Greta Thunberg

Ibi Dreams

Full Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2010
Messages
6,181
The younger generation just seem to need to have a popularity figure to lead them. Why is that? A couple of years ago it was Jeremy Corbyn. Nobody really took him seriously either, and now it's Greta Thunberg. Next year it will be somebody else.
Reformist movements have very often had popular figureheads leading them. Gandhi, Martin Luther King, Harvey Milk, Nelson Mandela, Emmeline Pankhurst, etc. It is nothing to do with "the younger generation".
 

Arruda

Love is in the air, everywhere I look around
Joined
Apr 8, 2009
Messages
12,584
Location
Azores
Supports
Porto
She filed a UN complaint against Germany, France, Turkey, Brazil and Argentina for "failing to uphold their obligations under the Convention on the Rights of the Child," alleging that "the petitioners’ rights to life, health, and culture have been violated."

Big polluters, no doubt, but a tad dramatic with the wording.
She's doing politics (well, activism, but it's similar). Grown-ups do it all the time. Just look at those cringe endorsement statements from politicians.
 

lsd

The Oracle
Joined
Jun 5, 2016
Messages
10,861
Don't understand why someone who is only asking to make the world a better place gets so much hate
 

11101

Full Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2014
Messages
21,304
Reformist movements have very often had popular figureheads leading them. Gandhi, Martin Luther King, Harvey Milk, Nelson Mandela, Emmeline Pankhurst, etc. It is nothing to do with "the younger generation".
That is true, but its a different situation here. People were fundamentally against what people like King, Milk, Pankhurst etc stood for. The majority already care about climate change. They don't need their views changing.

I just don't see her ever reaching the right audience because of the hysterical nature of her delivery. She lacks persuasion.
 

Mogget

Full Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2013
Messages
6,536
Supports
Arsenal
That is true, but its a different situation here. People were fundamentally against what people like King, Milk, Pankhurst etc stood for. The majority already care about climate change. They don't need their views changing.

I just don't see her ever reaching the right audience because of the hysterical nature of her delivery. She lacks persuasion.
Yep. She's too emotional. Her message would come across much better if it was being delivered by a man. A white one preferably. They're much more rational and logical.
 

11101

Full Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2014
Messages
21,304
Yep. She's too emotional. Her message would come across much better if it was being delivered by a man. A white one preferably. They're much more rational and logical.
Not crying and shouting mid way through would be a start.
 

Pexbo

Winner of the 'I'm not reading that' medal.
Joined
Jun 2, 2009
Messages
68,682
Location
Brizzle
Supports
Big Days
Not crying and shouting mid way through would be a start.
Whether you like her or not, she has clearly been hugely influential in getting children and young adults interested and energised around the subject of climate change. This is the future generation of adults and they will be in charge at some point so if she makes any sort of lasting impression which translates to policy issues in the future then she has done her job.

It's just bizarre how many supposedly intelligent adults just don't get it and think she's not having any sort of impact because they personally don't like her message. She's like catnip for the kids and her message is resonating amongst them. A huge number of 8-18 year olds are now incredibly passionate about seeing real change and they're all going to be voting within the next decade. If the politicians want to have any chance of picking up a meaningful amount of these votes then climate change is going to have to be part of that discussion.
 

stepic

Full Member
Joined
Aug 31, 2006
Messages
8,671
Location
London
I just don't see her ever reaching the right audience because of the hysterical nature of her delivery. She lacks persuasion.
no one individual is going to persuade the 'right audience' to change their ways, Greta included. and she would be the first person to tell you that.
 

nickm

Full Member
Joined
May 20, 2001
Messages
9,167
I just don't see her ever reaching the right audience because of the hysterical nature of her delivery. She lacks persuasion.
Do you have kids?

I'm going to assume no.

Edit: and I wonder if you'd have used the word 'hysterical' if Greta was a bloke.
 
Last edited:

Ekkie Thump

Full Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2013
Messages
3,892
Supports
Leeds United
Whenever I don't care what a person says I make sure I spend time over multiple days arguing about them on the internet.
 

amolbhatia50k

Sneaky bum time - Vaccination status: dozed off
Joined
Nov 8, 2002
Messages
95,675
Location
india
Kind of odd to pick a weird cartoon out of some dark corner of the internet and label it as all men.

Anyway, her 15 minutes will be over soon. The world has more pressing problems to deal with now.
So weird

it's so fecking weird to see grown men getting so annoyed by a 17 year old who is trying to be a positive role model for the single biggest issue of modern times.
It's really weird
 
Last edited:

amolbhatia50k

Sneaky bum time - Vaccination status: dozed off
Joined
Nov 8, 2002
Messages
95,675
Location
india
The majority already care about climate change. They don't need their views changing.

I just don't see her ever reaching the right audience because of the hysterical nature of her delivery. She lacks persuasion.
Completely wrong. You seem to consider a very small minority as the majority. Very very few people genuinely give an actual shit about tackling climate change.

