From that angle roofing it is the best option. He made the right decision.It was a textbook centre back's goal, smash it as hard as he possibly can. Great goal but I probably wouldn't call it clinical finishing!
From that angle roofing it is the best option. He made the right decision.It was a textbook centre back's goal, smash it as hard as he possibly can. Great goal but I probably wouldn't call it clinical finishing!
Best game he's had in god knows how long. Quite possibly the best game he's ever had for us with Varane not next to him? Not that I'm a historian on what games Martinez has played without Varane or anything.
Absolutely bang on the money. This is how the team develops and takes shape. Certain positions in this system/team need to be occupied by players with a certain skill set/profile:.. and some players we have currently don’t have that. That simple . Martinez is not one who is going to be suitable long term. Same shit for Dalot, Zirkzee, Onana etc.He had an absolutely masterclass against City away and got rightly praised, and then followed that up with his worst form since he's been here.
At some point we have to stop looking at individual performances because they can fluctuate game to game, week to week, month to month. What we really need to ask if they really have the necessary attributes to be a consistently elite player in their position. A centre back who is slow and small will never be a colossal centre back that we want. He will have good games, and he will have games where his obvious physical weaknesses are exposed, that's what we have to prepare ourselves for and ask are we going to win the league with that?
I don't think him getting overpowered on an aerial duel from a cross that results in a goal is because he had an off game or he's not match sharp, or it's a new formation, that's just who he is. I don't think when he gets outrun and outpaced it's because it's an off game or because he has a new centre back partner, that's just who he is. That's just his limitations as a player.
He had an absolutely masterclass against City away and got rightly praised, and then followed that up with his worst form since he's been here.
At some point we have to stop looking at individual performances because they can fluctuate game to game, week to week, month to month. What we really need to ask if they really have the necessary attributes to be a consistently elite player in their position. A centre back who is slow and small will never be a colossal centre back that we want. He will have good games, and he will have games where his obvious physical weaknesses are exposed, that's what we have to prepare ourselves for and ask are we going to win the league with that?
I don't think him getting overpowered on an aerial duel from a cross that results in a goal is because he had an off game or he's not match sharp, or it's a new formation, that's just who he is. I don't think when he gets outrun and outpaced it's because it's an off game or because he has a new centre back partner, that's just who he is. That's just his limitations as a player.
We don’t play with LBs. Martinez as LWB is ludicrous.Have we ruled out the possibility of Martinez playing LB for us? I've ruled out Shaw ever being a consistent performer for us ever again, and I'm ruling out Malacia on ground of being inadequate. We might bring in Alvaro, but whether we do or not it seems to me Martinez could be a handy asset for us at LB for us in Amorim's system.
Have we ruled out the possibility of Martinez playing LB for us? I've ruled out Shaw ever being a consistent performer for us ever again, and I'm ruling out Malacia on ground of being inadequate. We might bring in Alvaro, but whether we do or not it seems to me Martinez could be a handy asset for us at LB for us in Amorim's system.
Its now left wingback and it clearly doesnt suit his skillset.
He's perfectly set up as a LCB where he's central enough to play passes through the middle and not constantly be in foot races with pacy wingers right the way up and down the wing.
Fair enough, and many thanks to @El Presidente for his reply, but I suppose what I'm really getting at is that in the event we don't buy a LWB, which I understand is a different beast than LB, we're weak in the position. Dalot had a great game against Liverpool but in general doesn't impress at LWB.
Martinez relative to Dalot is a vastly better passer of the ball, although I don't think I've ever seen him deliver a cross. And he did show something in the final third against Liverpool that we have never seen from Dalot.
Yoro has showed some really good stuff at CB and looks the part to me, whereas Martinez has been beaten inside the 18 yard box. I wouldn't want to bench Martinez though.
Yeah, what I will add is that there is a reason why all of the best wingbacks in the world are rather underwhelming fullbacks and their main weakness is defending, but in the attacking phase is where their strong attributes really shine. That’s also the reason why Dalot and especially Maz really struggle here (although I’m very surprised about Dalot, since he even played as a winger in the past and has good qualities going forward). I personally think Dalot’s main problem is the incredible fatigue, both physical and mental, that he’s accumulated and can really go up a level if he’s given a rest, but that’s another matter.Martinez is obviously weak in the air, but something is going wrong if you have Maguire and De Ligt or Yoro in there with their ability in the air and they dont deal with it.
