Is Matic ruffling Ole's features (feathers)?

el3mel

Full Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2016
Messages
29,095
Location
Egypt
I'm pretty sure everyone at the club would love to go out and purchase a couple of top quality midfielders. Unfortunately, the reality is that we have a bloated wage budget on mediocre to poor squad players who are contributing nothing to team. Players realistically obtainable to us are either - good options but likely will never be the quality to take us up a level or prospects that we'd have to develop to top level. We can't afford to continually do bad business when we have so many duds aboard. An exit of Matic does afford us a measure of leniency to take a punt on a midfielder who otherwise wouldn't be a top 5 candidate in a regular summer window.
So getting rid of Fellaini and Herrera wasn't enough to relief this "bloated wage budget". We need to get rid of another one too, God knows why.

I bet after getting rid of Matic and not replacing him, the next in line will be: "We'll first need to offload Fred and Periera to be able to buy more players".
 

Maticmaker

Full Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2018
Messages
1,163
I am a self confessed Matic fan (even when he played for Chelsea) and as someone who has monitored his career I was delighted, although very surprised when he came to United. His first season for us was nothing short of fantastic, he made the difference and helped us to finish where we did. Then he had that back operation last year and he hasn't been the same since. His mobility is now almost perpetually in second gear, however his mind set is still very positive and with a couple of younger legs either side of him in a three man midfield, he can still perform a service for us, if only for another season.

It was clear now why Chelsea let him go, his back problem was looming and they knew he had only 1-3 seasons left. Still it helped us out at the time and as I say with the right people around him he can do a job for us, but he is now definitely one on the 'let go' list, which is a pity, but there you go!
 

Tom Cato

Full Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2019
Messages
1,083
So getting rid of Fellaini and Herrera wasn't enough to relief this "bloated wage budget". We need to get rid of another one too, God knows why.

I bet after getting rid of Matic and not replacing him, the next in line will be: "We'll first need to offload Fred and Periera to be able to buy more players".
Matic doesn't need replacing, in the sense that he's not even worthy of the bench currently unless we have injuries. All he adds right now is depth.

What we need to add is a creative midfielder that can take Freds role, unless Fred suddenly becomes PSG Fred on the regular.
 

el3mel

Full Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2016
Messages
29,095
Location
Egypt
Matic doesn't need replacing, in the sense that he's not even worthy of the bench currently unless we have injuries. All he adds right now is depth.

What we need to add is a creative midfielder that can take Freds role, unless Fred suddenly becomes PSG Fred on the regular.
He does needs replacing. One injury to Scott and we are pretty much fecked in midfield.
 

Craig Ward

Full Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2016
Messages
1,228
This was a bad deal by Jose, he thought Matic could come in and play with Pogba in a two. Matic never had the legs to adequately cover Pogba, and while at times we did look better with Herrera in there. It meant, we had 2 defensive mids in a mid 3. While defensively it was better, although far, far from perfect, it meant we were completely devoid of creativity if Pogba was shut down or having a poor game
Matic and Pogba was a disaster, but I wouldn't entirely blame Matic for that.

Pogba was so defensively naïve, Matic was left covering the whole of CM and DM alone, which made him look worse.

Switching to a 3 also didn't work as well as it should have.

My view on Matic is a bit unlike the majority of haters.

He was a proven P/L player, a P/L winner and integral for Chelsea, it was a bit of a coup signing that calibre of player. He done well and ultimately form has dipped. Matic was always going to provide a solid base for 2 seasons max, with the intention I believe of better recruitment to share game time/ultimately replace.

With Jose's sacking, and Woodwards failings in the transfer market, somehow this is still yet to happen.

I wouldn't say i'd be happy to see him go, but if a player has no value or feature he should be sold rather than kept around. That's been an issue for 6 seasons or so.

If he can go in Jan, so be it.

He offers the squad basically nothing so why keep?
 

Lee565

Full Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2019
Messages
1,013
There must be a player there still for conte to be interested, considering how good inter's midfield looks under conte why would he want to bring him to inter?

Look at matic's time at United, he had a good first season but was maybe played too much by Mourinho to the point he looked a bit burnt out at the back end of the season.

the second season wasn't so good but how do you expect any players to perform great when your being managed by Mourinho whilst he's in full meltdown mode and then managed by Solskjear who looks pretty hopeless with his past achievements to back up him being out of his depth. If matic was underwhelming under an actual good manager than fair enough but under a mediocre manager like Solskjear it's hard to gauge if he is done or just a victim of woeful coaching and team tactics.
 

Cassidy

No longer at risk of being mistaken for a Scouser
Joined
Oct 2, 2013
Messages
18,480
He does needs replacing. One injury to Scott and we are pretty much fecked in midfield.
We’re already fecked in midfield
 

C'est Moi Cantona

Full Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2014
Messages
6,282
Beef with Ole aside, there is no way he worse than Fred and Pereira, so until a couple of viable replacements are brought in then he needs to stay.
 

