Wumminator
The Qatar Pounder
He will score less than Holjund but we will play better with him.
Its because he is Martial-esque, in the sense he will probably "unlock" Rashford and other wingers we have, linking up with them.He will score less than Holjund but we will play better with him.
Its because he is Martial-esque, in the sense he will probably "unlock" Rashford and other wingers we have, linking up with them.
Hojlund wants the ball played to him in space which he can run into.
Two completely different forwards, we need both I guess.
Whilst I agree, as I was sick and tired of seeing Rashford and Garnacho last season, who were both shooting on sight and dribbling into defenders, the bolded has nothing to do with what I had said though. I was specifically talking about a couple of chances where Zirkzee took too long to shoot.
(Seems like twitter is removing the clips, so make do with this)
1:11 - loose first touch but still enough room and time to lace that low and hard. It may have been blocked but it could have gone through/got deflected and was in an optimal area of the penalty box (despite the defenders there). That's prime real estate where you really shouldn't try to overthink.
1:43 - a bit too casual with the finish by trying to place it with a side foot by setting his back foot. Again needs to lace it (or lifting it) by stepping forward into the shot.
Both examples of what I meant to support the original conversation you were debating against, which was he was taking too long/being too cute. As others have said, it's still too early to say and I'm not being too critical because on another day, those could have went it. I wouldn't say they were poor decisions as I can see why he was hesitant for the first chance and just didn't get the technique right for the second but he will have to learn to be more decisive in those areas if they come up again.
Also as for the getting on at the end of chances being an improvement compared to Hojlund, I would say that's a bit harsh on the Dane. First, he had to play in a ultra suicidal 4-2-4 pressing formation last year where it meant there was little to no build up play and secondly, he was playing with ultra selfish Rashford/Garnacho and a useless Antony. He's not had a chance to play with these (still crap but slightly more progressive) tactics and Amad, who is basically reinvigorating our right wing alongside a much better Rashford (compared to last season anyways).
I can see Hojlund having a bit of a scoring run when he gets back. He’ll be up for it. Be interesting to see if he can partner Zirkzee upfront in some games in our 4-2-2-2 formation.He will score less than Holjund but we will play better with him.
First situation was never a clean shot, he might have tried this but seems like he trusts himself more to get out of this traffic jam and create another opening. This is the tradeoff and consequence of the type of player that he is. Imagine someone like McTominay in this situation, there's no chance he makes more than one touch before pulling the trigger, but the chances of scoring are slim. I really wouldn't hold this against Zirkzee.
Second situation is 50/50, he was a few yards from goal, he got enough power on it, but made a wrong choice with where to put it. Best decision would've been probably to go high (ala Garnacho goal), but this is a high risk shot. Again, I don't care that much, it's fairly easy chance but if he ends up in those situation, the goals will come. I find this idea that he should've used more power on the second one a bit odd. The difficulty was how much of the goal was behind gk/ defenders bodies, not that the shot wasn't powerful enough.
On Hojlund - it's a valid point you made. However... The argument "there was no buildup" goes against Rasmus, as he is very clearly not equipped to contribute to it. I do agree that the jury is still out, and RH deserves another chance in with Amad and Co., but I am worried how rare it is for the ball to end up in a shooting situation for Hojlund. There is far more aspects of his game that is a concern, but it's very clear that Hojlund is a pure goalscorer, so he has to get at the end of chances far more often. That doesn't seem to be an impossible task tbh.
General/buildup play aside, the ball is looking for Zirkzee in the box, that is very very promising for the team.
Yeah, not sure what he was trying to do there, not even sure if that was a miscontrol or he had an idea. It's not what we were discussing though.His first touch there is what put him in the traffic jam tbf, could've had a clearer chance if that touch there was better.
Huge fan of his performance in general yesterday I must say though, seemed to make all the right decisions and touches when outside the box.
Just needs to click for him inside the box and he will be a great signing for us.
No they don’t. Sometimes they do rarely, they never tend toTrue. But sometimes teams do tend to score all their chances in a match.
So you’ve never seen a team beat another team by scoring the only few shots they’ve had on target?No they don’t. Sometimes they do rarely, they never tend to
He is very useful dropping deep and knitting play across the front line. He may never be a prolific scorer but I think there's a clear argument to be made that the rest of the team will play well because of him.Good in the buildup but not good enough as a striker. Wouldn't mind dropping Bruno and playing him as the number 10 though with Højlund up front.
If you read my post you would see I said they do sometimes, but it happens rarely. So it does not tend to happen, tend being the key wordSo you’ve never seen a team beat another team by scoring the only few shots they’ve had on target?
Not even sure about this. I think as Zirkzee grows into our side he'll hit double figures this season, as much as I like Hojlund I don't think he'll get close. Maybe between the two of them we'll finally have a front line that can -really- threaten though.He will score less than Holjund but we will play better with him.
Fair enough.If you read my post you would see I said they do sometimes, but it happens rarely. So it does not tend to happen, tend being the key word
He will score less than Holjund but we will play better with him.
