Keir Starmer Labour Leader

neverdie

Full Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2018
Messages
2,323
You still think Labour have a chance?
We watched the Tories force through Brexit with their lies, watched on in horror how they failed during the pandemic resulting untold how many lives needlessly lost and now watch on as the pound gets raped bit still theres more chance of a Tory win than a Labour one sadly.
i'm looking at the state of the british economy quite aside from all the other issues. when the imf and other institutions come out against a government's fiscal event, you've got a terrible credibility issue for the coservative government. if they persist with tax cuts, it'll be a disaster. if they do a u turn, it'll also be disastrous for them.

i think labour wins by default unless something unheard of happens over the next year or so. starmer would have to defeat himself somehow. the economy isn't rebounding any time soon. all starmer has to do now is to play it safe from the sideline and he'll win. i like two of his announcements. one looking at a potential green new deal. the other at pr. if he gives people just enough reason to get behind his vision, then a 97 blowout is not impossible. maybe not same levels but not far from it. tories are running on less than fumes.

but yes, i think labour will win barring something unprecedented.
 

Dobba

Full Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2006
Messages
28,460
Location
"You and your paper can feck off."
i'm looking at the state of the british economy quite aside from all the other issues. when the imf and other institutions come out against a government's fiscal event, you've got a terrible credibility issue for the coservative government. if they persist with tax cuts, it'll be a disaster. if they do a u turn, it'll also be disastrous for them.

i think labour wins by default unless something unheard of happens over the next year or so. starmer would have to defeat himself somehow. the economy isn't rebounding any time soon. all starmer has to do now is to play it safe from the sideline and he'll win. i like two of his announcements. one looking at a potential green new deal. the other at pr.

but yes, i think labour will win barring something unprecedented.
I love that of the two announcements you like, one is something he's already said won't be in the next manifesto.
 

neverdie

Full Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2018
Messages
2,323
I love that of the two announcements you like, one is something he's already said won't be in the next manifesto.
yeah, i'm not certain he means it or that labour means it, either. it should happen but it'll always be a problem for the next opposition bench. if you think you can win, why bother?
 

Smores

Full Member
Joined
May 18, 2011
Messages
25,496
You're watching it on knowing there is not an election coming up. Labour have led the polls in healthy margins for a long time now indicating if the public were able to change government they would.
Leading in the polls doesn't mean an election win. Labour are said to need a good 12% lead to get a majority.

Given where we are you'd think the poll lead may not slip like it usually does during a campaign but who knows.
 

neverdie

Full Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2018
Messages
2,323
Leading in the polls doesn't mean an election win. Labour are said to need a good 12% lead to get a majority.

Given where we are you'd think the poll lead may not slip like it usually does during a campaign but who knows.
the biggest one for me is that starmer's three year project of courting the right wing press, which i'm no fan of, has paid off insofar as it's not clear they won't move behind labour come next election. how much more value is there for someone like murdoch or whoever inherits that empire in staying behind this tory government? on the other hand, they could very easily jump behind some new tory face.

it's true that the poll lead could narrow a lot. but it could also widen. the next ge could be an open air forum on all the ills of successive tory governments from the inflection point of post-pandemic, high-inflation, and crippling cost of living britain.
 

lefty_jakobz

I ❤️ moses
Joined
Aug 22, 2013
Messages
3,648
i'm looking at the state of the british economy quite aside from all the other issues. when the imf and other institutions come out against a government's fiscal event, you've got a terrible credibility issue for the coservative government. if they persist with tax cuts, it'll be a disaster. if they do a u turn, it'll also be disastrous for them.

i think labour wins by default unless something unheard of happens over the next year or so. starmer would have to defeat himself somehow. the economy isn't rebounding any time soon. all starmer has to do now is to play it safe from the sideline and he'll win. i like two of his announcements. one looking at a potential green new deal. the other at pr. if he gives people just enough reason to get behind his vision, then a 97 blowout is not impossible. maybe not same levels but not far from it. tories are running on less than fumes.

but yes, i think labour will win barring something unprecedented.
I certainly hope you are right.
 

TheGame

Full Member
Joined
Jul 30, 2002
Messages
18,836
Location
In the Land of Saints and Sinners
So the ideological purity line is just about me for not wanting to vote for a liar? I'm honoured.

