Irrational.
Full Member
Contract until 2032
Good luck with that.
Good luck with that.

I think people are rightly questioning that he is highly regarded by many yet he hasn't got the record to back it up just yet. He's done well but nothing spectacular in his managerial career thus far.He's highly regarded in France and will be missed at Strasbourg. People are definitely underestimating him around here.
6 year contract is mental
What is even the point of it? I'm genuinely curious if there is any logic from the clubs point of view. Chelsea have not had a manager make it three years since Mourinho's first stint. I place the likelihood of Rosenior serving out this contract at about 0%.Contract until 2032
Good luck with that.
This. I think people dont realise how important command experience and respect is when coming to a 'top' or formally top club in England.I think people are rightly questioning that he is highly regarded by many yet he hasn't got the record to back it up just yet. He's done well but nothing spectacular in his managerial career thus far.
Chelsea can't help themselves reallyContract until 2032
Good luck with that.

Does ClearLake know that they can issue contracts shorter than 5 years? Especially when they hold all the leverage? Six and half year contract for an unproven manager is pure madness
Why do I keep seeing this with regards to Chelsea's contracts? Why would players/managers agree to ridiculously long contracts that seemingly only benefit Chelsea?It's possible that there might be some break clauses in there, don't you think?
Why do I keep seeing this with regards to Chelsea's contracts? Why would players/managers agree to ridiculously long contracts that seemingly only benefit Chelsea?
Seen many people suggest the players signing these long contracts are playing for "pennies". Just doesn't make sense.
Rosenior's is basically an NFL contract. There are break clauses with reduced penalties as well as incentives tied to team success.Why do I keep seeing this with regards to Chelsea's contracts? Why would players/managers agree to ridiculously long contracts that seemingly only benefit Chelsea?
Seen many people suggest the players signing these long contracts are playing for "pennies". Just doesn't make sense.
Pretty much spot on.
But they were 7th - it's a very weird signingYou should take a look at Strasbourg and you will understand he has done a very good job there.
Hull sacked him ( wrongfully) only to finish just above relegation the following season, their owner is a nut.
So what are Chelsea nowadays? Just a glorified player development club that needs to turn a profit for their owners?
Im not sure how Strasbourg fans feel about their club. It feels like the minors and majors situation some of our sports have here in N.America.To be fair, that's the perfect description for Strasbourg.
You must have done a wierd nod or somethingI met Liam Rosenior once and he acted weird.
Was in a restaurant in Westfield Shepherd’s Bush.
We were walking towards each other , me to the toilet, him from the toilet. we made eye contact and I obviously recognised him so a gave a knowing nod and the weirdo basically immediately looked down to the floor to avoid any further eye contact.
At the time he was Wazza’s assistant at Derby.
I’ve not forgiven him for this tbh.
Im not sure how Strasbourg fans feel about their club. It feels like the minors and majors situation some of our sports have here in N.America.
Now even their manager gets "promoted" and yanked mid-season. Every time they are doing well, they are at additional risk of seeing their manager leaving.
It is unusual (at least for now) to have a situation where your owner pushes the manager around for effectively performing well. They currently sit 7th in the table. I have seen Strasbourg mostly in the top flight but never as far as I can remember too high up the table, so 7th is probably pretty good for them. They apparently do have a league title in their history. I dont know how ambitious this club was supposed to be, but they are pushing a spot in Europe.I used to think they despised the situation but a Strasbourg fan explained to me a few months ago that the ultras are basically a minority. An extremely loud minority.
General fans don't particularly like or overly dislike Blueco, in fact a lot of them are pretty happy as long as the team is performing well, which it has been so far. They understand where they are in the food chain but they don't really like being associated with Chelsea in general, and especially not as some kind of little brother club, but most don't feel strongly enough about it to complain or protest.
I haven't seen anything from them about this situation but I can imagine they exactly be thrilled to lose Rosenier to Chelsea, knowing its their own owners who have taken the decision to move him on to Chelsea.
You must have done a wierd nod or something