Israel - Palestine Discussion | Post Respectfully | Discuss more, tweet less

Carolina Red

Moderator
Staff
Joined
Nov 7, 2015
Messages
36,368
Location
South Carolina
It's not a detail to be considered though. It's not a point system. Any one of those reasons is valid for application.
You're creating an argument out of nothing here.

If it is a valid reason for application, then it's something that's considered for an application. I really don't get your issue here, aside from wanting to play around with a word.
Arab Israelis can and do have firearms licenses in Israel. It's actually encouraged Illegal weapon rates are so high.
Well at least they're allowed that.
You're correct. Living in a settlement (or at least many of them) is a valid reason for a firearms license if pre-requisites are met.
So basically when I visited the West Bank, my perception of them being nice, hilltop forts was fairly accurate.
 

Deery

Dreary
Joined
May 21, 2019
Messages
18,590
They’ve probably only just arrived, doubt they would be able to stop a ground offensive if it is this far along in the planning / execution stage.

As far as intention, I’d say the latter would be the focus.
They’ve only just arrived today, it’s going to be hard to get in between them when they start firing rockets. I think it’s up to Netanyahu to pull back now we should be seeing more talking from Joe Biden imo he’s managed this all wrong.
 

Cardboard elk

Full Member
Joined
Jan 9, 2019
Messages
697
Supports
Rosenborg
I have a slightly different take more than being scary, it's predictable. Over the course of history humans have mainly been a bunch of sadistic savages who from time to time are convinced to behave, I would be willing to say that out of all animals humans are the meanest and the only ones that could be described as monsters.
As a sidenote: 300,000 years ago there were 9 human species. Around that time Homo Sapiens developed. Now, only us remains. We propably eradicated all those others. We will not stop until we eradicate ourselves too.
 

owlo

Full Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2015
Messages
3,252
I have a slightly different take more than being scary, it's predictable. Over the course of history humans have mainly been a bunch of sadistic savages who from time to time are convinced to behave, I would be willing to say that out of all animals humans are the meanest and the only ones that could be described as monsters.
Is that predictability not terrifying to you though? The fact that Jimmy down the street could easily be reprogrammed to raze carthage or rape and pillage in Stockholm. And that out of 100 Jimmy's, about 95 would do so.
 

JPRouve

can't stop thinking about balls - NOT deflategate
Scout
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Messages
65,587
Location
France
Is that predictability not terrifying to you though? The fact that Jimmy down the street could easily be reprogrammed to raze carthage or rape and pillage in Stockholm. And that out of 100 Jimmy's, about 95 would do so.
No, it's part of life. And I don't really exclude myself from the lunacy.
 

Suv666

Full Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2016
Messages
8,748
Twitter chatter suggests an invasion might happen. As soon as Hamas launched those rockets had a feeling we'll see something drastic.
 

Kaos

Full Member
Joined
May 6, 2007
Messages
31,729
Location
Ginseng Strip
Twitter chatter suggests an invasion might happen. As soon as Hamas launched those rockets had a feeling we'll see something drastic.
Perfect scenario for Netanyahu. Perpetual war-time government means his approaching corruption trial and political rival's attempt to form a government is now well and truly derailed.
 

VeevaVee

The worst "V"
Scout
Joined
Jan 3, 2009
Messages
46,258
Location
Manchester
This seems to be the latest trend on social media. People sharing meme type infographic stuff with no idea if it's correct themselves. Loads of 'boycott these brands if you're boycotting Isreal' posts and the like, that the people sharing won't even do themselves. I suppose it's still a good thing that people are paying attention to it though
 

calodo2003

Flaming Full Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2014
Messages
41,742
Location
Florida
They’ve only just arrived today, it’s going to be hard to get in between them when they start firing rockets. I think it’s up to Netanyahu to pull back now we should be seeing more talking from Joe Biden imo he’s managed this all wrong.
Rockets are already flying, though.
 

Moby

Dick
Joined
May 20, 2011
Messages
51,356
Location
Barcelona, Catalunya
Why don’t Hamas position their mobile rocket launchers outside of the most populated areas?
Because they couldn't give a lesser shit about innocent Palestinian civilians getting slaughtered in retaliation. They literally want to use them as human shields. They are terrorist scum who simply want indiscriminate annihilation.
 

