Skills
Snitch
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2012
- Messages
- 42,091
Shearers numbers are incredible tbhTalksport has Henry at 7th.
They have;
Shearer - 79
RVN - 68
Cole & Torres - 63
Fowler & Suarez - 63
Shearers numbers are incredible tbhTalksport has Henry at 7th.
They have;
Shearer - 79
RVN - 68
Cole & Torres - 63
Fowler & Suarez - 63
Were they league goals or goals for United across competitions? Just not sure. ThanksRuud had 68 in his first 98 games.
spurs is a great side and one of the most balanced in the epl. but yes he is much younger than most on that listWhile I think that Kane is nowhere near the best goalscorers in the EPL history, it must be said that he is younger than most of them and plays for a relatively worse side.
Shearers numbers can't really be compared to the others - because he had played over 100 matches in the old 1 division - without really scoring a lot of goals....and when P.L started - he started banging in goals.Shearers numbers are incredible tbh
Just league goalsWere they league goals or goals for United across competitions? Just not sure. Thanks
Holy crap, man. Ruud was something else wasn't he!Just league goals
The league now is more competitive than a decade or two ago. Spurs are a good side but not as dominant as United and Arsenal back then.spurs is a great side and one of the most balanced in the epl. but yes he is much younger than most on that list
I guess it's more suitable for a different thread but I always wondered why Drogba's goal stats seem underwhelming to be honest.Holy crap, man. Ruud was something else wasn't he!
Aguero's been sensational for City as well. Saw a post comparing his scoring record to that of Drogba's. He's absolutely destroyed Didier.
Fowler, Cole Shearer, were all very young when they reached those figures(i think)While I think that Kane is nowhere near the best goalscorers in the EPL history, it must be said that he is younger than most of them and plays for a relatively worse side.
He would cost £100m+ to get, it would be a ridiculous purchase.We talk about having English players. Harry Kane, at only 23, is one of the best strikers in the league. To me, he should replace Ibra the year after next. He's a goal machine.
Not many really care about having English players like some of you might think. I like having English players who came through are academy more than any other players though, but if we are going to splash money I seriously couldn't care less about player being English or not. There's also that thing that English players are generally average and that there are far more talented players around the world who mostly cost less.We talk about having English players. Harry Kane, at only 23, is one of the best strikers in the league. To me, he should replace Ibra the year after next. He's a goal machine.
What the hell even is this post?Whenever I see him play, or hear him speak, I honestly think he is dim as feck. Like he would need help making a round of toast dim. Is he just in the way and the ball hits him and goes in? He can't have a great football brain when his normal brain barely works.
You seem like a nice chapWhenever I see him play, or hear him speak, I honestly think he is dim as feck. Like he would need help making a round of toast dim. Is he just in the way and the ball hits him and goes in? He can't have a great football brain when his normal brain barely works.
Shearer's is skewed though because he was already playing in the PL, it just wasn't called the PL yet.Just wanted to say that Shearer's ratio in those first 100 matches is incredible. 79. Wow.
The Caf psychology unit strikes again.Whenever I see him play, or hear him speak, I honestly think he is dim as feck. Like he would need help making a round of toast dim. Is he just in the way and the ball hits him and goes in? He can't have a great football brain when his normal brain barely works.
So he's actually behind most of the very best strikers the league has had over the yearsTweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Still very impressive.Shearer's is skewed though because he was already playing in the PL, it just wasn't called the PL yet.
He's probably just fairly camera-shy, or maybe quite reserved. Nothing much wrong with that. And even if he is dim...it's hardly inhibiting him from the job he's paid to do on the field.Whenever I see him play, or hear him speak, I honestly think he is dim as feck. Like he would need help making a round of toast dim. Is he just in the way and the ball hits him and goes in? He can't have a great football brain when his normal brain barely works.
His scoring consistency is superb. Irrespective of what people think about him as a player, it's hard to argue against someone who's on track to score 20+ league goals for the third consecutive season. That's a feat Rooney hasn't managed, for example, nor plenty of other excellent strikers.10 PL goals so far isn't bad considering he was out for 8 weeks.
He was quite inconsistent. He only really turned up for 2 seasons (06/07 and 09/10). He was excellent in cup finals and his goals in the CL semi final and final in their win, kind of gloss over most of the inconsistencies.I guess it's more suitable for a different thread but I always wondered why Drogba's goal stats seem underwhelming to be honest.
Yeah, although what I will say about him is he was also a big-game player (as you say in regards to some of the goals he scored); he could have a season where his goals stats were very underwhelming, but the goals he did score were very important and memorable. Drogba was frighteningly good at his best, but with him in your side you did lose the sort of scoring consistency someone like Kane offers Spurs...even though I'd say Drogba was a far, far better player.He was quite inconsistent. He only really turned up for 2 seasons (06/07 and 09/10). He was excellent in cup finals and his goals in the CL semi final and final in their win, kind of gloss over most of the inconsistencies.
Still incredible numbers.Shearer's is skewed though because he was already playing in the PL, it just wasn't called the PL yet.
Absolutely, and Kane will do well to become half the player Shearer was.Still incredible numbers.
Ay, just had a little look at Drogba's numbers and I'm surprised to see he only hit 20 league goals on two occasions. His average was otherwise around 13 or 14. As you say, though, he tended to score when it mattered most.Yeah, although what I will say about him is he was also a big-game player; he could have a season where his goals stats were very underwhelming, but the goals he did score were very important and memorable. Drogba was frighteningly good at his best, but with him in your side you did lose the sort of scoring consistency someone like Kane offers Spurs...even though I'd say Drogba was a far, far better player.
Clearly you have no brain mate.Whenever I see him play, or hear him speak, I honestly think he is dim as feck. Like he would need help making a round of toast dim. Is he just in the way and the ball hits him and goes in? He can't have a great football brain when his normal brain barely works.
I agree, Shearer is one of the all time great English strikers. Kane has time on his side though and if he can remain consistent and score more for England he could come close.Absolutely, and Kane will do well to become half the player Shearer was.
Clearly, interestingly at the moment Shearer and Kane have exactly the same strike rate.Absolutely, and Kane will do well to become half the player Shearer was.