Jadon Sancho| Staying at Dortmund for now

Status
Not open for further replies.

El-Manos

Full Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2011
Messages
14,943
Location
Ireland
Are you writing on behalf of Dortmund or as a Man United fan? The club know what is the right valuation for Sancho in this market. Their stance is actually impressive for once instead of paying whatever Dortmund or any club has to demand. No one can predict the future, Dortmund will be foolish not to take money this season for Sancho. What happens if Sancho performs badly in the next 12 months or so and he wants to leave? They will get less money. People must stop acting like 120 million is 120 pounds. Its a lot of money and as one poster said, Woodward has studied economics and you can trust that for every deal he applies his economic take on it. It has been announced today by the Government that the UK Economy is in recession. That affects whatever revenue the football club makes whether through advertising or match day revenue. Fans on here must accept things are not the same today economically than they were in March. Valencia have put their entire squad on sale.
I agree with what you say but I think 120m is already including a “covid” discount. 2 years ago, a player of sancho’s Calibre would go for 160-200m. He’s one of the brightest talents in world football with already proven stats.
 

acnumber9

Full Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2006
Messages
22,285
Since 2016 who have we failed to sign?

Dyabala in the dying hours of a transfer window.
Two teenagers who chose the better option.

Matt Judge has gone out and got the managers selected targets.
I must have imagined that summer Mourinho wanted a centre back. It’s not like he mentioned it much. It’s not like one of them was a player that we signed a year later for more money. And he didn’t get the managers selected targets or has Perisic signed for us?
 

LawCharltonBest

Enjoys watching fox porn
Joined
May 17, 2012
Messages
15,120
Location
Salford
What is the general consensus on here about the chances of Sancho putting in transfer request
I think he could. He'd lose his loyalty bonus at Dortmund, but then earn it back with interest through his pumped up wages at United, or whoever else may be able to afford him.

He'll maybe feel he owes Dortmund something for giving him his first shot at first team football, but his stats there plus what they paid for him compared to what they'll end up getting for him - either this summer or next - will be thanks enough imo.

People also seem to be forgetting this... Sancho unhappy with DFL

I don't think he wants to stay in Germany any longer than he needs to.
 

FrankDrebin

Don't call me Shirley
Joined
Aug 25, 2019
Messages
20,233
Location
Police Squad
Supports
USA Manchester Red Socks
I feel if Memphis re-joins another super club then the status would just go to his head again.
He's a good player,though.
 

The Taurean

looks like a chipmunk
Joined
May 10, 2009
Messages
11,916
Location
Nothing is so common as the wish to be remarkable.
I agree with what you say but I think 120m is already including a “covid” discount. 2 years ago, a player of sancho’s Calibre would go for 160-200m. He’s one of the brightest talents in world football with already proven stats.
Subjective. Club with its pulse on actual income to expense situation may deem the value lower.
Not to say value of 160-200m itself are inflated.
 

mav_9me

Full Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2009
Messages
12,451
I kind of agree.
Spending 100m on one young player who is unproven in this climate is madness.

Hope Utd don't go through with this and look for other options.
How is he unproven? 2 fantastic seasons in Bundesliga.

Clubs have to pay back a large percentage of the tv deal as well.
Figures here in this thread. 20m pounds for us.

 

theklr

Full Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2019
Messages
2,659
I must have imagined that summer Mourinho wanted a centre back. It’s not like he mentioned it much. It’s not like one of them was a player that we signed a year later for more money. And he didn’t get the managers selected targets or has Perisic signed for us?
Yeah, that one.. that was more because Mourinho already bought Bailly and Lindelof and now he wanted more when he wasnt satisified. Stupid decision for sure, but there was a reason behind it
 

