Lewis Hall

He wants to go to Barcelona. I doubt there is any truth in it. He is also very, very good versatile player. He just needs to cut the Ashley Young antics.
It’s in his nature to be a whining, diving little cnut. It’s the main reason opposition fans hate him.

I agree he’s a good player, a very good player on his day, and also heard a while back he wants Barca. He’d improve us for sure, but he’d be thoroughly unlikeable.
 
Are our young left backs so promising we should be basing squad building decisions around them?

I'd be quite happy to ignore them for now personally. Sign Hall and if Amass or Leon or whoever else I'm forgetting were to end up the level required then we decide what to do about that issue when it presents, rather than try to pre-empt it.
Exactly. If players are good enough they will come through, if not, well hopefully they have a good career elsewhere.

We cannot long term decisions based on half a season at Sheff Wed.

Hall is exactly the right profile of player we should be looking at. If Amass or anyone else gets in ahead of him in a couple of years - great. Nothing wrong g with competition, it’s what we haven’t had across the squad for far too long.
 
Yeah, I think he's been quite highly rated for a few years now.

He's very good, think he struggled when he first joined Chelsea but he's been impressive for both club and country the past two years I'd say.

He's been very good for a very long time
Fair enough. I thought he was seen as a bit of a clown tbh, I remember we nearly took him on loan instead of Reguilon and most people were underwhelmed
 
He's very good, think he struggled when he first joined Chelsea but he's been impressive for both club and country the past two years I'd say.
He has come on. Didn’t we nearly get him on a loan when we got Regelion, but the costs were too high?
 
Fair enough. I thought he was seen as a bit of a clown tbh, I remember we nearly took him on loan instead of Reguilon and most people were underwhelmed
I had pretty much the exact same reaction to you maybe a year ago when I first saw him being linked to Barca. He was very much a joke for a while.
 
I remember we were looking to loan Cucurella and balked at the loan fee as well as I seem to remember Chelsea cup tied him. We ended up with reguillon. Doh! ‍

EDIT: There’s nothing like saying the same thing as someone else only ages after. :lol:
 
I'd expect there would be a difference in the wage which would make Hall the better buy, even more so given his age even if it's a 20m higher transfer fee upfront
 
Thats correct, everyone was losing their mind.

I would still have mixed feelings, extremely unlikeable player
So is Bruno. And Lisandro Martinez. Except for United fans. We love them.

I would take Cucu in a heartbeat.
 
Exactly. If players are good enough they will come through, if not, well hopefully they have a good career elsewhere.

We cannot long term decisions based on half a season at Sheff Wed.

Hall is exactly the right profile of player we should be looking at. If Amass or anyone else gets in ahead of him in a couple of years - great. Nothing wrong g with competition, it’s what we haven’t had across the squad for far too long.
Amass is out of contract next summer so he’s running out of time to impress
 
Excellent player. And a sh!thouse :lol: would be a great signing.
Oh yeah would give us defensive housery, depends how much they want for him. Like @noelyman said we tried to sign him on loan few years ago. Could well be a smokescreen to lower price for this guy though.
 
Are our young left backs so promising we should be basing squad building decisions around them?

I'd be quite happy to ignore them for now personally. Sign Hall and if Amass or Leon or whoever else I'm forgetting were to end up the level required then we decide what to do about that issue when it presents, rather than try to pre-empt it.

Yep, this is the way.
 
Are our young left backs so promising we should be basing squad building decisions around them?

I'd be quite happy to ignore them for now personally. Sign Hall and if Amass or Leon or whoever else I'm forgetting were to end up the level required then we decide what to do about that issue when it presents, rather than try to pre-empt it.
That's how I see it. We're not talking about Messi level talents here.

These will be the same people who were hyping Colyer after a half decent pre-season game.
 
Oh yeah would give us defensive housery, depends how much they want for him. Like @noelyman said we tried to sign him on loan few years ago. Could well be a smokescreen to lower price for this guy though.
Indeed. Definitely seems like LB is a specific area we are looking at, but between a perhaps lower punt amount for Cucurella or big money on Hall. I wouldn't be disappointed with either!
 
Indeed. Definitely seems like LB is a specific area we are looking at, but between a perhaps lower punt amount for Cucurella or big money on Hall. I wouldn't be disappointed with either!
I can't see there being much difference in values. The reporting that Cucurella is available for €40m-€50m (or £35m-£43m) seems low. I don't get why Chelsea sell one of the highest rated LB's in world, who is still only 27 to a PL rival for that amount. This goes double as they paid £55m plus add ons for him. Imo, no one gets him for less than what Chelsea paid. At that point he is just £5m-£10m cheaper than Hall but will likely demand higher wages.
 
Quite like Lewis Hall, seems like a very good replacement for Shaw and helps with the homegrown quota too. Newcastle will defo play hardball though, that's the main concern.
 

It’s clear Hall is our top target as all the respected United journo's are saying the same thing and all saying £50-£60 million, if we got the same longevity out of Hall as we technically have with Shaw then it’s money well spent.
 
It’s clear Hall is our top target as all the respected United journo's are saying the same thing and all saying £50-£60 million, if we got the same longevity out of Hall as we technically have with Shaw then it’s money well spent.
If they sell Tonali, with the ridiculous fee they got for Gordon, they won't need to sell anyone they'd prefer to keep. Be better United go in for him now and test the waters. Then would still need Hall to push for the move.
 
Fair enough. I thought he was seen as a bit of a clown tbh, I remember we nearly took him on loan instead of Reguilon and most people were underwhelmed
To be honest, I think that was illustrative of fans' tendencies to make overly-rash judgments more than anything else.
 
If they sell Tonali, with the ridiculous fee they got for Gordon, they won't need to sell anyone they'd prefer to keep. Be better United go in for him now and test the waters. Then would still need Hall to push for the move.
Yeah Tonali going would scupper any hopes
 
50 - 60 mil is the highest we should go, there are plenty of promising LB outside of EPL at better prices and we have Dorgu as LW and LB backup. I think we can afford to take an educated slight risk in this department.
 
50 - 60 mil is the highest we should go, there are plenty of promising LB outside of EPL at better prices and we have Dorgu as LW and LB backup. I think we can afford to take an educated slight risk in this department.
Yeah that should be our cutoff price, maybe we need to press ahead on this as maybe it takes Tonali off the table for Arsenal or dare I say City
 
Last edited:
Unless this hints at Hall formalising a request to leave, this isnt anything new

Why the negative spin, that was a fun life affirming tweet and then you’re all Skeletor about it.
 
This is a step in the right direction - hope this reporting means that we've been in discussions with the player and he's interested in joining us (in alignment with INEOS's transfer MO).

Some noise is better than no noise.
 
Would be a fantastic signing. Agree we shouldn't go much above £50m, but adjusted for inflation, that's surely about the price we paid for Shaw a decade ago.