If Ole doesn’t revert to a conventional 4-3-3,then he”ll be gone by December….

Ixion

Full Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2003
Messages
15,275
It's very possible. Fred and McTominay are the ideal midfield 2 for this tougher run of games.

Pogba and Matic is definitely not. If they play those 2 vs Liverpool is could get ugly.
Fred and McTominay played against Liverpool back in May when they beat us 4-2 at OT.
 

FrankDrebin

Don't call me Shirley
Joined
Aug 25, 2019
Messages
20,229
Location
Police Squad
Supports
USA Manchester Red Socks
I would drop Ronaldo long before I would either consider moving Bruno or Pogba out of the team.

Truth be told, we looked far more cohesive when Ronaldo wasn't here.
 

JB7

Full Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2008
Messages
8,841
Imagine anyone thinking Matic needs to play in our best eleven. Genuinely comical viewpoint, he offers zero protection to the defence and our whole team plays like they're running in treacle when he's on the pitch.
 

SAFMUTD

New Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2018
Messages
11,787
Changing formation won't solve the problems, by playing 4-3-3 would we suddenly be able to build comfortably from the back? Or preassure the opposition? Or attack with anything else but long balls?

The problems run deeper, we don't have a defined playing style. No formation change will solve that.
 

estel_manutd

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Oct 28, 2020
Messages
199
Location
USA
In addition to playing the 4-3-3 with three of Fred, Scot, Matic, Pogba, VDB, we should also stop pressing in the opposition's half - we don't have the personnel for it.
 

Andersons Dietician

Full Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2016
Messages
13,221
In all honesty if I was him I’d drop both Pogba and Bruno. I’d rather have stability and an ability to retain possession and work hard for one another. So if he decides to start using Fred, VDB, Mata, Matic, McT combination in a 3 just to solidify midfield I wouldn’t hold it against him.

Youve always then got the option to drop in a Pogba or Bruno once you actually get a functioning solid midfield. At least that lot understand the concept of passing and movement and filling in holes to cover one another. Hopefully eventually Pogba and Bruno realise what is needed to become a top team a long with Ole and his coaching team.
 

OmarUnited4ever

Full Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2021
Messages
3,435
I don't think a shift in tactics will save him!!!

Ole lacks the tactical nous to shift and make changes, he is too dependant on the 4231 due to Bruno's exploits.

So a change of tactics is meaningless.
 

Pickle85

Full Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2021
Messages
6,463
Reading the thread title I heard the last three words in the tune of that Wyclef Jean song. Great song actually.
 

NoLogo

Full Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2009
Messages
19,853
Location
I can't remember why I joined this war.
The issue we have is ideological, Ole is at the extreme end in the ideological difference between possession play and direct vertical play. We don't have the right mix between control and the need to attack at every instance. Thus we don't value players who excel at this aspect of the game, Ole wouldn't have time for Carrick for example.

This explains Donny's problems here, we don't have the structure, the right players nor the intention to control possession. This also introduces another weakness, our contempt for possession play tenets leads us to be extremely vulnerable when pressed. We could bring in Xavi but we'd still be lost with the ball.
Can't disagree with what you said. I mean, it's the main reason why we always look like we don't have a plan or clue of what to do with the ball once we have it and why even smaller teams look way too often more structured and disciplined than we do.
 

therealtboy

New Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2013
Messages
783
Location
Dubai
Supports
Feyenoord
Reading the thread title I heard the last three words in the tune of that Wyclef Jean song. Great song actually.
He'll be gone by December, he'll be gone by December,
January, February, March, April, May
We want him gone now but Ed wants him to stay.......
 

Remember the geese

Full Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2018
Messages
6,929
Location
Northampton
The only thing that will save Ole is the board's incompetence. By save, I mean delay the inevitable by longer than what is appropriate. I'd like to see us try out a Rashford, Greenwood, Sancho forward line. Ideally we will then sign a couple of centre mids that will offer similar, but better qualities than McFred. I'm thinking two of Tchouameni, Palhinha or Rice. As much as I rate Pogba, he no longer fits in here and his contract status is such that he shouldn't be indulged. However, the personnel is largely irrelevant without adequate tactics and coaching.
 

Nevilles.Wear.Prada

Full Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2015
Messages
2,707
Location
Malaysia
Supports
JDT
I think if u play your best eleven and ask them "go win this" i think they can do it. They are that good. Something about the way they coached or the specific instructions that they given is breaking the team. We not pressing higher up, and when we press they just simply switch sides and nobody presses on that side. The way we collectively keep retreating when opposition pushes towards our midfield up until they reach dangerous areas for example, tells me its coaching instruction. For whatever reason, its obvious. Simple misspasses, AWB aversion to make forward passes, bruno being too attacking, pogbas unnecessary spins. We fail at the basics. They are not being drilled enough or no longer care. Regardless it only leaves us with one option.
 