Zehner

Football Statistics Dork
Joined
Mar 29, 2018
Messages
8,091
Location
Germany
Supports
Bayer 04 Leverkusen
What about Bailey then. How much would he cost.
@Zehner is the one to ask about Bailey. But in my opinion he hasn't lived up to the early hype, he is inconsistent, I think that he has had a few injuries and essentially lost his place to Diaby.
Yeah, Bailey hat a series of great performances in his second year that lasted maybe 10-15 games. He's never been the same ever since so that suggests he simply overperformed. Decent potential but atrocious decision making and composure. He has a great match once in a while, usually when we can focus on counter attacks and he can just go full head through the wall mode. Not even remotely good enough for EPL top 6 though. Still hope a mid table English club pays 30+m for him this season but in all honesty, 20-25 wouldbalsonbe okay for me in the Corona market.
 

mav_9me

Full Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2009
Messages
12,451
Very negative outlook, if we don't get Sancho we may not get someone of his quality but we would still get quality in depth. I don't see us not making CL next year just because we didn't get Sancho.
Yeah but if we get Sancho we will be cementing our place in top 4 which is worth what 60m pounds?
 

acnumber9

Full Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2006
Messages
22,285
Yeah, that one.. that was more because Mourinho already bought Bailly and Lindelof and now he wanted more when he wasnt satisified. Stupid decision for sure, but there was a reason behind it
It was a stupid reason. Bailly and Lindelof were still at the club when we bought Maguire anyway. If every club worked like that Bravo and Nolito would still be playing for City instead of Ederson and Bernardo Silva.
 

Lynty

Full Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2014
Messages
3,094
the club are idiots when it comes to transfers and PR. Business degrees though. You would imagine any negotiating team would contain members with business and law degrees yes. So What?
How are we poor at PR? That a bizarre statement.

Our recruitment process has had it's issues and been openly remedied. One adjustment was to bring in Matt Judge to lead negotiations



The idea that we're bad at negotiating is largely unfounded or outdated view, that has become a social media meme and regurgitated by people who have no real knowledge of how transfers work.

Nothing you said in the original post is wrong. But Matt Judge - who is far more experienced than yourself, intimately knows the details of this potential transfer and has been in communication with Dortmund - if he thinks this is still on. It's still on. We aren't going to waste time on dead transfers, and we haven't done since his arrival.

Regardless, even if renegotiation's result in nothing, there's still 54 days of the window to go - plenty time
 

romufc

Full Member
Joined
Apr 30, 2019
Messages
12,557
Since 2016 who have we failed to sign?

Dyabala in the dying hours of a transfer window.
Two teenagers who chose the better option.

Matt Judge has gone out and got the managers selected targets.
We failed to sign Dybala? Isn't it clear that we are trying to stay away from these signings?
Juve were trying to get Lukaku, Dybala was never a target, he became a name we got linked with because of Lukaku.

Halaand chose Dortmund because of CL and and we didnt want a £60m release clause.
 

7even

Resident moaner, hypocrite and moron
Joined
Jun 4, 2006
Messages
4,218
Location
Lifetime vacation
Borussia Dortmund Annual Report 2019
Borussia Dortmund Q3 Report 2020

Key numbers
Cash reserves 31 Mars 2020 = €18,78m
Cash reserves 31 Mars 2019 = €55,86m
Revolving credit 31 Mars 2020 = €60m

EBIT Q3 = €2.01m (minus €28m from 2018)
EBIT Q1 - Q3 = €7,39m

Net transfer income Q1 - Q3 = €38,98m (Q1-Q3 2019 = €77,22m)
Trade Payables 31 Mars 2020 = €98m (31 Mars 2019 = €60,6m)
Total Trade Payables = €139m


My comments
After reading two annual reports and the latest Q3 2020 report I can easily say that Borussia Dortmund (BD) is a very well managed club with a profitable business plan that make them competitive on highest international level. Buying players cheap and selling with profit is part of their business plan.
But COVID had changed the landscape. In their own words "they are hit hard by COVID and that will affect their future plans".

Sooner or later BD needs fresh cash, probably from player sales or using their revolving credit. Selling Sancho is a easy way to solve their problems and prepare for future financial losses. Keeping Sancho could benefit them short term but long term it will decrease his value. The million dollar question is when is the optimal date to sell him?

