Scarlett Dracarys
( . Y . )
Why don't you prove that you are right and I'll retract my commentProve I'm wrong.
Why don't you prove that you are right and I'll retract my commentProve I'm wrong.
The Late 90s was the closest era to get some better situation (in my lifetime at least) but the hardliners at Likud facilitated the rise of Hamas because it suited their own personal political gains. Plus, it was Likud's far-right rhetoric that inspired the assassin of Rabin who, along with Peres, were really the most rational leaders of Israel in the last 25 years. Netanyahu, on the other hand, is a truly horrible human being, who deserves no sympathy or respect.How many decades have the Palestinians tried? They absolutely need to get rid of Hamas and Abbas. But Abbas and the Americans and the Israelis would not let anyone competent or charismatic get their heads up.
I hope you sleep well at night.Just for you...
I wonder what cartoons caused thisJust for you...
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
I'm challenging your designation of Gaza containing military infrastructure, given that a military is associated with a sovereign state, and engagements between militaries are governed by international law.Well, if military infrastructure is located in there, by definition certain places within it become such.
Hamas strategy of putting civilians in the line of danger in order to gain international sympathy is no secret to be honest. As for literally killing their own children I doubt it.He also said Hamas is killing their own children as part of their strategy.
Why don't you prove that you are right and I'll retract my comment
Children are civilians too.Hamas strategy of putting civilians in the line of danger in order to gain international sympathy is no secret to be honest. As for literally killing their own children I doubt it.
Scum. Taking pot shots at an enemy that can’t move or fight back and then having children sign the f**king rockets. It’s too much. My heart.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blood_libel
I wonder what cartoons caused this
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
If you can't fight back then don't start a fight.Scum. Taking pot shots at an enemy that can’t move or fight back and then having children sign the f**king rockets. It’s too much. My heart.
My family are sleeping in air raid shelters in Tel Aviv.I hope you sleep well at night.
The Palestinians who get evicted from their homes started it?If you can't fight back then don't start a fight.
I was referring to the current situation and children specifically. Do you have any proof from a non Israeli source ?
Obviously they dared to exist.The Palestinians who get evicted from their homes started it?
I get your point, but to say that all military engagements are governed by international law is a bit specious.I'm challenging your designation of Gaza containing military infrastructure, given that a military is associated with a sovereign state, and engagements between militaries are governed by international law.
The audacity is shameful.The Palestinians who get evicted from their homes started it?
Fight back? Are you for real? Your whole country is basically a state of the art military base. Their whole country is a concentration camp controlled by your army base. Most of the recent aggression and major crimes in my lifetime have been in the name of Israeli freedom when you guys are already free. You’ve looted, ransacked and segregated the region You've already won the “fight”. This is just bullshit theft and bullying. The Zionist’s love a bit of theft when their enemy is almost totally defenceless. Israel and their supporters are a disgrace.If you can't fight back then don't start a fight.
Well i meant literally executing them, but i guess there are some scenarios where it isnt much different.Children are civilians too.
Man that sucks children murdering can be so tedious you have to move to another room in the house.My family are sleeping in air raid shelters in Tel Aviv.
https://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/...s-say-israeli-defence-officials-30483468.html
The Israeli Defence Ministry will appeal against a supreme court ruling banning the use of Palestinian human shields in raids, officials said.
The Israeli supreme court ruled last Thursday that the 'human shield' procedure used by the IDF when detaining Palestinian terror suspects is illegal and violates international law.
Israeli Defense Forces made use of 'human shield' procedures on 1,200 occasions over the last five years, officials said.
Let the current Palestinian president correct you on that myth.The Palestinians who get evicted from their homes started it?
International law wouldn't really come into play since nothing would be enforceable if the US wasn't on board.I get your point, but to say that all military engagements are governed by international law is a bit specious.
If weapons are delivered from a certain location, what specific law restricts another entity from retaliating? When is that ever enforced, especially when it is still a very limited engagement as this particular flare up is?