None of our CBs have half the on the ball ability of Lisandro and most often he's our 2nd best distribution in the team so we really need him there doing it. And on the floor his defending is better than our other CBs other than maybe Yoro who hasnt played enough to make a comparison
As a wingback you need to be a runner to get back and help defensively and then become the winger in attacks. There have been a few good wingbacks who didnt have much pace but when they had the chance to cross they were sublime. I dont think Lisandro is one of those and putting him one on one with a pacy winger is the 2nd worst position he can find himself in other than defending a header against a taller player. So I dont think he's a viable option. Left back yeah he can do a job. Wingback? I'd prefer our wingers play there over a CB who doesnt have pace as a strength. Yoro might even be more suited to it because he does have some speed.
Yeah, what I will add is that there is a reason why all of the best wingbacks in the world are rather underwhelming fullbacks and their main weakness is defending, but in the attacking phase is where their strong attributes really shine. That’s also the reason why Dalot and especially Maz really struggle here (although I’m very surprised about Dalot, since he even played as a winger in the past and has good qualities going forward). I personally think Dalot’s main problem is the incredible fatigue, both physical and mental, that he’s accumulated and can really go up a level if he’s given a rest, but that’s another matter.
Back to Lisandro, his profile is obviously quite different and will actually expose his weaknesses. Not only is he slow, but also lacks explosiveness.
What I wonder is why wasn’t Garnacho tested out in that position. He’s way more suited and has very good attributes. Obviously we know where he’d struggle, but still.
Garnacho plays football to score goals. He dreams of being Ronaldo. I dont think a player like that would be suited to play left wing back even if he has some of the qualities that the position would require.
Which centre-back hasn't?If Martinez continues to struggle defending in the box -- he's been beaten on the ground as well as in the air -- we may have to entertain the possibility of benching him in favor of Yoro, who's growing rapidly into the role of a CB at this level.
Few so trivially. Regardless of the odd good game here and there - and he did have a good game - his limitations are both extreme (for a PL cb) and self evident.Which centre-back hasn't?
And you base this on shit you've pulled right out of your arse right?Few so trivially. Regardless of the odd good game here and there - and he did have a good game - his limitations are both extreme (for a PL cb) and self evident.
Ah, a high quality post and response. No, I base it on the evidence of watching him be dominated regularly both in pace and aerial ability, twinned with pretty regular losses of concentration. Especially against more direct sides that aren't afraid to target him specifically as a weakness. Which they do, regularly. And it works.And you base this on shit you've pulled right out of your arse right?
Reassuring. I'm sure you're a great scout, probably employed by one of the world's top clubs, right?Ah, a high quality post and response. No, I base it on the evidence of watching him be dominated regularly both in pace and aerial ability, twinned with pretty regular losses of concentration. Especially against more direct sides that aren't afraid to target him specifically as a weakness. Which they do, regularly. And it works.
Ah yes, to have an opinion on football players one needs to be a top scout. Nobody else can have them. That's why nobody discusses player performance on football forums, it'd be pointless.Reassuring. I'm sure you're a great scout, probably employed by one of the world's top clubs, right?
Whatever. You do you dude.Ah yes, to have an opinion on football players one needs to be a top scout. Nobody else can have them. That's why nobody discusses player performance on football forums, it'd be pointless.
Not sure why you're inventing quotes now. Or comparing incomparable players. Anyone could be roasted by young Fernando Torres. Martinez can be roasted by any given PL winger or fullback.Whatever. You do you dude.
"Nemanja Vidic is shit, he doesn't have pace, I've seen him beaten on the ground several times."
He has pocketed Haaland on multiple occasions.Martinez can be roasted by any given PL winger or fullback.
Which centre-back hasn't?