Also the most encouraging aspect about Zirkee is that he is not ten seconds behind the play like Hoijlund was last season. Yeah he enjoys playing deeper but at nearly every chance he is managing to put boot to ball in the six yard area, that tells us that his movement is great and that goals will come.I agree. I’ve said before, but a striker like Hojlund is only vindicated being a regular for a top goal if he scores a huge amount if goals. Haaland doesn’t play for City as an 18 goals striker, whereas Martial might, for example.
It will be interesting to see how they both develop, but ultimately, I think Zirkzee needs to score less goals than Hojlund does to justify his place. Which may push Hojlund on to become such a goalscoring beast that we have no choice but to start him, but theoretically, I’d take a 15 goal Zirkzee over a 20 goal Hojlund. Probably.
Early to tell but if the idea is that we are developing in to a high pressing energetic team then surely the one best suited to lead the line would be Rasmus. Not saying Zirkzee doesn’t press, not seen a big enough sample size of him but from what I’ve seen so far he doesn’t press with any intensity which we get from Rasmus.I agree. I’ve said before, but a striker like Hojlund is only vindicated being a regular for a top goal if he scores a huge amount if goals. Haaland doesn’t play for City as an 18 goals striker, whereas Martial might, for example.
It will be interesting to see how they both develop, but ultimately, I think Zirkzee needs to score less goals than Hojlund does to justify his place. Which may push Hojlund on to become such a goalscoring beast that we have no choice but to start him, but theoretically, I’d take a 15 goal Zirkzee over a 20 goal Hojlund. Probably.
It's still early days yeah and the problems in front of goal could be more permanent given e doesn't have a great scoring record. However Martial didn't press with much intensity and ETH loved him to bits. Think he will get the same from Zirkzee but Hoijlund did well last term but he is going to need to do more to be the undisputed starter.Early to tell but if the idea is that we are developing in to a high pressing energetic team then surely the one best suited to lead the line would be Rasmus. Not saying Zirkzee doesn’t press, not seen a big enough sample size of him but from what I’ve seen so far he doesn’t press with any intensity which we get from Rasmus.
He does look like a better rounded footballer than Rasmus but I suppose it depends on where we are heading and how ETH plans to use either. It’s good that both look promising and have differing attributes.
He will score less than Holjund but we will play better with him.
Early to tell but if the idea is that we are developing in to a high pressing energetic team then surely the one best suited to lead the line would be Rasmus. Not saying Zirkzee doesn’t press, not seen a big enough sample size of him but from what I’ve seen so far he doesn’t press with any intensity which we get from Rasmus.
He does look like a better rounded footballer than Rasmus but I suppose it depends on where we are heading and how ETH plans to use either. It’s good that both look promising and have differing attributes.
Could yeah, but nobody ever would say it outside of a comedy club.That could be said about me too, but United never offered me contract...
Could yeah, but nobody ever would say it outside of a comedy club.
Nah... i would score less than Højlund, and play better together with him than if i played alone.
I'm sure you would too...
You might need to re-read the statement you are replying to.
Yup. Höjlund has better pace and stamina, Zirkzee is more technical and has better holdup play. Think zirkzee will be more clinical.Early to tell but if the idea is that we are developing in to a high pressing energetic team then surely the one best suited to lead the line would be Rasmus. Not saying Zirkzee doesn’t press, not seen a big enough sample size of him but from what I’ve seen so far he doesn’t press with any intensity which we get from Rasmus.
He does look like a better rounded footballer than Rasmus but I suppose it depends on where we are heading and how ETH plans to use either. It’s good that both look promising and have differing attributes.
First situation was never a clean shot, he might have tried this but seems like he trusts himself more to get out of this traffic jam and create another opening. This is the tradeoff and consequence of the type of player that he is. Imagine someone like McTominay in this situation, there's no chance he makes more than one touch before pulling the trigger, but the chances of scoring are slim. I really wouldn't hold this against Zirkzee.
Second situation is 50/50, he was a few yards from goal, he got enough power on it, but made a wrong choice with where to put it. Best decision would've been probably to go high (ala Garnacho goal), but this is a high risk shot. Again, I don't care that much, it's fairly easy chance but if he ends up in those situation, the goals will come. I find this idea that he should've used more power on the second one a bit odd. The difficulty was how much of the goal was behind gk/ defenders bodies, not that the shot wasn't powerful enough.
On Hojlund - it's a valid point you made. However... The argument "there was no buildup" goes against Rasmus, as he is very clearly not equipped to contribute to it. I do agree that the jury is still out, and RH deserves another chance in with Amad and Co., but I am worried how rare it is for the ball to end up in a shooting situation for Hojlund. There is far more aspects of his game that is a concern, but it's very clear that Hojlund is a pure goalscorer, so he has to get at the end of chances far more often. That doesn't seem to be an impossible task tbh.
General/buildup play aside, the ball is looking for Zirkzee in the box, that is very very promising for the team.
Zirkzee seems to be getting a shed load of chances so his situation isn't the same as Højlund's last season at all.Holjund looked so isolated last season what with everyone around him completely disinterested in anything other than either cutting inside and having a shot, or shooting long-range from the edge of the area, that I'd like to see these two play together. We haven't had two attacking players on the pitch who look like they've ever met or been aware of each other's existence for a long time.
My worry for both is that the manager will continue to expect results from feeding them scraps. All of our wider players and Fernandes need to be far less selfish to make it work