amolbhatia50k
Sneaky bum time - Vaccination status: dozed off
Agree7/10 performance and lot better than Casemiro and Bruno who were pretty meh.

Agree7/10 performance and lot better than Casemiro and Bruno who were pretty meh.
Always interesting those stat man Dave posts because looking at that you'd think Mainoo played amazing tonight but my interpretation coming away from tonight's game was he was just alright.
Nothing amazing but wasn't bad either just ok. Gaps between the midfield looked way too big for huge portions of the game and him and Cas where to slow getting back a few times for my liking.
For me it was a bit a game of two halves. First half he was bright and useful, and took care of the ball well and kept up flow, which was important with so many players being erratic on the ball (Casemiro, Bruno, Cunha, Amad, Mbeumo, Dalot, Yoro). He had a part in us controlling the midfield in the first half.Had lots of really good moments but overall his style when paired with Casemiro in a two causes issues. It's just too slow and passive, pair him next to someone with more energy and it may not be an issue.
Was a tough game though as Everton packed the middle.
For me it was a bit a game of two halves. First half he was bright and useful, and took care of the ball well and kept up flow, which was important with so many players being erratic on the ball (Casemiro, Bruno, Cunha, Amad, Mbeumo, Dalot, Yoro). He had a part in us controlling the midfield in the first half.
Second half Everton took over midfield, with more players, winning more duels and more intensive movement. Both Mainoo and Casemiro suffered under this. It didn’t help them that both Bruno and Cunha in particular were very indisciplined in how they related to pressing position (not for lack of effort, but with the same result). But they as a pair lack the combined mobility, burst and proactiveness in defending to counter that problem, and we just ceded the control of the game. Luckily that opened up for our options on the counter, which gave us as many dangerous attacks as in the first half. And luckily Lammens and Maguire managed to scoop up all the Everton pressure.
A plus for Mainoo in the second half setting up the Mbeumo chance after good proactive defending and a good ball into a dangerous area.
A real lack of athletic ability.The whole midfield was average today, we struggled to really get on the ball and really dictate how the game would go. Mainoo was neat and tidy but not much more than that.
One thing I’ve noticed is Casemiro and Bruno often go for the risky forward passes so it often means build up is abandoned and a lot of the time Mainoo’s safer passing actually offers us balance. With no Martinez today it was important we had someone like Mainoo to keep recycling possession or it would have been like a ping pong game.
Hes got the ability and he's already improved a ton with this the last month, he's consistently been among the top in terms of touches and passes when he's on the pitch. You gotta remember that he's only 20, has so much room for growth and so much time.I wish he was more eager to get on the ball.
Of course. Like you say, so many years ahead of him. I’m pretty hopeful.Hes got the ability and he's already improved a ton with this the last month, he's consistently been among the top in terms of touches and passes when he's on the pitch. You gotta remember that he's only 20, has so much room for growth and so much time.
To a degree, but he was a bit Joe Allen-ish. He always nearly avoided a line breaking pass in favour of a safe one, which made it easier for Everton to defend when he was on the ball. If that's his role, then fine, but I'd like a bit more from him.The whole midfield was average today, we struggled to really get on the ball and really dictate how the game would go. Mainoo was neat and tidy but not much more than that.
One thing I’ve noticed is Casemiro and Bruno often go for the risky forward passes so it often means build up is abandoned and a lot of the time Mainoo’s safer passing actually offers us balance. With no Martinez today it was important we had someone like Mainoo to keep recycling possession or it would have been like a ping pong game.
That's a strange critique of him for this match considering he had 96% pass completion rate.
I'm genuinely asking here but how much of your opinion was based on your live watch of the game and then afterwards with the stats? I'm assuming you're referring to the dispossessions and unstable (?) touches for Mainoo?
From memory I think quite a few of those touches were when Mainoo was 'creating' and in disadvantageous situations. He definitely could have done better but looking at the video and just glancing at their positions throughout the match, I think there's a clear positional difference. Casemiro was the deepest receiving from the centre backs and then Mainoo a little further ahead as the central option or in the final third. The issue is that Everton were blocking the middle very well and our ball progression by the likes of Shaw, Maguire and Yoro were very poor. So aside from the two midfielders, a lot of the progressive ball actions came from Dalot or Amad/Mbeumo and Bruno, all who had to come towards the ball or deeper. This lead to Everton crowding out the space and getting lots of interceptions. Of course most of our players were poor anyways.
