Jurriën Timber | Arsenal player

Status
Not open for further replies.

golden_blunder

Site admin. Manchester United fan
Staff
Joined
Jun 1, 2000
Messages
119,815
Location
Dublin, Ireland
It seems bizarre because so many people used to complain about Lindelof being bullied in the air, the forum consensus has done a complete 180 over last couple of years whereby aerial duels no longer matter because "modern football". Bottom 9th percentile of centre backs in the Dutch league for aerial duels isn't a concern in the slightest.
Not me, I think it’s still important in the PL.

but the difference between timber and Lindelof is attitude. Timber is proactive, competes, positions well and uses his physicality. Lindelof is passive and well the absolute opposite of everything. So even though timber is smaller, I’d take him over Lindelof every time.
Smaller CBs have succeeded in English football; it’s all about attitude and timing
 

Thoms

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jul 29, 2019
Messages
486
Supports
Ajax
Isn’t he with the Ajax squad for some tour game which Ten Hag didn’t participate? Any Ajax fans know more of this? :lol:
He is with the Ajax squad on Curacao. He features on the latest Ajax vid on youtube.
 

Mcking

Full Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2017
Messages
6,015
Location
Nigeria
It seems bizarre because so many people used to complain about Lindelof being bullied in the air, the forum consensus has done a complete 180 over last couple of years whereby aerial duels no longer matter because "modern football". Bottom 9th percentile of centre backs in the Dutch league for aerial duels isn't a concern in the slightest.
I find it amusing how often members of this forum dismiss the apparent weakness of players we are linked to, until they join and it turns out to be a major weakness after all.

Just check-out Wan-Bissaka and Maguire's transfer threads. Some were genuinely arguing that 80m was going to be a good deal for Maguire, and that there was nothing wrong with Wan-Bissaka's technique, as if Wan-Bissaka's lack of technical proficiency while he played for Palace wasn't one the most obvious things you'd notice in football. Even someone that had no history as a football fan could see that his ball handling was completely different compared to almost every other Premier League footballer.

For what it's worth, I like Timber as a potential signing because he is a fantastic footballer, and I want him as our RB, but aerial dominance and presence at setpieces should be a prerequisite for a Premier League centerback, and if you sign one who is neither, then you have already made a transfer mistake whether the manager is able to make it work or not.
 

evil_geko

Full Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2005
Messages
5,837
You would think Cannavaro, Puyol, Baresi, Beckenbauer etc didn't exist judging by reading this thread. :houllier:
 

SATA

Full Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2005
Messages
15,204
Location
We all love United
His agency posted the picture so might be just them going to negotiate.
Not sure if a face to face negotiation is necessary as it can be done virtually online and phone calls till all parties agree. I get your point though. I was more on the player flying in to sign the actual contract :lol:
 

Darlington Padgett

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Sep 9, 2017
Messages
1,215
Not sure if a face to face negotiation is necessary as it can be done virtually online and phone calls till all parties agree. I get your point though. I was more on the player flying in to sign the actual contract :lol:
That makes sense but I just want to keep the dream alive :lol:
 

Dominos

Full Member
Joined
Jul 5, 2009
Messages
7,000
Location
Manchester
You would think Cannavaro, Puyol, Baresi, Beckenbauer etc didn't exist judging by reading this thread. :houllier:
You're going back decades, to different leagues to find exceptions.

It's also worth noting some players may be far far better in the air than their height would suggest, which I can't say applies to Timber given he's bottom 9th percentile in the Dutch league for centre backs.

Again, how many current premier league sides start with a 5'10 centre backs consistently? And in a back 4? And do so with a lot of success that it's not an issue? Someone ought to tell the current premier league managers that Puyol wasn't that tall so they should start signing short centre backs. Is Klopp crazy too because he targets aerially dominant centre backs?
 

joedirt87

Full Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2010
Messages
6,237
the only recent shorter CB in the Prem I can think off is Nathan Ake. No clue how he has done for City but I thought he was a decent to pretty good defender at Bournemouth. assuming we do get Timber it would be nice if he was taller but he can make up for the lack of height by good positioning and effort in defending. Pretty sure we've been one of the taller teams the last few years and don't really utilize it defending or attacking.
 
Last edited:

golden_blunder

Site admin. Manchester United fan
Staff
Joined
Jun 1, 2000
Messages
119,815
Location
Dublin, Ireland
You're going back decades, to different leagues to find exceptions.