Red River Rock

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Mar 21, 2021
Messages
4
We are now also rans. No matter how you decorate the cake, the poor filling is showing. I wish I could say different, but until Ole goes & we replace with a decent manager, this is how it will be. Since Fergie left, other clubs have got bigger & better. Now Newcastle are in the mix for the best players, & manager. Our slippery slide continues. Poor management from the top down.
 

davidmichael

Full Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2015
Messages
3,398
It’s basically do or die for Ole against Liverpool and nothing less than a win saves him so he needs to go all out instead of being so cautious, go all out and play a proper 4-3-3 with Greenwood and Rashford either side of Ronaldo then play one of Fernandes or Pogba alongside McTominay and Fred as it’s inevitable they’ll play.
 

Nikelesh Reddy

Full Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2017
Messages
1,912
We can't drop Bruno, that would be insane. But I think you're right that there is clearly now a balance issue in the team. For a long while we had a lot of success playing both Matic/Pogba and McFred in the central pivot, but it is evident that simply isn't working. Maybe having Ronaldo up there rather than Cavani or Martial has a systemic impact that has tipped the balance, maybe teams have just figured out how to deal effectively with our midfield, but whatever it is, it's not working. Some sort of major adjustment has to come.

The trouble is, we don't really have the pieces do we. Matic cannot be the defensive guy, that seems clear. You saw it yesterday - what he now offers is a good deal of quality incisive forward passing, with the occasional key tackle or repossession and the somewhat more frequent ball loss or foul in dangerous positions, but he just doesn't exercise steady control defensively. To be effective, he needs buffering. Fred at least offers industry, energy and work rate, of which we were painfully short yesterday. If it's going to be a midfield 3, our best option in my view is McTominay, Fred and either Bruno or Pogba, with McT in the deep role. But whichever way you shuffle the deck, you end up with players playing in a role they're only partially suited for.

As City shows, top offensive players can thrive in a midfield set-up like that and have the freedom to go forward, but that presupposes a front 3 that works a lot harder without the ball than ours do - otherwise the midfield just gets overrun. We have played in a way emphasising diligent pressing from the forwards before under Ole, notably during his caretaker phase, but that notion does run headlong into the question "then why have you signed Ronaldo?" He may be GOAT, but he is also literally in the bottom 1% of forwards in Europe in terms of pressing.

Frankly, if playing Ronaldo means benching Bruno, then I'd rather we didn't have him. And though the team's travails is not Ronaldo's fault, it is starting to look like we're not really a team suited to integrating him and that doing so is a major obstacle to necessary adjustments. If we can't rely on forwards pressing, then there is no other option than constructing a midfield capable of dealing with the consequences of that. With the players we currently have, that is difficult to do, and it's hard to see how it can be done without sacrificing a forward spot.

If we do that, that means either doing without a no 10, or doing without wide forwards and play two up front. Either of which would remove a key aspect of our offensive game.

I really, really hope OGS and the coaching team is quickly able to come up with some sort of working solution that I can't see. Because as things stand right now, we seem to have built ourselves into a cul-de-sac.
Honestly mate,Ronaldo and Bruno can’t play together in the big games.Yeah we can get away with it against the lesser teams,but any half decent team will put us to the sword with those 2 in the team.Citys attacking players work their socks off when they lose possession,our attacking players lack the same work ethic.We will continue to struggle if we keep playing those 2 in the big games..,
 

LJJT

Full Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2010
Messages
1,536
Location
North West
Agree on the 433 but play Fred mct bruno as the 3. Can swap in Pogba/Matic/Vdb as and when required. We can turn this around. Wonder if this is why Fred mentioned recently he doesn’t want to play as a DM?
 

Lentwood

Full Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2015
Messages
6,827
Location
West Didsbury, Manchester
I would tend to agree. This feels to me like Frank Lampard at Chelsea last year. Did reasonably when his choices were limited and expectations were lower, but as soon as their are choices to manage and decisions to be made, looks a bit clueless!
 

DULLAGHAN

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Nov 16, 2020
Messages
147
I'd actually like to see Bruno and Donny playing as our midfield 2 and Pogba playing in front of them. Bruno and Donny are both highly mobile players and have shown a bit of bite here and there. Under strick instructions for at least one to sit at all times. It would give us a midfield with the ability to retain the ball and move it quickly to our attack. We can't get any more porous in the middle than we are, at least this way we would be functional in possession. That leaves Pogba to roam in what's now brunos position and cause havoc with his physicality and shooting.

