Kalidou Koulibaly

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Jul 31, 2015
Messages
22,880
Location
Somewhere out there
:houllier: We conceded more goals than half of the league. We can't build up from the back in the slightest. The exact reason for that is because of a massive lack of quality in the back 4 and how we've neglected it for years. We need a top CB, a right back, a midfielder and a winger at the bare minimum this summer. Probably 2 midfielders, maybe even 3. But a CB is a must, especially if we can get someone like Koulibaly. Just look at how Liverpool went from a joke defensively to having the best defence in Europe just by adding Van Dijk instead of always using both Lovren and Matip. We need both a right back and a CB, but that's one area we can't afford to cheap out in.
This with bells on.
 
Joined
Jul 31, 2015
Messages
22,880
Location
Somewhere out there
He's closer to 187cm. I think they got it wrong on a Fifa game and Google uses that wrong height of 195cm.
I’m going off ESPN.

Watching him vs. Icardi he’s a good bit taller than him so must be closer to 190. Someone get the tape measure out. :)

Either way if he’s a good bit taller than Icardi then he’s plenty tall enough to be a great compliment to Lindelöf.
 
Last edited:

RD94

New Member
Newbie
Joined
May 13, 2017
Messages
105
Well he’s 195 @RD94 so yes more, 10cm more in fact.
Taller than both Smalling and Slabhead.
He's closer to 187cm. I think they got it wrong on a Fifa game and Google uses that wrong height of 195cm.
No,he is not even 1.87cm.Look at team or squad photos of Napoli,he stands on his toes and is smaller than Milik who is 1.86cm and much smaller than Albiol.

He is not someone to compliment Lindelof for certainly,more of a upgrade on him and that is not what we need this summer.

Maguire would be a better option for example or Tah to partner Lindelof because of aerial presence which he misses to be a top notch defender,for certainly in Premier league.
 

bosnian_red

Worst scout to ever exist
Joined
Aug 13, 2011
Messages
58,020
Location
Canada
I agree, however, Maguire is Prem proven and seems to have a very good mentality, hence why I said I would prefer him for where the team is right now. It's not always about who's the best, it's who's best for the team, Klopp's Liverpool is testament to this. Maguire just seems the better fit.
How is Maguire a better fit if Koulibaly is better in every department? Being prem proven isn't a worry for Koulibaly, the guy is physically huge and a beast. You have to also look at the cost and how much of an improvement would they be. Koulibaly would be worth the huge investment. Maguire would be a small improvement. Both would require huge fees. That's why I understand not wanting to splash the cash on Maguire but being open to it for Koulibaly.
 

gr3yham3

Full Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2016
Messages
1,182
Heading is not just about height though - strength, jumping ability, courage and timing are all other important aspects. Nesta was 187, Maldini was 186 and Cannavaro was 177! If height was everying, our team of giants under Jose would have scored from most corners that we had.
 

lysglimt

Full Member
Scout
Joined
Jun 1, 2008
Messages
15,267
It’s about 2 years away from declining, which isn’t a problem for a 20m signing, but Koulibaly will cost 5 times that. No-one is debating his quality, but is it value for money? That’s all I’m asking. I don’t know the answer by the way, I’m on the fence.
If he earns us 10 Points pr season - do you Think that is Worth £26 million a season ? I do!
 

lysglimt

Full Member
Scout
Joined
Jun 1, 2008
Messages
15,267
Heading is not just about height though - strength, jumping ability, courage and timing are all other important aspects. Nesta was 187, Maldini was 186 and Cannavaro was 177!
The name Karl Heinz Riedle springs to mind - he was lethal in the air and I dont think he was 1.80
 

gr3yham3

Full Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2016
Messages
1,182
And we don't know how much he will cost us well - that 150m Euro is just Napoli's valuation of him. I think we will spend 200m pounds at least before player sales this summer anyway, especially considering how skint we were last summer.
 

crossy1686

career ending
Joined
Jun 5, 2010
Messages
31,672
Location
Manchester/Stockholm
We need leaders and if this lad is capable then get him in. My only reservation is that he hasn't won anything but then neither had VVD before moving to Liverpool.
 

crossy1686

career ending
Joined
Jun 5, 2010
Messages
31,672
Location
Manchester/Stockholm
Heading is not just about height though - strength, jumping ability, courage and timing are all other important aspects. Nesta was 187, Maldini was 186 and Cannavaro was 177! If height was everying, our team of giants under Jose would have scored from most corners that we had.
Cannavaro also the last defender to win the Ballon D'or. Pretty sure he was jacked on something though, he could leap about three times his height in the air from a standing jump and his best season came when he was about 33. Suspicious...
 