Am I allowed to not vote for him now he's parroting Farage's immigration spiel?
What are you banging on about? Are you just WUMing now? No one is forcing you to vote for anyone. All people did on here was ask you question of who you are voting for yet you get your knickers in a twist and play some kind of victim. Very strange.
 

Jericholyte2

Full Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2004
Messages
3,536
There was actually a specific thing mentioned there: the racial profiling.

This is very relevant to the question I asked you yesterday, which you replied to but didn't answer. What does it actually mean to not be ideologically pure? Do you have to think that it's good to racially profile Muslim members, or are you supposed to disagree with it as long as it in no way impacts your support of the party? This also goes for those who are being profiled, do they have to agree with how they're being treated?
I can't say I've read anywhere near enough about the profiling issue to make anything like an informed judgment about it, so I won't (it's a rare talent I feel these days to be able to say 'I don't know').

Regarding the ideological purity: I see it as being unwavering in your pursuit of a mythical Party that is both electable and also matching you exactly in your ideology. Corbyn, for his many issues, had a wealth of policies that I'm 100% on board with, but I acknowledge that Labour under him, lost two elections to two of the worst PMs in our history, giving one an absolutely horrific 80-seat majority. Because of that I've acknowledged that I can't realistically find a party that is likely to be elected, that is anywhere near to my personal political ideology. Therefore, I look at which of the electable parties is closer to my desired destination.

I've posted before about political parties being busses, not taxis. They won't get you exactly where you want to go, but you take the one that gets you closest. Starmer may lie about being able to take me to the proverbial end of my street, but he's heading in the right direction, so I'm going with him.

Ideological purity is the equivalent of staying on the bus that's heading in the opposite direction, all the while complaining about the direction the bus is going, all because the Labour bus didn't have a stop outside your door.
 

Hernandez - BFA

The Way to Fly
Joined
Jan 5, 2011
Messages
17,290
As someone who is trying to get to grips with current politics (I hate it generally because I find them all liars who won’t admit they are in the wrong).

What are Starmer’s general faults? As in, I’ve heard some people say that Labour would stand better chance without him in charge. What’s generally the negatives for him?
 

sun_tzu

The Art of Bore
Joined
Aug 23, 2010
Messages
19,536
Location
Still waiting for the Youthquake
As someone who is trying to get to grips with current politics (I hate it generally because I find them all liars who won’t admit they are in the wrong).

What are Starmer’s general faults? As in, I’ve heard some people say that Labour would stand better chance without him in charge. What’s generally the negatives for him?
For some it's that he's not Jeremy Corbyn
Though for most that's his biggest positive
 

Badunk

Shares his caf joinday with Dante
Joined
Oct 22, 2010
Messages
12,914
Location
Occupied Merseyside
As someone who is trying to get to grips with current politics (I hate it generally because I find them all liars who won’t admit they are in the wrong).

What are Starmer’s general faults? As in, I’ve heard some people say that Labour would stand better chance without him in charge. What’s generally the negatives for him?
Made 10 pledges in the run up to becoming leader before abandoning all of them. Promised to unite the party but instead purged the left. Promised to root out antisemitism but the definition of the word for him means that criticism of Israel is antisemitic, which has led to the expulsion of many Jews from the party. Claims that his first order of business as PM will be the Hillsborough Law but also gives interviews to the Sun newspaper. The flag shagging, the monarchy sycophancy, the lack of solidarity with picketing union members.

Probably more but that's just off the top of my head.
 

NotThatSoph

Full Member
Joined
Sep 12, 2019
Messages
3,757
I can't say I've read anywhere near enough about the profiling issue to make anything like an informed judgment about it, so I won't (it's a rare talent I feel these days to be able to say 'I don't know').

Regarding the ideological purity: I see it as being unwavering in your pursuit of a mythical Party that is both electable and also matching you exactly in your ideology. Corbyn, for his many issues, had a wealth of policies that I'm 100% on board with, but I acknowledge that Labour under him, lost two elections to two of the worst PMs in our history, giving one an absolutely horrific 80-seat majority. Because of that I've acknowledged that I can't realistically find a party that is likely to be elected, that is anywhere near to my personal political ideology. Therefore, I look at which of the electable parties is closer to my desired destination.

I've posted before about political parties being busses, not taxis. They won't get you exactly where you want to go, but you take the one that gets you closest. Starmer may lie about being able to take me to the proverbial end of my street, but he's heading in the right direction, so I'm going with him.

