Oranges038
Full Member
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2020
- Messages
- 20,326
That's sped up
Play it at .25 for the real speed.
That's sped up
He absolutely does care about 1000 goals. We're this far into his career and you think he doesn't care about milestones still?![]()
There is probably no easy way to figure out the numbers, but he would be a lot closer to 1,000 goals had he always taken every penalty. I am certain he doesn’t give anything about reaching it.
According to balagues book about pep, to help Messi avoid injuries they stopped messi eating argentine beef which he supposedly ate a lot of, in addition to banning popcorn, cola, pizza and chocolate peanuts and had him eat more steamed vegetables and fish.
I think he's in the conversation especially when its comes through balls and final third passing, but Pirlo and Scholes were better at long balls, Modric and Xavi were incredibly well rounded. Id also argue M. Laudrup was more visionary, creative and had more varied and artistic final third passing. But that's just my opinion. Messi in his prime was more effective because his dribbling and goalscoring ability was so absurd he could throw off the entire defence and then make a killer ball.I’m quite comfortable calling him the best passer of all time
Scholes was amazing at pinging to a guy in lots of space, it was rare for him to combine it with a through ball. Messi’s long passes inside the centre back and full back are just ridiculousI think he's in the conversation especially when its comes through balls and final third passing, but Pirlo and Scholes were better at long balls, Modric and Xavi were incredibly well rounded. Id also argue M. Laudrup was more visionary, creative and had more varied and artistic final third passing. But that's just my opinion. Messi in his prime was more effective because his dribbling and goalscoring ability was so absurd he could throw off the entire defence and then make a killer ball.
Haven't seen anyone better.I’m quite comfortable calling him the best passer of all time
I think he's in the conversation especially when its comes through balls and final third passing, but Pirlo and Scholes were better at long balls, Modric and Xavi were incredibly well rounded. Id also argue M. Laudrup was more visionary, creative and had more varied and artistic final third passing. But that's just my opinion. Messi in his prime was more effective because his dribbling and goalscoring ability was so absurd he could throw off the entire defence and then make a killer ball.
His through passes along the ground taking out multiple lines of defence are ridiculous.I think he's in the conversation especially when its comes through balls and final third passing, but Pirlo and Scholes were better at long balls, Modric and Xavi were incredibly well rounded. Id also argue M. Laudrup was more visionary, creative and had more varied and artistic final third passing. But that's just my opinion. Messi in his prime was more effective because his dribbling and goalscoring ability was so absurd he could throw off the entire defence and then make a killer ball.
Agreed.His through passes along the ground taking out multiple lines of defence are ridiculous.
I don't think nor Xavi, nor Modric in an alltime sense deserve to be mentioned in a historical point of view, in fact in such aspect Busquets was trully a metronome and we tend to just focus too much in recent times. Of course they had excellent overall passing, yet more CM alike than actually someone like Zico, Diego, Platini, etc to just name a few without even going further in the past, or even in their own time.
Laudrup too even more in the mold of the three mentioned, was a lesser overall player on every aspect, yet at the same time criminally underrated, such a geam of a player a la Iniesta.
If he was just a specialist at that he'd have easier time being recognized as the best passer ever. The fact that he was the best finisher and dribbler as well takes some credit away from his passing.His through passes along the ground taking out multiple lines of defence are ridiculous.
True.If he was just a specialist at that he'd have easier time being recognized as the best passer ever. The fact that he was the best finisher and dribbler as well takes some credit away from his passing.
Modric doesn't belong, but I personally think Xavi does.
He was more productive in 2008-2009 than attacking midfielders with the amount of assists he had while being a controller.
Both belong, also Kroos, and many in terms of let's organizative CMs, yet when you historically there are players like Zico, Platini, Maradona, Laudrup that were here mentioned, or even more offensive and risk oriented fellas the passing atribute, if we just focus on that particular skill, there are too many options to put even excellent passers like him or even current Vitinha, Pedri, Kimmich, Neves, as silly as any TOP 3 ever is.
Also historically is a huge ammount of time involved there, there were excellent passers since the 40s, or even someone like the Spaniard Luis Suarez, but we will always have more bias towards fellas that did it recently and watch regularly, specially in this CMs roles, because with time, they might get more buried by the next super forward or super 10 alike fella.
