Kieran Trippier / signed for Newcastle

Status
Not open for further replies.

Sultan

Gentleness adorns everything
Joined
Sep 1, 2004
Messages
48,569
Location
Redcafe
Yep. When he said Matic was the best player in pre-season that shocked me. If I have 1 criticism of Ole it's he seems to like the "people" a bit too much, and not just judge them on the pitch.
Matic is our best passer out of Fred and McTominay. So Ole would be correct to say Matic was the best player. However, he just cannot cope playing against high-intensity pressing teams these days. In pre-season high pressing is not normally used due to these games being just preparations for the upcoming season.
 

Sultan

Gentleness adorns everything
Joined
Sep 1, 2004
Messages
48,569
Location
Redcafe
I might be in a minority here who think Dalot is a better player going forward than Wan Bissaka. Obviously, the latter is the better defending. If the defensive unit works well with the acquisition of Varane there could possibly be plenty of games for Dalot when he would have less responsibility in certain games.
 

crossy1686

career ending
Joined
Jun 5, 2010
Messages
31,486
Location
Manchester/Stockholm
I might be in a minority here who think Dalot is a better player going forward than Wan Bissaka. Obviously, the latter is the better defending. If the defensive unit works well with the acquisition of Varane then there could be plenty of games for Dalot when he would have less responsibility in certain games.
I'd agree with this. There was talk for a while that Dalot might actually be better as a winger
 

Brightonian

Full Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2012
Messages
14,090
Location
Juanderlust
Honestly can't say I care that much what we decide to do, Trippier or Dalot. I'm very happy with AWB as first choice. And extremely excited to see Laird come into the picture in a couple of seasons. Whoever we use as back-up will be just that.
 

AFC NimbleThumb

Full Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2019
Messages
8,280
I might be in a minority here who think Dalot is a better player going forward than Wan Bissaka. Obviously, the latter is the better defending. If the defensive unit works well with the acquisition of Varane there could possibly be plenty of games for Dalot when he would have less responsibility in certain games.
I’ve always liked the ‘idea’ of Dalot.

With Varane in the back line we shouldn’t be so risk averse & I’d like to see him given more opportunities.

AWBs lack of offensive ability can be stifling at times & it’s hardly as if we keep plenty of clean sheets with him in it, AWB is an exceptional 1-v-1 defender but his positional play isn’t something to write home about.
 

Adam-Utd

Part of first caf team to complete Destiny raid
Joined
Sep 10, 2010
Messages
39,954
Matic is our best passer out of Fred and McTominay. So Ole would be correct to say Matic was the best player. However, he just cannot cope playing against high-intensity pressing teams these days. In pre-season high pressing is not normally used due to these games being just preparations for the upcoming season.
Doesn't matter if you can pass under no pressure - when the real games happen he can't move his feet fast enough. Pereira was probably better than Matic yet it means nothing.
 

Sultan

Gentleness adorns everything
Joined
Sep 1, 2004
Messages
48,569
Location
Redcafe
Doesn't matter if you can pass under no pressure - when the real games happen he can't move his feet fast enough. Pereira was probably better than Matic yet it means nothing.
Erm, it's what I'm saying.
 

hobbers

Full Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2013
Messages
27,359
Shit management keeping Dalot and not trying to upgrade/put pressure on AWB.
 

mitchmouse

loves to hate United.
Joined
Oct 8, 2014
Messages
17,361
We still persist in not listening when told a price. Coming soon: a bid of £7.50p for Neymar, followed by shock that it's been turned down. What made our geniuses think an £18m bid at the last moment was going to work? Either we want him or we don't (and yes, I've been lectured on "negotiating" already). Atletico made it clear what they wanted (and it might have been bonkers or not, given your thoughts), just as Dortmund have done in the past - even we have turned down bids we felt were too low for players
 

NYAS

Full Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2012
Messages
4,315
Go back for him in January.