At this moment nobody can pay €120m in one installament. Probably not even in two intallament. From what I can see the maximun that Manchester United can pay in 2020 is in the region of €60 - 80M. Above €80m will come with significant short term risk in todays financial climate. From my perspective a package of €60M/€30m/€20m in three years installament is a very good deal for both clubs. BD get close their valuation and MU can afford the deal. If BD wait another season the value of Sancho can easily drop significant because of COVID, only two years left of the contract and if the player dont perform next season to expectations.

My best guess is that BD will sell Sancho soon rather then later if the total offer is close to €120m. Manchester Unted can probably only buy if they can pay the fee in three sensible installments. But as usual future will tell.
 

LawCharltonBest

Enjoys watching fox porn
Joined
May 17, 2012
Messages
15,120
Location
Salford
How are we poor at PR? That a bizarre statement.

Our recruitment process has had it's issues and been openly remedied. One adjustment was to bring in Matt Judge to lead negotiations



The idea that we're bad at negotiating is largely unfounded or outdated view, that has become a social media meme and regurgitated by people who have no real knowledge of how transfers work.

Nothing you said in the original post is wrong. But Matt Judge - who is far more experienced than yourself, intimately knows the details of this potential transfer and has been in communication with Dortmund - if he thinks this is still on. It's still on. We aren't going to waste time on dead transfers, and we haven't done since his arrival.

Regardless, even if renegotiation's result in nothing, there's still 54 days of the window to go - plenty time
:lol:

Who did that!

Paul Woolston isn't a real thing!

And AAAron Wan-Bissaka..?
 

RkkMan

Full Member
Joined
May 16, 2019
Messages
2,179
Very negative outlook, if we don't get Sancho we may not get someone of his quality but we would still get quality in depth. I don't see us not making CL next year just because we didn't get Sancho.
We went from 2nd to 6th when we didn`t get a CB even though at the time our defensive record was solid. Do not underestimate how much of an impact not signing Sancho can cause unless we have a VERY good alternative up our sleeves
 

Lynty

Full Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2014
Messages
3,094
I must have imagined that summer Mourinho wanted a centre back. It’s not like he mentioned it much. It’s not like one of them was a player that we signed a year later for more money. And he didn’t get the managers selected targets or has Perisic signed for us?
Selecting (and disagreeing) transfer targets is not the same as transfer negotiations.

We failed to sign Dybala? Isn't it clear that we are trying to stay away from these signings?
Juve were trying to get Lukaku, Dybala was never a target, he became a name we got linked with because of Lukaku.

Halaand chose Dortmund because of CL and and we didnt want a £60m release clause.
I agree. I don't think we were ever seriously in for Dybala. But we don't definitely know so I included him, as that was the obvious comeback to my argument.
 

theklr

Full Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2019
Messages
2,659
I agree. I don't think we were ever seriously in for Dybala. But we don't definitely know so I included him, as that was the obvious comeback to my argument.
We were seriously in for Dybala. We came so far to negotiate and discover the image rights problem.

True that he really didnt want to come, but you never go as far as checking legal rights for the image rights if you are not seriously wanting to sign the player.

The "attitude" / "only want players that want to play for us" thing was just a PR ploy when it fell through.
 

Lash

Full Member
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
12,069
Location
Buckinghamshire
Supports
Millwall, Saint-Etienne
Yeah but if we get Sancho we will be cementing our place in top 4 which is worth what 60m pounds?
That's the point though, it doesn't. Hence why we won't just pay exactly what Dortmund are asking for. We could as easily Cement our place in the top 4 with a couple of good signings without signing Sancho.
We went from 2nd to 6th when we didn`t get a CB even though at the time our defensive record was solid. Do not underestimate how much of an impact not signing Sancho can cause unless we have a VERY good alternative up our sleeves
We've been linked to a lot of good alternatives, Dembele, Chiesa, Coman.
 

UncleBob

New Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2014
Messages
6,330
That's the point though, it doesn't. Hence why we won't just pay exactly what Dortmund are asking for. We could as easily Cement our place in the top 4 with a couple of good signings without signing Sancho.

