Glazers to generate $400m by selling 24m Class A shares (apparently not)

manutddjw

Full Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2010
Messages
3,700
Location
Canada
I could see them seriously considering walking away. With their leveraged buy out and putting very little of their own money into the club they could leave with at least 2 billion profit for what has been a 14 year investment.

Why would they want to leave? To me it’s simple. Football has changed. Players cost a fortune, and player contracts keep going up and most of all they lost their security blanket in Sir Alex. They had to invest very little and would reap huge rewards financially. Now they have to invest a lot and those rewards are not guaranteed. If this continues going this way they might not get an offer as high as they can now.
 

Redjazz

Full Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2010
Messages
455
Location
Scattered
It's just a registration statement saying that the club might raise money by various means and the Glazers might sell some shares. Nothing more. It's a recurring filing.
 

Bastian

Full Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2015
Messages
18,525
Supports
Mejbri
They've neglected the team to such a degree that our midfield resembles a Championship midfield without Pogba, which is criminal. They've neglected our attack to the same degree. And the only possible conclusion I can come to after weighing up their negligence, is that that they're getting ready to jump ship.
They might just be doing it for the laughs.

Haven’t read the original filing but 400m USD represents 16% of the total market cap of the club. That to me is pretty clearly a sign to invite bids for the club.

Edit: on second thought, that is about the amount of debt the club has at the moment. Glazers could be trying to use the funds to buy back their debt. Potentially could just be a ploy to refinance the debt at more favorable terms. I am drunk, will look again tomorrow.
Cheers. I doubt they will clear the debt or fix the stadium at any point.
 

MrPooni

New Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2012
Messages
2,423
This needs to be added to the title:
It's just a registration statement saying that the club might raise money by various means and the Glazers might sell some shares. Nothing more. It's a recurring filing.
 

The Boy

Full Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2014
Messages
4,336
Supports
Brighton and Hove Albion
ah yes right you are - so they are just selling more of the same non-voting shares which is why the price is the same

interesting timing though and will no doubt lead to all sorts of rumours about them wanting to exit -
Is this the beginning of their exit?
These two posts right next to each other just made me chuckle #Glexit
 

Madzik_92

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Aug 24, 2019
Messages
134
I'm sorry i don't understand what the shares all means. Can someone explain it easier terms. Will it means the Glazers gonna sell the club?
 

MDFC Manager

Full Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2005
Messages
24,184
Well, that's Sancho out the way.

Seriously, though, money isn't the problem here, its how we spend it. Once we sort that out, then we'll be back in the right direction, although obviously other major factors come into play when aspiring to be at the top again.
Exactly this.
 

Nou_Camp99

what would Souness do?
Joined
Apr 1, 2013
Messages
10,274
I'm sorry i don't understand what the shares all means. Can someone explain it easier terms. Will it means the Glazers gonna sell the club?
What's so hard to understand about it? They are selling off shares to raise capital but those shares are pretty much worthless when it comes to having a say at the club. They are purely for people to make a quick buck and make the Glazers richer essentially.

This doesn't make the sale of the club any closer basically.
 

Skills

Snitch
Joined
Jan 17, 2012
Messages
42,055
What's so hard to understand about it? They are selling off shares to raise capital but those shares are pretty much worthless when it comes to having a say at the club. They are purely for people to make a quick buck and make the Glazers richer essentially.

This doesn't make the sale of the club any closer basically.
Isn't that a good thing? Because usually the one say shareholders want to have is that the business needs to do whatever it can to protect the value of their investment. That means cutting costs and increasing profit.

If I was a shareholder, I'd be wanting the club to curb it's spending massively considering the way the club has wasted money in the last few years in poor transfers and a massive wage bill.
 

Nou_Camp99

what would Souness do?
Joined
Apr 1, 2013
Messages
10,274
Isn't that a good thing? Because usually the one say shareholders want to have is that the business needs to do whatever it can to protect the value of their investment. That means cutting costs and increasing profit.

If I was a shareholder, I'd be wanting the club to curb it's spending massively considering the way the club has wasted money in the last few years in poor transfers and a massive wage bill.
You missed the bit where he said good for us. It's not. It's good for them. That's what I'm getting at. Shares with little to no voting rights doesn't put any pressure on them at all.

