Kroos "the deal was all but done"

TRUERED89

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jan 23, 2019
Messages
2,366
Location
England
Depressing, but deep down we all know that he would have gone to garbage here -
I disagree, he'd just won the CL with Bayern and was at the absolute peak of his powers. Having Kroos would of enhanced LVG's heavy possession based style with some actual creativity from midfield, something we sorely lacked hence why we were painfully boring to watch.
 

12OunceEpilogue

In perfect harmony
Scout
Joined
Oct 2, 2016
Messages
18,392
Location
Wigan
Confirms earlier reports, now Kroos was the type of quality player we could've really benefitted from.

If we're talking about missed opportunities though, for me it gets even more bizarre if you realize that first we had a Dutch manager. He didn't bring in guys like Wijnaldum or De Vrij in despite just having worked with them very sucessfully, and he completely failed to recognize Van Dijk's talent, two of them ending up being very succesful for Liverpool out of all clubs. Instead he brings in guys like Schneiderlin, Schweinsteiger, Memphis.

Then we have a Portugese manager but we somehow don't get a truly unique talent like Bernardo Silva who goes to our bitter rivals. Neither do we get Cristiano Ronaldo back despite the Mendes connection and his history at this club, for some reason however we do get Lukaku and fecking Lindelöf.

Now we have a Norwegian manager but of course we didn't get Haaland...
Yeah and where the feck was Colin Hendry when Fergie managed us? We ended up with Choccy and Fletcher.

LVG's transfers were poor, there's no doubt about it. What we could have done with Kroos in that midfield.
 

ash_86

Full Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2013
Messages
6,337
The problem isn't chopping and changing manager but this weird confusion that the manager is the club when he is simply an employee that will rarely be at the club for the entire length of most players contracts. Most players at top clubs sign for 5 years while managers rarely spend more than 3 years, it makes no sense to put the manager above the playing staff. That's why unless if you have a manager like SAF, transfers should be the clubs decision and the manager do with what he is given, he can have some input but that's only advisory.
You're right. Football is a result oriented business and these decisions has to happen over the pay grade of manager. Wish we move to a European model of dof. It's blatant to see what we are missing and still not getting addressed.
 

NewGlory

United make me feel dirty. And not in a sexy way.
Joined
Jul 13, 2019
Messages
4,239
It shows how stupid is to just change managers with no plan whatsoever.

If we had a director of football and a proper structure with long-term plan, these kind of failures would not happen on a regular basis, as it has been the case with our club.
100%
 

Bastian

Full Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2015
Messages
18,444
Supports
Mejbri
Depressing, but deep down we all know that he would have gone to garbage here - for a high profile player on what would have been an excessive wage and looking to make an impact - it was possibly the worst time to join us.
He’d have done well here, for sure.
 

Adam-Utd

Part of first caf team to complete Destiny raid
Joined
Sep 10, 2010
Messages
39,954
LVG sold Kroos from Bayern, so it's not crazy he didn't want to buy him.

What is crazy though is that he was the perfect player for his possession based tactics. The fact we didn't go ahead with the deal really does haunt us even to this day.

Imagine a midfield of Kroos, Pogba and Fernandes right now?
 

cyril C

Full Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2017
Messages
2,634
We got matey Bastian and blind instead just as Moyes brought matey fellaini and Mou brought matey Matic. That what happens when you give full control to the manager.
How many matey players did Pep buy? With whatever structure you have, with or without DOF, if you manager whom you just hired and obviously trusted, want 1 key player as last piece of his puzzle, would you not support him? If that player cost 200m you can decline base on commercial reason, but not a 40m player. If your manager want yet another DMF beside your current 3 DMF (like Conte did) then your DOF should do his job. If your manager want yet another left winger like Sanchez while you already have 2 key players playing on the left, your DOF should say something.

Out of all the deadwood that we recruited, I would say a good DOF can only filter half of them.

