Let's discuss our attack

Discussion in 'Manchester United Forum' started by ManuMou, Oct 21, 2019.

  1. Oct 21, 2019
    #1

    ManuMou Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2017
    Messages:
    640
    Exact formation and players obviously depend on circumstances like opponents and injuries. Just an approximation of our attack formation and players (ie Pogba & Co. means Pogba could be playing in a midfield of two or three but he will obviously contribute to our attack more than other midfielders).

    Against smaller teams I would like to see

    Wan-Bissaka --------------Shaw
    -----------Pogba & Co.----------
    James/Greenwood-----Rashford
    ------------Martial---------------

    Against bigger teams I would like to see similar dual striker system against PSG/Liverpool

    Wan-Bissaka/Dalot ---------------Shaw
    ---------------Pogba & Co.--------------
    James/Greenwood------Rashford/Martial

    I think it's not all doom and gloom. With proper plan, coaching, and game time, a Top 4 is still very possible with okay-to-solid defense and McTom/Fred/Matic/Pereira doing their job okay-ish. Lingard/Mata as subs.

    Thoughts?
  2. Oct 21, 2019
    #2

    SadlerMUFC Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2017
    Messages:
    2,140
    Location:
    Niagara Falls, Canada
    I can't believe nobody has started a thread about our attack already...
  3. Oct 21, 2019
    #3

    amolbhatia50k Sneaky bum time

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2002
    Messages:
    72,310
    Location:
    india
    Yeah except we don't have a proper plan and proper coaching.
  4. Oct 21, 2019
    #4

    WR10 Correctly predicted France to win World Cup 2018

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2009
    Messages:
    4,636
    Location:
    Dream
    My thoughts are: it doesn't matter. We have a useless medical department.
  5. Oct 21, 2019
    #5

    mitchmouse Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2014
    Messages:
    7,330
    Souness and Keane did make me wonder on Sunday. They seemed to think we could "just go out and sign Kane". Go all out. So I wonder if we stopped our ususal fecking about and offered them £200m-£220m would Levy crumble? Might be worth testing the water, but done on the quiet - and by a director of football!
  6. Oct 21, 2019
    #6

    Kappa123 New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2019
    Messages:
    20
    Our 'attack' doesn't even exist. One scrappy winger in Rashford and one mercurial striker-wide player in Martial who can't ever seem to turn up.

    Our striker is in Italy and we're paying him to play for Inter, not only that but he's complete shite :lol:
  7. Oct 21, 2019
    #7

    Jibbs New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2013
    Messages:
    411
    In an ideal world, United would go on and sign Kane and Sancho, for anywhere around 250 to 300 m. Instead we should be pragmatic and sign Erling Braut Håland and Samuel Chukwueze for around 100 to 120 m. Both players are destined to be greats of the game in the long-run.
  8. Oct 21, 2019
    #8

    blue blue Full Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2016
    Messages:
    779
    Supports:
    chelsea
    What about signing Giroud at Xmas as an interim solution? Batshuyai is in front of him in the pecking order at Chelsea.
  9. Oct 21, 2019
    #9

    Samid follows Pogue around, fixing his images

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2012
    Messages:
    23,208
    Location:
    Oslo, Norway
    I'd prefer Mount and Odoi. You can have Mata and Matic in return.
  10. Oct 21, 2019
    #10

    blue blue Full Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2016
    Messages:
    779
    Supports:
    chelsea
    Its good to see you lot haven't lost your sense of humour. I think Chelsea might be down £150m on that deal.
  11. Oct 21, 2019
    #11

    King Andow New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2014
    Messages:
    505
    Location:
    Brazil
    Let's be nice, let's be nice now. We'll throw Lingard too.
  12. Oct 21, 2019
    #12

    blue blue Full Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2016
    Messages:
    779
    Supports:
    chelsea
    You can throw in Rashford and Martial and it still ain't happening.

