talking robot
Full Member
let's hope mazouari is a good left back.
We had Ragnick and Ashworth. Two people with reputation, experience and knowledge.Ashworth getting sacked was a terrible decision.
I am not crashing out.
I'm commenting that having 3 months to bring in a left back and failing to do so, and then asking City if they'll loan us a player on deadline day, isn't quite how a well run football club operates.
Don't be naive. It was Jason's master plan all along. Based on his massive experience and knowledge from one year in Southampton, his plan was always to loan Ait Nouri on deadline day. Not his fault it failed.
Honeslty, best in class my backside
This is exactly what I’ve said pretty much since Wilcox got the job based on his relationship with Berrada and that the similarities between Berrada and Wilcox and Woodward and Murtough are uncannyDon't know what people expect. This guy is just another murtough, clearly overpromoted by a chief exec who thinks who can make football decisions despite having a solely commercial background. Ineos are a disaster in sports, you would think any halfway competent owner of sports ventures would have had some success by now.
They make decisions on the basis of pinching pennies regardless of whether they make any medium term strategic sense
It's questionable if he is good enough at his best position at RB.let's hope mazouari is a good left back.
My take:All three of you are pretty embarrassing.
Another superb example at people not actually reading what's reported and making shit up to serve their own narrative.
Read the actual articles, then come back with a take for the sake of rational debate!
My take is consistent.My take:
All summer (and for even longer), I’ve been listening to you and a few others tell us how our top-class DoF from Southampton has a plan, that we have nothing to complain about, and that we should just wait until the end of the window.
That same “man with a plan” spends the entire summer not getting a left-back deal done — a position we clearly need, and one he knew we needed. Then, three days before the deadline, he starts frantically jumping from one left-back to another, and on deadline day ends up making a failed loan offer for a left-back from our local rivals.
Yes, that is fecking embarrassing. Not for him, because I couldn’t give a feck about him, but for the club.
What the feck was the plan from the best-in-class DoF when he spent the final two days frantically offering loans for a left-back to anyone who would listen? And he couldn’t even get that done.
So go on, tell me your take now, please.
To be fair it's not just wilcox it's the whole setup. Berrada. Ineos. All of them are utterly incompetentMy take:
All summer (and for even longer), I’ve been listening to you and a few others tell us how our top-class DoF from Southampton has a plan, that we have nothing to complain about, and that we should just wait until the end of the window.
That same “man with a plan” spends the entire summer not getting a left-back deal done — a position we clearly need, and one he knew we needed. Then, three days before the deadline, he starts frantically jumping from one left-back to another, and on deadline day ends up making a failed loan offer for a left-back from our local rivals.
Yes, that is fecking embarrassing. Not for him, because I couldn’t give a feck about him, but for the club.
What the feck was the plan from the best-in-class DoF when he spent the final two days frantically offering loans for a left-back to anyone who would listen? And he couldn’t even get that done.
So go on, tell me your take now, please.
I have no real opinions on Wilcox or Ineos in general but it's hard to look at this Ait Nouri stuff and not feel embarrassed at the cluelessness around the club
My take is consistent.
Midfield was the focus and we get a LB if we find value for a player we have conviction on, else we go and target defense next window.
There's very little reason to suggest Salinas or Balde represent a higher floor than Maz at LB or even Dorgu. So this idea that we should have just signed a LB as though it was a tick box is ill thought and representative of the mistakes we used to make.
Our team of Berrada, Wilcox Vivell & co have gone out and reshaped out midfield. They've also stood firm on Rashford and been consistent in not caving in transfer valuations this summer. I find all 3 recruits to be very encouraging and I actually find the Rashford return as a well executed pivot to the original plan of sale.
I also think a LB that we deem worthy of purchase needs to be available at the right fee. Would I have liked a Raum for example? Sure. Am I going to be theatrical and extremist in my view where I think it's run by novices and a complete disaster? feck no.
I don't have an agenda, this window is a 7 for me and with a good left back it would be an 8.
The posts here are just crying for a body at LB and not evaluating whether it changes our quality much beyond what we have as backups. It's just sad to be honest.
And we have posters like yourself and the other two, trying to whip up or agree upon fake made up narratives around ait nouri to scrape some confirmation bias.
, what? Fine on the actual business they did, but all they did was reject a low ball offer from Barcelona. Hardly a well executed plan.When i want confirmation bias, i go to FPL thread.My take is consistent.
