They were more popular than this lot. Our ridiculously outdated electoral system got Starmer into power. It was a house of cards that is now falling.
They had the opportunity to "move the dial" with the massive majority and get everyone on board. But they never had any intent to move it more than a slight turn. Just kept the same show on the road.
They can push through whatever legislation they want. Turn that dial up to the max. Why haven't they done it?
I suspect the changes in law that will be required to overcome the inertia on the 'dial' are part of the change in constitutional precedence that will be required. This involves 'timing' as well as content. Starmers past experience as the senior law officer have to be trusted on this. It is not something the general public will want to know, or necessarily in some cases approve, e.g how to prevent future acts of 'nimbyism' from thwarting land and construction development, in particular regarding house building.
Another 'biggy' are changes in and development of employment law; this will take lots of time and effort and as far as employers are concerned, must not 'frighten the horses'; the economic situation is key to this and as yet its nowhere near good enough and any meaningful movement now to develop a new Social contract with employers, it would take too long and allow too many 'side steps' to be taken that even a massive parliamentary majority could not force through. This has to be in the second term.
One of the most difficult but necessary movements of the dial will be on education, from pre-school through to tertiary levels and beyond to continuous development/lifelong learning facilities and life time learning plans to help the public understand and engage in, e.g. AI and things as yet undiscovered/developed. This is another 2 term target maybe be even a third term.
Perhaps the one area they can move forward on more quickly is NHS/Welfare 'joined up system' approach... and with currently the aim to reduce waiting lists they are already 'at it'. This again takes money and significant changes in working practice which Streeting has been set up to lead... of course if he gets tempted to go for the PM job... it will be back to square one.
So much of the underpinning work required for all the above is currently in a 'latent' situation, its not always obvious and clear; what is clear is that from a constitutional stand point, a lot of dead wood and trench digging needs to be done first.
The main thing is of course the economy; that means everybody needs some extra cash in their pocket/bank account beyond what the need to live, to feel they can progress/move forward. That in turn means Reeves and Starmer have to be ruthless in how they managed the money that is available, in a much fairer way, but with non of the usual 'give-away's' to lull people into a sense of improvement that isn't really happening.
Its going to be a tough job, I suspect out of the current Labour heavyweights only Starmer can 'move the dial' but he will have plenty of scars on his back (from his own side) and will have to'bob-and-weave' with such as Farage, to accomplish it.
Of course this is not immediate, not for everybody, only the under 30's will truly benefit.... if the dial does get moved