What helps Xavi, Modric and any more or less modern player like Vitinha, Neves, Pedri, etc with such characteristics, it's that the exposure is bigger in such roles in current world, that happily we can witness such great qualities vastly more regularly and when we add to this great succees like WCs, CLs, etc..this type of players finally have a deserved more recgonition. Yet at the same time, their talent in particular aspects get a tad overblown in a historical sense and even from a strict role/playing style perspective.
I don't think Modric belongs at all in a conversation about greatest passers of all-time.
That wasn't his key strength.
What remains tight, or might even have improved is the secondary, ghosting movements and timings - his runs and intuitive positioning really highlight how elite his mind is. He doesn’t have to take on a whole defence to score - if there are good suppliers into the box, he’ll definitely score “simple” goals at the World Cup from his approach play.
If Argentina set up right, he’ll be very potent at this tournament.
What remains tight, or might even have improved is the secondary, ghosting movements and timings - his runs and intuitive positioning really highlight how elite his mind is. He doesn’t have to take on a whole defence to score - if there are good suppliers into the box, he’ll definitely score “simple” goals at the World Cup from his approach play.
If Argentina set up right, he’ll be very potent at this tournament.
1
We all know trhe MLS is no parameter, yet at the same time there are players there way younger, fitter than just simply can't do the same, even fecking lazy De Paul in hsi very wn team. He is quite fecking old by now and his dexterity it's still impecable. This si very important, because like you've said the vision, the movement, the brain would always still there, yet he still moves and looks fitter than his real age.
I'm even a tad worried that he is puttinmg some extra effort so close to the WC (calm down motherfecker):
Yep. He is basically a classic striker in the box now with elite movement, timing and instincts none of which rely on some supreme, athletic prowess - you take your eyes off him for a second and he's in, so that aspect will be very interesting as he'll be very potent with good supply and it won't take much out of him to make those runs when and as he elects to do so.That and his chance creation % is still ridiculous. He'll probably still end up with one of the best G+A's in the tournament just by virtue of one or the other.
Are Argentina looking a better squad going into this WC? For sure Alvarez is light years better than their striking options in the last one, with Alvarez himself being significantly better.
That and his chance creation % is still ridiculous. He'll probably still end up with one of the best G+A's in the tournament just by virtue of one or the other.
Are Argentina looking a better squad going into this WC? For sure Alvarez is light years better than their striking options in the last one, with Alvarez himself being significantly better.
He's scored 905/907 goals in his career so far? Only 66/64 less than Ronaldo and feels like only thing Ronaldo has had on his mind for years is scoring goals, while Messi has been terrific at creating chances all this time.
Obviously super happy we had Ronaldo at United twice and we were lucky but Messi is out of this world.
And keep in mind that he has played less games and often lets other take the penalties.He's scored 905/907 goals in his career so far? Only 66/64 less than Ronaldo and feels like only thing Ronaldo has had on his mind for years is scoring goals, while Messi has been terrific at creating chances all this time.
Obviously super happy we had Ronaldo at United twice and we were lucky but Messi is out of this world.
Best player I’ve seen play live and it isn’t close. Fergie’s answer to that ingrate journalist’s question after the 2009 CL drubbing still cracks me up.909, yet I think that in his last game one of the goals was changed to an own goal.
Still, I think that evrytime we talk about numbers with the fella, we do a disservice.
And keep in mind that he has played less games and often lets other take the penalties.
And seems like he's not narcissist and egomaniac. At least not to the extent Cristiano clearly is.And keep in mind that he has played less games and often lets other take the penalties.
I believe he has more non-penalty goals than "that other guy" and obviously a better minutes-per-goal ratio.Dunno if it's true, yet apparently at club level since 2021/22 Messi has taken 15 penalties, converting 12.
PD: very few penalties considering that's more or less 6 years.
Messi has 796 goals from open play, the other guy has 788 but has played 168 more games. But erm we are crossing into the forbidden discussion.I believe he has more non-penalty goals than "that other guy" and obviously a better minutes-per-goal ratio.