Ideological purity is the equivalent of staying on the bus that's heading in the opposite direction, all the while complaining about the direction the bus is going, all because the Labour bus didn't have a stop outside your door.
Alright. So to bring it back to what started it all, saying that those who believes in Starmer's latest spiel (the energy thing) deserves to be taken for a ride is not on its own ideological purity as long as you still voting Labour while pointing out that it's just bullshit, right?

I'm also wondering if there's a line that can be crossed here. For instance, say that Labour figures they have to compete on immigration, so they launch the Congo Republic asylum plan. It's more centrist than the Rwanda one on most measures; it's closer to the UK, it scores slightly higher on the Human Development Index and it has a coastline.

Would that matter at all? Also they snap up Rishi Sunak to take advantage of Tory turmoil.
 

Jericholyte2

Full Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2004
Messages
3,536
Alright. So to bring it back to what started it all, saying that those who believes in Starmer's latest spiel (the energy thing) deserves to be taken for a ride is not on its own ideological purity as long as you still voting Labour while pointing out that it's just bullshit, right?

I'm also wondering if there's a line that can be crossed here. For instance, say that Labour figures they have to compete on immigration, so they launch the Congo Republic asylum plan. It's more centrist than the Rwanda one on most measures; it's closer to the UK, it scores slightly higher on the Human Development Index and it has a coastline.

Would that matter at all? Also they snap up Rishi Sunak to take advantage of Tory turmoil.
The line is simply ‘Do I believe that life under this Labour would be better or worse than it currently is’
 

Jericholyte2

Full Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2004
Messages
3,536
It'll be absolutely no different. Except the people who rightly dragged Farage and co for their points based immigration system fantasies will instead be supporting it.
And you know that how? From his career as a public defender? Or more of the media driven nonsense about ‘all politicians are the same’?
 

Jericholyte2

Full Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2004
Messages
3,536
So, yes, you would vote for Sunak and his Congo Republic asylum plan. Ok, I wouldn't.
I didn’t say would my life be better, I’d take everything in to account.

Again, your suggesting that we stay with this cabal of fascists because the opposition isn’t offering a Shangri La with everyone holding hands and living in peace.
 

Dobba

Full Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2006
Messages
28,460
Location
"You and your paper can feck off."
And you know that how? From his career as a public defender? Or more of the media driven nonsense about ‘all politicians are the same’?
Oh I know for definite that not all politicians are the same. For example, I'm quite right in my view not to vote Tory because their policies are a combination of things I find utterly appalling and outright lies. Where as I'm completely wrong to think that way about a bunch of neoliberal policies I despise spouted by a demonstrable liar who has done almost nothing but abstain on the utterly appalling policies of the Tories whilst he's been in the job.

Calls for 'Points based immigration' were thinly veiled racism and xenophobia for every day of the past 10 years, now they're things you should ignore and vote for the party leader spouting them anyway.

If anything Starmer is the poster boy for treating politicians who say the same things entirely differently.
 

Jericholyte2

Full Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2004
Messages
3,536
Oh I know for definite that not all politicians are the same. For example, I'm quite right in my view not to vote Tory because their policies are a combination of things I find utterly appalling and outright lies. Where as I'm completely wrong to think that way about a bunch of neoliberal policies I despise spouted by a demonstrable liar who has done almost nothing but abstain on the utterly appalling policies of the Tories whilst he's been in the job.

Calls for 'Points based immigration' were thinly veiled racism and xenophobia for every day of the past 10 years, now they're things you should ignore and vote for the party leader spouting them anyway.
That’s simply not true. You know what the Tories do because they’ve been doing it for 12 years.

You think you know what Labour will do because of prejudices about the leader not being Jeremy Corbyn and the media influence.
 

Dobba

Full Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2006
Messages
28,460
Location
"You and your paper can feck off."
That’s simply not true. You know what the Tories do because they’ve been doing it for 12 years.

You think you know what Labour will do because of prejudices about the leader not being Jeremy Corbyn and the media influence.
I know what Labour will do because of who the leader is, the lies he spouts in order to gain power and the appalling records of his handpicked Shadow Cabinet.