YES - Fellaini, Schneiderlin (if he has done enough research), Sanchez, Rojo (too short), Dalot, Darmian (too slow)

NO - Blind (versatile enough, can you say no?), Bastian, Matic, Bailly, Lukaku, Depay,
 

Crashoutcassius

Full Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2013
Messages
10,295
Location
playa del carmen
It shows how stupid is to just change managers with no plan whatsoever.

If we had a director of football and a proper structure with long-term plan, these kind of failures would not happen on a regular basis, as it has been the case with our club.
fast forward 5 years and sancho says allegri torpedoed the deal so he could sign a more defensive and experienced winger in juan cuadrado
 

Crashoutcassius

Full Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2013
Messages
10,295
Location
playa del carmen
LVG sold Kroos from Bayern, so it's not crazy he didn't want to buy him.

What is crazy though is that he was the perfect player for his possession based tactics. The fact we didn't go ahead with the deal really does haunt us even to this day.

Imagine a midfield of Kroos, Pogba and Fernandes right now?
we still have to imagine a midfield of fernandes pogba and anybody else haha
 

devilish

Juventus fan who used to support United
Joined
Sep 5, 2002
Messages
61,519
Liverpool have a sporting director,in Edwards.

Tixi and Pep are like a manager and assistant in terms of the way they work. No players there gets signed without pep wanting it too.

The term 'DOF' doesnt really say much. What each 'DOF' do vary alot from club to club. The structure in Dortmund is way off the one Man City have.
I've yet to meet a club whose board is devoid of anyone with football experience as ours is. This leads to abuse where the manager simply ask and the board blindly decide whether it gives its go ahead or not

That poses 2 problems

A- modern managers are head coaches. They are used of having sporting directors/DOFs/head of recruitment doing transfers on their behalf and lack the experience and time to do that job as opposed to specialists whose doing that full time

B- managers has their own agendas which might not concede with that of the club. For example a manager who is losing the dressing room would want his men in irrespective whether they are the most suited players at the club or not. Hence you see LvG bringing in the Dutch army + the likes of valdes & Bastian in instead of players like kroos

Having specialists at board level means that everyone is accountable for what it does and can focus on what it does best. It's within these people's interests to work alongside managers as there's no point bringing in players only for the manager not to play them. However having someone who can challenge the manager when he asks for the ridiculous is beneficial both for the club and the manager himself
 

Skills

Snitch
Joined
Jan 17, 2012
Messages
42,010
Yet our fans will stay the problem at this club is Woodward playing DOF rather than our managers having way too much influence on the clubs transfer strategy.

The idea that you turn down rare WC class because it doesn't fit a certain manager is so unbelievably stupid. Players are far more valuable and if turns out the the manager and players aren't a good fit, it's the manager that needs to feck off.
 

devilish

Juventus fan who used to support United
Joined
Sep 5, 2002
Messages
61,519
fast forward 5 years and sancho says allegri torpedoed the deal so he could sign a more defensive and experienced winger in juan cuadrado
Which is why both allegri and Pochs (who play narrow football) are inappropriate at this point. I am firmly ole out but for God's sake let bring appropriate football people at board level first. We need to build on the work done by the previous management rather then start from scratch
 

mu4c_20le

Full Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2013
Messages
42,728
Yet our fans will stay the problem at this club is Woodward playing DOF rather than our managers having way too much influence on the clubs transfer strategy.

The idea that you turn down rare WC class because it doesn't fit a certain manager is so unbelievably stupid. Players are far more valuable and if turns out the the manager and players aren't a good fit, it's the manager that needs to feck off.
Di Maria. Pogba. Alexis Sanchez..
 

Godfather

Full Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2007
Messages
29,803
Location
Austria
It shows how stupid is to just change managers with no plan whatsoever.

If we had a director of football and a proper structure with long-term plan, these kind of failures would not happen on a regular basis, as it has been the case with our club.
Changing the manager isn't the problem. As you've mentioned not hiring a proper DoF is.
 