Looking at the no. of passes and accuracy percentages, I'll probably conclude Casemiro had a higher volume due to his deeper position (e.g passes to CBs and square balls to FBs) but lower accuracy because he tried to do too much also with the progressive/through balls. It's systematic issue as much of a personnel. I'd still stand by my comment that Mainoo is more or less 'alone' in being the natural rhythmic midfielder whilst Casemiro (too eager) and Bruno (ill position) are on different wavelengths.
Something for Carrick and the coaching staff to think about if they recognises this.
Thanks mate - then I'll admit I was wrong, and Bruno was very poor yesterday, no doubt.
Cheers - likewise! Who knows, perhaps I was deluded into thinking so for him not working himself out of it. Bruno is absolutely one you can push off the ball, but as he proved against Fulham, he can be very clever and just avoid those situations and drift into pockets of space. Against Everton he just struggled with space, with passing, retention. Most likely just a poor day at the office.No worries mate, I wasn't trying to pull you up on it or anything. I usually find myself agreeing with your comments, so had to double take and question whether I had missed Everton's man marking on my first watch.
This is it for meIf we buy 2 CMs in the summer he can find himself out of the team again.
Still all potential at this stage, he either improves his physicality to develop into a screener who can break the press with his ball carrying, or his medium and long passing to be a playmaker. At the moment he’s just looking tidy in there without really impacting the games. Hand on heart can anybody say he has improved on the player he was 2 years ago?
It's very different to mount who is an experienced attacking player on a huge salary. He is playing as one of two deeper midfielders and as someone has previously mentioned casemiro and Bruno often play risky passes and give the ball away a lot so his recycling of possession offers sone valance.Sort of a bit like Mount. Spend most of the time wondering what he actually does. Doesn't create, doesn't score, doesn't win the ball. Can't do anything other than a simple pass.
Cheers - likewise! Who knows, perhaps I was deluded into thinking so for him not working himself out of it. Bruno is absolutely one you can push off the ball, but as he proved against Fulham, he can be very clever and just avoid those situations and drift into pockets of space. Against Everton he just struggled with space, with passing, retention. Most likely just a poor day at the office.
I think if he'll be a long term success at United it would be as a 6.If we buy 2 CMs in the summer he can find himself out of the team again.
Still all potential at this stage, he either improves his physicality to develop into a screener who can break the press with his ball carrying, or his medium and long passing to be a playmaker. At the moment he’s just looking tidy in there without really impacting the games. Hand on heart can anybody say he has improved on the player he was 2 years ago?
Watch the full games rather than highlights. It would be great in Mainoo developed his qualities in both boxes but as things stand his quality with regards to ball retention and profession are very good.Sort of a bit like Mount. Spend most of the time wondering what he actually does. Doesn't create, doesn't score, doesn't win the ball. Can't do anything other than a simple pass.
He's been way more aggressive, with his pitch covering and fight for the ball.Joggie Mainoo.
It is. Who said it?The notion that Kobbie Mainoo has failed to meet expectations for his age is utterly bizarre.
It is. Who said it?
But who said he failed to meet expectations? The expectations on the Kobbie hype train are that he's a generational talent and that he knits everything together.I prefer not to embarrass other posters, but I’ll copy and paste one post:
“Sort of a bit like Mount. Spend most of the time wondering what he actually does. Doesn't create, doesn't score, doesn't win the ball. Can't do anything other than a simple pass.“
Unless, of course, the mistake is mine and this quote actually refers to someone other than Kobbie Mainoo.
But who said he failed to meet expectations? The expectations on the Kobbie hype train are that he's a generational talent and that he knits everything together.
We didn't see that the last 2 games. I think he's got bags of potential but he needs lots of development.
It's easier to understand what he does if you watch him play and have played football yourself to be honest. Especially if you've played in midfield! Easy to see why he's a top talent.Sort of a bit like Mount. Spend most of the time wondering what he actually does. Doesn't create, doesn't score, doesn't win the ball. Can't do anything other than a simple pass.