Dolf

Full Member
Joined
May 27, 2016
Messages
2,892
Location
Amsterdam
This is Koulibaly next to Sane, who is 196 cm. So I suppose Koulibaly is somewhere between 187 and 190

 

crossy1686

career ending
Joined
Jun 5, 2010
Messages
31,672
Location
Manchester/Stockholm
I'm worried we're going to pay silly money for him and it be a disaster again.

Is there a reason why no other club seems to be in for him? Age? Injury record? Price? Anything?
 

BlueHaze

New Member
Joined
May 20, 2018
Messages
4,453
I'm worried we're going to pay silly money for him and it be a disaster again.

Is there a reason why no other club seems to be in for him? Age? Injury record? Price? Anything?
That exact reason. While he is a good player no one is willing to pay the £100m+
 

gr3yham3

Full Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2016
Messages
1,182
Not many top teams need him as well for a high price. Most of them already have settle CB pairings, and are all going after the shiny new toy in De Ligt.
 

settembrini

Full Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2015
Messages
3,283
Heading comparison for aerial duels per 90 minutes this season.

Koulibaly: 2.2 won vs 1.5 lost.
Lindelof: 2.1 won vs 1.4 lost.
Smalling: 4.0 won vs 2.3 lost.
Maguire: 4.2 won vs 1.2 lost.

He's definitely not an aerially dominant centre back. Lindelof has improved a lot in this regard considering he was losing more headers than he won in his first season but as a partnership in the PL they would be considered vulnerable.
 

Beaucoup

Full Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2016
Messages
1,563
How is Maguire a better fit if Koulibaly is better in every department? Being prem proven isn't a worry for Koulibaly, the guy is physically huge and a beast. You have to also look at the cost and how much of an improvement would they be. Koulibaly would be worth the huge investment. Maguire would be a small improvement. Both would require huge fees. That's why I understand not wanting to splash the cash on Maguire but being open to it for Koulibaly.
We don't know this to be the case as he simply hasn't played PL football.
 

Nytram Shakes

cannot lust
Joined
Feb 2, 2014
Messages
5,272
Location
Auckland
Would be an utterly terrible signing for us this summer, spending what would be way over half our transfer budget on a player who by the time we are ready to compete, or even near competing would be in decline.

He's the sort of signing you make when your, just falling short and need that experienced bit of quality to take you over the line to win trophies. Not the sort of signing you make, when your squads a mess and needs a massive change of personal and attitude.

Not to mention if he would agree to come us this summer, when we don't have champions league, in what is likely to be his last big contract, he is going to want an insane wage, and we already have Sanchez's wage been an issue we don't want to add to that problem.
 

RedCurry

Full Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2016
Messages
4,686
Regardless of how much it gets ridiculed here, he's too old for a big fee transfer. For all we know he might need a year to settle into the team and the league by the time he'd be on his way to a physical decline and added to our list of deadwood.

Even at half of that incredibly silly release clause, he wouldn't be worth it.
 

Hawks2008

Full Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2015
Messages
4,912
Location
Melbz
No,he is not even 1.87cm.Look at team or squad photos of Napoli,he stands on his toes and is smaller than Milik who is 1.86cm and much smaller than Albiol.

He is not someone to compliment Lindelof for certainly,more of a upgrade on him and that is not what we need this summer.

Maguire would be a better option for example or Tah to partner Lindelof because of aerial presence which he misses to be a top notch defender,for certainly in Premier league.
Yes let's sign worse defenders than Koulibaly because they can head the ball a bit better..

Why not just keep Smalling at that rate.
 

Nou_Camp99

what would Souness do?
Joined
Apr 1, 2013
Messages
10,274
Despite all the talk on this today, I'm not buying it one bit. I Don't think we'll be spending £100m on a soon to be 28 year old CB.

If Napoli would take 65/70m then it's more realistic. No other club in the world would pay 100 for him. That should tell us we shouldn't either. Find someone else if that's the price.
 

steakpie

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Oct 13, 2018
Messages
429
Spending £100m on him sounds exactly the type of transfer we would do. Clubs must rub their hands when we come calling.
 