He's had a couple great games against City (and some poor ones) - but I'm really not sure how that negates my point? They didn't exploit his weaknesses on those occasions whereas other teams have where they've created foot races or aerial duels in key situations against him. Where he avoids those, he does well, but that isn't a realistic strategy match in match out. I'm also less interested in when we play City than when we play Forest, or Wolves. We are usually somewhat pinned back by City - being in a lower block where there is less space in behind, and they're more interested in crafting the perfect goal than just booting it in behind, which actually plays to Martinez' strengths. But against more direct teams, they will use that long ball every time. So to me he's an occasional asset against stronger, possession based teams, but a regular detriment against teams we should be beating.He has pocketed Haaland on multiple occasions.
On that last paragraph - of course it can work. You can build your team/partnerships around compensating for a players weakness. See Liverpool and TAA, as an example. Question is, would you want to? Does the other attributes he brings outweigh the cost of “carrying” him? Anyhow, I’m hopeful his demise is overblown and that the blips are temporary due to a combination of his long term injury struggles & a change in role/formation (plus ever changing partnerships at the back). I like Licha though, so maybe I’m a tad biased, but he was very good/consistent in his first season iirc.He's had a couple great games against City (and some poor ones) - but I'm really not sure how that negates my point? They didn't exploit his weaknesses on those occasions whereas other teams have where they've created foot races or aerial duels in key situations against him. Where he avoids those, he does well, but that isn't a realistic strategy match in match out. I'm also less interested in when we play City than when we play Forest, or Wolves, since we are usually somewhat pinned back by City and being in a lower block where there is less space in behind, and they're more interested in crafting the perfect goal than just booting it in behind, which actually plays to Martinez' strengths. But against more direct teams, they will use that long ball every time. So to me he's an occasional asset against stronger, possession based teams, but a regular detriment against teams we should be beating.
We cannot be carrying players that have clear and obvious weaknesses - or assuming that his partners strengths will compensate for those weaknesses. It's simply not how it works in the PL, teams will exploit him every time and while I do like many of his qualities, there's no chance that he is a pillar we can build around.
I mean, I think there's grades to it, but how many league titles have Liverpool won in recent years compared to city who have been employing defenders with no major physical deficits (taking this year as an exception). If the goals is 90 points, you can't have clear and obvious weaknesses in your back line. Nobody else is mad enough to try to compensate for a CB, for good reason.On that last paragraph - of course it can work. You can build your team/partnerships around compensating for a players weakness. See Liverpool and TAA, as an example. Question is, would you want to? Does the other attributes he brings outweigh the cost of “carrying” him? Anyhow, I’m hopeful his demise is overblown and that the blips are temporary due to a combination of his long term injury struggles & a change in role/formation (plus ever changing partnerships at the back). I like Licha though, so maybe I’m a tad biased, but he was very good/consistent in his first season iirc.
If only Shaw could stay fit, we’d have a damn fine competitor for that LCB spot.
No way, he‘s a leader on the pitch and our best progressive passer & tackler from the back. Not so easy to replace.Sell if we can breakeven or make a profit, otherwise keep. He's really good when he's on it, skill and attitude wise. Would definitely keep him around even if it's just a rotation option. Ideally he would rotate with another more bigger and physical LCB. G. Inacio?
There is no LB in this system anyway, but modern full backs have to have some semblance of pace and attacking prowess. Those are just not Martinez.Have we ruled out the possibility of Martinez playing LB for us? I've ruled out Shaw ever being a consistent performer for us ever again, and I'm ruling out Malacia on ground of being inadequate. We might bring in Alvaro, but whether we do or not it seems to me Martinez could be a handy asset for us at LB for us in Amorim's system.
Didn’t that Klopp Pool team hit 90 points twice when they lost the title?I mean, I think there's grades to it, but how many league titles have Liverpool won in recent years compared to city who have been employing defenders with no major physical deficits (taking this year as an exception). If the goals is 90 points, you can't have clear and obvious weaknesses in your back line. Nobody else is mad enough to try to compensate for a CB, for good reason.
Fair point but they still didn't win!Didn’t that Klopp Pool team hit 90 points twice when they lost the title?
yeah, I agree with your overall point though - it’s very, very difficult to carry someone with huge deficiencies in a team - albeit, it is possible as proven by Pool. I’m just hoping Lisandro turns it around as everyone gets more comfortable in the new system, and with their new partnerships.Fair point but they still didn't win!