    They aren't out and out centre forwards anyway. Giroud might add some focus to your attack. At the moment I don't see a target man.
  13. Oct 21, 2019
    #13

    King Andow New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2014
    Messages:
    505
    Location:
    Brazil
    Maybe as a short-term loan, he's old and declining. There's better options for the target man role out there, like Wout Weghorst.
  14. Oct 21, 2019
    #14

    UpWithRivers Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2013
    Messages:
    999
    Its beyond me how a former goal scoring hero has 0 capacity to attack. Got rid of attacking players without replacements, decided his current forwards are good enough, has set up one plan and thats counter attack, pushed our best creative midfielder Pogba deeper, relies on Mata, Periera and lindgard for right wing and number 10 positions and all have about 5 goals and assists put together, puts pressure on a 17 year old to deliver. And on and on. How did he not see this coming?

    To fix it I think we need to hope Fred can improve and him and Mctominay can form a bit of a partnership freeing Pogba.

    Then Martial needs to play as main striker with Rashford on the left and James RW.
  15. Oct 21, 2019
    #15

    Godfather Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2007
    Messages:
    19,075
    Location:
    Austria
    The Chelsea game was the last game we scored more than one goal. Let that sink in. It's absolute shambles and probably the worst I can ever remember. Not just the strikers but our whole attacking set up starting from midfield.
  16. Oct 21, 2019
    #16

    Roboc7 Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2014
    Messages:
    3,425
    Our attacking play is completely dependent on counter attacking, there’s no other tactic. It’s like it didn’t occur to anyone that teams would just sit back and we have to have a different way of attacking.

    At this moment it’s hard to see where the goals are coming from, I can’t even remember last game where the opposition keeper was even remotely busy.
  17. Oct 21, 2019
    #17

    Fosu-Mens Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2016
    Messages:
    2,922
    Location:
    Fred | 2019/20 Performances
    When playing against a deep sitting defence, the only ways for us to score is to depend on individual moments or coincidence. Hence, the team with or without PP is like night and day against a team parking the bus.

    A team without no plan on how to systematically break down a balanced defence are not rare. Most teams struggle with this --> Tottenham and Liverpool are two teams that dominate the rest of a game, but will really struggle against a parked defence. City as a team got the ability, Messi does it for Barca, and the rest of the teams turns to frequent crossing from good positions.

    Our problem is that we are so bad at passing/controlling the game that we struggle to pass the ball well against a deep sitting team.
  18. Oct 22, 2019
    #18

    croadyman New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2018
    Messages:
    608
    Just seen someone mention in a fan cam that we haven't won a league game this season without scoring a penalty. Wow that is certainly a very damning stat of just how shit we are and how little we create.
  19. Oct 22, 2019
    #19

    RG 11 Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2009
    Messages:
    725
    This. There doesn't seem to be any pattern to our play. Current plan seems to be to have basic tactics and then let players do whatever they want.

    It doesn't really seem like players are trained:
    - to make runs
    - look for runs
    - draw defenders to create space for others

    Combined this with lack of cohesive wing play, strikers not getting in the box and some of the worst set piece takers in the league and we can see why tinkering with formations wont exactly change anything.
  20. Oct 22, 2019
    #20

    amolbhatia50k Sneaky bum time

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2002
    Messages:
    72,310
    Location:
    india
    They are trained to do that. However it's not surprising that better managers are better at doing their job. And hence we appear untrained as compared to the top sides.
  21. Oct 22, 2019
    #21

    RG 11 Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2009
    Messages:
    725
    Based on Ole emphasizing on giving players freedom to express themselves in interviews (along with the no set penalty taker thing he mentioned), I actually think it's possible there's lack of training when it comes to the minor details of the game.
  22. Oct 22, 2019
    #22

    devilish Juventus fan who used to support United

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2002
    Messages:
    51,254
    Our team is a contradiction in itself. We've got a top midfielder whose best games came as the most advanced option in a 3 men CM. So what do we do? We play him in a 2 men CM. That ruins Matic as well whose an anchor man. Same thing about the RW role. We've bought one of the best defensive fullbacks in the world. What do we do? We play no entities as RW.

    If you ask me we should stop piling up squad players. We've already have enough in Martial, Rashford, Greenwood, Mata, Lingard and co. Instead we should buy players that are quality, they provide value and they are versatile to adapt to 2-3 systems which in turn would make us unpredictable.
  23. Oct 22, 2019
    #23

    Bestietom Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2013
    Messages:
    4,653
    Location:
    Ireland
    We either bring in an attacking midfielder and stick with Pogba, and Mctominay, or a Defensive midfielder and push Pogba forward.
    Mata, Pereira, Lingard, have all tried playing as a 10 but failed.
  24. Oct 22, 2019
    #24

    Schmeichel's Cartwheel Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,544
    Location:
    Manchester
    "Attack"...

