Fooza
Full Member
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2014
- Messages
- 3,968
Surely he takes a pay cut to save face
I would very much doubt it he doesn't give a feck about anything it seems.Surely he takes a pay cut to save face
Five years at Chelsea with lower wages is more money to collect while doing feck all than the remaining year on his United contractI would very much doubt it he doesn't give a feck about anything it seems.
Yeah I reckon. Thats why he decided to show up last night. He can give up again once he has a new contract signed.Surely he takes a pay cut to save face
Hope it happens. He has to go.Five years at Chelsea with lower wages is more money to collect while doing feck all than the remaining year on his United contract
YepIf he stays does that mean we get the 25m that was agreed on?
Shush!Realistically his best bet financially is to see out his contract at United & go the free agent route. The club will find a team that will take him on loan, probably in the Bundesliga & at the end of the season he can call his own shots
Could this 25m help us sign Mbuemo you recon?
For sure, but I don't know if it was or wasn't already accounted for in our alleged budgetCould this 25m help us sign Mbuemo you recon?
CorrectIf he stays does that mean we get the 25m that was agreed on?
It could , and could also have £30 million extra by getting turned down by DelapCould this 25m help us sign Mbuemo you recon?
No, no and noI think Amorim could get a tune out of him in our formation, as evidenced by the way hes improved other players in our squad
If I had to guess I’d say wasn’t. As rumours the last few weeks had Chelsea wanting to send him back and paying us 5m. I recon his goal last night helped them change there mindFor sure, but I don't know if it was or wasn't already accounted for in our alleged budget
Come on Sancho, don't not be greedy.
Yeah, it's been a while.we really could use good news.![]()
Come on Sancho, don't not be greedy.
Yes, there's a clip from Sky stating this.So... is there anywhere Sky have actually said this?
I never really understand why people can't tell the difference between Sky saying something and Chelsea fan Emmanuel from Nigeria with 11 followers saying Sky have said something.
Nice one, have we got that somewhere?Yes, there's a clip from Sky stating this.
Maybe one of the Chelsea resident fans can confirm, but I thought their setup was that everyone was on £100k max per week, and then there were just loads of add ons? Sadly I think United's contract was given to him before we stopped the ridiculous salaries so there's likely a pretty huge gap in terms of guaranteed money.
https://www.skysports.com/football/...utd-loanee-to-keep-forward-at-stamford-bridgeSo... is there anywhere Sky have actually said this?
I never really understand why people can't tell the difference between Sky saying something and Chelsea fan Emmanuel from Nigeria with 11 followers saying Sky have said something.
I was curious and checked the chelsea fan forum. Most of them seem happy to keep him (on lower wages) as they think he's either about as good or slightly better than their current wingers plus he's a chelsea fan apparently. A few thinks he's just average.Interesting news. He certainly performed better than the majority of their attackers last night outside of Palmer. Still, surprised they're opting to potentially go through with the deal.
He's not bad, he just doesn't like United, and doesn't apply himself here. Going to Chelsea is the smart move for him.I was curious and checked the chelsea fan forum. Most of them seem happy to keep him (on lower wages) as they think he's either about as good or slightly better than their current wingers plus he's a chelsea fan apparently. A few thinks he's just average.
They dont seem to think he's anywhere as good as he was supposed to be when he came to United or as bad as most of us think he is.