It's also worth noting some players may be far far better in the air than their height would suggest, which I can't say applies to Timber given he's bottom 9th percentile in the Dutch league for centre backs.

Again, how many current premier league sides start with a 5'10 centre backs consistently? And in a back 4? And do so with a lot of success that it's not an issue? Someone ought to tell the current premier league managers that Puyol wasn't that tall so they should start signing short centre backs. Is Klopp crazy too because he targets aerially dominant centre backs?
Silva at Chelsea
 

Dr. McBeasty

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jun 21, 2020
Messages
37
There's plenty of defenders in the PL < 6ft that do just fine - Ben Mee, Ben Davies, Cesar Azpilicueta, Marcal, Malang Sarr, Ake, Guehi. Sure, some play in a back 3, but point is looking at height isn't really the best gauge. There are plenty of occasions when Burnley of all teams have started 3 of a back 4 under 6ft. Especially if we're looking to play a higher line and focus on possession in the opposing team's half, I would think that a player that is comfortable on the ball, has rapid recovery pace and can defend large areas of space is a much more important area for us to address, as we really lack a player with all of those attributes.
 

Bojan Djordjic

Full Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2018
Messages
1,650
There's plenty of defenders in the PL < 6ft that do just fine - Ben Mee, Ben Davies, Cesar Azpilicueta, Marcal, Malang Sarr, Ake, Guehi. Sure, some play in a back 3, but point is looking at height isn't really the best gauge.
With respect, nobody is just looking at height. The height wouldn't matter if he was even on a par with the average defender as the likes of other small centre backs such as Phil Jones can. Jones wins roughly 70% of the headers he competes for. Last year, Maguire was winning 78%. None of the players you named are losing headers more than 40% of the time. Timber is at 50% which is in the bottom 8% of defenders across top five leagues. This is why people have concerns.
 

UNITED ACADEMY

New Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2018
Messages
13,127
Supports
Erik ten Hag
Gullit's criticism is fair, this is not a height issue but he just is a bit mistake prone. I'd compare this to signing John Stones from Everton but cheaper. Maybe he'll get better with age. There's some fantastic positives of signing him in the sense that he brings qualities on the ball many of our players don't have.

Which one you prefer, signing young player that still has room to improve and develop but great potential with cheap fees? Or the holywood signings that cost double or triple fees?
 

Dr. McBeasty

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jun 21, 2020
Messages
37
With respect, nobody is just looking at height. The height wouldn't matter if he was even on a par with the average defender as the likes of other small centre backs such as Phil Jones can. Jones wins roughly 70% of the headers he competes for. Last year, Maguire was winning 78%. None of the players you named are losing headers more than 40% of the time. Timber is at 50% which is in the bottom 8% of defenders across top five leagues. This is why people have concerns.
It may not apply to you necessarily, but there does seem to be quite a number of posters in this thread dismissing him on height alone. Either way Who Scored has Timber as winning 58% of aerial duels, which isn't fantastic by any means, but by comparison Ben Mee is only at 61%. Lindelof is at 60%, so basically you could call them even, but Timber's recovery pace and aggression provides a whole new dimension that Lindelof doesn't provide. So long as he's paired w/ a partner that is good in the air, I don't see any reason why his aerial ability would be a huge worry.
 

Caesar2290

New Member
Joined
Apr 27, 2019
Messages
1,283
It may not apply to you necessarily, but there does seem to be quite a number of posters in this thread dismissing him on height alone. Either way Who Scored has Timber as winning 58% of aerial duels, which isn't fantastic by any means, but by comparison Ben Mee is only at 61%. Lindelof is at 60%, so basically you could call them even, but Timber's recovery pace and aggression provides a whole new dimension that Lindelof doesn't provide. So long as he's paired w/ a partner that is good in the air, I don't see any reason why his aerial ability would be a huge worry.
Yes, but you have to factor in the league they play in. The PL is way more physical that the Eredevise.
 

bosnian_red

Worst scout to ever exist
Joined
Aug 13, 2011
Messages
57,917
Location
Canada
The amount of pages spent arguing over his height is wild.

His heading isn't a strength. Obviously. Blind did pretty well as a CB here next to Smalling and formed our best partnership post Sir Alex despite being useless in the air. It's fine. Timber will regardless be used as a RB if he signs anyway for the first bit, where he'd be an enormous improvement (and in the air he would be an improvement out there), and then he'll transition inside in time if he's capable. It's fine. His potential and talent all around along with filling an immediate need and being depth at CB in the mean time is more than fine.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.