Heck, I'll even drop the first bit of that and say you could stick Corbyn in charge of this Shadow Cabinet of absolute bastards, whilst calling for a points based immigration system and I still absolutely wouldn't be voting for them.
 

NotThatSoph

Full Member
Joined
Sep 12, 2019
Messages
3,757
I didn’t say would my life be better, I’d take everything in to account.

Again, your suggesting that we stay with this cabal of fascists because the opposition isn’t offering a Shangri La with everyone holding hands and living in peace.
Yes, and taking everything into account surely Sunak and Congo for Labour is better that the Tories, so you'd want that.

I'm not suggesting anything, I'm responding to you calling people pure and them wanting the Tories in power etc. By the same token, you want everything the Tories are doing just marginally shifted towards the left, whatever that means. All those tax cuts for the rich? You support that, just a cent less. Letting migrants drown? Perfect, just as long as we save one more than now. 172 103 people dead from Covid, 172 102 would have been a great success.

I just don't see why this is a very useful thing to do. Unless you think talking about ideological purity and saying that people are as bad as the tories will make them change their minds, and you're doing it for som kind of campaigning purpose, but I don't think you believe that.
 

Jericholyte2

Full Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2004
Messages
3,536
I know what Labour will do because of who the leader is, the lies he spouts in order to gain power and the appalling records of his handpicked Shadow Cabinet.

Heck, I'll even drop the first bit of that and say you could stick Corbyn in charge of this Shadow Cabinet of absolute bastards, whilst calling for a points based immigration system and I still absolutely wouldn't be voting for them.
Again though, purely conjecture and magic 8-ball predictions.

We’re heading for a horrific recession, the pound heading to parity with the dollar. Public services on their knees and population of children living under the poverty line is increasing hand over fist.

And you genuinely think it will be no better than under Labour…

I feel bad for you.
 

Dobba

Full Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2006
Messages
28,460
Location
"You and your paper can feck off."
Again though, purely conjecture and magic 8-ball predictions.

We’re heading for a horrific recession, the pound heading to parity with the dollar. Public services on their knees and population of children living under the poverty line is increasing hand over fist.

And you genuinely think it will be no better than under Labour…

I feel bad for you.
8-ball predictions or, as they're known to everyone else, judging people by their actions.

Oh don't feel bad for me, you're the one rushing to support Farage's immigration policy because the rosette of the guy spouting it has gone from purple to red.
 

Jericholyte2

Full Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2004
Messages
3,536
Yes, and taking everything into account surely Sunak and Congo for Labour is better that the Tories, so you'd want that.

I'm not suggesting anything, I'm responding to you calling people pure and them wanting the Tories in power etc. By the same token, you want everything the Tories are doing just marginally shifted towards the left, whatever that means. All those tax cuts for the rich? You support that, just a cent less. Letting migrants drown? Perfect, just as long as we save one more than now. 172 103 people dead from Covid, 172 102 would have been a great success.

I just don't see why this is a very useful thing to do. Unless you think talking about ideological purity and saying that people are as bad as the tories will make them change their minds, and you're doing it for som kind of campaigning purpose, but I don't think you believe that.
I want a fair system of taxation
I want public services to be able to do the jobs they need
I want an empathetic immigration policy
I want significant public ownership of utilities etc

But no party is doing that.

The party currently in power is making things worse literally on a daily basis.

So yes, if the option is between what is happening now and something that’s 1% better, I’m picking the option that’s 1% better. I won't feel great about it, and would likely do it through gritted teeth, but I'd do it as I'd rather things get slightly better, then start a fight again to make it even better than that, then again, and again, until we have something resembling good.
 
Last edited:

balaks

Full Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2014
Messages
15,335
Location
Northern Ireland
Supports
Tottenham Hotspur
I know what Labour will do because of who the leader is, the lies he spouts in order to gain power and the appalling records of his handpicked Shadow Cabinet.

Heck, I'll even drop the first bit of that and say you could stick Corbyn in charge of this Shadow Cabinet of absolute bastards, whilst calling for a points based immigration system and I still absolutely wouldn't be voting for them.
Ok so vote for the Lib Dems, or the Greens, or fecking anybody other than the Tories.
 

Kinsella

Copy & Paste Merchant
Joined
Jan 20, 2012
Messages
2,761

These are vote winners IMO
Whatever about public ownership of the NHS, the service needs fundamental root and branch reform.