This isn't a good thing for us.
 

7even

Resident moaner, hypocrite and moron
Joined
Jun 4, 2006
Messages
4,218
Location
Lifetime vacation
From my experience this is a classical corporate “have your cake and eat it too”!

Using a timeline it started in the summer 2018. I assume the owners gave the board instructions to;

a) reduce investments
b) cutting costs
c) shifting focus from increasing revenues to maximize profits

It all make sense.

In the summer 2018 we saw Woodward using the handbrake regarding buying new expensive players. He started to shifting high incomes against low or median incomes.

Mourinho (high) against Solksjaer (low median)
Lukaku and Sanchez (high) against James and Greenwood (low)
Fellaini and Herrera (median) against McTominay and Pereira (low)
Valencia, Darmian and Smalling (median) against Tuanzebe and Dalot (low)

Selling assets 2019

Lukaku
Fellaini

Maguire and AWB was a huge long term investments t but both are English and on relatively speaking median incomes. So that also make sense in this scenario. We need to blend young academy players with proven quality.

Next summer (2020) we will probably see the departure of Matic, Young and one of Jones/Rojo. All of them are on median incomes. It’s possible we sell Pogba (high income/huge asset) and reinvest some of it in younger players with low or median incomes.

Yesterday the owners opened the door to sell more shares. From my perspective that’s the next logical step if they want to “cash in”. We have already heard the rumors about a Saudi takeover. I assume more rumors will come.

We saw from last financial report that we estimate a lower turnover in 2020. The owners are scared that this will reduce the value of the club. That why we so dramatically lowering our costs in order to keeping our profits high. Typical behavior of defensive owners.

Shifting Mou against Ole was another indicator. From a vocal and controversial character to a loyal and diplomatic person who is (over) positive and can follow corporate instructions. On top of that a ex player and a legend who has the fan base behind him. Bingo!

Next crucial indicator will be how we handle Paul Pogba. Selling him and mission is completed.
 

Skills

Snitch
Joined
Jan 17, 2012
Messages
42,055
You missed the bit where he said good for us. It's not. It's good for them. That's what I'm getting at. Shares with little to no voting rights doesn't put any pressure on them at all.

This isn't a good thing for us.
I don't understand how them selling off voting rights would be good for us? What kind of people do you think those shares word end up in the hands of anyway?
 

GBBQ

Full Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2012
Messages
4,807
Location
Ireland
Its not gonna happen lads. United is a cash cow to the Glazers and until some multi billionaire makes an offer they can't refuse they will not sell. Even if there were voting rights, they'd never make enough available to actually put their decision making at risk and the eventual buyers of said votes are unlikely to be football men anyway.

The only hope is that any shares sold are done so to at least partly make funds available for a significant one-off investment in the squad next summer.
 

Skills

Snitch
Joined
Jan 17, 2012
Messages
42,055
Any savvy investors think now is a good time to buy?
Or you're better off waiting till next year, once we finish 2 consecutive seasons outside of the top 4 and have to write off a chunk of the Adidas income? That should crash the share price a fair bit?
 

Massive Spanner

Give Mason Mount a chance!
Joined
Jul 2, 2014
Messages
28,050
Location
Tool shed
Any savvy investors think now is a good time to buy?
Or you're better off waiting till next year, once we finish 2 consecutive seasons outside of the top 4 and have to write off a chunk of the Adidas income? That should crash the share price a fair bit?
Wait for Brexit, most likely. By then £3bn will be equivalent to a dime.
 

Skills

Snitch
Joined
Jan 17, 2012
Messages
42,055
Wait for Brexit, most likely. By then £3bn will be equivalent to a dime.
Is Brexit really going to have a massive effect on the business of the club? Or will it just be the downturn in economy, which will mean less money for people to spend on season tickets/sky & TV income?
 

