Of course, that's what MR wants. A move every 2 or 3 years and his share of commission each time it happens it's a business model that works phenomenally well for him.
Back to the subject of this thread, Kane's representatives have f*cked up in this regard. He signed a long contract with no release clause and with 3 years left to run, Levy is entitled to hold him to that contract.
The days of the agent will be over when players realize the guy representing you actually contributed nothing and it is your performances and talent that are writing your own ticket. This isn't like the 90s where footballers were majorly screwed over by not maximizing their value and needed financial know-how and help.
Why would you make some fat toad mega-wealthy every time you move clubs? KDB etc have recently used solicitors to do their own deals and the cost was probably circa £500k - I see this being the model players use soon. Certainly not having some random idiot sitting in a room with you, scoffing all the free biscuits, then pocketing more than you earn a year for the privilege. The more I think about it the more idiotic it seems.
Onto Kane, I certainly feel we should be onto Levy. For the good of the league, he should be looking to sell him elsewhere other than City and we can pay him a big fee. Can even through in some players too.
If he relents and sells him to City - then the league is done. Levy has an opportunity here to level the field a little while getting paid. So what if you get £15m less - at this level barely makes a difference.