Let’s go on a living free, they say the best things in life are free
Done by 30? He turned 44 just about 2 weeks ago mate.They can have Kanye. He’ll be done by 30 I suspect. We need to get Haaland though, far better suited to whatever it is we are trying to do.
But that appears to be United’s ethos in general. We seem to constantly be looking for the player who will ‘elevate us’ and win us the league. I put this down to Cantona, and we have been chasing it ever since.United have too many broken parts in our first team for me to feel comfortable spunking over £ 100 million on one player. City are practically the finished article (similar to the Liverpool team of the 90's). They only need to add 1 player a season to maintain dominance.
Haaland>Kanye.If City bought Kanye they'd finally have enough fans to fill the Etihad.
Regardless if he has a bad Euros, Levy will play hardball on this, no way he goes for less that €115million.Can't decide if I want him to flop at this Euros so his value drop but it is almost certain he will go to City so I'd rather they pay a ridiculous fee for him.
A young starlet called Phil Jones I hear is our main target.Are United not linked with many players every summer?
Few of them get over the line.
Liverpool were not dominant in the 90s, United were. Pehaps you mean't the 80s?United have too many broken parts in our first team for me to feel comfortable spunking over £ 100 million on one player. City are practically the finished article (similar to the Liverpool team of the 90's). They only need to add 1 player a season to maintain dominance.
They can have Kanye. He’ll be done by 30 I suspect. We need to get Haaland though, far better suited to whatever it is we are trying to do.
Mason Greenwood would have to be our hope. If not, another will be along within a few years. But there is potential that Mase could match that level of centre forward.Just thinking, Kane to city and Haaland to Chelsea, who the hell do we buy then…Martinez from Inter perhaps?
This Lukaku guy scores quite oftenJust thinking, Kane to city and Haaland to Chelsea, who the hell do we buy then…Martinez from Inter perhaps?
He would sign them both and then play Gundogan as a false 9 in the champions league final with both of them as wing backs
Kieffer Moore, Ballon d'OrJust thinking, Kane to city and Haaland to Chelsea, who the hell do we buy then…Martinez from Inter perhaps?
Presume you mean the 80s? Bearing in mind they just about scraped a single 90s title and then embarked on a 30 year barren spell?United have too many broken parts in our first team for me to feel comfortable spunking over £ 100 million on one player. City are practically the finished article (similar to the Liverpool team of the 90's). They only need to add 1 player a season to maintain dominance.
Any deal that see's Kane go to City would be absolutely dynamite for them. It'd be like if we had managed to sign Shearer back in the 90's. As good as the other three are (Sterling debatable), City can find replacements.Two of Sterling/Mahrez/Laporte in addition to 60-70 mil cash for Kane would be a better deal for Spurs than for City actually.
If they could get Sterling and Laporte that would be absolutely great business for Spurs IMO.Any deal that see's Kane go to City would be absolutely dynamite for them. It'd be like if we had managed to sign Shearer back in the 90's. As good as the other three are (Sterling debatable), City can find replacements.
Laporte and Mahrez would be very good additions to Tottenhams first team though.
Pretty sure he would only cost around 75m next summer though when his clause kicks in.Fairly certain the price for Haaland alone will be pretty near 210m Euro at this point. If Dortmund sell this summer it is only going to be for a massive fee.
Great, which means they wouldn't sign Grealish thenTweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Wouldn't believe a word coming out of Peps mouth even if I were his father
Agreed but if you want him this summer then you can double that at least. If they sell him they probably don't get CL football next year and that is a massive loss of revenue, they will keep him until the clause kicks in unless they get offered stupid money.Pretty sure he would only cost around 75m next summer though when his clause kicks in.
I can'5 imagine those players would agree to drop down to Spurs' level, surely!Two of Sterling/Mahrez/Laporte in addition to 60-70 mil cash for Kane would be a better deal for Spurs than for City actually.
It really depends whether they would make more money from CL football next year, or from the additional money they would get if sell him this summer.Agreed but if you want him this summer then you can double that at least. If they sell him they probably don't get CL football next year and that is a massive loss of revenue, they will keep him until the clause kicks in unless they get offered stupid money.
Hire Conte buy Lukaku.Yeah, but no club in their right mind would want to sell him
Yean Kanye will be a shit signing for them. Kane won't though.They can have Kanye. He’ll be done by 30 I suspect. We need to get Haaland though, far better suited to whatever it is we are trying to do.
Not likely, but not impossible and Kane moving would free up wages for new top earners.I can'5 imagine those players would agree to drop down to Spurs' level, surely!
I agree with this. Now whether City would be willing to let so many players go to get Kane, is another question.Not likely, but not impossible and Kane moving would free up wages for new top earners.
London is a great city to live for rich people. And they have won it all apart from CL at City so if Pep can’t guarantee these players regular football they might indeed be willing to consider Spurs.
That is the point. CL revenue is estimated between 70-100m so that plus the 75m they get from the clause next summer is his price this year.It really depends whether they would make more money from CL football next year, or from the additional money they would get if sell him this summer.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date