Kaos

Full Member
Joined
May 6, 2007
Messages
31,729
Location
Ginseng Strip
That is an expected outcome when this occurs...


Why don’t Hamas position their mobile rocket launchers outside of the most populated areas?
Not that I'm endorsing or supporting these rocket attacks, but I don't think you realise how small and densely populated the Gaza strip is. If they wanted them out of sight then there's not a whole lot of places to position them. Having them out in the open in say Gaza beach would just make them easy targets for Israeli strikes, which would completely nullify their guerilla tactics. It's pretty scummy of them to disregard the human life around them and in Israel, but what do you expect from people who've had their dignity stripped and are backed into a corner.
 

Smores

Full Member
Joined
May 18, 2011
Messages
25,519
Yes. :( And it's scary how easy it is for people to be radicalised and turned to monsters.
That's the reality, we can all judge but if anyone hear claims they wouldn't succumb to violence under the injustices and tragedy imposed on Palestinians they're naive.

The only way you stop the cycle is to reduce the injustices to start with. The rest of the world is happy to ignore these acts and then act surprised when violence breaks out.
 

calodo2003

Flaming Full Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2014
Messages
41,742
Location
Florida
Because they couldn't give a lesser shit about innocent Palestinian civilians getting slaughtered in retaliation. They literally want to use them as human shields. They are terrorist scum who simply want indiscriminate annihilation.
I had a Patriot missile battery positioned in a field across from my house once for a week. I had no fear of being killed by an incoming enemy bomb or missile as I was living on the coast of Georgia at the time. The Patriot is also a defensive weapon system.

I can only imagine how helpless I would feel when a protector wheeled an offensive weapon system to within 100 feet off my house & fired it off.

Just insane.
 

Deery

Dreary
Joined
May 21, 2019
Messages
18,590
Rockets are already flying, though.
Hamas said they’d stop if Israel stop though, then Biden comes out with the Israel have the right to defend themselves line giving Netanyahu the green light so to speak.
 

calodo2003

Flaming Full Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2014
Messages
41,742
Location
Florida
Not that I'm endorsing or supporting these rocket attacks, but I don't think you realise how small and densely populated the Gaza strip is. If they wanted them out of sight then there's not a whole lot of places to position them. Having them out in the open in say Gaza beach would just make them easy targets for Israeli strikes, which would completely nullify their guerilla tactics. It's pretty scummy of them to disregard the human life around them and in Israel, but what do you expect from people who've had their dignity stripped and are backed into a corner.
I do realize how small & densely populated Gaza is. These ‘shoot & scoot’ systems could be
deployed on a field or a park. There’s two systems in that clip literally at a neighborhood intersection.

This then goes to my question of what one expects the other combatant to do in response. The clip earlier of the building being felled is an example of extreme restraint of force in a densely populated urban area.

The horrors of this conflict are shared & owned by both sides.
 

rotherham_red

Full Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2005
Messages
7,408
For obvious reasons
The reasons being that it's one of the most densely populated places on earth, with over 2 million people living in a strip of land which can fit into London about 4 times. Where the exchange of goods and services between the borders is almost nigh on impossible? Those reasons? In which case, I agree.
 

Raoul

Admin
Staff
Joined
Aug 14, 1999
Messages
130,093
Location
Hollywood CA
Hamas said they’d stop if Israel stop though, then Biden comes out with the Israel have the right to defend themselves line giving Netanyahu the green light so to speak.
Biden wouldn't be able to stop the Israeli side from finishing whatever they are doing. It would put a bit more pressure on them, but they don't really have any impetus to listen to Biden since they knows the American public are pro-Israeli.
 

calodo2003

Flaming Full Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2014
Messages
41,742
Location
Florida
Hamas said they’d stop if Israel stop though, then Biden comes out with the Israel have the right to defend themselves line giving Netanyahu the green light so to speak.
Then we saw the biggest barrage in recent times last night.
 

Lebowski

Full Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2010
Messages
707
Location
Collyhurst
Ultimately, if there’s no such thing as enforceable international law, then concepts like illegal and extremist will be framed by the entities in power. In the US, the framing is one of an internationally recognized nation state and US ally, being rocket attacked by a terrorist organization (as defined by the State Department, EU, and various other Democratic nations). This ostensibly frames the conflict as being between a nation state and terror group, which provides politicians in the west more than sufficient moral leverage to continue backing the Israeli side. So at the end of the day, the rules are defined by those in power.
Excellent post.

