hobbers
Full Member
- Joined
- Jun 24, 2013
- Messages
- 28,137
£100m plus Martial. Easy peasy.
Well, the other option is staying around to compete with Kane and Cavani up front or Rashford, Greenwood, maybe even Sancho and Pogba in the wide areas.Well there's three sides to that particular equation
Spurs were a lot more attractive a few years ago, can't see Martial being too keen going there at the moment
I don't disagree, Kane or no Kane Martial is well down the pecking order here now regardless.Well, the other option is staying around to compete with Kane and Cavani up front or Rashford, Greenwood, maybe even Sancho and Pogba in the wide areas.
This but I was thinking 75m plus Martial and Lingard,£100m plus Martial. Easy peasy.
didn’t you just make this post? Bit repetitive. It’s logical why people see him as a more likely fit at City right now.Everyone is convinced he’s not coming here. You love to see it.
Even coming up with scenarios as to where he may be going and how well he’ll do at said club.
We’re a sucker for misery is the CAF
Don't think Levy is that stupid to give us Kane and £100m for Martial.£100m plus Martial. Easy peasy.
I did make an eerily similar post, I’m just that astounded as to how a Man Utd board who we’re supposed to be fans of, do this self deprecating thing where for every single big name player they make up situations where they’ll go to every other club in the world bar United. It’s crazy!didn’t you just make this post? Bit repetitive. It’s logical why people see him as a more likely fit at City right now.
I’d rather he went to City and we signed Haaland next summer.
God no, Kane over Haaland every day and twice on Tuesdays.City can have him, we can have Haaland. Fair?
Yeah, me too. 2 players we can easily live without to get a World Class CF. Can't see it happening but it's a fine idea in theory.I'd happily give them Martial + Lingard + £50m to make Kane come. It's a no brainer for me.
I think Haaland would suit us more as he has pace. Kane would just drop deep all the time and Bruno wouldn’t be as effective.God no, Kane over Haaland every day and twice on Tuesdays.
Indeed, Kane does that for Tottenham of late largely because he's carrying the entire team on his back. With United, his value add in dropping deeper actually allows Greenwood/Rashford to occupy striker positions to chip into goals. And that's not to forget he is an out and out striker too. He's very similar to Cavani just 27, in fact. Arguably more ruthless too. He's perfect for us over Haaland in my opinion.I think Haaland would suit us more as he has pace. Kane would just drop deep all the time and Bruno wouldn’t be as effective.
This is my worry with Kane. Not much pace, and seems to drop deeper by the game.I think Haaland would suit us more as he has pace. Kane would just drop deep all the time and Bruno wouldn’t be as effective.
The sad thing is I can envision Chelsea beating City in the final, City going apeshit internally after being a whisker away from the ultimate goal and just activating mission Harry Kane to take no risks the next year.I’m oddly confident about this transfer. Not sure what it is but just seems the perfect fit.
Watch him sign for City.
That is most likely the correct theory. Haaland will stay although i did have city or madrid as his likely destination, I now think Madrid, i dont buy this rubbish that Dortmund are bluffing. Lukaku or Kane seem likely for City, Ings a long shotNo chance of him coming to us. I honestly think the extension Cav has allowed us to stick with what we have upfront and spend the cash on other positions.