Kostur

海尔的老板
Joined
Mar 8, 2012
Messages
28,749
Location
Poland, Kraków
Lucky us, dodged a bullet here. Otherwise we wouldn't have signed such superstars as Schweinsteiger or Schneiderlin.
 

Skills

Snitch
Joined
Jan 17, 2012
Messages
42,010
Di Maria. Pogba. Alexis Sanchez..
All players we were only heavily linked with when each manager was signed.

Pogba himself was all Mourinho's doing despite Mourinho's best efforts at hoodwinking the disadvantaged sect of our fanbase. The club he was heavily linked with before Mourinho's arrival at Old Trafford, was in fact Chelsea when Mourinho was there.
 

El Zoido

Full Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2013
Messages
12,259
Location
UK
This is why we need a DOF who can shape the style of the team. Our method of leaving transfer strategy to the manager has been disastrous. At least Ole seems to be doing the right thing and that’s one positive about him. He knows a player when he sees one.
 

Nou_Camp99

what would Souness do?
Joined
Apr 1, 2013
Messages
10,274
LVG sold Kroos from Bayern, so it's not crazy he didn't want to buy him.

What is crazy though is that he was the perfect player for his possession based tactics. The fact we didn't go ahead with the deal really does haunt us even to this day.

Imagine a midfield of Kroos, Pogba and Fernandes right now?
I wouldn't want that midfield at all to be honest. Who's the defensive one there? 2 out of the 3 and a class DM and then you're talking.
 

Skills

Snitch
Joined
Jan 17, 2012
Messages
42,010
This is why we need a DOF who can shape the style of the team. Our method of leaving transfer strategy to the manager has been disastrous. At least Ole seems to be doing the right thing and that’s one positive about him. He knows a player when he sees one.
That's only up until we actually do get a new manager, hand him all the reigns and he decides he can't do with a RB as limited as AWB, a CB as slow as Maguire and a midfielder as Portuguese as Bruno. Or something, and then there'll be a new cult formed around him to justify all of this shit.
 

Mr PG

Full Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2014
Messages
1,514
Biggest loss with losing Kroos is we wouldn't have needed to sign Pogba who lets face it doesn't really suit us and the money could have been better spent on forward attacking player. 89m plus wages was surely too much for a midfielder when you look what city paid for the silva's.
 

izec

Full Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2013
Messages
27,164
Location
Lucilinburhuc
Kroos and LvG weren't best buddies, so if you let your manager decide transfers, this happens and he brings in Schweinsteiger.

Buying Kroos and then hiring Jose is also the complete opposite of what one should do. Our transfer policy highlights our lack of direction in management and managers
 

TheRedHearted

Full Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2016
Messages
2,633
Location
New York, NY
Hate to say it, but lucky him. Maybe this could have been a game changer but who knows. Either way three champions league titles, yep.
 

mu4c_20le

Full Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2013
Messages
42,728
Biggest loss with losing Kroos is we wouldn't have needed to sign Pogba who lets face it doesn't really suit us and the money could have been better spent on forward attacking player. 89m plus wages was surely too much for a midfielder when you look what city paid for the silva's.
Forget kroos, they paid half of that for de bruyne only a year earlier. We could've bought him to replace di maria, guy was class even when he was at Chelsea out on loan, but Mourinho didn't rate him. Would've fit LVG's system as well.
 

crossy1686

career ending
Joined
Jun 5, 2010
Messages
31,486
Location
Manchester/Stockholm

Shows how chopping and changing manager can be so counter productive. It's hard to define where we draw the line but we cannot keep changing policy every year.
And yet people on this forum still don't get why sacking a manager is hitting reset on any progress made, especially seeing as we don't have a DOF.
 

Mihai

Full Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2013
Messages
4,614

Shows how chopping and changing manager can be so counter productive. It's hard to define where we draw the line but we cannot keep changing policy every year.
I'd rather no Kroos and no Moyes than Kroos and Moyes.
 