    Sorry, I'm a United fan so I'm not familiar with that term.

    Isn't the objective of football to score one goal and then hope your opponent doesn't score?
  25. Oct 22, 2019
    #25

    redshaw Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2015
    Messages:
    3,208
    Yep it's very bad.

    An opening day win against Chelsea which includes a penalty and a 1-0 pen win at home to Leicester is all we have. Opening days can be random, we caught Chelsea at a good time and they could've easily scored 2-3 goals anyway.
  26. Oct 22, 2019
    #26

    Bestietom Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2013
    Messages:
    4,653
    Location:
    Ireland
    Mata, Pereira, Lingard, Fred, Matic, are just not good enough. We need to get rid and bring in a few more midfielders.
    Rashford and Martial are not CF's so we need a prolific goalscorer.
    Then we need a goalscoring specialist RW.
    Jones, Rojo, Should go also so maybe a left sided CB/LB coming in.
    Do you agree.
  27. Oct 22, 2019
    #27

    passing-wind Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2013
    Messages:
    1,133
    Supports:
    Pass & Move
    Somehow fans have been tricked into thinking that buying player X will automatically change the dynamics of the team being dreadfully coached and all of a sudden are able to create clear cut chances at our own disposal ?

    Ole being such a basic manager is the reason why his only success has come in the Norwegian league in a decade. The likes of Pep / Klopp put emphasis on the details of their play. That's why when we have a manager like Ole who can provide no in depth analysis to systematically make us useful, the hope of any players coming in and making a drastic difference is mute.

    How about this perspective are we relying on quality players to make a difference individually, or are we relying on quality players to make a difference in the team ? One of these dynamics is the reason we as a club are so inconsistent and one of them provides us with consistency. Unfortunately for us, a team needs direction and a philosophy, something Solskjaer has been unable to provide.

    So my solution is it doesn't matter who we buy under Ole, we will not move forward until we start looking like a team and not a bunch of individuals.
  28. Oct 22, 2019
    #28

    sunama Baghdad Bob

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2014
    Messages:
    14,364
    We also have a useless DoF, our manager isn't great, our players are mis-firing, our scouts seem like a waste of space (AWB was a player highlighted by many on here, Maguire doesn't need scouting - everybody knew about him and James was recommended by Giggs - our scouts are useless), our coaches are obviously bad at their job.
    From top to bottom we are terrible. We ground out a draw against LFC after they laid siege to our goal and many on here are ecstatic about this.

    And yes, regarding our attack - poor coaching and tactics. The coaches (Carrick and McKenna) have known nothing but failure since they joined the backroom staff.
  29. Oct 22, 2019
    #29

    TwoSheds More sheds (and tiles) than you, probably

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2014
    Messages:
    4,759
    I feel like dropping James would be rather mental given the percentage of our goals he's been responsible for so far this year.
  30. Oct 22, 2019
    #30

    Volumiza Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2018
    Messages:
    1,278
    Location:
    Somewhere in the middle
    Aside from James and maybe in a year or so Greenwood, we have no player that is completely specialised in attack.

    It's amazing to think that Dan James, £15m is actually our biggest threat. I mean, that in a nutshell is the problem. Much as I have a desire to see Rashford and Martial become great goalscorers, they just aren't.

    There is no one player dynamic enough in an attacking Midfield role to create opportunities and no absolute goal getters either. It's not rocket science really. Some people are saying it's down to the coaching and that may be partially true but come on, none of our players have anything close to the natural instincts some of our best goalscorers had, you can't teach a player everything.

    We desperately need some effective attacking personnel, midfield and the forward line, it will make the world of difference.
  31. Oct 22, 2019
    #31

    Schmeichel's Cartwheel Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,544
    Location:
    Manchester
    It's almost as if Ole is a shit manager and we are a poorly run club...
  32. Oct 22, 2019
    #32

    koop New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2017
    Messages:
    252
    No please, he's our lord and saviour.
  33. Oct 22, 2019
    #33

    devilish Juventus fan who used to support United

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2002
    Messages:
    51,254
    I confess that I tried to build a realistic side that might make us competitive again and despite my hard effort to avoid the unrealistic players (Neymar, Kane etc) + those who would cost a bomb (Jadon Sancho etc), it still looked like something coming out from football manager. I ensure you the names I put down were very gettable players like Tonali, Fraser, McGinn, Bergwijn, Konate, Ndidi etc.