There is far too much bureaucracy involved in modern health care, and the pen pushing management class in every Trust (which the public never encounters) has far too much power and influence over how hospitals are run. The situation in NI is beyond dire, and it’s not just due to funding.
 

Fluctuation0161

Full Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2016
Messages
8,156
Location
Manchester
So the Leader of the Labour Group at the time couldn't even decide what his Brexit policy was? Brexit was a big factor no doubt but there were several other factors where people didn't see Corbyn as prime minister material.
Brexit was the core issue of the 2019 election. Let's be honest.

With regard to Brexit policy, Starmer went rogue. Seems he was plotting even back then.

"Keir Starmer defies Jeremy Corbyn to say Labour could back second EU referendum"

https://www.politicshome.com/news/a...to-say-labour-could-back-second-eu-referendum
 

TheGame

Full Member
Joined
Jul 30, 2002
Messages
18,836
Location
In the Land of Saints and Sinners
Brexit was the core issue of the 2019 election. Let's be honest.

With regard to Brexit policy, Starmer went rogue. Seems he was plotting even back then.

"Keir Starmer defies Jeremy Corbyn to say Labour could back second EU referendum"

https://www.politicshome.com/news/a...to-say-labour-could-back-second-eu-referendum
It was a key issue not the defining issue for the election. Corbyn just wasn't appealing or convincing to the electorate. Of course the media didn't help but he made a number of gaffe's himself. To use Brexit as the argument why Labour lost is lazy and suddenly absolves Corbyn of any responsibility. Him and his shadow cabinet include McDonnell and Abbott didn't come across a Government who could govern.
 

Fluctuation0161

Full Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2016
Messages
8,156
Location
Manchester
As someone who is trying to get to grips with current politics (I hate it generally because I find them all liars who won’t admit they are in the wrong).

What are Starmer’s general faults? As in, I’ve heard some people say that Labour would stand better chance without him in charge. What’s generally the negatives for him?
Look up his 10 leadership pledges and what his position is on them now...
 

Fluctuation0161

Full Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2016
Messages
8,156
Location
Manchester
It was a key issue not the defining issue for the election. Corbyn just wasn't appealing or convincing to the electorate. Of course the media didn't help but he made a number of gaffe's himself. To use Brexit as the argument why Labour lost is lazy and suddenly absolves Corbyn of any responsibility. Him and his shadow cabinet include McDonnell and Abbott didn't come across a Government who could govern.
It is not absolving anyone of responsibility to acknowledge that Brexit was the core issue for the 2019 election. As in, it was the primary concern and I would argue it was the defining issue of that political period.
 

Boycott

Full Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2013
Messages
6,306
Without going too far into old ground I think one understated issue that impacted Corbyn negatively is simply that he was a career politician who spent decades in the obscurity of the commons and who came from a relatively privileged background. That was a tap in for attacks of champagne socialism. And for the critics of Starmer's beige personality which I don't disagree with, Corbyn was a dullard too but with a less relatable life story. You may say that no one relates to etonian tories and that is true but they get held to a different standard on that question. It's why Johnson gets portrayed as one of the lads by the media. I've often wondered if a long serving politician like Dennis Skinner would turn that on its head because he had a strong personality and was working class having been a miner before politics. Labour generally lack charismatic/strong personalities now compared to the past.
 

berbatrick

Renaissance Man
Scout
Joined
Oct 22, 2010
Messages
21,539
How triumphant. :lol:

I think you need to understand that Labour's improvement in the polls is in spite of Starmer, not because of him. The Tories have imploded. Labour could have Harry Maguire as leader and they'd still be ahead in the polls.
See, these arguments don't really matter. It's like arguing about Brazil 1982 vs Italy 1982. Purists can admire the youtube videos of Brazil, but Italy carved their name into the thing.
You can argue about circumstances, sabotage, etc. What history will note is a 18 point loss by a leftist and a 15 point win by the right-wing. Same as Blair's success vs Foot's failure - every circumstance melts away, leaving behind the right-wing wins. And that will be the lesson taken.

Timing is as important as anything else, and the right-wing have timed their purges and abandoning of promises perfectly, because of covid, Johnson's scandals, and the current mess.
There are a few maybes for Corbyn - doing his own purges before his party could back stab him seems to, have been an obvious solution. But it didn't happen, and his ideology goes into the dustbin with him.