Spark
Full Member
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2012
- Messages
- 3,294
We can't beat Grimsby, we've been rudely awakened. Multiple times.The top teams from Saudi league are no pushovers. We’re in for a rude awakening.
(But yes, I fully get what you're saying).
We can't beat Grimsby, we've been rudely awakened. Multiple times.The top teams from Saudi league are no pushovers. We’re in for a rude awakening.
I remember this.I remember when everyone on here didn't want us to get bought out and funded by the Saudis due to their moral concerns. People were extremely vocal and aggressive about their stance on the matter.
This is fine though. It definitely isn't in any way the same thing.
The benefits are you have 1 game a week for training the whole season. 1 or 2 friendlies won't break thatSo any "benefits" for missing out on Europe we complete bullshit.
Probably desperately trying to write something else that another piece on United being in a bad place. Usually he'd have his midweek piece lined up, can't really write about training.Seems Whitwell needlessly stretched one line of information (United are looking at a possible Saudi mid-season friendly) into an entire article that didn't really tell us more than the title.
Think they all have a quota of articles to releaseSeems Whitwell needlessly stretched one line of information (United are looking at a possible Saudi mid-season friendly) into an entire article that didn't really tell us more than the title.
Interesting point what if it is more lucrative to play mid week in Saudi, aren't the other big clubs going to want to get in on that vs playing Grimsby town.So, the squad was not ready for Europe so that we can play some meaningless friendlies?
Wonderful. We should also explore going out of FA Cup at the first calling itself so that we can play more meaningless friendlies.
It was all part of the master plan...Interesting point what if it is more lucrative to play mid week in Saudi, aren't the other big clubs going to want to get in on that vs playing Grimsby town.
Is it the same thing really?I remember when everyone on here didn't want us to get bought out and funded by the Saudis due to their moral concerns. People were extremely vocal and aggressive about their stance on the matter.
This is fine though. It definitely isn't in any way the same thing.
I mean Amorim never said the latter and we get beat by average PL teams so we'd be equally useless in Europe. Even if we had a better manager we wouldn't do much better than the 2nd round.So, the squad was not ready for Europe so that we can play some meaningless friendlies?
Wonderful. We should also explore going out of FA Cup at the first calling itself so that we can play more meaningless friendlies.
Eh? He doesnt own TKO...That's not his game, though. He's a pretend face to all these deals. He basically owns WWE, UFC, that boxing league they set up and everything else. He has access to unlimited funds and does whatever he likes on under the illusion he's got independent wealth.
Didn't say he did. Im saying he controls them due to how much money he has access to. Look at how the board of directors bow to himEh? He doesnt own TKO...
Europa is too much for us according to Amorim. Saudi's fine though.
Is Amorim responsible for arranging this, then?
Well he had such a influence on proceedings that he was basically allowed to do whatever he wanted. Even ETH was persuaded into a truce with Sancho for pre-season while Amorim was allowed to sideline 5 players completely, allowed to tank game after game so that he can steadfastly stick to his system/philosophy. Surely he can oppose these pointless friendlies and say there's an injury risk to the players if he wanted to?I mean Amorim never said the latter and we get beat by average PL teams so we'd be equally useless in Europe. Even if we had a better manager we wouldn't do much better than the 2nd round.
Is it the same thing really?
It's a game that gives you maybe 5-10m and maybe a way to build a connection to ship players to Saudi. The other is a bad purpose every day, maybe the next 50 years.
Don’t turn this into another thread to slag off the coach and players.
Limited number of games makes the idea of lucrative friendlies a very good way to replace the lost revenue.
Is it the same thing really?
It's a game that gives you maybe 5-10m and maybe a way to build a connection to ship players to Saudi. The other is a bad purpose every day, maybe the next 50 years.
We will probably find out that we can make more money by traveling to these places in the middle of the season than we would have made by toiling away in CL/EL.I thought no mid week games was a blessing because we could spend more time on the training ground to learn the magic system.
I seriously doubt thatWe will probably find out that we can make more money by traveling to these places in the middle of the season than we would have made by toiling away in CL/EL.
well they can always use Newcastle as a feeder clubHis net worth is only around £2bn, given that the PIF own newcastle, i'm pretty sure that saudi ownership is now off limits for us.
I understand the money factor, but no not for me. We shouldn't do this. I've no interest in seeing us sell ourselves out to Saudi. It will just make an already depressing season worse.
I remember when everyone on here didn't want us to get bought out and funded by the Saudis due to their moral concerns. People were extremely vocal and aggressive about their stance on the matter.
This is fine though. It definitely isn't in any way the same thing.
I doubt we would play there for so low. It would be probably closer to 20-30m including sponsors and match tickets for maybe 2-3 games.Try closer to £5-£8m....