Midfield was the focus and we get a LB if we find value for a player we have conviction on, else we go and target defense next window.
There's very little reason to suggest Salinas or Balde represent a higher floor than Maz at LB or even Dorgu. So this idea that we should have just signed a LB as though it was a tick box is ill thought and representative of the mistakes we used to make.
Our team of Berrada, Wilcox Vivell & co have gone out and reshaped out midfield. They've also stood firm on Rashford and been consistent in not caving in transfer valuations this summer. I find all 3 recruits to be very encouraging and I actually find the Rashford return as a well executed pivot to the original plan of sale.
I also think a LB that we deem worthy of purchase needs to be available at the right fee. Would I have liked a Raum for example? Sure. Am I going to be theatrical and extremist in my view where I think it's run by novices and a complete disaster? feck no.
I don't have an agenda, this window is a 7 for me and with a good left back it would be an 8.
The posts here are just crying for a body at LB and not evaluating whether it changes our quality much beyond what we have as backups. It's just sad to be honest.
And we have posters like yourself and the other two, trying to whip up or agree upon fake made up narratives around ait nouri to scrape some confirmation bias.
It's questionable if he is good enough at his best position at RB.
What's so funny? It's easy to say "all they did was x" but it was a genuine break from all the shit they did before where they'd let clubs take a piss. And it carries risk, reintegration is dicey and that's why some clubs often isolate the player to force them out instead., what? Fine on the actual business they did, but all they did was reject a low ball offer from Barcelona. Hardly a well executed plan.
I'm probably at a 6 without seeing what Baleba we've got yet, no LB and not replacing the aerial threat from Casemiro in both boxes. I think it's a 7 if Baleba's as good as as I hope he can be in combatting the transition threat we struggle to cope with.
Well not really. Fans have wanted a left back all summer but it's fine to me if the club didn't want to buy one other than Hall. At least we could live with the idea that they don't think that we desperately need a LB and are happy with what they have. Instead in the 11th hour we have them checking our city rivals if they would loan us a player. So what does the club hierarchy actually feel about the position ?It isn't that deep. The agent got in touch offering the player and the club did due diligence in asking what the terms are. It didn't proceed.
People are just being silly
This one's killed me. I might aswell be a Brighton supporter.
We'll want this guy for triple within a year.
Yeah sacking them two for this clown is criminalWe had Ragnick and Ashworth. Two people with reputation, experience and knowledge.
How the feck we ended with this noob?
Imo, Ed Woodward is better DoF than Wilcox and it is not even a contest.
We were promised best in class and we got Southampton sporting director... that says it all really.
He isn't qualified for the role, and since appointment he has done nothing but prove that.
Yeah, but they didn't reintegrate him, they just didn't sell him. The credit goes to Carrick and the coaches on reintegration to the group. Not sure why deserve any credit for a decision that was made for them by Barca's shitty antics.What's so funny? It's easy to say "all they did was x" but it was a genuine break from all the shit they did before where they'd let clubs take a piss. And it carries risk, reintegration is dicey and that's why some clubs often isolate the player to force them out instead.
Do you know what reintegrate means? Sorry to be direct but I don't get what you mean by "they didn't reintegrate him".Yeah, but they didn't reintegrate him, they just didn't sell him. The credit goes to Carrick and the coaches on reintegration to the group. Not sure why deserve any credit for a decision that was made for them by Barca's shitty antics.
Well not really. Fans have wanted a left back all summer but it's fine to me if the club didn't want to buy one other than Hall. At least we could live with the idea that they don't think that we desperately need a LB and are happy with what they have. Instead in the 11th hour we have them checking our city rivals if they would loan us a player. So what does the club hierarchy actually feel about the position ?
I think you are way off pal.I swear people are living in an unreality where we didn't just buy a new front three who as soon as we were set up more sensibly were able to fire us to top three.
We've now also got a motivated Rashford back in the side.
Ok would have been great to get a left back but is it actually worth all this melting down everyone is doing. Christ its pathetic
I don't find it very easy to engage with this forum right now to be honest, so it is refreshing to see at least one person with a countervail to the overwhelming "Wilcox is a clown" narrative.My take is consistent.
Midfield was the focus and we get a LB if we find value for a player we have conviction on, else we go and target defense next window.