Tragically this is a perfect summation for why the media coverage and international political reaction to the occupation and aggression has been so woeful.

As well as the issue of international law you correctly identified, I think that there's also a cultural and historical element. Decades of the 'war on terror' has conditioned western observers to see Arab resistance through the lense of the Arab terrorist. There's also the similarities between the settler colonial policies of Israel and the founding of the United States and treatment of North America's indigenous population.

I can't prove it, but it certainly feels to me like the cultural lense of the west is another equally powerful factor in why the BBC and CNN have this week subjected their Palestinian guests to the usual 'what do you have to say about Hamas rockets' routine.
 

Raoul

Admin
Staff
Joined
Aug 14, 1999
Messages
130,093
Location
Hollywood CA
The reasons being that it's one of the most densely populated places on earth, with over 2 million people living in a strip of land which can fit into London about 4 times. Where the exchange of goods and services between the borders is almost nigh on impossible? Those reasons? In which case, I agree.
Its standard guerrilla warfare. They don't mind using surrounding infrastructure to their advantage, irrespective of death or destruction.
 

JPRouve

can't stop thinking about balls - NOT deflategate
Scout
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Messages
65,587
Location
France
That is an expected outcome when this occurs...



Why doesn’t Hamas position their mobile rocket launchers outside of the most populated areas?
Human/moral shields. The sad reality is that if Hamas or any palestinian has the stupidity to leave the cover of civil habitations with mid range rockets, Tzahal will destroy them in a matter of minutes if not seconds. I'm not defending palestinians but it is a form of midrange guerilla warfare that allow them to have a chance to hurt the opposing side, the alternative being to quickly die or give up.
 

Raoul

Admin
Staff
Joined
Aug 14, 1999
Messages
130,093
Location
Hollywood CA
Excellent post.

Tragically this is a perfect summation for why the media coverage and international political reaction to the occupation and aggression has been so woeful.

As well as the issue of international law you correctly identified, I think that there's also a cultural and historical element. Decades of the 'war on terror' has conditioned western observers to see Arab resistance through the lense of the Arab terrorist. There's also the similarities between the settler colonial policies of Israel and the founding of the United States and treatment of North America's indigenous population.

I can't prove it, but it certainly feels to me like the cultural lense of the west is another equally powerful factor in why the BBC and CNN have this week subjected their Palestinian guests to the usual 'what do you have to say about Hamas rockets' routine.
The coverage of this entire thing in the US has been surprisingly non-existent. CNN have done a few reports here and there, which were interspersed with other domestic political stories. The only guy really placing a lot of emphasis on this has been Mehdi Hasan's show on Peacock.
 

Deery

Dreary
Joined
May 21, 2019
Messages
18,590
Biden wouldn't be able to stop the Israeli side from finishing whatever they are doing. It would put a bit more pressure on them, but they don't really have any impetus to listen to Biden since they knows the American public are pro-Israeli.
Should be still calling for calm but and trying to negotiate instead of inciting more bombing.
 

Van Piorsing

Lost his light sabre
Joined
Feb 10, 2006
Messages
22,534
Location
Polska
Time and human ignorance doing it's thing for the overall depopulation program. There are less degrading scenes in cramped zoo with animals fighting that in this tribalistic pisser. There's literally no hope for this place.

Carpet bomb the whole thing and let Amish live there, the only scandal you'll hear is that the butter rolling machine is broken.

Same events leading to same discussions over and over...
 

Raoul

Admin
Staff
Joined
Aug 14, 1999
Messages
130,093
Location
Hollywood CA
Should be still calling for calm but and trying to negotiate instead of inciting more bombing.
That's precisely what he did. He dispatched his middle east envoy to the region to meet with both sides.

 

calodo2003

Flaming Full Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2014
Messages
41,742
Location
Florida
Human/moral shields. The sad reality is that if Hamas or any palestinian has the stupidity to leave the cover of civil habitations with mid range rockets, Tzahal will destroy them in a matter of minutes if not seconds. I'm not defending palestinians but it is a form of midrange guerilla warfare that allow them to have a chance to hurt the opposing side, the alternative being to quickly die or give up.
No doubt.

As I said earlier in a post, I understand the tactics of such warfare. As a strategy, it trends towards self-defeatism, but tactically it has some merit.