Tarrou

Full Member
Joined
May 13, 2013
Messages
25,609
Location
Sydney
It's just a registration statement saying that the club might raise money by various means and the Glazers might sell some shares. Nothing more. It's a recurring filing.
well that killed my buzz pretty quick
 

wolvored

Full Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2016
Messages
9,931
only a small amount of the shares were previously listed - it was around $300m at the time and sold at $14 per share IIRC.

They are just selling more of their personal holding into the market.
I assume they will be disappointed that the price isnt higher after all these years, my guess is that one or two of the Glazer sibilings wants out.
I read a few years ago it was a 50 50 split. 3 wanted to sell up but Joel and abram talked them out of it. Maybe its waivering
 

KM

I’m afraid I just blue myself
Joined
Sep 18, 2008
Messages
49,737
It's just a registration statement saying that the club might raise money by various means and the Glazers might sell some shares. Nothing more. It's a recurring filing.
This needs to be emphasised more in the thread. This is a nothing update.
 

Fosu-Mens

Full Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2016
Messages
4,101
Location
Fred | 2019/20 Performances
Its not gonna happen lads. United is a cash cow to the Glazers and until some multi billionaire makes an offer they can't refuse they will not sell. Even if there were voting rights, they'd never make enough available to actually put their decision making at risk and the eventual buyers of said votes are unlikely to be football men anyway.

The only hope is that any shares sold are done so to at least partly make funds available for a significant one-off investment in the squad next summer.
It will happen sooner or later when the mismanagement of this club has caused it to deteriorate further. The new tv-deals might extent the profitability of this club by 2-3 season but with no CL-money, saturated commerical opportunities and long expensive deals on a number of players will make us less profitable in the future. And if they do not invest in the squad each summer then we are more likely to fight a relegation battle than for a top 4 spot.

The shares sold, and they will sell them, will be pocketed by the Glazers.
 

JPB

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Dec 5, 2018
Messages
701
What if they sell and we get someone even worse? What if the new owners drive up the dept again, the same way the Glazers did when they first came? I would like them gone too. But everyone seems to think if they sell it will be an automatic improvement. It could easily get even worse.
 

Catt

Ole's at the wheel!
Joined
Mar 10, 2013
Messages
27,630
Location
Norway
What if they sell and we get someone even worse? What if the new owners drive up the dept again, the same way the Glazers did when they first came? I would like them gone too. But everyone seems to think if they sell it will be an automatic improvement. It could easily get even worse.
Doesn't matte to some as they seemingly think the Glazer's are as bad as it gets. They're obviously not though.
 

stubie

Full Member
Joined
May 13, 2009
Messages
9,683
Location
UK
What if they sell and we get someone even worse? What if the new owners drive up the dept again, the same way the Glazers did when they first came? I would like them gone too. But everyone seems to think if they sell it will be an automatic improvement. It could easily get even worse.
Unless the Saudi's buy the club this would probably be the case
 

Adisa

likes to take afvanadva wothowi doubt
Joined
Nov 28, 2014
Messages
50,359
Location
Birmingham
I always think, better the devil you know.
Apart from the moral issues, someone in SA might be worth £50bn today and be in prison tomorrow. That's how volatile the place is ubder that madman.
If people look at the last six years, out operating profits are actually quite low compared to some of our rivals like Liverpool and Spurs. We actually do invest in the team. Just do it badly. Most of our problems seems to be organisational on the football side not a lack of investment.
 

Jezpeza

Full Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2018
Messages
2,018
People who own Class A shares are selling them off. They don't need or want all of their Class A shares and are going to make a lot of money. Whether or not it goes back towards the club or debt repayment, who knows. Either way, the shareholders are leveraging the club in an effort to make immediate capital for themselves. It's important to know who exactly are these selling shareholders of Class A shares and if they actually have any club ownership.
I’d assume the glazers. whoever buys it its an investment obviously - buying into future sale price and dividends. Interesting to see if the money goes on the stadium or debt or players. But doubt it
 

red thru&thru

Full Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2004
Messages
7,657
From my experience this is a classical corporate “have your cake and eat it too”!

Using a timeline it started in the summer 2018. I assume the owners gave the board instructions to;

a) reduce investments
b) cutting costs
c) shifting focus from increasing revenues to maximize profits

It all make sense.