There's very little reason to suggest Salinas or Balde represent a higher floor than Maz at LB or even Dorgu. So this idea that we should have just signed a LB as though it was a tick box is ill thought and representative of the mistakes we used to make.
Our team of Berrada, Wilcox Vivell & co have gone out and reshaped out midfield. They've also stood firm on Rashford and been consistent in not caving in transfer valuations this summer. I find all 3 recruits to be very encouraging and I actually find the Rashford return as a well executed pivot to the original plan of sale.
I also think a LB that we deem worthy of purchase needs to be available at the right fee. Would I have liked a Raum for example? Sure. Am I going to be theatrical and extremist in my view where I think it's run by novices and a complete disaster? feck no.
I don't have an agenda, this window is a 7 for me and with a good left back it would be an 8.
The posts here are just crying for a body at LB and not evaluating whether it changes our quality much beyond what we have as backups. It's just sad to be honest.
And we have posters like yourself and the other two, trying to whip up or agree upon fake made up narratives around ait nouri to scrape some confirmation bias.
I think you are way off pal.
We achieved top 3 last season, primarily because we had fewer games second half of the season.
We have signed three midfielders, OK signings, none were our first or second choices.
A motivated Rashford? He is only here because Barca didn't want to pay and no other European giant came in. More a marriage of convenience, time will tell if it works out. I'm yet to be convinced, once bitten, twice shy with the player.
We have completely neglected LB, backup striker, and that is just want we are desperate for. Serious clubs would also look a RB and CB, not letting problems fester for years before you eventually address them.
We could have really pushed the boat out this summer and showed some serious intent but Ineos has decided to pull back for whatever reason.I swear people are living in an unreality where we didn't just buy a new front three who as soon as we were set up more sensibly were able to fire us to top three.
We've now also got a motivated Rashford back in the side. And more depth and options/ Skillsets in midfield
Ok would have been great to get a left back but is it actually worth all this melting down everyone is doing. Christ its pathetic
We're water and oil on this. Our opinions just aren't going to meet. We observe the same facts completely differently.Ok. We had fewer games but also worked against us with rust at times..
Point being Rashford should be a good player who contributes 10-15 goals to the squad. Carrick wanted him for a reason.
Cunha also plays up front, as does Mbeumo and we've kept Zirkzee as well for certain games..
OK a left footed left back would have been great but not meltdown worthy
The actual work of reintegration is done by the manager, the coaches and probably the senior figures in the group ie bringing him back into the group for training, planning on how to use him within the tactics, attempts to motivate him again, etc.Do you know what reintegrate means? Sorry to be direct but I don't get what you mean by "they didn't reintegrate him".
And no that's a structural move for the player, involving Carrick and the DoF given Rashford went from being a saleable asset in the shop window to being given the 9 and starting PL games for us.
We're water and oil on this. Our opinions just aren't going to meet. We observe the same facts completely differently.
If you think those striker options are good enough / acceptable, if you think Rashford was really 'wanted' more than he just couldn't be gotten rid of on the boards terms, more power to you.
The actual work of reintegration is done by the manager, the coaches and probably the senior figures in the group ie bringing him back into the group for training, planning on how to use him within the tactics, attempts to motivate him again, etc.
The decision was made for them. The plan was always to sell him. His only suitor didn't want to pay the fee we agreed as an option from his loan, spent 70m on his replacement from the same league and his wage went back up to silly levels due to us being back in the CL, pricing him out of any move. The DOF's remit is basically to decide he can't be sold and the coach needs to plan for him for the coming season. I think after that, you're crediting him with other people's work. I actually think this is potentially going to be one of Carrick's best bits of work, if he can get the version of Rashford we saw against Ipswich, for the whole season.
I maintain he’s been hilariously lucky in our dealings so far in that we’ve managed to bring in some good players by paying asking prices and releases clauses on low risk deals
Imagine because he was told signing a replacement of any note wasn't an option.We're not in the room so obviously its based in reporting but Carrick supposedly really pushed for Rashford to stay after the Barcelona move fell through..
I’m not going to check. Just wondered if you had been championing all of them all summer.@TheReligion
"I know you’ve been set on Fernandes for a while but have you wanted Andres and Sangare all summer too?"
You can check my post history, for Sangare and Andres comments this summer. You can also see the comments from others saying they were not realistic signings for the Premier League.
Brighton and Brentford thought otherwise unfortunately.