But thinking that resultant civilian death in a densely populated area being used for cover of the weapon system / military infrastructure of the protector is a shock or an outrage is a bit odd to me. Such collateral damage is absolutely expected when such an environment is created.
 

Gehrman

Phallic connoisseur, unlike shamans
Joined
Feb 20, 2019
Messages
11,086
Both Israel and the Palestinians need their own Gandhi's. A two-state solution solution was viable in the past now it just looks like it's slipping away.
 

Lebowski

Full Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2010
Messages
707
Location
Collyhurst
The coverage of this entire thing in the US has been surprisingly non-existent. CNN have done a few reports here and there, which were interspersed with other domestic political stories. The only guy really placing a lot of emphasis on this has been Mehdi Hasan's show on Peacock.
Agreed, it's the usual out of sight out of mind and of the small amount of US TV reporting I've seen, it's been exactly along the frame you've laid out.

The clip I had in mind when I mentioned CNN was the Mohammed El Kurd interview that went viral yesterday.

 

Kaos

Full Member
Joined
May 6, 2007
Messages
31,729
Location
Ginseng Strip
I do realize how small & densely populated Gaza is. These ‘shoot & scoot’ systems could be
deployed on a field or a park. There’s two systems in that clip literally at a neighborhood intersection.

This then goes to my question of what one expects the other combatant to do in response. The clip earlier of the building being felled is an example of extreme restraint of force in a densely populated urban area.

The horrors of this conflict are shared & owned by both sides.
It's a tough question to answer, but my viewpoint is this - while Hamas are to blame for starting the latest volley of missile strikes between Israel and Gaza, they didn't start this cycle of violence. As has been a recurring theme, this was started with a systemic process of looking to uproot Palestinians from their homes, this time in Sheikh Jarrah, as well as subjecting them to further humiliation in Jerusalem, provoking the (expectedly) radicalised elements of the Palestinian population to hit back with what they deem to be the most effective way, as destructive as it is for them. Its worth remembering that while this all started in the late 40s, Hamas were only formed in 1988, filling in the vacuum to represent an increasingly repressed and desperate Palestinian population, who's resistance prior to the likes of Hamas was largely a secular one taking a far less extreme modus, and one that was systemically sapped thanks to the US' allies like the United States.

I just find it infuriatingly frustrating when the narrative starts with Hamas' rocket attacks. I find it disingenuous and devoid of the context of the whats and whys of everything that's currently happening.
 

Smores

Full Member
Joined
May 18, 2011
Messages
25,519
No doubt.

As I said earlier in a post, I understand the tactics of such warfare. As a strategy, it trends towards self-defeatism, but tactically it has some merit.

But thinking that resultant civilian death in a densely populated area being used for cover of the weapon system / military infrastructure of the protector is a shock or an outrage is a bit odd to me. Such collateral damage is absolutely expected when such an environment is created.
That sounds a lot like you're saying, well if they fight back then civilian deaths are their own fault. They can't realistically move those rockets anywhere else.
 

calodo2003

Flaming Full Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2014
Messages
41,742
Location
Florida
After Israel had blown up an orphanage and housing tower block though.
Inside an urban area in which legitimate military targets are consciously placed. These buildings were collateral damage or error (as it seems the orphanage was) or intended (as it seems the tower was).

The horrors are owned by both sides.
 

Foxbatt

New Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2013
Messages
14,297
Both Israel and the Palestinians need their own Gandhi's. A two-state solution solution was viable in the past now it just looks like it's slipping away.
Certainly not a Gandhi but an Israeli killed their own man who was about to make peace, just like a Hindu who killed Gandhi.
 

Gehrman

Phallic connoisseur, unlike shamans
Joined
Feb 20, 2019
Messages
11,086
That sounds a lot like you're saying, well if they fight back then civilian deaths are their own fault. They can't realistically move those rockets anywhere else.
They can tell the civilians to evacuate.
 

Gehrman

Phallic connoisseur, unlike shamans
Joined
Feb 20, 2019
Messages
11,086
Certainly not a Gandhi but an Israeli killed their own man who was about to make peace, just like a Hindu who killed Gandhi.
Well I'm short on historical examples. Dalai Lama is well and good but he never got Tibet back for obvious reasons(5 mil population vs 1,5 bil)