Josep Dowling

Full Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2014
Messages
7,622

Shows how chopping and changing manager can be so counter productive. It's hard to define where we draw the line but we cannot keep changing policy every year.
This was no reason to keep Moyes any longer. He was never going to be successful. Just look at what he's done at Real Sociedad, Sunderland and West Ham since.
 

sunama

Baghdad Bob
Joined
Apr 26, 2014
Messages
16,830
It shows how stupid is to just change managers with no plan whatsoever.

If we had a director of football and a proper structure with long-term plan, these kind of failures would not happen on a regular basis, as it has been the case with our club.
And the depressing part of all this is that this problem still exists, after all these years of failure, Woodward still holds the role of DoF.
This is why I say, while Woodward is at the club, we won't win another league title.
 

sunama

Baghdad Bob
Joined
Apr 26, 2014
Messages
16,830
Some people thought he was laying the foundations :houllier:
They're as thick as him. There's still people that rate his defensive record despite it only happening because we passed the ball around on the half way line for 90 mins.
:lol:

Lucky us, dodged a bullet here. Otherwise we wouldn't have signed such superstars as Schweinsteiger or Schneiderlin.
:lol:

Some crackers....keep 'em coming.
 
Last edited:

izec

Full Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2013
Messages
27,164
Location
Lucilinburhuc
And yet people on this forum still don't get why sacking a manager is hitting reset on any progress made, especially seeing as we don't have a DOF.
The issue was not getting rid of Moyes, but hiring him in the first place. Kroos should have been a club target, and not manager. That just shows you how badly run we are. There was no progress to be made with Moyes
 

Crashoutcassius

Full Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2013
Messages
10,295
Location
playa del carmen
Which is why both allegri and Pochs (who play narrow football) are inappropriate at this point. I am firmly ole out but for God's sake let bring appropriate football people at board level first. We need to build on the work done by the previous management rather then start from scratch
fully agreed. no noises of this happening though (if we are honest ole won't last another year so movement should really be in place now). no real signs from the fan base that they think this is a priority either, they prefer sacking ole as some kind of punishment because of results that are 'unacceptable' rather than making the best plan for the club
 

Man-United

Full Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2003
Messages
16,208
LvG's transfers were probably the worst in the history of any United manager.
 

ash_86

Full Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2013
Messages
6,337
This was no reason to keep Moyes any longer. He was never going to be successful. Just look at what he's done at Real Sociedad, Sunderland and West Ham since.
Not disagreeing. These discussions has to take place at higher level though. Need a dof
 

Offside

Euro 2016 sweepstake winner
Joined
Jun 9, 2012
Messages
26,627
Location
London
I've said it a million times; Van Gaal was the worst of all our post-Fergie managers. Yes I'm including Moyes. He was a complete feck-wit.
 

Stadjer

Full Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2013
Messages
7,296
Location
The Netherlands
Biggest loss with losing Kroos is we wouldn't have needed to sign Pogba who lets face it doesn't really suit us and the money could have been better spent on forward attacking player. 89m plus wages was surely too much for a midfielder when you look what city paid for the silva's.
Impressive how you managed to bring Pogba into this and also managed to imply that Pogba has been a bad transfer.
 

Suv666

Full Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2016
Messages
8,705
Has to be one of the biggest feck ups we have made. Kross would have been a class addition. At that time he was one of the best midfielders around.
 

Alfie092

Full Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2015
Messages
1,009
So why didn't LvG agree to Kroos coming in if apparently a verbal agreement was in place? :confused:

Wonder what would have happened had Moyes pulled off signing Bale, Kroos and/or Fabregas? :(

The quality of those players alone would have probably stopped us from spiraling downwards like we have!
 

Stadjer

Full Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2013
Messages
7,296
Location
The Netherlands
What is also quite strange is that Kroos has fantastic technique and even better passing.. he would have been great for LvG his type of football. The whole idea of LvG his football was to keep the ball and have some moments to make that defensive splitting pass to score. Kroos would have been perfect for that. LvG still tried playing that kind of football but never had anyone to make that pass so it turned into no risk and sideway passing.