But how do you that in practice? Start a new organisation from scratch? That takes time and a lot of balls from the organisations that separate from FIFA. You know FIFA will be furious in their response and probably go the legal way and block any new organisation every step of the way.
I think the big boys in UEFA just want Infantino gone and try to get some compromise candidate in.
Very hard to do in practice, but probably one of these two options would be better than whatever we have now:
1) Decentralize the power from the president. President should still have power, but not be close to omnipotent. Maybe a 'primus inter pares' (say similar to SCOTUS) with the organization being lead by a committee of him, secretary general, heads of confederations, and some club and player representatives (say FIFPro). No veto cause then you risk becoming impotent like UN is.
2) FIFA being broken into several organizations, each of which specializes at something. Say, the organization that organizes the world cup is not the same that gives money to federations for football development (so you do not get blatant corruption like vote for me as president, I'll give you money).
In either case, strict term limits (maybe a single mandate of 4-6 years), so the power cannot be accumulated.
Most likely either of those options would bring a lot of unforeseen problems, but it shouldn't continue like this. Havelange was more corrupted than Trump for example, Blatter surpassed Havelange in corruption, and Infantino is ever worse. Except boxing organizations, I would struggle to name some organization who is as corrupt as FIFA, and this is clearly a systematic problem, not a problem of Infantino. Replacing Infantino with someone else, and changing nothing else, will likely cause the same issues later.