£70m including add ons.Wasn’t it €70m? So about £60m?
Just because Sky Sports like to think they can just change the currency symbol and inflate fees doesn’t make them accurate.
And yes.
So we haven’t paid £70m then.£70m including add ons.
Hear, hear.There’s still time to delete the thread…
Agreed but to be fair the latest thread was a bit senseless.What an awful thread merge. It basically makes no sense anymore.
Showing his age, really? How? Dip in form for a few games?The guy is our best player, but 60 million was to much, I think he has shown his age in the second half of the season, and we already need to think about replacing him. that’s not a good sign for a 60 million player.
"Ever" is a long time and if we go back far enough I can think of Keane, Cantona, Ruud, Rio, Ronaldo, Rooney. Vidic had a few wobbles in his first few months but become a colossus before long. But the point is very well taken that Casemiro was an inspired acquisitionHe was 30 when he joined us and didn't come cheap, but has there ever been a signing that has been such a perfect fit and has had such a direct impact as Casemiro? Shoot!
That's a bit personal. I thought the idea was to debate the post, not to attack the poster.Hear, hear.
Embarrassing as feck. But to be expected from a poster of this calibre.
Astonishing thread. Is this how you get promoted to full membership?There’s still time to delete the thread…
It was but certainly deserved to die in its own lunacy without tainting other threads.Agreed but to be fair the latest thread was a bit senseless.![]()
Edit. Prefer peace.That's a bit personal. I thought the idea was to debate the post, not to attack the poster.