USREDEVIL
Full Member
Only thing I take from the game is we need a lb and if we fail to get one we are gonna do worse this season
I unfortunately haven’t caught too much of preseason but I also know there’s very little relation between preseason results and how your actual season will go. I say this from an anecdotal POV anyway. If anything, the more we lose during preseason the better I feel our season will go![]()
Its not even about preseason it's the bigger picture. We are lacking in too many positions.Think there have been some good things in pre-season, I like what I have seen from our new signings. However today they targeted our weak spot, the left and it worked. Also pressed us and either we didn't want to risk injury or had no answer to it.
I’d like us to at least try him there! We have enough cover up top.It seems to me that even Dorgu is a better left back at the moment than Shaw. At least Dorgu is running and trying to win duels. But of course Dorgu has to play left/right winger, because he is better there.
VarianceWhat is it with Bruno missing his penalties all of a sudden?
Strong werkThe ‘building fitness’ trope needs to die fairly quickly.
I unfortunately haven’t caught too much of preseason but I also know there’s very little relation between preseason results and how your actual season will go. I say this from an anecdotal POV anyway. If anything, the more we lose during preseason the better I feel our season will go![]()
I feel like someone on the caf once did an analysis like this over several seasons. Comparing preseason results with the first few league match results. If I remember correctly, there was a correlation, but it wasn't particularly strong. Something like 60% chance to have a good season start if preseason was goodIt felt like in the Fergie years our league performance was always inversely proportional to the pre-season results prior. Don’t know if the stats bear that out though.
Something like 60% is quite close to 50/50?I feel like someone on the caf once did an analysis like this over several seasons. Comparing preseason results with the first few league match results. If I remember correctly, there was a correlation, but it was particularly strong. Something like 60% chance to have a good season start if preseason was good
Yeah that's what I mean. Slightly better chance at a good season opening with a good preseason, but only slightly. So statistically it helps to have a good preseason, but it's by no means decisive or significant.Something like 60% is quite close to 50/50?
He’s building fitness up to scoring them, it’s different to a real penalty. As long as he builds muscle during the kick we are sound.What is it with Bruno missing his penalties all of a sudden?
It’s quite difficult when you are flogging your arse off and the boss says he will definitely get you some help and he gets you a new pair of shinnies.What is it with Bruno missing his penalties all of a sudden?
I do feel like people over played how much more we'd create and control the game with Santos and Tielemans. It was obvious there were still deficienes that need addressing, glad it was shown in a friendly, so at least we can't skimp.
You are already in midseason form.He’s building fitness up to scoring them, it’s different to a real penalty. As long as he builds muscle during the kick we are sound.

No one's saying they're rubbish, there are just obvious issues playing against more physical or vertical playing teams a la Amorim. Brentford would be the same, so we need to find solutions for it. That doesn't mean throwing the baby out with the bathwater, it means adapting the squad to mitigate for it. Hall would be an obvious start or a LB of his ilk.That was literally their first ever time playing together in a game. Perhaps our knees could be jerking a little less.
I need rotating due to fatigueYou are already in midseason form.![]()
No one's saying they're rubbish, there are just obvious issues playing against more physical or vertical playing teams a la Amorim. Brentford would be the same, so we need to find solutions for it. That doesn't mean throwing the baby out with the bathwater, it means adapting the squad to mitigate for it. Hall would be an obvious start or a LB of his ilk.
A week ago, Tielemans and Santos were great signings. Today, they are rubbish. Some people on here go overboard quicker than sailors on board an American aircraft carrier
I need rotating due to fatigue
Calm downMissed the game but saw the score - utterly disgusted.
I don't care if it's 'preseason' - it's one game out from the PL. It's against a manager who called you the worst United team in history, and made you play like one. He said he'd rather play his goalkeeping coach than some of our players out there.
You don't need tactics for this game as much as you need to go out there and show that you care. I don't care if we played like prime Barca, and created loads, this result is shameful on the players. They should be docked a month's pay for that.
Fuming. How can you not show up for this game of all games? Don't really care if Carrick benched all starters to prove a point even if it means throwing the Hull game. Losing to that coward must make you lose respect for yourself as a player.
Couldn't work out how to play his system, couldn't work out how to play against it.
Plenty to work on! We played like RA or ETH were still in charge of the midfield and defence, large holes up the middle that a few decent but straightforward passes could bypass and cause trouble almost every time.
Our game management was straight out of one of their textbooks too.
He's being immature, just ignore him.Calm down
Go rewatch the EL final against Spurs.Calm down
Sure it's a small sample size, but I don't think the last two games have done anything to convince me we've fixed the issues we had last season in that regard and we're asking our team to play higher - from what I've seen anyway. Add to the fact Chelsea fans said it was a concern with Santos and we know that's the main weakness of Tielemans game, I don't think it's as knee jerk as your portraying it either.I’m not saying anyone’s said that. You said other fans have overplayed how much more we’d create and control with them in the midfield, and I’m simply pointing out that we just don’t know yet. The sample size is far, far too small to say either way.
BingoThe concern for me having watched most of our pre season games (missed Wrexham and Rosenberg) is that by and large we've been sloppy at the back and our form has progressively got worse not better.
Granted it's hard to judge games when so many changes are being made and essentially they are glorified training sessions. But, but... We should be seeing something. A spark of some kind, somewhere. Today it was a team with absolutely zero pride just strolling around accepting a tanking.
I feel like our fan base has written the first fixture as an easy win and we're due a crap, scrappy performance against Hull. We don't look remotely ready.
sounds like it.were we bad or really bad?
Sure it's a small sample size, but I don't think the last two games have done anything to convince me we've fixed the issues we had last season in that regard and we're asking our team to play higher - from what I've seen anyway. Add to the fact Chelsea fans said it was a concern with Santos and we know that's the main weakness of Tielemans game, I don't think it's as knee jerk as your portraying it either.
The concern for me having watched most of our pre season games (missed Wrexham and Rosenberg) is that by and large we've been sloppy at the back and our form has progressively got worse not better.
Granted it's hard to judge games when so many changes are being made and essentially they are glorified training sessions. But, but... We should be seeing something. A spark of some kind, somewhere. Today it was a team with absolutely zero pride just strolling around accepting a tanking.
I feel like our fan base has written the first fixture as an easy win and we're due a crap, scrappy performance against Hull. We don't look remotely ready.
Why does anyone bother doing it then! No one's expecting the finished article, but you can see patterns or style and generally how people will play together. I think it's obvious how we will be attacked against with them in midfield and that's not necessarily their fault, it's the construction of the team/squad not being able to cover for what they bring in their positive aspects. I don't really think they can do much about their lack of athleticism, but as a team, you need to account for it. I don't think we're equipped for that currently - I think even Carrick will probably think that.Well pre-season games shouldn't convince anyone of anything - that's my point! It was Tielemans and Santos first ever time playing together in a game so of course they aren't going to immediately fix issues from last season. It is knee jerk to jump on them for that after their first 60 mins playing together, or to extrapolate that they won't or can't help with some of those issues this season. Like any new signings, they need time to settle and learn to play together.