Rice and Haaland in the summer.
 

ivaldo

Mediocre Horse Whisperer, s'up wid chew?
Joined
Nov 15, 2012
Messages
28,699
We still persist in not listening when told a price. Coming soon: a bid of £7.50p for Neymar, followed by shock that it's been turned down. What made our geniuses think an £18m bid at the last moment was going to work? Either we want him or we don't (and yes, I've been lectured on "negotiating" already). Atletico made it clear what they wanted (and it might have been bonkers or not, given your thoughts), just as Dortmund have done in the past - even we have turned down bids we felt were too low for players
Every single club in the world makes it clear they want more money than they'll actually accept. Dortmund took significantly less than what they demanded from the beginning of the window. I think you've been going to the Phil Wang School of Negotiating.
 

Red Royal

Full Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2013
Messages
2,983
Location
Planet Earth
Every single club in the world makes it clear they want more money than they'll actually accept. Dortmund took significantly less than what they demanded from the beginning of the window. I think you've been going to the Phil Wang School of Negotiating.
Absolutely true.. except PSG refusing to sell Mbappe which was a total outlier
 

Abraxas

Full Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2021
Messages
6,023
The club were sensible not pursuing this one for silly money.

We spent 50 million pounds on AWB. He's shown some improvement. Maybe not enough, but if he's not good enough this season then we need to identify a long term option or at least long term competition. Not an aging player that will be done in a few years. That method was okay for striker because there's so few but if we can't find and develop our own RB then we've got serious problems in recruitment.
 

CM10

Full Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2014
Messages
7,275
I think we'll be back in for him, the interest seemed genuine and it sounds like Trippier was up for it too.

There are a lot of conflicting reports over whether his contract expires in 2022 or 2023 but if he's available on a free next year I'm almost certain we'll make a move.
 

sun_tzu

The Art of Bore
Joined
Aug 23, 2010
Messages
19,536
Location
Still waiting for the Youthquake
I think we'll be back in for him, the interest seemed genuine and it sounds like Trippier was up for it too.

There are a lot of conflicting reports over whether his contract expires in 2022 or 2023 but if he's available on a free next year I'm almost certain we'll make a move.
I think its 2023
He signed initially till 2022 with a clause that if he played 20 games last season this would trigger an extension till 2023
he played over 20 games
https://onefootball.com/en/news/kieran-trippier-renews-contract-with-atletico-madrid-33020252
https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/kieran-trippier/profil/spieler/95810

So as far as i know hes not available on a free

He will be 31 in a few weeks as well so i dont see us spending much on him - and 33 pretty much as soon as he is available on a free - personally I have high hopes for Laird who I hope to see back with us next year
 
Last edited:

Ralph1386

Full Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2008
Messages
3,440
Reports in Spain that we will go back for him in January. I wish we’d spend more energy trying to bolster our midfield rather than replacing a back-up RB with another one.
 

Santos J

Full Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2013
Messages
7,346
Reports in Spain that we will go back for him in January. I wish we’d spend more energy trying to bolster our midfield rather than replacing a back-up RB with another one.
Why would the 2 be mutually exclusive?
 

Ralph1386

Full Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2008
Messages
3,440
Why would the 2 be mutually exclusive?
Because the budget is not unlimited, one buy affects how much money we have for another buy. There are no reports that we are going for a midfielder in January. Also we officially for Trippier on deadline day and nobody else.
 

Santos J

Full Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2013
Messages
7,346
Because the budget is not unlimited, one buy affects how much money we have for another buy. There are no reports that we are going for a midfielder in January. Also we officially for Trippier on deadline day and nobody else.
We were after Trippier all summer and signed other players in the mean time. If we sign Trippier it'd be for £20m max if that and by all accounts the loan deal we agreed with Dortmund for Dalot was 5m EUR fee with an option to buy so any 'impact' on this limited budget would be negligible as it would obviously be a 1 in for 1 out signing. Just because some shite papers haven't linked us with a midfielder doesn't mean we don't want one and won't sign one.
 

