Next Mane.Whats he like player wise? I take it he is not at Sanchos level.
Not bad then.Next Mane.
Why would you want Malang Sarr?If its not Malaang I dont want it.
Yup. Absolutely no idea what planet the people comparing him to Mane are on. He has very good movement in behind though.He has lots of pace but needs space to run into. A better version of Dan James. Close control dribbling is not one of his key attributes. Nothing like Sancho other than plays in the same position.
He's a more polished Dan James. They have similar weaknesses. Both better on the counter. I think Sarr can improve in this regard though and I'd definitely have him (with Sancho).Is he any good against teams who park the bus/in tight spaces? Is he more of a dribbler?
Says who? Are you being serious?Next Mane.
He tore Liverpool to shredsLooks average in compilations and has average stats. Not convinced at all, gonna be another one we sell on after failing to impress I reckon, hope I'm wrong though.
He's tall and fast, a decent dribbler but not close to the level of his compatriot Mane. In all honest for £40m I think we'd be getting a raw deal, he's young and has potential but technically his level isn't high enough.Whats he like player wise? I take it he is not at Sanchos level.
Been living off that game since though.He tore Liverpool to shreds
Or competing with Greenwood who is pretty mint tbf.Would have been a good upgrade on James/Lingard.
Had we already signed Sancho.
Laughable fall back option for someone who's supposed to be starting on the right wing in our best eleven.
Well obviously not, he's a gamble.Whats he like player wise? I take it he is not at Sanchos level.
That is very true but get the impression he maybe lacks consistency at this levelHe tore Liverpool to shreds
Pretty much. We go for our BTEC option and wonder why whoever signs Sancho in a year is pissing the league with ease. £40m, Jesus wept.This would blatantly be one of those transfers that involves us selling the player for a low fee in 3 years when it becomes clear he's not good enough.
And it tends to stay that way. He is better than James but still mainly a speed merchant.He's tall and fast, a decent dribbler but not close to the level of his compatriot Mane. In all honest for £40m I think we'd be getting a raw deal, he's young and has potential but technically his level isn't high enough.
As I’ve stated in the Sancho thread, there is no “alternative” to Sancho unless it’s Mbappe.Yup. Absolutely no idea what planet the people comparing him to Mane are on. He has very good movement in behind though.
Would take Benrahma over all of them.Have extra two weeks to sign players from Championship so we could spend even longer considering or preparing bids for likes of Sarr, King and Brooks.
Yeah I thought after I saw that Liverpool game that he was going to be huge.Been living off that game since though.