Ole needs to do something drastic and may as well go down swinging as fade away like he's doing now.

Also I'd drop Ronaldo to the bench as I think we're much better with Mason or Cavani up top. Then have Ronaldo to come on when the defence is tired late on. It saves Ronaldos legs and gives that real fear factor when it's needed.

That could all be a disaster, but then there's a reason I'm writing on the CAF and not coaching football....
 

Tom Cato

Godt nyttår!
Joined
Jan 3, 2019
Messages
7,575
How about we play roughly the same team and formation beat Manchester City 3 times in a season? you know, the clueless PE teacher tactic
 

laughtersassassin

Full Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2014
Messages
11,435
From today Pogba needs dropping and we need to take control of games. Win our 50/50s and start pressing in an honest and consistent way. We can’t have 3 forwards walking around. Their lack of energy and fight seeps down through the rest of the team and our midfield and defenders get rag dolled. Ditto with Pogba and Matic walking around the middle. So annoyed today. So annoyed!
We didn't win our other games when Pogba was not playing or on the wing either.

It's not a personnel issue. It's a managerial one.
 

Nikelesh Reddy

Full Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2017
Messages
1,912
The chorus to drop Bruno is growing louder and louder.I have read loads of articles in these last few days arguing the same…I think he may be dropped either tonight or against Liverpool..,
 

roonster09

Hercule Poirot of the scouting world
Scout
Joined
May 10, 2009
Messages
36,625
4-3-3 is not magical formula. 4-2-3-1 or 4-3-3 doesn't matter, playing principles is what defines the playing style.
 

Wing Attack Plan R

Full Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2019
Messages
10,542
Location
El Pueblo de la Reyna de los Angeles
It should be painfully obvious to everyone that simple formation changes are not going to solve anything. Ole’s coaching team is just not doing the business. Whatever formation you put them in, the basics aren’t there, so we’ll have the same problems.
Ole is trying out the new 10-0-0 formation for Liverpool. That should keep the score down a bit.
 

Sky1981

Fending off the urge
Joined
Apr 12, 2006
Messages
30,032
Location
Under the bright neon lights of sincity
433. 4231. 451. 352. It's all basically the same thing. What makes them difference is not the dot on the field but their instruction.

Ajax 433 and moyes 433 are both 433 but the result would be extremely opposite. Formation is just a number, it's the tweak that made it works.

Right now we dont have the tweak. We're just puting 6 bodies at the back. And 6 up front doing whatever they wanna do. Have fun and hope that one of them pull something. To be fair with our talent we normally does.
 

Fredo

You broke my heart!
Joined
Dec 9, 2015
Messages
710
Location
Fergie's head
Would 4-4-2 work with Cavani and Ronaldo up front?
--------------Ronaldo--Cavani
Sancho - Fred - Bruno - Greenwood
Shaw - Maguire - Varane - Awb
 

justsomebloke

Full Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2020
Messages
5,917
4-3-3 is not magical formula. 4-2-3-1 or 4-3-3 doesn't matter, playing principles is what defines the playing style.
Yes, but the formation also matters - it needs to fit the playing principles, among other things.

If we accept that the issue is the lack of balance and control in a 4231 with the four attackers doing little pressing or defensive work, then there are two possible solutions: Fewer players with a primarily attacking role, or more defensive and pressing work from the attackers.

The latter solution is compatible with any formation. The former dictates a shift in formation.

433 and a 3 at the back type formation, such as Chelsea's 3421, seems like the most obvious options.

With a 433, that would mean either forcing Bruno into a lower and more defined role in the midfield, with more extensive defensive duties and benching Pogba, or arranging the 3 man attack line so that Bruno can play in it, and use Pogba together with Fred and McTominay in a flatter midfield 3. Either way, there would be an awful lot of excellent players seeing a lot of bench time.

The more I think about a 3-at-the-back formation, the less I like it. Particularly in terms of squad suitability. If you want a 3421 formation to work in the sense of allowing you to control and dominate the game and produce steady offensive pressure, as opposed to just drop back securely and counterattack (which is a futile approach, as it is completely ineffective against most teams we play, who sit back and have to be broken down), then I think Tuchel's Chelsea give you the template for that: Tight cohesive shape and intensive counterpress over the whole pitch. If we can do intensive counterpress, then there's no need to drop 4231 in the first place.