    The reason being is that we lack both quality and quantity. Defence is hardly perfect (no quality LB and no quality cover for any other position really). Once past defence there's not a single player that deserves a first team player role. They aren't good enough (Periera, Lingard, Fred, Jones, Rojo etc), they are too old (Matic, Mata etc), they lack the attitude to be at a club like United were consistency is key (Martial) or they simply don't want to be here anymore (Pogba).

    What I do know is that United need some serious restructuring at board level. We can't leave our transfer strategy at the whims of the manager simply because

    a- modern managers see the job as a short term project. They want to win and win now so they can move elsewhere for bigger money
    b- modern managers lack the skill and the time to properly scout players
    c- we need to be able a huge staff turnover on a regular basis
    d- managers are often stuck ups who think that their philosophy is the only successful system there is. We can't be at the whim of these people else we end up with a hot potch of players from different philosophies who won't work well together. We need someone who is here for the long run and bring in players who are versatile enough to adapt to different systems just in case the manager won't last long. For example does it make sense to bring in a player whose a natural no 10 and can't play in any other role especially since we're well stocked with no 10s and we might soon have a manager who doesn't rely on no 10s?

    Also this rebuild will take years. Therefore any manager coming here need to embrace the fact that he'll be relying on a number of sub standard players for X amount of years. We should hire managers who adapts his system to the players he's got rather then a purist who sticks to his 'vision' and can't divert from it whatsoever. Unfortunately since we've got a team who lack quality than that would probably means grinding points.
  34. Oct 22, 2019
    #34

    Styler 7 New Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2014
    Messages:
    16
    Yes but they must always be rushed off their feet with the number of patients :)
  35. Oct 22, 2019
    #35

    tjb Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2013
    Messages:
    590
    You can blame ole all you like but this is no different to what lvg and Mourinho had to deal with. It's not the midfield, it's the midfield, it's the attack. Keane and ince weren't responsible for their front fours, Scholes and Carrick never had high assist numbers, even viera and petit/ Silva weren't creators for their teams.
    We took a gamble on players that had not shown anything paramount to being consistent attackers. Martial came to us at 18, produced a few games and was considered a saviour. Rashford was even younger and did nothing prior that that yet despite the fact that he was as bad as iheanacho over the last three years, we are still arguing over him while city have discarded iheanacho. We still don't have a right winger, and the rest of our attack are either too young or are very bad. The difference between our front 4 and other teams is simple. Ours do not have that proven quality. Can't control balls, no physical side, poor passes, poor creators, no vision and poor in moving off the ball outside of beating the offside trap. Fred and Matic have been bad, but I feel with a better attack this could have been masked. It's not as if they do not get the ball in the final third, but if you constantly rely on wan bissaka and young to create for you while you hide, then you should not be a man utd player.
  36. Oct 22, 2019
    #36

    Skills Snitch

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2012
    Messages:
    29,682
    I read the thread title as 'Let's diss our attack'.
  37. Oct 23, 2019
    #37

    Buster15 Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2018
    Messages:
    3,399
    Location:
    Bristol
    Supports:
    Bristol Rovers
    Got it in one.
  38. Oct 23, 2019
    #38

    Buster15 Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2018
    Messages:
    3,399
    Location:
    Bristol
    Supports:
    Bristol Rovers
    Why just one.
    And no objective should be based around hope surly.
  39. Oct 23, 2019
    #39

    Schmeichel's Cartwheel Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,544
    Location:
    Manchester
    I know, I was mocking us for never scoring more than one goal a game then sitting back and hoping our opponents don't score..
  40. Oct 23, 2019
    #40

    Buster15 Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2018
    Messages:
    3,399
    Location:
    Bristol
    Supports:
    Bristol Rovers
    You are right. That is not the true Manchester United that we knew and loved.
    God, how we have fallen. Thanks.