Ralph1386

Full Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2008
Messages
3,440
We were after Trippier all summer and signed other players in the mean time. If we sign Trippier it'd be for £20m max if that and by all accounts the loan deal we agreed with Dortmund for Dalot was 5m EUR fee with an option to buy so any 'impact' on this limited budget would be negligible as it would obviously be a 1 in for 1 out signing. Just because some shite papers haven't linked us with a midfielder doesn't mean we don't want one and won't sign one.
I don’t agree and I don’t think we should be wasting any time or money on the Trippier deal. Actions speak louder than words, we did not officially bid for any midfielder this summer (though we were linked with some), and we are clearly going back for Trippier in January.

Unless an injury crisis forces our hand, I don’t think we’re going for a midfielder until next summer.
 

Highfather_24

Full Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2014
Messages
2,725
With Ronaldo in the team, you need good crossing. I can see why Ole would want Trippier over AWB in certain games.
 

UNITED ACADEMY

New Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2018
Messages
13,127
Supports
Erik ten Hag
To be fair, Trippier's cross -> Ronaldo's heading goal could be a love story. On top of that imagine if the score is 1-1 or 0-0 and you want a goal, you put Trippier, Cavani, Ronaldo on the pitch and that could be the solution. But I doubt he will be available in January.
 

LawCharltonBest

Enjoys watching fox porn
Joined
May 17, 2012
Messages
14,886
Location
Salford
Reports in Spain that we will go back for him in January. I wish we’d spend more energy trying to bolster our midfield rather than replacing a back-up RB with another one.
I agree with you, but Trippier seems a very doable transfer in January and it would make sense for all parties. According to Andy Mitten, who is close to Trippier's family, despite reports that Trippier has 2 years left, he actually has the option to leave on a free in 10 months.

I think when that DM/CM comes in, it'll be a big deal in the summer. I can't see another "Bruno" happening unless we are struggling badly to qualify for the top 4. Less so if Pogba commits by then too because he can fill in.
 

Poborsky's hair

Full Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2020
Messages
1,720
Supports
Bohemians 1905
Maybe this will encourage AWB take on players more and put in a cross more often, he's obviously not as good at it as trippier but he got some assists from crosses last season, we just need to encourage him a bit more. On the other hand Dalot could provide some early crosses but yeah, he's very inconsistent in it..
 

matherto

ask me about our 50% off sale!
Joined
Nov 3, 2009
Messages
17,511
Location
St. Helens
Probably kneejerk after what AWB did tonight but can see us going for him in January.
 

joedirt87

Full Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2010
Messages
6,203
Probably kneejerk after what AWB did tonight but can see us going for him in January.
Even if United do sign him, I think it's merely for cover. I think the move makes sense if we had a manager who would make the tactical changes to start Tripper over AWB in games where we need a more attacking minded full back on the right, or bring him on for his crossing as a sub to change the game. There's been times when Bissaka has looked he's got nothing left in the tank and yet he starts every game.
 

matherto

ask me about our 50% off sale!
Joined
Nov 3, 2009
Messages
17,511
Location
St. Helens
Even if United do sign him, I think it's merely for cover. I think the move makes sense if we had a manager who would make the tactical changes to start Tripper over AWB in games where we need a more attacking minded full back on the right, or bring him for an attacking impact. There's been times when Bissaka has looked he's got nothing left in the tank and yet he starts every game.
I feel like most games we need a more attacking right back though. Would help Sancho and Greenwood so much more and balance us out so we're not all down the left and predictable.
 

joedirt87

Full Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2010
Messages
6,203
I feel like most games we need a more attacking right back though. Would help Sancho and Greenwood so much more and balance us out so we're not all down the left and predictable.
i agree with you, but do you see really Ole starting one or the other based on the matchup, or just throwing AWB out there every week and Trippier sitting on the bench getting a cup game here and there.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.