Also, I think for such a formation to work, the three parts of the team that absolutely needs real, serious quality is the wing backs, the central midfield pairing and the striker. The striker because I think you'll tend to generate fewer quality chances with that formation, and so you are more dependent on a first rate finisher on top. We have that in Ronaldo, so that's fine. But then it gets more difficult. You're so dependent on the wing backs for any kind of offensive pressure, and at the same time they'll have a lot to handle defensively. The CMs, like the wing backs, have to be able to contribute a lot both with and without the ball. It's those four players who largely determine if you're getting pushed around or if you impose yourself with that formation.

And, those positions are where we would be weakest. We don't have a fully formed wing back other than Alex Telles, and on the right side it's an open question if we even have someone who would be fully functional, never mind dominant. And our CM would still be our CM. It might be an easier framework to perform within than our current formation, but we would hardly have a top class central midfield duo anyway.

For the remaining five spots, I think we'd be fine. A 3-man back line generally requires less from each CB than a CB pairing does, and makes it considerably easier to perform well. And the two attackers behind the striker, that can be done effectively in a lot of different ways and there's also no lack of players who could do that well.

All in all, I think that if we go that way with this squad, we'll end up with a more defensively secure team, but also one that is not able to control or dominate games, and which will be hugely challenged against weaker, low-defending opponents.

So I guess that brings us back to 433, or the forwards doing more work and doing it well.
 

roonster09

Hercule Poirot of the scouting world
Scout
Joined
May 10, 2009
Messages
36,625
Yes, but the formation also matters - it needs to fit the playing principles, among other things.
Coach's playing style and his principles matter. 4-3-3 or 4-2-3-1 we won't control games because of the nature of set up. 4-2-3-1 or 4-3-3 Bayern will control game even with Muller as second striker.

Likewise 4-3-3 or 3-4-3/3-5-2 Tuchel's team have same playing principles.

Which again brings back to my initial point, formations matter very less. It's all about coach's playing style and principles.
 

justsomebloke

Full Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2020
Messages
5,917
Coach's playing style and his principles matter. 4-3-3 or 4-2-3-1 we won't control games because of the nature of set up. 4-2-3-1 or 4-3-3 Bayern will control game even with Muller as second striker.

Likewise 4-3-3 or 3-4-3/3-5-2 Tuchel's team have same playing principles.

Which again brings back to my initial point, formations matter very less. It's all about coach's playing style and principles.
Yes, of course playing style and principles matter. I'm not arguing that a certain formation in itself yields a particular result, irrespective of the factors you mention and others as well, or that different formations cannot accommodate different playing styles of principles. But different formations does demand different things at different positions, and aren't just dependent on which players are implementing it but also has consequences for which players in the squad you can utilise, and the demands that are placed on them. Otherwise, managers would hardly bother using different formations. Presumably there is a reason Tuchel chooses 3421 as the way to implement his principles and playing style with the squad he has at his disposal, and it is hardly the case that any squad or any given set of principles or playing style is equally suited to any formation.

Whether in terms of principles and playing style, or in terms of formation, or both, what do you figure our problem is and what are the options to fix them?
 
Joined
Jun 26, 2014
Messages
21,910
Location
Behind the right goal post as "Whiteside shoots!"
In addition to playing the 4-3-3 with three of Fred, Scot, Matic, Pogba, VDB, we should also stop pressing in the opposition's half - we don't have the personnel for it.
I’d agree with this… it has to be done in the right situations and as a team. Or, don’t bother, drop a bit and give them eleven players to get through. We need to stop trying to do things other teams do (the pressing, playing out of defence) until we have the personnel/coaching to make it work. Until then, there’s nothing wrong with dropping back and theres nothing wrong with hoofing it some times. Play to your strengths not some Pep/Klopp/Tuchel ideal.

But a midfield three akin to Atalanta second half with Bruno dropping deeper.. still ahead of McFred/Frogba but 5-10 yards ahead and not 30/off the shoulder of Ronaldo.
 

justsomebloke

Full Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2020
Messages
5,917
I’d agree with this… it has to be done in the right situations and as a team. Or, don’t bother, drop a bit and give them eleven players to get through. We need to stop trying to do things other teams do (the pressing, playing out of defence) until we have the personnel/coaching to make it work. Until then, there’s nothing wrong with dropping back and theres nothing wrong with hoofing it some times. Play to your strengths not some Pep/Klopp/Tuchel ideal.

But a midfield three akin to Atalanta second half with Bruno dropping deeper.. still ahead of McFred/Frogba but 5-10 yards ahead and not 30/off the shoulder of Ronaldo.
As far as I can make out, we pretty much have stopped pressing in the opposition's half. And for a good while now, we've been playing a mid-block, with only light pressing up front. Nothing wrong with that, per se.