Fer

Full Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2014
Messages
2,787
Spending £100m on him sounds exactly the type of transfer we would do. Clubs must rub their hands when we come calling.
De Ligt would be cheaper and he is 8 years younger.
If we sign Koulibaly for 100m, I hope we can also get Alderweireld for 25m.
 

Bobski

Full Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2017
Messages
9,921
I haven't seen enough of Koulibaly to make any type of insightful or accurate judgment of him. He looked good at times in those matches versus Arsenal and Liverpool this year but also made some mistakes that I would not expect from a CB hyped as highly as he is.

I have this inherent concern from buying from Italy though, the pace of the game is so much slower, can expose flaws not seen previously. Seems ridiculous(on my part) from a country with such a storied defensive reputation, but from the money we are talking about you can't make a mistake.
 

bosnian_red

Worst scout to ever exist
Joined
Aug 13, 2011
Messages
58,020
Location
Canada
I'm worried we're going to pay silly money for him and it be a disaster again.

Is there a reason why no other club seems to be in for him? Age? Injury record? Price? Anything?
Same reason Van Dijk stayed at Southampton for so long. Most clubs don't need to spend crazy money on CBs. Real Madrid have Varane and Ramos and decent back ups. PSG have Marquinhos, Thiago Silva, Kimpembe, etc. City have Stones, Kompany, Otamendi, Laporte. Teams just don't tend to spend massively on a CB unless they are in dire need (like Liverpool were, or we are).
 

bosnian_red

Worst scout to ever exist
Joined
Aug 13, 2011
Messages
58,020
Location
Canada
Regardless of how much it gets ridiculed here, he's too old for a big fee transfer. For all we know he might need a year to settle into the team and the league by the time he'd be on his way to a physical decline and added to our list of deadwood.

Even at half of that incredibly silly release clause, he wouldn't be worth it.
Was Liverpool crazy for spending £75m on Van Dijk? They're the same age (though yes they bought him last summer). Its kind if the same situation. Koulibaly has been one of the top CBs for a while now. Theres no doubts about his talent.
 

flappyjay

Full Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2016
Messages
5,933
Was Liverpool crazy for spending £75m on Van Dijk? They're the same age (though yes they bought him last summer). Its kind if the same situation. Koulibaly has been one of the top CBs for a while now. Theres no doubts about his talent.
No its not. Liverpool didn't have a bunch of other holes to fill. Also from the sounds of it Napoli want more than what Liverpool paid for vvd. So not exactly the same situation. Also he is a year older as you said. That plays into the situation
 

JJ12

Predicted Portugal, Italy to win Euro 2016, 2020
Joined
Mar 30, 2016
Messages
10,880
Location
Wales
Regardless of how much it gets ridiculed here, he's too old for a big fee transfer. For all we know he might need a year to settle into the team and the league by the time he'd be on his way to a physical decline and added to our list of deadwood.

Even at half of that incredibly silly release clause, he wouldn't be worth it.
Same age as Van Dijk.

Not too old at all. Whether he's worth a mega fee is another thing.
 

RedCurry

Full Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2016
Messages
4,686
Same age as Van Dijk.

Not too old at all. Whether he's worth a mega fee is another thing.
Was Liverpool crazy for spending £75m on Van Dijk? They're the same age (though yes they bought him last summer). Its kind if the same situation. Koulibaly has been one of the top CBs for a while now. Theres no doubts about his talent.
But VVD was a year younger, already well settled in the league and cost 55m GBP less than Koulibaly's release clause. I'd say it was still a big gamble from Liverpool although a great one in the hindsight.

With that kind of money we could get two younger and yet very good defenders. We could get Maguire + Munier and still have sizable amount of spare cash left for strengthening another position. When a team has only one weak position like Liverpool did, they can afford to splash a big chunk of their transfer kitty on that position. We have holes everywhere in the team and need quantity to go along with quality.
 

bosnian_red

Worst scout to ever exist
Joined
Aug 13, 2011
Messages
58,020
Location
Canada
No its not. Liverpool didn't have a bunch of other holes to fill. Also from the sounds of it Napoli want more than what Liverpool paid for vvd. So not exactly the same situation. Also he is a year older as you said. That plays into the situation
They did though. They signed Van Dijk, while they also had Alisson, fabinho and Keita to sign (keita was agreed but didnt join). Not like they spent a small amount on any of them. Their team had holes and at some point you just need to spend to fix it. Our right back, center back and midfield positions are positions that "just need spending". Proper spending. Not bringing in someone for massive money who is only a minor improvement like Maguire, but a proper top CB like Koulibaly.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.