We've been linked to a lot of good alternatives, Dembele, Chiesa, Coman.
None of these are good alternatives.
 

Lynty

Full Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2014
Messages
3,094
We were seriously in for Dybala. We came so far to negotiate and discover the image rights problem.

True that he really didnt want to come, but you never go as far as checking legal rights for the image rights if you are not seriously wanting to sign the player.

The "attitude" / "only want players that want to play for us" thing was just a PR ploy when it fell through.
Fair enough. I can't really recall the exact details of that little saga
 

croadyman

Full Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2018
Messages
34,587
Anyone else think that Utd would be more flexible on aspects of this deal if Dortmund were willing to ditch the intermediaries.
 

acnumber9

Full Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2006
Messages
22,285
Selecting (and disagreeing) transfer targets is not the same as transfer negotiations.



I agree. I don't think we were ever seriously in for Dybala. But we don't definitely know so I included him, as that was the obvious comeback to my argument.
United were blatantly in negotiations for Perisic though. In fact we were rumoured to have agreed a fee for him and tried to change it too, as has now been rumoured regarding Sancho. There’s also more to negotiations than just eventually signing the player. Yes, we signed Maguire. But we signed him a few days before the end of the window when if we’d stopped fecking about we could’ve signed him sooner and then maybe moved on to the attacker that we desperately needed and had to wait until January for. Which almost ruined our entire season.

There’s also the issue with the fact we put all our eggs in one basket and seemingly can only negotiate one thing at a time. The failure to get rid of players that we haven’t wanted for years and even extending their contracts to protect the asset. Woodward is a fecking clown and there’s no way I can agree he’s had four successful transfer windows. At a push I’d say the first year under Mourinho was a a success and last year was an acceptable window.
 

UncleBob

New Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2014
Messages
6,330
We were seriously in for Dybala. We came so far to negotiate and discover the image rights problem.

True that he really didnt want to come, but you never go as far as checking legal rights for the image rights if you are not seriously wanting to sign the player.

The "attitude" / "only want players that want to play for us" thing was just a PR ploy when it fell through.
No.
 

mav_9me

Full Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2009
Messages
12,451
That's the point though, it doesn't. Hence why we won't just pay exactly what Dortmund are asking for. We could as easily Cement our place in the top 4 with a couple of good signings without signing Sancho.

We've been linked to a lot of good alternatives, Dembele, Chiesa, Coman.
Agree to disagree then. I would rather play with McT and Sancho than say Partey and Chiesa.
 

Lash

Full Member
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
12,069
Location
Buckinghamshire
Supports
Millwall, Saint-Etienne
None of these are good alternatives.
They are if you're paying close to half the price and in some of those cases a loan. Sancho is clearly the best in class to purchase at this moment in time, but it might not be possibel to get him for a price we can afford. Those are some of the most talented youngsters in Europe, it's not like we're raiding the championship instead.
 

Verminator

Full Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2011
Messages
8,118
Location
N3404 The Island of Manchester United
Yeah but if we get Sancho we will be cementing our place in top 4 which is worth what 60m pounds?
Thanks. You got in before me.

Also, momentum has to be factored in.
If we dropped back out of top4, the Ole out brigade would be more vocal. Players wanting to leave rumours start. Confidence isn't as high, nor is the fear factor, for opponents.

Strengthening the squad is necessary, but if the new additions don't raise the level of the first team, impact versus transfer fee & wages will not be profound.
Yes we tired towards the end of the season, but still posted very respectable results.

One thing people still don't seem to get is, Sancho can cover for all four front spots. That has to be more economical than getting a back up for AM, ST, LW (not ignoring James) and a first choice RW.
 

Lash

Full Member
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
12,069
Location
Buckinghamshire
Supports
Millwall, Saint-Etienne
Agree to disagree then. I would rather play with McT and Sancho than say Partey and Chiesa.
I would rather the former too, but I do think there seems to be an issue on how we structure this deal in order to afford it - so the latter would still be a very good window and we'd very likely keep top 4 with that.
 