However, when we're just dropping semi deep, and there's mostly basically no pressure on the ball-carrier even far into our own half, and not that much tracking back from four attackers, the result usually doesn't look very good. We get played through far too easily, and that happened against Atalanta too.

Also, I don't agree we lack the personnel to press high. We did that to great effect during Ole's caretaker period, and we did it occasionally last season too. Rashford, Lingard, Cavani, Bruno, Martial (when he sets his mind to it) are all pretty good at it, Greenwood is capable of doing it too, Sancho I don't know well enough to tell. Not saying we should, necessarily, but I do think we can.
 

OleTheGreat

Full Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2019
Messages
816
Location
Bangalore, India
We simply cannot change formation to 4-3-3 right now because we do not have a dedicated defensive midfielder and Matic is not the one at 33 years old. He will easily get turned by majority of the teams in the league and of course Europe. We need to buy one and until such time we can revert to a 4-3-3 attack formation. Fred/Mctominay or VDB cannot be a CDM. Ole will have to make do with 4-2-3-1. He wants to play counter attack and believes that the United way. What's surprising me more is that Ole doesn't really have a style of his own like that of Pep (possession) or Klopp (gegenpress). Also, football has changed a lot since the Sir Alex era of counter attacking football. Even smaller teams want to play more with the ball these days and will yield only to teams that can dominate possession and therefore we need to keep possession and move the ball around quickly to win matches. Inviting pressure and then beating them with pace doesn't work anymore, if it could've been done, Jose would've paraded a couple more trophies in the PL. I have my doubts with Ole because I don't think he has a way of playing football, he thinks there is a United way and that we should go and do that. Work hard, retrieve the ball and go forward is all he says. If you watch his interviews carefully, he will always talk about forwards moving through lines or running past opponent defenders but never about how technical or skilled they are at tricking the opponents by playing fast and quick passes around the defenders. That's exactly what is required for the modern footballers.
 

justsomebloke

Full Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2020
Messages
5,917
We simply cannot change formation to 4-3-3 right now because we do not have a dedicated defensive midfielder and Matic is not the one at 33 years old. He will easily get turned by majority of the teams in the league and of course Europe. We need to buy one and until such time we can revert to a 4-3-3 attack formation. Fred/Mctominay or VDB cannot be a CDM. Ole will have to make do with 4-2-3-1. He wants to play counter attack and believes that the United way. What's surprising me more is that Ole doesn't really have a style of his own like that of Pep (possession) or Klopp (gegenpress). Also, football has changed a lot since the Sir Alex era of counter attacking football. Even smaller teams want to play more with the ball these days and will yield only to teams that can dominate possession and therefore we need to keep possession and move the ball around quickly to win matches. Inviting pressure and then beating them with pace doesn't work anymore, if it could've been done, Jose would've paraded a couple more trophies in the PL. I have my doubts with Ole because I don't think he has a way of playing football, he thinks there is a United way and that we should go and do that. Work hard, retrieve the ball and go forward is all he says. If you watch his interviews carefully, he will always talk about forwards moving through lines or running past opponent defenders but never about how technical or skilled they are at tricking the opponents by playing fast and quick passes around the defenders. That's exactly what is required for the modern footballers.
If you are dependent on a pure CDM, then we're not really talking about a 3-man central midfield, but rather about one where you have two very offensive midfielders and one sitter, like City. We did play 433 with an intensive counterpress during Ole's caretaker period.
 

estel_manutd

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Oct 28, 2020
Messages
199
Location
USA
As far as I can make out, we pretty much have stopped pressing in the opposition's half. And for a good while now, we've been playing a mid-block, with only light pressing up front. Nothing wrong with that, per se.

However, when we're just dropping semi deep, and there's mostly basically no pressure on the ball-carrier even far into our own half, and not that much tracking back from four attackers, the result usually doesn't look very good. We get played through far too easily, and that happened against Atalanta too.

Also, I don't agree we lack the personnel to press high. We did that to great effect during Ole's caretaker period, and we did it occasionally last season too. Rashford, Lingard, Cavani, Bruno, Martial (when he sets his mind to it) are all pretty good at it, Greenwood is capable of doing it too, Sancho I don't know well enough to tell. Not saying we should, necessarily, but I do think we can.
I agree that we have stopped pressing as a team. However, some players still press on random occasions on their own - e.g., Bruno. It destroys our midfield structure. Bruno has to play deeper and stop initiating a one man press if we are to compete this season or we should try playing a midfield three of Pogba - Matic - Fred.