Yeah, Lingard and Martial have been rubbish under him. Sanchez looked awful today. Rashford has had zero chances. Lukaku's scoring record has gotten worse.
This is the only response to literally any Mhkitaryan related chat from any ABU/rival fan/mate etc.
It’s absolute nonsense. Your posts are continually imbecilic.
I'd like to see what these players have been able to do vs top 6 sides under Mourinho...
He had 5 assists in our first 3 games this season
What do you expect? He’s a Barcelona fan and is probably still salty that Mourinho stopped them in 2010.
Martial and Rashford have been underwhelming in light of their perceived potential. Lingard is no world beater.
It's not anti-United to predict that he would do better at Arsenal. Regardless of his form going forward, we made the right decision and got the better player. Him playing well in a system doesn't change that. Anyone using this game to bash Mourinho is agenda driven.This is the sole reason I want him to fail at arsenal, if he produce the goods there you’ll get idiots gloating with their anti-Mourinho/United agenda
Lets wait and see how consistent his performances for Arsenal are first.
Why stop there? Why not see what they've been able to do vs top 3 sides away from home in the first half on the right flank when marked by 2 opposition players?
Yes, that is my point.
Yeah fair enough. But he's looked a completely different player in this game.
Claiming it's not particularly conductive is very different to saying he stifles attacking players, which is total shite. I'm not saying he is as good at getting the absolute best out of them as the likes of Pep and Klopp but the idea that Mourinho limits attacking players from reaching their potential is utter bollocks. You don't win what he has by stifling your attackers.
The point I'm making is our set up in those games does stifle our attacking players. So it is true that this happens.
Oh feck off. Mkhi put in these type of performances in at United. Let's see what he's like by the end of the year. Bet Arsenal fans get frustrated with him like we did.
Thankfully there's more to football than just perceived attacking quality, eh?
One game against a farce of a team. We’ve watched Mkhi for 18 months. He’s an absolute weakling.
We can argue semantics but it's the same thing. Mkhitaryan isn't built to play under a manager like Mourinho.
I'd say bar Liverpool away that's just not true at all. Spurs midweek Mourinho picked the exact side everyone wanted him to, a very offensive one, and we got butchered. Our problem in big games this season has been our midfield being bypassed and our defenders making brainfarts.
I think they wanted to re -unite Mkhi and Aubameyang. And from what I have seen so far in the Arsenal game it looks like a good choice. They both seem to fit Arsenal’s way of playing. And with Mkhi and Özil they have two players who can deliver great passes. I know it’s only one game, but Arsenal is looking pretty good.
There's more to a league season than games vs 5 teams. If it was all about enjoying being able to attack, Sanchez would still be at Arsenal and Mkhitaryan at United inevitably.
Ok this is the wrong thread for this. I'm not talking about team selection. Point is our attacking players don't perform in the big games. Our record shows this.
That's not the same thing. That's just Mkhi not having the right mentality, which is something that has been proven time and time again in his career. Top players should not have to be "built" to play a certain way or in a certain system.
No matter how shit Arsenal are, Spurs always find a way to fold against them.
Where have I disagreed with that? I simply made a comment to support the fact that our attackers get stifled by our manager. Mhiki cannot handle that, Sanchez probably can
