Seems like a no brainer, although we should be looking at the next Harry Kane who is 8 years younger and able to contribute for a decade over a 30 year old.
No reason for them to. The goal this season was top four and we're very likely to finish in the top four as is. Bookie odds imply a probability of roughly 75%, for example. They'll be content with how things are.Surely there must be the financial capacity to borrow the 80m it would take right now, in the January window, to pry Harry loose from Daniel. We have no strikers, and without strikers, we will drop points as we did today.
Likely is right, but we’ve fallen out of the top four from likely top four positions before. With Kane, we go from likely top four to stone wall top four. And the added half season to acclimate to the hot lights of OT would do Harry and United wonders to hit the new season at a full sprint.No reason for them to. The goal this season was top four and we're very likely to finish in the top four as is. Bookie odds imply a probability of roughly 75%, for example. They'll be content with how things are.
I'm not estimating I'm saying that's all I'd pay.20 million? You're estimation is so far removed from the reality of the current transfer market. Arsenal just paid 27 million for Trossard with 6 months on his contract.
It'll take a minimum of 50 for spurs to consider selling him.
Yeah, Kane would have prevented every goal we conceded today. We should absolutely go out and sign him, whatever the cost…As if we’ve got sad acts on here that wouldn’t sign this fella.
Just look at today for feck sake.
They had an option of another year.20 million? You're estimation is so far removed from the reality of the current transfer market. Arsenal just paid 27 million for Trossard with 6 months on his contract.
It'll take a minimum of 50 for spurs to consider selling him.
We are not on 2012, a year on which 25 million bought us RVP. We are on 2022, a year on which 70-80 million are needed to bring us Kane.I'm not estimating I'm saying that's all I'd pay.
I know Levy will want a billion
Sounds likee how people rate caceido after letting 2 goals in vs leicsterYeah, Kane would have prevented every goal we conceded today. We should absolutely go out and sign him, whatever the cost…
90million in 2023We are not on 2012, a year on which 25 million bought us RVP. We are on 2022, a year on which 70-80 million are needed to bring us Kane.
as if your actually using todays game as an example to not sign the best #9 we could possibly sign,Yeah, Kane would have prevented every goal we conceded today. We should absolutely go out and sign him, whatever the cost…
I’m hoping kane has some say in where he goes and wants to come here. In England, not a london club (that would tarnish his reputation imo). He wanted to go city two summers ago, didn’t get his move despite the gentleman’s agreement. He has got his head down and carried on with them.. I’m hoping if kane wants this move and we pay up the money.. we get him. Surely levy will want the money this summer for his rebuild.£20m suggestion is nuts even if we are paying for just one extra season but I don’t think Levy would sell him to us even if we offer them £100m. He still has that perception of Spurs being fierce rivals to all PL clubs. We’d probably need to wait another year and just grab him for free when he is out of contract.
I agree. But we're much more likely to be able to find an able backup for Casemiro (even a younger player with potential) than to find a top striker. There are very few out there, the ones that are younger have a question mark over their head. If we sign Kane we become title contendors straight away. No doubt. Sign Kane and spend the rest of the budget on younger players with the potential to take over from Eriksen/Casemiro.We need more than Casemiro, we need someone to replace Eriksen and backup for Casemiro
How bout this guy at Brighton to be understudySeems like a no brainer, although we should be looking at the next Harry Kane who is 8 years younger and able to contribute for a decade over a 30 year old.
Kane has never been about pace but top finisherWould love to see him and Weghorst jn a race.
If my memory serves me right we refused to sell Lingard, yeah Lingard to WH for some similar money last year. When he also had one year left.30 and 12 months on his contract.
Insanity to pay more than 20mill for him when he is available for nowt such a short time later
His signature doesn't guarantee trophies
Yeah making the most out of them two is vitalYes but not for another 3 or so years. If we bring in Kane, we could also get a young up and coming DM or CM. Next summer a young striker and so on. We have enough time to sort it out while also maximising the talent that we have now. What would be the point in having now a young striker that needs 2 or so years to adapt/ develop while Casemiro and Varane are at their prime?
Yeah controlling CM but still lack a proper 9Never mind eh lads? Maybe if we splurge £100m on Kane we’ll be able to defend in the last 10 minutes of the game.
Maybe now you realise where our real issues lie.
Controlling a game is irrelevant if you're not scoring goals and no Rashford can't be a solution as a No9 because his hold up play and back to goal are far off that of an elite No9. A cheap squad player to an injury prone Martial won't work either because you're stockpiling the team with future deadwoodNever mind eh lads? Maybe if we splurge £100m on Kane we’ll be able to defend in the last 10 minutes of the game.
Maybe now you realise where our real issues lie.
The guy appears to be a born loser.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Will you say the same if Rashford extends?The guy appears to be a born loser.
Rashford's won more silverware than KaneWill you say the same if Rashford extends?
No. Rashford plays for a big club on the up.Will you say the same if Rashford extends?
Well I’ll be damned.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date