El-Manos

Full Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2011
Messages
14,943
Location
Ireland
How are we poor at PR? That a bizarre statement.

Our recruitment process has had it's issues and been openly remedied. One adjustment was to bring in Matt Judge to lead negotiations



The idea that we're bad at negotiating is largely unfounded or outdated view, that has become a social media meme and regurgitated by people who have no real knowledge of how transfers work.

Nothing you said in the original post is wrong. But Matt Judge - who is far more experienced than yourself, intimately knows the details of this potential transfer and has been in communication with Dortmund - if he thinks this is still on. It's still on. We aren't going to waste time on dead transfers, and we haven't done since his arrival.

Regardless, even if renegotiation's result in nothing, there's still 54 days of the window to go - plenty time
That’s actually very informative. Never actually noticed the subtle change since 2016 when Matt took over.
 

laughtersassassin

Full Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2014
Messages
11,435
Very negative outlook, if we don't get Sancho we may not get someone of his quality but we would still get quality in depth. I don't see us not making CL next year just because we didn't get Sancho.
I'm sure people said that after came second under Jose and decided that just buying Fred will do.

If your not striving to improve you are already going backwards.
 

T00lsh3d

T00ly O' Sh3d
Joined
Mar 20, 2014
Messages
8,408
Borussia Dortmund Annual Report 2019
Borussia Dortmund Q3 Report 2020

Key numbers
Cash reserves 31 Mars 2020 = €18,78m
Cash reserves 31 Mars 2019 = €55,86m
Revolving credit 31 Mars 2020 = €60m

EBIT Q3 = €2.01m (minus €28m from 2018)
EBIT Q1 - Q3 = €7,39m

Net transfer income Q1 - Q3 = €38,98m (Q1-Q3 2019 = €77,22m)
Trade Payables 31 Mars 2020 = €98m (31 Mars 2019 = €60,6m)
Total Trade Payables = €139m


My comments
After reading two annual reports and the latest Q3 2020 report I can easily say that Borussia Dortmund (BD) is a very well managed club with a profitable business plan that make them competitive on highest international level. Buying players cheap and selling with profit is part of their business plan.
But COVID had changed the landscape. In their own words "they are hit hard by COVID and that will affect their future plans".

Sooner or later BD needs fresh cash, probably from player sales or using their revolving credit. Selling Sancho is a easy way to solve their problems and prepare for future financial losses. Keeping Sancho could benefit them short term but long term it will decrease his value. The million dollar question is when is the optimal date to sell him?

At this moment nobody can pay €120m in one installament. Probably not even in two intallament. From what I can see the maximun that Manchester United can pay in 2020 is in the region of €60 - 80M. Above €80m will come with significant short term risk in todays financial climate. From my perspective a package of €60M/€30m/€20m in three years installament is a very good deal for both clubs. BD get close their valuation and MU can afford the deal. If BD wait another season the value of Sancho can easily drop significant because of COVID, only two years left of the contract and if the player dont perform next season to expectations.

My best guess is that BD will sell Sancho soon rather then later if the total offer is close to €120m. Manchester Unted can probably only buy if they can pay the fee in three sensible installments. But as usual future will tell.
Solid effort there
 

UncleBob

New Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2014
Messages
6,330
They are if you're paying close to half the price and in some of those cases a loan. Sancho is clearly the best in class to purchase at this moment in time, but it might not be possibel to get him for a price we can afford. Those are some of the most talented youngsters in Europe, it's not like we're raiding the championship instead.
Dembele has been a disaster signing for Barcelona, none of those players are the type of players we should even be remotely interested in buying outright.
 

Lash

Full Member
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
12,069
Location
Buckinghamshire
Supports
Millwall, Saint-Etienne
I'm sure people said that after came second under Jose and decided that just buying Fred will do.

If your not striving to improve you are already going backwards.
Sancho is not the only player in the world that can improve us though. That's just demonstrably not true.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.