and Jones, they always go all-in.
More irrelevance. Well done.
What does that even mean and how is it relevant?He’s a manc.
I honestly don’t see any reason why anyone from the top 5 leagues and Championship would take him at their team. Anyone apart some percentage of our fan base can see his true colours, without being blinded by a goal in the UCL final. For any other fans, he is a norwegian league level manager who should be nowhere near the top or mid tier jobs. I think even comparisons with Steve Bruce are unwarranted as I believe he is a better manager. Truth is, all other managers in the EPL worked their way there, while Ole got here through nepotism, that’s why I prefer to stay rational rather than being deluded thinking he is not the worst of the bunch. You should not forget that managing in the premier league by merit puts you probably in the top 100 managers in the world, so yeah, that’s why I think it’s not unreasonable to believe that a Molde manager is the worst.
So you are telling me that the Molde manager who happened to be a club legend got here on merit?
Bolded is nonsense. As far as I am aware, there are no official qualifications beyond obtaining your badges, to be a head coach. Lampard's appointment could be called nepotism as well.
He's not doing well at the moment but nepotism isn't the right term.
What is the official standard below which an appointment can be gauged to be a nepotic one? Please tell.So you are telling me that the Molde manager who happened to be a club legend got here on merit?
Bingo... this has been my opinion for a long time now, I get accused of being an Ole fanboy for making the same point.We got Lampard in who had similar lack of experience. Interesting comparison after first 13 games.
I think it's good you're playing more youth again and less mercenaries. Main issue as Utd is the owners and Woodward imo. The worst big club at transfers, always going for players who just signed a contract, so end up paying 2-3x what is needed if planned properly.
You're better off building for the long term, what you really need is new management on the football side and new owners to implement that.
Not sure it matters who is the manager much until those problems fixed.
Are the managers in the Norwegian league usually in contention for the United job? Or jobs at any other big club? I would say no. Maybe that’s an accurate unofficial standard.What is the official standard below which an appointment can be gauged to be a nepotic one? Please tell.
Kind of obvious. Would you take an Lfc mgr on your club. The question was would you take him on your club. That’s the first reason. Second is he’s just not good enough for your club is he? So why would we want him even if we had a floundering mgr of our own. It’s not like he’s SAF and even him I wouldn’t have taken if he decided to quit at an earlier time.What does that even mean and how is it relevant?
Too much sand. The poster with whom I had argument understood the point but it’s too hard for you, maybe because it’s not a post criticising Ole alone. In case you are still struggling it’s not a post supporting Ole.More irrelevance. Well done.
You wouldn't know would you?What's a non-genuine question?
Genuine question.
Nobody is struggling other than you bleating on about players in a thread about the manager and then crying about irrelevance. Find another thread for it.Too much sand. The poster with whom I had argument understood the point but it’s too hard for you, maybe because it’s not a post criticising Ole alone. In case you are still struggling it’s not a post supporting Ole.
Again this is also irrelevant to this thread and the reason for this is you are just struggling to get simple point.
I agree with pretty everything you have said and just want to add that I also feel PSG was a massive turning point too.I can understand why Utd's board felt they had to appoint Ole after the start he made. The turning point in that early run was the away success to spurs, when Pogba played that stunning pass to Rashford. Spurs battered Utd that day and should have won. Had Utd lost that game I doubt Ole would be your manager. It would have stopped the winning run much earlier and likely meant a more measured approach from board and fans. But the run continued and pressure from media and some fans made it inevitable he would get the job. However if I remember right the appointment was made on the back of two defeats. So why not just press pause and say hang on we're going to wait till the end of the season? It wasn't like Madrid or Barca were hovering to sign Ole up. There's no doubt the manager is far from the only problem at Utd but it appears that there isn't much chance of change in structure or personnel off the pitch right now. So why not employ the best available manager to at least maximise your chances of success.
That person is definitely not Ole. Like us, when things went wrong with Kenny, red tinted glasses and the love for a club legend are clouding what should be a straightforward decision. It's a third of the way through the season and Utd are closer to the bottom 3 than the top 4 after a decent spend in the summer. Not all Utd fans are still loyal to him though and I was surprised to see some suggesting Rodgers or even Rafa! That would be like us in the '90s wanting Ron Atkinson. Now that Poch is available who is a much better manager, with a progressive style of play, who improves players and has good PL experience I think Utd will rue not making the change if he ends up at Madrid or PSG. Of course as an LFC fan I would like Ole to stay on for at least another couple of seasons. But I'll be amazed if he is your manager next season and when he does go I doubt another top club anywhere in Europe will consider him when a vacancy arises.
Too much sand .Nobody is struggling other than you bleating on about players in a thread about the manager and then crying about irrelevance. Find another thread for it.
Well played.You wouldn't know would you?
That’s silly. Ole managed to get a point against the so called best manager in the league, where everyone else failed so do tell how you would interpret that.You need to remember that many football fans are deluded.
There are many on this very forum who absolutely believe that Ole is doing a good job and will grow into the role.
So, who knows, there may be rival fans who rate him highly and might actually want him.
Like many, I rated him as the worst manager in the EPL, barring Steve Bruce (who most rated as the worst). Ole unfortunately, took the "worst manager in the EPL" mantle, when S.Bruce's Newcastle played and beat us.
I think it's quite sad that we now have personnel in our team who are so bad that no other team in the league (even the teams battling relegation and are rock bottom), would take them.
For Woodward, Ole was a great appointment, as it allows him to save money and drop down the table without any ill-effects.
Fans would be furious if under Moyes, LVG, Jose, we were in 9th place. But under Ole, it's fine.
What the feck is wrong with you?Obviously no one would take him. He brought a team into relegation. He’s a manc. And he’s struggling.
Thank you. Quite happy with that one. Not to brag but it works on 3 levels very well.Well played.
Really difficult to evaluate OGS - but that has been the case for every manager after Fergie.Would you like him managing your club - not counting his affiliation to us. I'm just curious as I've heard many people say he's the worst manager in the entire league, even among our fanbase, I'm curious to see how he's viewed elsewhere.
Fergie put a word in on his behalf, that's how the clown ended up here.What is the official standard below which an appointment can be gauged to be a nepotic one? Please tell.