@Raoul brought up the construction of rockets in Gaza. Is eliminating such forbidden by international law? I honestly don’t know the granular details of such, but to try to eliminate an element of that infrastructure will be a right asserted by either side of the equation.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
That video has nothing to do with Palestinians being evicted from their homes today.Let the current Palestinian president correct you on that myth.
They aren't?I get your point, but to say that all military engagements are governed by international law is a bit specious.
If weapons are delivered from a certain location, what specific law restricts another entity from retaliating? When is that ever enforced, especially when it is still a very limited engagement as this particular flare up is?
@Raoul brought up the construction of rockets in Gaza. Is eliminating such forbidden by international law? I honestly don’t know the granular details of such, but to try to eliminate an element of that infrastructure will be a right asserted by either side of the equation.
@Spoony is spot on, how is this guy not banned already?What part of Hamas's strategy of getting it's own kids killed don't you understand?
Of course it does, and I can fully get why you want history to begin last week.That video has nothing to do with Palestinians being evicted from their homes today.
The world see the Palestinians with far more sympathy imo.We laugh at the Trumper-like Fearless but it's depressing the world sees the Palestinians through his eyes.
Hamas have already claimed the life of Israeli children this week. Perhaps you'd be happy if Iron Dome didn't exist.@Spoony is spot on, how is this guy not banned already?
IDF are killing the kids, not Hamas. And the pretence isn't exactly water tight is it? "We have intelligence of" is about as "Saddam has WMDs" as it gets.
What is wrong with you? Are you being paid by the Israeli government to spout such nonsensical shit?Who are you wishing ill on? The Israeli's for defending themselves against Jihad or the Jihadists literally inviting death and destruction on their own people?
What's wrong with what he posted? I don't see the people of Palestine rising against hamas who uses them as human shields and launches rockets from their houses.Why is this still allowed in here?
Can only speak for Germany, where criticising Israel is always stepping on thin ice, but there's a lot of support for Palestinians.The world see the Palestinians with far more sympathy imo.
That's an interesting question that can only be answered with several others but if we assume that Gaza is a sovereign territory and that there isn't an international embargo on Gaza then the answer to your question is yes, it is forbidden. It's effectively an act of war.I get your point, but to say that all military engagements are governed by international law is a bit specious.
If weapons are delivered from a certain location, what specific law restricts another entity from retaliating? When is that ever enforced, especially when it is still a very limited engagement as this particular flare up is?
@Raoul brought up the construction of rockets in Gaza. Is eliminating such forbidden by international law? I honestly don’t know the granular details of such, but to try to eliminate an element of that infrastructure will be a right asserted by either side of the equation.
Oh no, yet another half truth from the Zionists is being exposed. Careful bro, you'll be labelled an anti-Semite...Terrible conditions. My heart bleeds.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
You're a paid troll or you live in Israel and are shit scared that your web activity is monitored, can't be another explanationHamas have already claimed the life of Israeli children this week. Perhaps you'd be happy if Iron Dome didn't exist.
Germany is between a rock and a hard place on that issue, to be fair.Can only speak for Germany, where criticising Israel is always stepping on thin ice, but there's a lot of support for Palestinians.
Well, you kind of made my point.They aren't?
The US didn't get pulled up over the use of white phosphorus in Iraq, because the UN is spineless. However it was a violation.
You're trying to isolate the issue of sending rockets back and forth. If this was a war between two sovereign powers (e.g. Israel and Egypt), then sure. But applying such logic here bypasses the fact that Israel maintains Gaza as an open air prison and subjects it's occupants to violence on a daily basis. You say that Israel should be able to retaliate based on missiles being fired into it's territory. Shouldn't Palestinians be able to retaliate based on the violence they are subject to every day living in Gaza and the West Bank (not for long)?
I know many people label it as such, but this is not a complicated issue, at all.
Be careful Giggs86. They'll accuse you of the usual cack.What's wrong with what he posted? I don't see the people of Palestine rising against hamas who uses them as human shields and launches rockets from their houses.