In the summer 2018 we saw Woodward using the handbrake regarding buying new expensive players. He started to shifting high incomes against low or median incomes.

Mourinho (high) against Solksjaer (low median)
Lukaku and Sanchez (high) against James and Greenwood (low)
Fellaini and Herrera (median) against McTominay and Pereira (low)
Valencia, Darmian and Smalling (median) against Tuanzebe and Dalot (low)

Selling assets 2019

Lukaku
Fellaini

Maguire and AWB was a huge long term investments t but both are English and on relatively speaking median incomes. So that also make sense in this scenario. We need to blend young academy players with proven quality.

Next summer (2020) we will probably see the departure of Matic, Young and one of Jones/Rojo. All of them are on median incomes. It’s possible we sell Pogba (high income/huge asset) and reinvest some of it in younger players with low or median incomes.

Yesterday the owners opened the door to sell more shares. From my perspective that’s the next logical step if they want to “cash in”. We have already heard the rumors about a Saudi takeover. I assume more rumors will come.

We saw from last financial report that we estimate a lower turnover in 2020. The owners are scared that this will reduce the value of the club. That why we so dramatically lowering our costs in order to keeping our profits high. Typical behavior of defensive owners.

Shifting Mou against Ole was another indicator. From a vocal and controversial character to a loyal and diplomatic person who is (over) positive and can follow corporate instructions. On top of that a ex player and a legend who has the fan base behind him. Bingo!

Next crucial indicator will be how we handle Paul Pogba. Selling him and mission is completed.

Great post. Thank you.
 

Rood

nostradamus like gloater
Scout
Joined
Jun 21, 2008
Messages
21,270
Location
@United_Hour
It's just a registration statement saying that the club might raise money by various means and the Glazers might sell some shares. Nothing more. It's a recurring filing.
The club files this every year?

First time I've seen it, but then I'm not looking TBF
 

Jezpeza

Full Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2018
Messages
2,018
From my experience this is a classical corporate “have your cake and eat it too”!

Using a timeline it started in the summer 2018. I assume the owners gave the board instructions to;

a) reduce investments
b) cutting costs
c) shifting focus from increasing revenues to maximize profits

It all make sense.

In the summer 2018 we saw Woodward using the handbrake regarding buying new expensive players. He started to shifting high incomes against low or median incomes.

Mourinho (high) against Solksjaer (low median)
Lukaku and Sanchez (high) against James and Greenwood (low)
Fellaini and Herrera (median) against McTominay and Pereira (low)
Valencia, Darmian and Smalling (median) against Tuanzebe and Dalot (low)

Selling assets 2019

Lukaku
Fellaini

Maguire and AWB was a huge long term investments t but both are English and on relatively speaking median incomes. So that also make sense in this scenario. We need to blend young academy players with proven quality.

Next summer (2020) we will probably see the departure of Matic, Young and one of Jones/Rojo. All of them are on median incomes. It’s possible we sell Pogba (high income/huge asset) and reinvest some of it in younger players with low or median incomes.

Yesterday the owners opened the door to sell more shares. From my perspective that’s the next logical step if they want to “cash in”. We have already heard the rumors about a Saudi takeover. I assume more rumors will come.

We saw from last financial report that we estimate a lower turnover in 2020. The owners are scared that this will reduce the value of the club. That why we so dramatically lowering our costs in order to keeping our profits high. Typical behavior of defensive owners.

Shifting Mou against Ole was another indicator. From a vocal and controversial character to a loyal and diplomatic person who is (over) positive and can follow corporate instructions. On top of that a ex player and a legend who has the fan base behind him. Bingo!

Next crucial indicator will be how we handle Paul Pogba. Selling him and mission is completed.
A very good post. Sensible reading of business decisions behind the football stuff. I think currently the method of clearing out the overpaid garbage and replacing with young hungry players is a good step. By coincidence. I think Pogba will go. The proof of the pudding on this ‘young british’ issue will be if he does go we sign a big replacement and do we carry on with our young english policy if it involves writing a blank check for Maddison or Sancho? My suspicion would be no.