She's already reached tons of people. How influential she will be in raising awareness and action remains to be seen. But it's a good cause and every bit helps
 

Buster15

Go on Didier
Joined
Aug 28, 2018
Messages
13,478
Location
Bristol
Supports
Bristol Rovers
Yep. She's too emotional. Her message would come across much better if it was being delivered by a man. A white one preferably. They're much more rational and logical.
Probably the stupidest thing I have read, anywhere.
Go back to the stone age...
 

Fener1907

Full Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2014
Messages
3,102
Location
Istanchester
Well that is the name of the Convention to be fair to her.
"Big polluters, no doubt, but a tad dramatic with the wording" is a terrible name for a convention.

She's doing politics (well, activism, but it's similar). Grown-ups do it all the time. Just look at those cringe endorsement statements from politicians.
Although a subsequent tweet she sent about some of the actual biggest polluters looked very soft. Brazil, Argentina, France, Turkey and Germany were condemned, but China, USA, Saudi Arabia and Russia were excused. It was just slightly odd because she is hyped as a radical face of child activism on climate change and I expected her to give no quarter, but that one was a bit of an own goal.
 

OverratedOpinion

Full Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2017
Messages
6,509
Don't understand why someone who is only asking to make the world a better place gets so much hate
I don't understand why people find the idea that a preachy private school kid might annoy some people so strange.

Given she shouldn't get the level of vitriol she seems to receive but that is partially just the way the internet works sadly.
 

Buster15

Go on Didier
Joined
Aug 28, 2018
Messages
13,478
Location
Bristol
Supports
Bristol Rovers
That is true, but its a different situation here. People were fundamentally against what people like King, Milk, Pankhurst etc stood for. The majority already care about climate change. They don't need their views changing.

I just don't see her ever reaching the right audience because of the hysterical nature of her delivery. She lacks persuasion.
It is one thing for the majority of people to care about climate change.

But I am afraid that caring is not going to combat climate change.
Only massive and pretty quick action will have any affect.

And as yet, nothing like enough is being done.

And that is her point.
And she is completely correct.
 

LawCharltonBest

Enjoys watching fox porn
Joined
May 17, 2012
Messages
15,226
Location
Salford
I wonder what people small talk to her about

You’d mention the weather and find yourself marching down the street with a sign within the hour
 

berbatrick

Renaissance Man
Scout
Joined
Oct 22, 2010
Messages
21,634
"Big polluters, no doubt, but a tad dramatic with the wording" is a terrible name for a convention.



Although a subsequent tweet she sent about some of the actual biggest polluters looked very soft. Brazil, Argentina, France, Turkey and Germany were condemned, but China, USA, Saudi Arabia and Russia were excused. It was just slightly odd because she is hyped as a radical face of child activism on climate change and I expected her to give no quarter, but that one was a bit of an own goal.
if i had to guess, without a google, those countries probably haven't signed that convention on child rights.
 

Fener1907

Full Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2014
Messages
3,102
Location
Istanchester
if i had to guess, without a google, those countries probably haven't signed that convention on child rights.
Aside from the US, all of the aforementioned countries have signed the convention, just not the treaty that allows children to file complaints. Her tweet about that wasn't accurate. Again, though, the complaint itself is fine. Nations shouldn't be excused from their obligations to the planet.

It's just not a particularly useful message when other notoriously bad polluters are given leeway of any sort, so I'm actually sympathetic to the overall cause but somebody could have advised her a bit better on that one i.e. the awkward wording of the complaint and getting basic facts wrong.
 

Snow

Somewhere down the lane, a licky boom boom down
Joined
Jul 10, 2007
Messages
33,377
Location
Lousy Smarch weather
9 days. I'd say that counts as 'a few'.


And good on her for turning her attention to what is thought to be the primary spreaders of the virus, the young.
Where have you read that and what do you consider the young? Usually viruses spread more easily because of the young (schools etc.) but this virus isn't necessarily following the same pattern.
 

11101

Full Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2014
Messages
21,304
Where have you read that and what do you consider the young? Usually viruses spread more easily because of the young (schools etc.) but this virus isn't necessarily following the same pattern.
Italian health service keeps stressing it. They think the young are the main spreaders but dont get affected as much by it.
 

Denis' cuff

Full Member
Joined
May 13, 2007
Messages
7,771
Location
here
You know what it means... that he's just another tedious windbag upset at a teenage girl (probably).
“Probably”:D

Get a grip, dear.

I’m not the one stressing along with a little girl’s rantings. She makes some valid points but ffs... lets not get too emotional, matey. She really doesn’t have a lot on influence in my life. Can’t say the same about the usual media/trend victims on here who have too much time on their hands and little purpose. Keep sucking it all up.
 

Redlambs

Creator of the Caftards comics
Joined
Aug 22, 2006
Messages
42,228
Location
Officially the best poker player on RAWK.
“Probably”:D

Get a grip, dear.

I’m not the one stressing along with a little girl’s rantings. She makes some valid points but ffs... lets not get too emotional, matey. She really doesn’t have a lot on influence in my life. Can’t say the same about the usual media/trend victims on here who have too much time on their hands and little purpose. Keep sucking it all up.
You do seem fixated on her apparant influence though.