Renegade

Full Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2009
Messages
3,560
Mourinho’s transfer legacy. 40m for one okay season. It’s scary how much money we’ve pissed away.
 

mariachi-19

Full Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2008
Messages
15,340
Location
I may be the devil, but i'm not a monster
Matic will leave (good) and we will not replace him in January (bad). That's my guess. More wage-saving and clearing of deadwood is great but not when nobody better is coming in.
We're currently managing without him so if the right player isn't available in january, its not the end of the world to wait until next season even if we offload him in jan
 

mariachi-19

Full Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2008
Messages
15,340
Location
I may be the devil, but i'm not a monster
Beef with Ole aside, there is no way he worse than Fred and Pereira, so until a couple of viable replacements are brought in then he needs to stay.
Mate, he's a pile of dog shit covered in petrol with a lit match mere milimeters away. He's a complete liabilty every time he plays where as the other two have had good games this season.

He's finished and has been for 12 months.
 

Sterling Archer

Full Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2016
Messages
4,189
Mourinho’s transfer legacy. 40m for one okay season. It’s scary how much money we’ve pissed away.
I wonder how our transfers would have fared had we a DOF or Sporting Director in place. Definitely a lot better financially. I bet Jose would have been more successful himself.
 

Sterling Archer

Full Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2016
Messages
4,189
Mate, he's a pile of dog shit covered in petrol with a lit match mere milimeters away. He's a complete liabilty every time he plays where as the other two have had good games this season.

He's finished and has been for 12 months.
I think saying he's old and past it would have sufficed.
 

thepolice123

Full Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2008
Messages
9,585
There must be a player there still for conte to be interested, considering how good inter's midfield looks under conte why would he want to bring him to inter?

Look at matic's time at United, he had a good first season but was maybe played too much by Mourinho to the point he looked a bit burnt out at the back end of the season.

the second season wasn't so good but how do you expect any players to perform great when your being managed by Mourinho whilst he's in full meltdown mode and then managed by Solskjear who looks pretty hopeless with his past achievements to back up him being out of his depth. If matic was underwhelming under an actual good manager than fair enough but under a mediocre manager like Solskjear it's hard to gauge if he is done or just a victim of woeful coaching and team tactics.
Inter could do well to have a player like him in DM. I watched a lot of Inter this season and while Brozovic is a good player, he is not suited to play in that anchoring role.
 

WR10

Correctly predicted France to win World Cup 2018
Joined
Jul 19, 2009
Messages
4,710
Location
Dream
He must feel like an alien in that young locker room. Who would he even be talking to? Of course he'd be causing a headache for Ole. Ole is trying to form a single unit culture at the club - hence ditching Lukaku and Sanchez. Lukaku's toxic personality got him disconnected and Sanchez barely was even physically at the club.
 

RedTiger

Full Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2013
Messages
14,746
Location
Beside the sea-side, Beside the sea.
This was a bad deal by Jose, he thought Matic could come in and play with Pogba in a two. Matic never had the legs to adequately cover Pogba, and while at times we did look better with Herrera in there. It meant, we had 2 defensive mids in a mid 3. While defensively it was better, although far, far from perfect, it meant we were completely devoid of creativity if Pogba was shut down or having a poor game
This pretty much.
 

UNITED ACADEMY

Full Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2018
Messages
2,068
This was a bad deal by Jose, he thought Matic could come in and play with Pogba in a two. Matic never had the legs to adequately cover Pogba, and while at times we did look better with Herrera in there. It meant, we had 2 defensive mids in a mid 3. While defensively it was better, although far, far from perfect, it meant we were completely devoid of creativity if Pogba was shut down or having a poor game
It was very bad. We really got ripped apart by Chelsea here. Should have kept Herrera & Pogba partnership. Or with the same amount of fees or less we could take Gueye from Everton. Playing Pogba in pair of two would be better having a player like Kante, Gueye or Herrera who can cover a lot of ground than a player who often ball watching like Matic.

I wonder how our transfers would have fared had we a DOF or Sporting Director in place. Definitely a lot better financially. I bet Jose would have been more successful himself.
Let's be real for Matic's transfer. Matic is likely a Jose's signing & his own midfield signing recommendation. If we have DOF may be we would say no to this signing and if we don't get Matic Jose would have been moaning again saying that United didn't get the player he wanted.
 

C'est Moi Cantona

Full Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2014
Messages
6,282
Mate, he's a pile of dog shit covered in petrol with a lit match mere milimeters away. He's a complete liabilty every time he plays where as the other two have had good games this season.

He's finished and has been for 12 months.
Harsh, but even if true I'd rather we keep him for eternity than let him leave without a replacement (as some have said).

As we have found out with Lukaku, and is blatantly obvious, this is of absolutely no gain to anyone other than the people trying to save money for our owners.